@inproceedings{RosbachAmmelingKruegeletal.2025, author = {Rosbach, Emely and Ammeling, Jonas and Kr{\"u}gel, Sebastian and Kießig, Angelika and Fritz, Alexis and Ganz, Jonathan and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Donovan, Taryn and Klang, Andrea and K{\"o}ller, Maximilian C. and Bolfa, Pompei and Tecilla, Marco and Denk, Daniela and Kiupel, Matti and Paraschou, Georgios and Kok, Mun Keong and Haake, Alexander F. H. and de Krijger, Ronald R. and Sonnen, Andreas F.-P. and Kasantikul, Tanit and Dorrestein, Gerry M. and Smedley, Rebecca C. and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Uhl, Matthias and Bertram, Christof and Riener, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {"When Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" - Examining Confirmation Bias and the Role of Time Pressure During Human-AI Collaboration in Computational Pathology}, pages = {528}, booktitle = {CHI'25: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems}, editor = {Yamashita, Naomi and Evers, Vanessa and Yatani, Koji and Ding, Xianghua and Lee, Bongshin and Chetty, Marshini and Toups-Dugas, Phoebe}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York}, isbn = {979-8-4007-1394-1}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713319}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in computational pathology. However, human-AI collaboration can introduce and amplify cognitive biases, like confirmation bias caused by false confirmation when erroneous human opinions are reinforced by inaccurate AI output. This bias may increase under time pressure, a ubiquitous factor in routine pathology, as it strains practitioners' cognitive resources. We quantified confirmation bias triggered by AI-induced false confirmation and examined the role of time constraints in a web-based experiment, where trained pathology experts (n=28) estimated tumor cell percentages. Our results suggest that AI integration fuels confirmation bias, evidenced by a statistically significant positive linear-mixed-effects model coefficient linking AI recommendations mirroring flawed human judgment and alignment with system advice. Conversely, time pressure appeared to weaken this relationship. These findings highlight potential risks of AI in healthcare and aim to support the safe integration of clinical decision support systems.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{RosbachAmmelingKruegeletal.2024, author = {Rosbach, Emely and Ammeling, Jonas and Kr{\"u}gel, Sebastian and Kießig, Angelika and Fritz, Alexis and Ganz, Jonathan and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Donovan, Taryn and Klang, Andrea and K{\"o}ller, Maximilian C. and Bolfa, Pompei and Tecilla, Marco and Denk, Daniela and Kiupel, Matti and Paraschou, Georgios and Kok, Mun Keong and Haake, Alexander F. H. and de Krijger, Ronald R. and Sonnen, Andreas F.-P. and Kasantikul, Tanit and Dorrestein, Gerry M. and Smedley, Rebecca C. and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Uhl, Matthias and Bertram, Christof and Riener, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {"When TwoWrongs Don't Make a Right" - Examining Confirmation Bias and the Role of Time Pressure During Human-AI Collaboration in Computational Pathology}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.01007}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @unpublished{RosbachGanzAmmelingetal.2024, author = {Rosbach, Emely and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Riener, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Automation Bias in AI-Assisted Medical Decision-Making under Time Pressure in Computational Pathology}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00998}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerRichterSchaeferetal.2023, author = {Mueller, Juliane and Richter, Monika and Schaefer, Kathrin and Ganz, Jonathan and Lohscheller, J{\"o}rg and Mueller, Steffen}, title = {How to measure children's feet: 3D foot scanning compared with established 2D manual or digital methods}, volume = {16}, pages = {21}, journal = {Journal of Foot and Ankle Research}, publisher = {BioMed Central}, address = {London}, issn = {1757-1146}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00618-y}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Background In infants and young children, a wide heterogeneity of foot shape is typical. Therefore, children, who are additionally influenced by rapid growth and maturation, are a very special cohort for foot measurements and the footwear industry. The importance of foot measurements for footwear fit, design, as well as clinical applications has been sufficiently described. New measurement techniques (3D foot scanning) allow the assessment of the individual foot shape. However, the validity in comparison to conventional methods remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare 3D foot scanning with two established measurement methods (2D digital scanning/manual foot measurements). Methods Two hundred seventy seven children (125 m / 152 f; mean ± SD: 8.0 ± 1.5yrs; 130.2 ± 10.7cm; 28.0 ± 7.3kg) were included into the study. After collection of basic data (sex, age (yrs), body height (cm), body weight (kg)) geometry of the right foot was measured in static condition (stance) with three different measurement systems (fixed order): manual foot measurement, 2D foot scanning (2D desk scanner) and 3D foot scanning (hand-held 3D scanner). Main outcomes were foot length, foot width (projected; anatomical; instep), heel width and anatomical foot ball breadth. Analysis of variances for dependent samples was applied to test for differences between foot measurement methods (Post-hoc analysis: Tukey-Kramer-Test; α=0.05). Results Significant differences were found for all outcome measures comparing the three methods (p<0.0001). The span of foot length differences ranged from 3 to 6mm with 2D scans showing the smallest and 3D scans the largest deviations. Foot width measurements in comparison of 3D and 2D scans showed consistently higher values for 3D measurements with the differences ranging from 1mm to 3mm. Conclusions The findings suggests that when comparing foot data, it is important to consider the differences caused by new measurement methods. Differences of about 0.6cm are relevant when measuring foot length, as this is the difference of a complete shoe size (Parisian point). Hence, correction factors may be required to compare the results of different measurements appropriately. The presented results may have relevance in the field of ergonomics (shoe industry) as well as clinical practice.