TY - INPR A1 - Paula, Daniel A1 - Bauder, Maximilian A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Petermeier, Franziska A1 - Kubjatko, Tibor A1 - Böhm, Klaus A1 - Riener, Andreas A1 - Schweiger, Hans-Georg T1 - Impact of Partially Automated Driving Functions on Forensic Accident Reconstruction: A Simulator Study on Driver Reaction Behavior in the Event of a Malfunctioning System Behavior N2 - Partially automated driving functions (SAE Level 2) can control a vehicle's longitudinal and lateral movements. However, taking over the driving task involves automation risks that the driver must manage. In severe accidents, the driver's ability to avoid a collision must be assessed, considering their expected reaction behavior. The primary goal of this study is to generate essential data on driver reaction behavior in case of malfunctions in partially automated driving functions for use in legal affairs. A simulator study with two scenarios involving 32 subjects was conducted for this purpose. The first scenario investigated driver reactions to system limitations during cornering. The second scenario examined driver responses to phantom braking caused by the AEBS. As a result, the first scenario shows that none of the subjects could control the situation safely. Due to partial automation, we could also identify a new part of the reaction time, the hands-on time, which leads to increased steering reaction times of 1.18 to 1.74 seconds. In the second scenario, we found that 25 of the 32 subjects could not override the phantom braking by pressing the accelerator pedal, although 16 subjects were informed about the system analog to the actual vehicle manuals. Overall, the study suggests that the current legal perspective on vehicle control and the expected driver reaction behavior for accident avoidance should be reconsidered. UR - https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.0947.v1 Y1 - 2023 UR - https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.0947.v1 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:573-42173 PB - Preprints CY - Basel ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Appel, Patricia B. A1 - Böck, Henrike A1 - Hegner, Franziska A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Riener, Andreas T1 - Annoyed of Traffic Jams? Fly with FeliFly! T2 - 15th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces: Adjunct Conference Proceedings UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3581961.3609856 Y1 - 2023 UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3581961.3609856 SN - 979-8-4007-0112-2 SP - 330 EP - 332 PB - ACM CY - New York ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Schartmüller, Clemens A1 - Riener, Andreas A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Hegner, Franziska ED - Schneegass, Stefan ED - Pfleging, Bastian ED - Kern, Dagmar T1 - The (mobile) driving experience lab: bridging research and knowledge transfer to the general public T2 - Tagungsband Mensch & Computer 2021 UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3474028 Y1 - 2021 UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3474028 SN - 978-1-4503-8645-6 SP - 582 EP - 585 PB - ACM CY - New York ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Bauder, Maximilian A1 - Paula, Daniel A1 - Riener, Andreas A1 - Schweiger, Hans-Georg T1 - Using a Driving Simulator to Assess Reaction Times and Driving Behavior for Forensic Accident Analysis T2 - 15th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces: Adjunct Conference Proceedings UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3581961.3609846 KW - car2x KW - semi-automated KW - reaction times KW - trust KW - instrument cluster Y1 - 2023 UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3581961.3609846 SN - 979-8-4007-0112-2 SP - 320 EP - 322 PB - ACM CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Paula, Daniel A1 - Bauder, Maximilian A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Petermeier, Franziska A1 - Kubjatko, Tibor A1 - Böhm, Klaus A1 - Riener, Andreas A1 - Schweiger, Hans-Georg T1 - Impact of Partially Automated Driving Functions on Forensic Accident Reconstruction: A Simulator Study on Driver Reaction Behavior in the Event of a Malfunctioning System Behavior JF - Sensors N2 - Partially automated driving functions (SAE Level 2) can control a vehicle’s longitudinal and lateral movements. However, taking over the driving task involves automation risks that the driver must manage. In severe accidents, the driver’s ability to avoid a collision must be assessed, considering their expected reaction behavior. The primary goal of this study is to generate essential data on driver reaction behavior in case of malfunctions in partially automated driving functions for use in legal affairs. A simulator study with two scenarios involving 32 subjects was conducted for this purpose. The first