@article{BlaschvanderGrijpPetrovicsetal.2021, author = {Blasch, Julia and van der Grijp, Nicolien M. and Petrovics, Daniel and Palm, Jenny and Bocken, Nancy and Darby, Sarah J. and Barnes, Jacob and Hansen, Paula and Kamin, Tanja and Golob, Ursa and Andor, Mark and Sommer, Stephan and Nicita, Agatino and Musolino, Monica and Mlinaric, Masa}, title = {New clean energy communities in polycentric settings}, volume = {2021}, pages = {102276}, journal = {Energy Research \& Social Science}, subtitle = {four avenues for future research}, number = {82}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {2214-6296}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102276}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Given the gaps between EU ambitions regarding energy community development and the current reality of clean energy communities in Europe, we explore a research framework enabling viable multi- and interdisciplinary research into new clean energy communities. We offer a definition of new clean energy communities, discuss their potential for wider dissemination and identify four factors that contribute to the current mismatch between ambitions and reality in energy community development. As a broader framework for interdisciplinary research into the field of new clean energy communities, we propose polycentric governance theory, considering the fact that the area of community energy systems is essentially multi-scalar, and that the rules of engagement in such systems are of great significance. This opens up four avenues for research on energy communities, which we outline in terms of enabling institutional contexts, potential for learning and transferability, business models and value propositions, and evaluation of outcomes and processes.}, language = {en} }