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AubrevilleStathonikosDonovanetal.2023, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Donovan, Taryn and Klopfleisch, Robert and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Wilm, Frauke and Veta, Mitko and Jabari, Samir and Eckstein, Markus and Annuscheit, Jonas and Krumnow, Christian and Bozaba, Engin and Cayir, Sercan and Gu, Hongyan and Chen, Xiang and Jahanifar, Mostafa and Shephard, Adam and Kondo, Satoshi and Kasai, Satoshi and Kotte, Sujatha and Saipradeep, Vangala and Lafarge, Maxime W. and Koelzer, Viktor H. and Wang, Ziyue and Zhang, Yongbing and Yang, Sen and Wang, Xiyue and Breininger, Katharina and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species - Insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.15589}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Recognition of mitotic figures in histologic tumor specimens is highly relevant to patient outcome assessment. This task is challenging for algorithms and human experts alike, with deterioration of algorithmic performance under shifts in image representations. Considerable covariate shifts occur when assessment is performed on different tumor types, images are acquired using different digitization devices, or specimens are produced in different laboratories. This observation motivated the inception of the 2022 challenge on MItosis Domain Generalization (MIDOG 2022). The challenge provided annotated histologic tumor images from six different domains and evaluated the algorithmic approaches for mitotic figure detection provided by nine challenge participants on ten independent domains. Ground truth for mitotic figure detection was established in two ways: a three-expert consensus and an independent, immunohistochemistry-assisted set of labels. This work represents an overview of the challenge tasks, the algorithmic strategies employed by the participants, and potential factors contributing to their success. With an F1 score of 0.764 for the top-performing team, we summarize that domain generalization across various tumor domains is possible with today's deep learning-based recognition pipelines. When assessed against the immunohistochemistry-assisted reference standard, all methods resulted in reduced recall scores, but with only minor changes in the order of participants in the ranking.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{HaghoferParlakBarteletal.2023, author = {Haghofer, Andreas and Parlak, Eda and Bartel, Alexander and Donovan, Taryn and Assenmacher, Charles-Antoine and Bolfa, Pompei and Dark, Michael and Fuchs-Baumgartinger, Andrea and Klang, Andrea and J{\"a}ger, Kathrin and Klopfleisch, Robert and Merz, Sophie and Richter, Barbara and Schulman, F. Yvonne and Ganz, Jonathan and Scharinger, Josef and Aubreville, Marc and Winkler, Stephan M. and Kiupel, Matti and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Nuclear Morphometry using a Deep Learning-based Algorithm has Prognostic Relevance for Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.15031}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Variation in nuclear size and shape is an important criterion of malignancy for many tumor types; however, categorical estimates by pathologists have poor reproducibility. Measurements of nuclear characteristics (morphometry) can improve reproducibility, but manual methods are time consuming. In this study, we evaluated fully automated morphometry using a deep learning-based algorithm in 96 canine cutaneous mast cell tumors with information on patient survival. Algorithmic morphometry was compared with karyomegaly estimates by 11 pathologists, manual nuclear morphometry of 12 cells by 9 pathologists, and the mitotic count as a benchmark. The prognostic value of automated morphometry was high with an area under the ROC curve regarding the tumor-specific survival of 0.943 (95\% CI: 0.889 - 0.996) for the standard deviation (SD) of nuclear area, which was higher than manual morphometry of all pathologists combined (0.868, 95\% CI: 0.737 - 0.991) and the mitotic count (0.885, 95\% CI: 0.765 - 1.00). At the proposed thresholds, the hazard ratio for algorithmic morphometry (SD of nuclear area ≥9.0μm2) was 18.3 (95\% CI: 5.0 - 67.1), for manual morphometry (SD of nuclear area ≥10.9μm2) 9.0 (95\% CI: 6.0 - 13.4), for karyomegaly estimates 7.6 (95\% CI: 5.7 - 10.1), and for the mitotic count 30.5 (95\% CI: 7.8 - 118.0). Inter-rater reproducibility for karyomegaly estimates was fair (κ = 0.226) with highly variable sensitivity/specificity values for the individual pathologists. Reproducibility for manual morphometry (SD of nuclear area) was good (ICC = 0.654). This study supports the use of algorithmic morphometry as a prognostic test to overcome the limitations of estimates and manual measurements.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{GanzMarzahlAmmelingetal.2024, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Marzahl, Christian and Ammeling, Jonas and Richter, Barbara and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Denk, Daniela and Demeter, Elena A. and Tabaran, Flaviu A. and Wasinger, Gabriel and Lipnik, Karoline and Tecilla, Marco and Valentine, Matthew J. and Dark, Michael and Abele, Niklas and Bolfa, Pompei and Erber, Ramona and Klopfleisch, Robert and Merz, Sophie and Donovan, Taryn and Jabari, Samir and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {On the Value of PHH3 for Mitotic Figure Detection on H\&E-stained Images}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.19899}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. Deep learning algorithms can standardize this task, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label noise introduced during the annotation process may impede the algorithm's performance. Unlike H\&E, the mitosis-specific antibody phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) specifically highlights MFs. Counting MFs on slides stained against PHH3 leads to higher agreement among raters and has therefore recently been used as a ground truth for the annotation of MFs in H\&E. However, as PHH3 facilitates the recognition of cells indistinguishable from H\&E stain alone, the use of this ground truth could potentially introduce noise into the H\&E-related dataset, impacting model performance. This study analyzes the impact of PHH3-assisted MF annotation on inter-rater reliability and object level agreement through an extensive multi-rater experiment. We found that the annotators' object-level agreement increased when using PHH3-assisted labeling. Subsequently, MF detectors were evaluated on the resulting datasets to investigate the influence of PHH3-assisted labeling on the models' performance. Additionally, a novel dual-stain MF detector was developed to investigate the interpretation-shift of PHH3-assisted labels used in H\&E, which clearly outperformed single-stain detectors. However, the PHH3-assisted labels did not have a positive effect on solely H\&E-based models. The high performance of our dual-input detector reveals an information mismatch between the H\&E and PHH3-stained images as the cause of this effect.