scenario investigated driver reactions to system limitations during cornering. The results show that none of the subjects could avoid leaving their lane and moving into the oncoming lane and, therefore, could not control the situation safely. Due to partial automation, we could also identify a new part of the reaction time, the hands-on time, which leads to increased steering reaction times of 1.18 to 1.74 s. The second scenario examined driver responses to phantom braking caused by AEBS. We found that 25 of the 32 subjects could not override the phantom braking by pressing the accelerator pedal, although 16 subjects were informed about the system analog to the actual vehicle manuals. Overall, the study suggests that the current legal perspective on vehicle control and the expected driver reaction behavior for accident avoidance should be reconsidered. UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s23249785 Y1 - 2023 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s23249785 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:573-42766 SN - 1424-8220 VL - 23 IS - 24 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Hegner, Franziska A1 - Peintner, Jakob A1 - Weißenberger, Markus A1 - Riener, Andreas T1 - “I want to platoon a lot... or maybe just a little?” - An interactive experience for automated platooning. T2 - 15th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces: Adjunct Conference Proceedings UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3581961.3609848 KW - platooning KW - energy saving KW - trust KW - fully automated Y1 - 2023 UR - https://doi.org/10.1145/3581961.3609848 SN - 979-8-4007-0112-2 SP - 297 EP - 299 PB - ACM CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bauder, Maximilian A1 - Paula, Daniel A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Petermeier, Franziska A1 - Kubjatko, Tibor A1 - Riener, Andreas A1 - Schweiger, Hans-Georg T1 - Influences of Vehicle Communication on Human Driving Reactions: A Simulator Study on Reaction Times and Behavior for Forensic Accident Analysis JF - Sensors N2 - Cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITSs) are mass-produced and sold in Europe, promising enhanced safety and comfort. Direct vehicle communication, known as vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, is crucial in this context. Drivers receive warnings about potential hazards by exchanging vehicle status and environmental data with other communication-enabled vehicles. However, the impact of these warnings on drivers and their inclusion in accident reconstruction remains uncertain. Unlike sensor-based warnings, V2X warnings may not provide a visible reason for the alert, potentially affecting reaction times and behavior. In this work, a simulator study on V2X warnings was conducted with 32 participants to generate findings on reaction times and behavior for accident reconstruction in connection with these systems. Two scenarios from the Car-2-Car Communication Consortium were implemented: “Stationary Vehicle Warning—Broken-Down Vehicle” and “Dangerous Situation—Electronic Emergency Brake Lights”. Volkswagen’s warning concept was utilized, as they are the sole provider of cooperative vehicles in Europe. Results show that V2X warnings without visible reasons did not negatively impact reaction times or behavior, with average reaction times between 0.58 s (steering) and 0.69 s (braking). No significant distraction or search for warning reasons was observed. However, additional information in the warnings caused confusion and was seldom noticed by subjects. In this study, participants responded correctly and appropriately to the shown false-positive warnings. A wrong reaction triggering an accident is possible but unlikely. Overall, V2X warnings showed no negative impacts compared with sensor-based systems. This means that there are no differences in accident reconstruction regarding the source of the warning (sensors or communication). However, it is important that it is known that there was a warning, which is why the occurrence of V2X warnings should also be saved in the EDR in the future. UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144481 Y1 - 2024 UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144481 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:573-48982 SN - 1424-8220 VL - 24 IS - 14 PB - MDPI CY - Basel ER - TY - INPR A1 - Bauder, Maximilian A1 - Paula, Daniel A1 - Pfeilschifter, Claus A1 - Petermeier, Franziska A1 - Kubjatko, Tibor A1 - Riener, Andreas A1 - Schweiger, Hans-Georg T1 - Influences of Vehicle Communication on Human Driving Reactions: A Simulator Study on Reaction Times and Behavior for Forensic Accident Analysis T2 - SSRN UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4588275 Y1 - 2023 UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4588275 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER -