TY - INPR A1 - Wan, Lei A1 - Zhao, Jianxin A1 - Wiedholz, Andreas A1 - Bied, Manuel A1 - Martinez de Lucena, Mateus A1 - Jagtap, Abhishek Dinkar A1 - Festag, Andreas A1 - Fröhlich, Antônio A1 - Keen, Hannan Ejaz A1 - Vinel, Alexey T1 - A Systematic Literature Review on Vehicular Collaborative Perception – A Computer Vision Perspective UR - https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.04631 Y1 - 2025 UR - https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.04631 PB - arXiv CY - Ithaca ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wan, Lei A1 - Zhao, Jianxin A1 - Wiedholz, Andreas A1 - Bied, Manuel A1 - Martinez de Lucena, Mateus A1 - Jagtap, Abhishek Dinkar A1 - Festag, Andreas A1 - Fröhlich, Antônio A1 - Keen, Hannan Ejaz A1 - Vinel, Alexey T1 - A Systematic Literature Review on Vehicular Collaborative Perception—A Computer Vision Perspective JF - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems N2 - The effectiveness of autonomous vehicles relies on reliable perception capabilities. Despite significant advancements in artificial intelligence and sensor fusion technologies, current single-vehicle perception systems continue to encounter limitations, notably visual occlusions and limited long-range detection capabilities. Collaborative Perception (CP), enabled by Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication, has emerged as a promising solution to mitigate these issues and enhance the reliability of autonomous systems. Beyond advancements in communication, the computer vision community is increasingly focusing on improving vehicular perception through collaborative approaches. However, a systematic literature review that thoroughly examines existing work and reduces subjective bias is still lacking. Such a systematic approach helps identify research gaps, recognize common trends across studies, and inform future research directions. In response, this study follows the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and includes 106 peer-reviewed articles. These publications are analyzed based on modalities, collaboration schemes, and key perception tasks. Through a comparative analysis, this review illustrates how different methods address practical issues such as pose errors, temporal latency, communication constraints, domain shifts, heterogeneity, and adversarial attacks. Furthermore, it critically examines evaluation methodologies, highlighting a misalignment between current metrics and CP’s fundamental objectives. By delving into all relevant topics in-depth, this review offers valuable insights into challenges, opportunities, and risks, serving as a reference for advancing research in vehicular collaborative perception. UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2025.3631141 Y1 - 2025 UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2025.3631141 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:573-64708 SN - 1558-0016 VL - 27 IS - 1 SP - 81 EP - 118 PB - IEEE CY - New York ER -