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{GanzAmmelingRosbachetal.2024, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Rosbach, Emely and Lausser, Ludwig and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Is Self-Supervision Enough? Benchmarking Foundation Models Against End-to-End Training for Mitotic Figure Classification}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.06365}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Foundation models (FMs), i.e., models trained on a vast amount of typically unlabeled data, have become popular and available recently for the domain of histopathology. The key idea is to extract semantically rich vectors from any input patch, allowing for the use of simple subsequent classification networks potentially reducing the required amounts of labeled data, and increasing domain robustness. In this work, we investigate to which degree this also holds for mitotic figure classification. Utilizing two popular public mitotic figure datasets, we compared linear probing of five publicly available FMs against models trained on ImageNet and a simple ResNet50 end-to-end-trained baseline. We found that the end-to-end-trained baseline outperformed all FM-based classifiers, regardless of the amount of data provided. Additionally, we did not observe the FM-based classifiers to be more robust against domain shifts, rendering both of the above assumptions incorrect.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GanzBertramKlopfleischetal.2022, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Bertram, Christof and Klopfleisch, Robert and Jabari, Samir and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Classification of visibility in multi-stain microscopy images}, booktitle = {Medical Imaging with Deep Learning: MIDL 2022 Short Papers}, url = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=-GsA-mUVmm}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @unpublished{PugetGanzOstermaieretal.2024, author = {Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Ganz, Jonathan and Ostermaier, Julian and Konrad, Thomas and Parlak, Eda and Bertram, Christof and Kiupel, Matti and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc and Klopfleisch, Robert}, title = {Deep Learning model predicts the c-Kit-11 mutational status of canine cutaneous mast cell tumors by HE stained histological slides}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06169}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Numerous prognostic factors are currently assessed histopathologically in biopsies of canine mast cell tumors to evaluate clinical behavior. In addition, PCR analysis of the c-Kit exon 11 mutational status is often performed to evaluate the potential success of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. This project aimed at training deep learning models (DLMs) to identify the c-Kit-11 mutational status of MCTs solely based on morphology without additional molecular analysis. HE slides of 195 mutated and 173 non-mutated tumors were stained consecutively in two different laboratories and scanned with three different slide scanners. This resulted in six different datasets (stain-scanner variations) of whole slide images. DLMs were trained with single and mixed datasets and their performances was assessed under scanner and staining domain shifts. The DLMs correctly classified HE slides according to their c-Kit 11 mutation status in, on average, 87\% of cases for the best-suited stain-scanner variant. A relevant performance drop could be observed when the stain-scanner combination of the training and test dataset differed. Multi-variant datasets improved the average accuracy but did not reach the maximum accuracy of algorithms trained and tested on the same stain-scanner variant. In summary, DLM-assisted morphological examination of MCTs can predict c-Kit-exon 11 mutational status of MCTs with high accuracy. However, the recognition performance is impeded by a change of scanner or staining protocol. Larger data sets with higher numbers of scans originating from different laboratories and scanners may lead to more robust DLMs to identify c-Kit mutations in HE slides.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GanzKirschHoffmannetal.2021, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Kirsch, Tobias and Hoffmann, Lucas and Maier, Andreas and Breininger, Katharina and Bl{\"u}mcke, Ingmar and Jabari, Samir and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Automatic and explainable grading of meningiomas from histopathology images}, volume = {2021}, booktitle = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research: Proceedings of COMPAY 2021}, number = {156}, publisher = {PMLR}, address = {[s. l.]}, url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v156/ganz21a.html}, pages = {69 -- 80}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @unpublished{GanzMarzahlAmmelingetal.2024, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Marzahl, Christian and Ammeling, Jonas and Rosbach, Emely and Richter, Barbara and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Denk, Daniela and Demeter, Elena A. and Tabaran, Flaviu A. and Wasinger, Gabriel and Lipnik, Karoline and Tecilla, Marco and Valentine, Matthew J. and Dark, Michael and Abele, Niklas and Bolfa, Pompei and Erber, Ramona and Klopfleisch, Robert and Merz, Sophie and Donovan, Taryn and Jabari, Samir and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Information Mismatch in PHH3-Assisted Mitosis Annotation Leads to Interpretation Shifts in H\&E Slide Analysis}, titleParent = {Research Square}, publisher = {Research Square}, address = {Durham}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900505/v1}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker, as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. In a computer-aided setting, deep learning algorithms can help to mitigate this, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label noise introduced during the annotation process may impede the algorithms' performance. Unlike H\&E, where identification of MFs is based mainly on morphological features, the mitosis-specific antibody phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) specifically highlights MFs. Counting MFs on slides stained against PHH3 leads to higher agreement among raters and has therefore recently been used as a ground truth for the annotation of MFs in H\&E. However, as PHH3 facilitates the recognition of cells indistinguishable from H\&E staining alone, the use of this ground truth could potentially introduce an interpretation shift and even label noise into the H\&E-related dataset, impacting model performance. This study analyzes the impact of PHH3-assisted MF annotation on inter-rater reliability and object level agreement through an extensive multi-rater experiment. Subsequently, MF detectors, including a novel dual-stain detector, were evaluated on the resulting datasets to investigate the influence of PHH3-assisted labeling on the models' performance. We found that the annotators' object-level agreement significantly increased when using PHH3-assisted labeling (F1: 0.53 to 0.74). However, this enhancement in label consistency did not translate to improved performance for H\&E-based detectors, neither during the training phase nor the evaluation phase. Conversely, the dual-stain detector was able to benefit from the higher consistency. This reveals an information mismatch between the H\&E and PHH3-stained images as the cause of this effect, which renders PHH3-assisted annotations not well-aligned for use with H\&E-based detectors. Based on our findings, we propose an improved PHH3-assisted labeling procedure.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AmmelingHeckerGanzetal.2023, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Hecker, Moritz and Ganz, Jonathan and Donovan, Taryn and Klopfleisch, Robert and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Automated Volume Corrected Mitotic Index Calculation Through Annotation-Free Deep Learning using Immunohistochemistry as Reference Standard}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.08949}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The volume-corrected mitotic index (M/V-Index) was shown to provide prognostic value in invasive breast carcinomas. However, despite its prognostic significance, it is not established as the standard method for assessing aggressive biological behaviour, due to the high additional workload associated with determining the epithelial proportion. In this work, we show that using a deep learning pipeline solely trained with an annotation-free, immunohistochemistry-based approach, provides accurate estimations of epithelial segmentation in canine breast carcinomas. We compare our automatic framework with the manually annotated M/V-Index in a study with three board-certified pathologists. Our results indicate that the deep learning-based pipeline shows expert-level performance, while providing time efficiency and reproducibility.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AmmelingSchmidtGanzetal.2022, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Schmidt, Lars-Henning and Ganz, Jonathan and Niedermair, Tanja and Brochhausen-Delius, Christoph and Schulz, Christian and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Attention-based Multiple Instance Learning for Survival Prediction on Lung Cancer Tissue Microarrays}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.07724}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Attention-based multiple instance learning (AMIL) algorithms have proven to be successful in utilizing gigapixel whole-slide images (WSIs) for a variety of different computational pathology tasks such as outcome prediction and cancer subtyping problems. We extended an AMIL approach to the task of survival prediction by utilizing the classical Cox partial likelihood as a loss function, converting the AMIL model into a nonlinear proportional hazards model. We applied the model to tissue microarray (TMA) slides of 330 lung cancer patients. The results show that AMIL approaches can handle very small amounts of tissue from a TMA and reach similar C-index performance compared to established survival prediction methods trained with highly discriminative clinical factors such as age, cancer grade, and cancer stage.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AubrevillePanSievertetal.2023, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Pan, Zhaoya and Sievert, Matti and Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Oetter, Nicolai and Stelzle, Florian and Frenken, Ann-Kathrin and Breininger, Katharina and Goncalves, Miguel}, title = {Few Shot Learning for the Classification of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Images of Head and Neck Tumors}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.07216}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The surgical removal of head and neck tumors requires safe margins, which are usually confirmed intraoperatively by means of frozen sections. This method is, in itself, an oversampling procedure, which has a relatively low sensitivity compared to the definitive tissue analysis on paraffin-embedded sections. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is an in-vivo imaging technique that has shown its potential in the live optical biopsy of tissue. An automated analysis of this notoriously difficult to interpret modality would help surgeons. However, the images of CLE show a wide variability of patterns, caused both by individual factors but also, and most strongly, by the anatomical structures of the imaged tissue, making it a challenging pattern recognition task. In this work, we evaluate four popular few shot learning (FSL) methods towards their capability of generalizing to unseen anatomical domains in CLE images. We evaluate this on images of sinunasal tumors (SNT) from five patients and on images of the vocal folds (VF) from 11 patients using a cross-validation scheme. The best respective approach reached a median accuracy of 79.6\% on the rather homogeneous VF dataset, but only of 61.6\% for the highly diverse SNT dataset. Our results indicate that FSL on CLE images is viable, but strongly affected by the number of patients, as well as the diversity of anatomical patterns.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GanzLipnikAmmelingetal.2023, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Lipnik, Karoline and Ammeling, Jonas and Richter, Barbara and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Parlak, Eda and Diehl, Laura and Klopfleisch, Robert and Donovan, Taryn and Kiupel, Matti and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Deep Learning-based Automatic Assessment of AgNOR-scores in Histopathology Images}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2023: Proceedings, German Workshop on Medical Image Computing, Braunschweig, July 2-4, 2023}, editor = {Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Palm, Christoph and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-41657-7}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41657-7_49}, pages = {226 -- 231}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @article{AubrevilleStathonikosDonovanetal.2024, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Donovan, Taryn and Klopfleisch, Robert and Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Wilm, Frauke and Veta, Mitko and Jabari, Samir and Eckstein, Markus and Annuscheit, Jonas and Krumnow, Christian and Bozaba, Engin and Cayir, Sercan and Gu, Hongyan and Chen, Xiang and Jahanifar, Mostafa and Shephard, Adam and Kondo, Satoshi and Kasai, Satoshi and Kotte, Sujatha and Saipradeep, Vangala and Lafarge, Maxime W. and Koelzer, Viktor H. and Wang, Ziyue and Zhang, Yongbing and Yang, Sen and Wang, Xiyue and Breininger, Katharina and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species — Insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge}, volume = {2024}, pages = {103155}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, number = {94}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1361-8423}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2024.103155}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Recognition of mitotic figures in histologic tumor specimens is highly relevant to patient outcome assessment. This task is challenging for algorithms and human experts alike, with deterioration of algorithmic performance under shifts in image representations. Considerable covariate shifts occur when assessment is performed on different tumor types, images are acquired using different digitization devices, or specimens are produced in different laboratories. This observation motivated the inception of the 2022 challenge on MItosis Domain Generalization (MIDOG 2022). The challenge provided annotated histologic tumor images from six different domains and evaluated the algorithmic approaches for mitotic figure detection provided by nine challenge participants on ten independent domains. Ground truth for mitotic figure detection was established in two ways: a three-expert majority vote and an independent, immunohistochemistry-assisted set of labels. This work represents an overview of the challenge tasks, the algorithmic strategies employed by the participants, and potential factors contributing to their success. With an score of 0.764 for the top-performing team, we summarize that domain generalization across various tumor domains is possible with today's deep learning-based recognition pipelines. However, we also found that domain characteristics not present in the training set (feline as new species, spindle cell shape as new morphology and a new scanner) led to small but significant decreases in performance. When assessed against the immunohistochemistry-assisted reference standard, all methods resulted in reduced recall scores, with only minor changes in the order of participants in the ranking.}, language = {en} } @article{GanzMarzahlAmmelingetal.2024, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Marzahl, Christian and Ammeling, Jonas and Rosbach, Emely and Richter, Barbara and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Denk, Daniela and Demeter, Elena A. and Tabaran, Flaviu A. and Wasinger, Gabriel and Lipnik, Karoline and Tecilla, Marco and Valentine, Matthew J. and Dark, Michael and Abele, Niklas and Bolfa, Pompei and Erber, Ramona and Klopfleisch, Robert and Merz, Sophie and Donovan, Taryn and Jabari, Samir and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Information mismatch in PHH3-assisted mitosis annotation leads to interpretation shifts in H\&E slide analysis}, volume = {14}, pages = {26273}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, number = {1}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {London}, issn = {2045-2322}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77244-6}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker, as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. In a computer-aided setting, deep learning algorithms can help to mitigate this, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label noise introduced during the annotation process may impede the algorithms' performance. Unlike H\&E, where identification of MFs is based mainly on morphological features, the mitosis-specific antibody phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) specifically highlights MFs. Counting MFs on slides stained against PHH3 leads to higher agreement among raters and has therefore recently been used as a ground truth for the annotation of MFs in H\&E. However, as PHH3 facilitates the recognition of cells indistinguishable from H\&E staining alone, the use of this ground truth could potentially introduce an interpretation shift and even label noise into the H\&E-related dataset, impacting model performance. This study analyzes the impact of PHH3-assisted MF annotation on inter-rater reliability and object level agreement through an extensive multi-rater experiment. Subsequently, MF detectors, including a novel dual-stain detector, were evaluated on the resulting datasets to investigate the influence of PHH3-assisted labeling on the models' performance. We found that the annotators' object-level agreement significantly increased when using PHH3-assisted labeling (F1: 0.53 to 0.74). However, this enhancement in label consistency did not translate to improved performance for H\&E-based detectors, neither during the training phase nor the evaluation phase. Conversely, the dual-stain detector was able to benefit from the higher consistency. This reveals an information mismatch between the H\&E and PHH3-stained images as the cause of this effect, which renders PHH3-assisted annotations not well-aligned for use with H\&E-based detectors. Based on our findings, we propose an improved PHH3-assisted labeling procedure.}, language = {en} } @article{HaghoferParlakBarteletal.2024, author = {Haghofer, Andreas and Parlak, Eda and Bartel, Alexander and Donovan, Taryn and Assenmacher, Charles-Antoine and Bolfa, Pompei and Dark, Michael and Fuchs-Baumgartinger, Andrea and Klang, Andrea and J{\"a}ger, Kathrin and Klopfleisch, Robert and Merz, Sophie and Richter, Barbara and Schulman, F. Yvonne and Janout, Hannah and Ganz, Jonathan and Scharinger, Josef and Aubreville, Marc and Winkler, Stephan M. and Kiupel, Matti and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Nuclear pleomorphism in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors: Comparison of reproducibility and prognostic relevance between estimates, manual morphometry, and algorithmic morphometry}, volume = {62}, journal = {Veterinary Pathology}, number = {2}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London}, issn = {1544-2217}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858241295399}, pages = {161 -- 177}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Variation in nuclear size and shape is an important criterion of malignancy for many tumor types; however, categorical estimates by pathologists have poor reproducibility. Measurements of nuclear characteristics can improve reproducibility, but current manual methods are time-consuming. The aim of this study was to explore the limitations of estimates and develop alternative morphometric solutions for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCTs). We assessed the following nuclear evaluation methods for accuracy, reproducibility, and prognostic utility: (1) anisokaryosis estimates by 11 pathologists; (2) gold standard manual morphometry of at least 100 nuclei; (3) practicable manual morphometry with stratified sampling of 12 nuclei by 9 pathologists; and (4) automated morphometry using deep learning-based segmentation. The study included 96 ccMCTs with available outcome information. Inter-rater reproducibility of anisokaryosis estimates was low (k = 0.226), whereas it was good (intraclass correlation = 0.654) for practicable morphometry of the standard deviation (SD) of nuclear size. As compared with gold standard manual morphometry (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.839, 95\% confidence interval [CI] = 0.701-0.977), the prognostic value (tumor-specific survival) of SDs of nuclear area for practicable manual morphometry and automated morphometry were high with an AUC of 0.868 (95\% CI = 0.737-0.991) and 0.943 (95\% CI = 0.889-0.996), respectively. This study supports the use of manual morphometry with stratified sampling of 12 nuclei and algorithmic morphometry to overcome the poor reproducibility of estimates. Further studies are needed to validate our findings, determine inter-algorithmic reproducibility and algorithmic robustness, and explore tumor heterogeneity of nuclear features in entire tumor sections.}, language = {en} } @article{GlahnHaghoferDonovanetal.2024, author = {Glahn, Imaine and Haghofer, Andreas and Donovan, Taryn and Degasperi, Brigitte and Bartel, Alexander and Kreilmeier-Berger, Theresa and Hyndman, Philip S. and Janout, Hannah and Assenmacher, Charles-Antoine and Bartenschlager, Florian and Bolfa, Pompei and Dark, Michael and Klang, Andrea and Klopfleisch, Robert and Merz, Sophie and Richter, Barbara and Schulman, F. Yvonne and Ganz, Jonathan and Scharinger, Josef and Aubreville, Marc and Winkler, Stephan M. and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Automated Nuclear Morphometry: A Deep Learning Approach for Prognostication in Canine Pulmonary Carcinoma to Enhance Reproducibility}, volume = {11}, pages = {278}, journal = {Veterinary Sciences}, number = {6}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2306-7381}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11060278}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The integration of deep learning-based tools into diagnostic workflows is increasingly prevalent due to their efficiency and reproducibility in various settings. We investigated the utility of automated nuclear morphometry for assessing nuclear pleomorphism (NP), a criterion of malignancy in the current grading system in canine pulmonary carcinoma (cPC), and its prognostic implications. We developed a deep learning-based algorithm for evaluating NP (variation in size, i.e., anisokaryosis and/or shape) using a segmentation model. Its performance was evaluated on 46 cPC cases with comprehensive follow-up data regarding its accuracy in nuclear segmentation and its prognostic ability. Its assessment of NP was compared to manual morphometry and established prognostic tests (pathologists' NP estimates (n = 11), mitotic count, histological grading, and TNM-stage). The standard deviation (SD) of the nuclear area, indicative of anisokaryosis, exhibited good discriminatory ability for tumor-specific survival, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 and a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.38. The algorithm achieved values comparable to manual morphometry. In contrast, the pathologists' estimates of anisokaryosis resulted in HR values ranging from 0.86 to 34.8, with slight inter-observer reproducibility (k = 0.204). Other conventional tests had no significant prognostic value in our study cohort. Fully automated morphometry promises a time-efficient and reproducible assessment of NP with a high prognostic value. Further refinement of the algorithm, particularly to address undersegmentation, and application to a larger study population are required.}, language = {en} } @article{GanzAmmelingJabarietal.2024, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Jabari, Samir and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Re-identification from histopathology images}, volume = {2025}, pages = {103335}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, number = {99}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1361-8423}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2024.103335}, year = {2024}, abstract = {In numerous studies, deep learning algorithms have proven their potential for the analysis of histopathology images, for example, for revealing the subtypes of tumors or the primary origin of metastases. These models require large datasets for training, which must be anonymized to prevent possible patient identity leaks. This study demonstrates that even relatively simple deep learning algorithms can re-identify patients in large histopathology datasets with substantial accuracy. In addition, we compared a comprehensive set of state-of-the-art whole slide image classifiers and feature extractors for the given task. We evaluated our algorithms on two TCIA datasets including lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We also demonstrate the algorithm's performance on an in-house dataset of meningioma tissue. We predicted the source patient of a slide with 𝐹1 scores of up to 80.1\% and 77.19\% on the LSCC and LUAD datasets, respectively, and with 77.09\% on our meningioma dataset. Based on our findings, we formulated a risk assessment scheme to estimate the risk to the patient's privacy prior to publication.}, language = {en} } @article{AubrevilleGanzAmmelingetal.2024, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Rosbach, Emely and Gehrke, Thomas and Scherzad, Agmal and Hackenberg, Stephan and Goncalves, Miguel}, title = {Prediction of tumor board procedural recommendations using large language models}, volume = {282}, journal = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1434-4726}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08947-9}, pages = {1619 -- 1629}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AmmelingHeckerGanzetal.2024, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Hecker, Moritz and Ganz, Jonathan and Donovan, Taryn and Klopfleisch, Robert and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Automated Mitotic Index Calculation via Deep Learning and Immunohistochemistry}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2024: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Erlangen, March 10-12, 2024}, editor = {Maier, Andreas and Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Palm, Christoph and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-44037-4}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44037-4_37}, pages = {123 -- 128}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{EisenmannReinkeWeruetal.2023, author = {Eisenmann, Matthias and Reinke, Annika and Weru, Vivienn and Tizabi, Minu Dietlinde and Isensee, Fabian and Adler, Tim J. and Ali, Sharib and Andrearczyk, Vincent and Aubreville, Marc and Baid, Ujjwal and Bakas, Spyridon and Balu, Niranjan and Bano, Sophia and Bernal, Jorge and Bodenstedt, Sebastian and Casella, Alessandro and Cheplygina, Veronika and Daum, Marie and De Bruijne, Marleen and Depeursinge, Adrien and Dorent, Reuben and Egger, Jan and Ellis, David G. and Engelhardt, Sandy and Ganz, Melanie and Ghatwary, Noha M. and Girard, Gabriel and Godau, Patrick and Gupta, Anubha and Hansen, Lasse and Harada, Kanako and Heinrich, Mattias and Heller, Nicholas and Hering, Alessa and Huaulm{\´e}, Arnoud and Jannin, Pierre and Kavur, A. Emre and Kodym, Oldrich and Kozubek, Michal and Li, Jianning and Li, Hongwei and Ma, Jun and Mart{\´i}n-Isla, Carlos and Menze, Bjoern H. and Noble, Alison and Oreiller, Valentin and Padoy, Nicolas and Pati, Sarthak and Payette, Kelly and R{\"a}dsch, Tim and Rafael-Pati{\~n}o, Jonathan and Bawa, Vivek Singh and Speidel, Stefanie and Sudre, Carole H. and Van Wijnen, Kimberlin M. H. and Wagner, M. and Wei, D. and Yamlahi, Amine and Yap, Moi Hoon and Yuan, C. and Zenk, Maximilian and Zia, A. and Zimmerer, David and Aydogan, Dogu Baran and Bhattarai, B. and Bloch, Louise and Br{\"u}ngel, Raphael and Cho, J. and Choi, C. and Dou, Q. and Ezhov, Ivan and Friedrich, Christoph M. and Fuller, C. and Gaire, Rebati Raman and Galdran, Adrian and Garc{\´i}a-Faura, {\´A}lvaro and Grammatikopoulou, Maria and Hong, S. and Jahanifar, Mostafa and Jang, I. and Kadkhodamohammadi, Abdolrahim and Kang, I. and Kofler, Florian and Kondo, Satoshi and Kuijf, Hugo Jaco and Li, M. and Luu, M. and Martinčič, Tomaz and Morais, P. and Naser, M. A. and Oliveira, B. and Owen, D. and Pang, S. and Park, Jinah and Park, S. and Płotka, S. and Puybareau, {\´E}lodie and Rajpoot, Nasir M. and Ryu, K. and Saeed, N. and Shephard, Adam and Shi, P. and Štepec, Dejan and Subedi, Ronast and Tochon, Guillaume and Torres, Helena R. and Urien, H{\´e}l{\`e}ne and Vila{\c{c}}a, Jo{\~a}o L. and Wahid, Kareem A. and Wang, H. and Wang, J. and Wang, L. and Wang, Xiyue and Wiestler, Benedikt and Wodzinski, Marek and Xia, F. and Xie, J. and Xiong, Z. and Yang, Sen and Yang, Y. and Zhao, Z. and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and J{\"a}ger, Paul F. and Kopp-Schneider, Annette and Maier-Hein, Lena}, title = {Why is the Winner the Best?}, booktitle = {Proceedings: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {Los Alamitos}, isbn = {979-8-3503-0129-8}, issn = {2575-7075}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.01911}, pages = {19955 -- 19967}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AmmelingMangerKwakaetal.2023, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Manger, Carina and Kwaka, Elias and Kr{\"u}gel, Sebastian and Uhl, Matthias and Kießig, Angelika and Fritz, Alexis and Ganz, Jonathan and Riener, Andreas and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Appealing but Potentially Biasing - Investigation of the Visual Representation of Segmentation Predictions by AI Recommender Systems for Medical Decision Making}, booktitle = {Mensch und Computer 2023: Building Bridges: Tagungsband (Proceedings)}, editor = {Stolze, Markus and Loch, Frieder and Baldauf, Matthias and Alt, Florian and Schneegass, Christina and Kosch, Thomas and Hirzle, Teresa and Sadeghian, Shadan and Draxler, Fiona and Bektas, Kenan and Lohan, Katrin and Knierim, Pascal}, publisher = {ACM}, address = {New York}, isbn = {979-8-4007-0771-1}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3603555.3608561}, pages = {330 -- 335}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AmmelingWilmGanzetal.2023, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Wilm, Frauke and Ganz, Jonathan and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Reference Algorithms for the Mitosis Domain Generalization (MIDOG) 2022 Challenge}, booktitle = {Mitosis Domain Generalization and Diabetic Retinopathy Analysis}, editor = {Sheng, Bin and Aubreville, Marc}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-33658-4}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33658-4_19}, pages = {201 -- 205}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AubrevilleGanzAmmelingetal.2023, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Donovan, Taryn and Fick, Rutger H. J. and Breininger, Katharina and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Deep Learning-based Subtyping of Atypical and Normal Mitoses using a Hierarchical Anchor-free Object Detector}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2023: Proceedings, German Workshop on Medical Image Computing, Braunschweig, July 2-4, 2023}, editor = {Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Palm, Christoph and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-41657-7}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41657-7_40}, pages = {189 -- 195}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @article{AmmelingGanzWilmetal.2025, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Wilm, Frauke and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Investigation of Class Separability within Object Detection Models in Histopathology}, volume = {44}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging}, number = {8}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {New York}, issn = {0278-0062}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2025.3560134}, pages = {3162 -- 3174}, year = {2025}, language = {en} } @article{AmmelingGanzRosbachetal.2026, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Rosbach, Emely and Lausser, Ludwig and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Benchmarking Foundation Models for Mitotic Figure Classification}, volume = {3}, pages = {2026:003}, journal = {Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging}, number = {MELBA-BVM 2025 Special Issue}, publisher = {Melba editors}, address = {[s. l.]}, issn = {2766-905X}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2026-a3eb}, pages = {38 -- 55}, year = {2026}, abstract = {The performance of deep learning models is known to scale with data quantity and diversity. In pathology, as in many other medical imaging domains, the availability of labeled images for a specific task is often limited. Self-supervised learning techniques have enabled the use of vast amounts of unlabeled data to train large-scale neural networks, i.e., foundation models, that can address the limited data problem by providing semantically rich feature vectors that can generalize well to new tasks with minimal training effort increasing model performance and robustness. In this work, we investigate the use of foundation models for mitotic figure classification. The mitotic count, which can be derived from this classification task, is an independent prognostic marker for specific tumors and part of certain tumor grading systems. In particular, we investigate the data scaling laws on multiple current foundation models and evaluate their robustness to unseen tumor domains. Next to the commonly used linear probing paradigm, we also adapt the models using low-rank adaptation (LoRA) of their attention mechanisms. We compare all models against end-to-end-trained baselines, both CNNs and Vision Transformers. Our results demonstrate that LoRA-adapted foundation models provide superior performance to those adapted with standard linear probing, reaching performance levels close to 100 \% data availability with only 10 \% of training data. Furthermore, LoRA-adaptation of the most recent foundation models almost closes the out-of-domain performance gap when evaluated on unseen tumor domains. However, full fine-tuning of traditional architectures still yields competitive performance.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RosbachGanzAmmelingetal.2025, author = {Rosbach, Emely and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Riener, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Automation Bias in AI-assisted Medical Decision-making under Time Pressure in Computational Pathology}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, editor = {Palm, Christoph and Breininger, Katharina and Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-47422-5}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_27}, pages = {129 -- 134}, year = {2025}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GanzAmmelingRosbachetal.2025, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Rosbach, Emely and Lausser, Ludwig and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Is Self-supervision Enough?}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, subtitle = {Benchmarking Foundation Models Against End-to-end Training for Mitotic Figure Classification}, editor = {Palm, Christoph and Breininger, Katharina and Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-47422-5}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_15}, pages = {63 -- 68}, year = {2025}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AmmelingGanzRosbachetal.2025, author = {Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Rosbach, Emely and Lausser, Ludwig and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Benchmarking Foundation Models for Mitotic Figure Classification}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.04441}, year = {2025}, language = {en} } @article{PugetGanzBertrametal.2025, author = {Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Ganz, Jonathan and Bertram, Christof and Conrad, Thomas and Baeblich, Malte and Voss, Anne and Landmann, Katharina and Haake, Alexander F. H. and Spree, Andreas and Hartung, Svenja and Aeschlimann, Leonore and Soto, Sara and de Brot, Simone and Dettwiler, Martina and Aupperle-Lellbach, Heike and Bolfa, Pompei and Bartel, Alexander and Kiupel, Matti and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc and Klopfleisch, Robert}, title = {Artificial intelligence predicts c-KIT exon 11 genotype by phenotype in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors: Can human observers learn it?}, volume = {63}, journal = {Veterinary Pathology}, number = {2}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London}, issn = {1544-2217}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858251380284}, pages = {369 -- 379}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCTs) are frequent neoplasms with variable biological behaviors. Internal tandem duplication mutations in c-KIT exon 11 (c-KIT-11-ITD) are associated with poor prognosis but predict therapeutic response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a previous work, deep learning algorithms managed to predict the presence of c-KIT-11-ITD on digitalized hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological slides (whole-slide images, WSIs) in up to 87\% of cases, suggesting the existence of morphological features characterizing ccMCTs carrying c-KIT-11-ITD. This 3-stage blinded study aimed to identify morphological features indicative of c-KIT-11-ITD and to evaluate the ability of human observers to learn this task. 17 untrained pathologists first classified 8 WSIs and 200 image patches (highly relevant for algorithmic classification) of ccMCTs as either positive or negative for c-KIT-11-ITD. Second, they self-trained to recognize c-KIT-11-ITD by looking at the same WSIs and patches correctly sorted. Third, pathologists classified 15 new WSIs and 200 new patches according to c-KIT-11-ITD status. In addition, participants reported microscopic features they considered relevant for their decision. Without training, participants correctly classified the c-KIT-11-ITD status of 63\%-88\% of WSIs and 43\%-55\% of patches. With self-training, 25\%-38\% of WSIs and 55\%-56\% of patches were correctly classified. High cellular pleomorphism, anisokaryosis, and sparse cytoplasmic granulation were commonly suggested as features associated with c-KIT-11-ITD-positive ccMCTs, none of which showed reliable predictivity in a follow-up study. The results indicate that transfer of algorithmic skills to the human observer is difficult. A c-KIT-11-ITD-specific morphological feature remains to be extracted from the artificial intelligence model.}, language = {en} } @article{RosbachAmmelingGanzetal.2026, author = {Rosbach, Emely and Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Bertram, Christof and Conrad, Thomas and Riener, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Stuck on Suggestions: Automation Bias, the Anchoring Effect, and the Factors That Shape Them in Computational Pathology}, volume = {3}, pages = {2026:007}, journal = {Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging}, number = {MELBA-BVM 2025 Special Issue}, publisher = {Melba editors}, address = {[s. l.]}, issn = {2766-905X}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2026-87b1}, pages = {126 -- 147}, year = {2026}, abstract = {Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven clinical decision support systems (CDSS) hold promise to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in computational pathology. However, collaboration between human experts and AI may give rise to cognitive biases, such as automation and anchoring bias, wherein users may be inclined to blindly adopt system recommendations or be disproportionately influenced by the presence of AI predictions, even when they are inaccurate. These biases may be exacerbated under time pressure, pervasive in routine pathology diagnostics, or shaped by individual user characteristics. To investigate these effects, we conducted a web-based experiment in which trained pathology experts (n = 28) estimated tumor cell percentages twice: once independently and once with the aid of an AI. A subset of the estimates in each condition was performed under time constraints. Our findings indicate that AI integration generally enhances diagnostic performance. However, it also introduced a 7\% automation bias rate, quantified as the number of accepted negative consultations, where a previously correct independent assessment gets overturned by inaccurate AI guidance. While time pressure did not increase the frequency of automation bias occurrence, it appeared to intensify its severity, as evidenced by a performance decline linked to increased automation reliance under cognitive load. A linear mixed-effects model (LMM) analysis, simulating weighted averaging, revealed a statistically significant positive coefficient for AI advice, indicating a moderate degree of anchoring on system output. This effect was further intensified under time pressure, suggesting that anchoring bias may become more pronounced when cognitive resources are limited. A secondary LMM evaluation assessing automation reliance, used as a proxy for both automation and anchoring bias, demonstrated that professional experience and self-efficacy were associated with reduced dependence on system support, whereas higher confidence during AI-assisted decision-making was linked to increased automation reliance. Together, these findings underscore the dual nature of AI integration in clinical workflows, offering performance benefits while also introducing risks of cognitive bias-driven diagnostic errors. As an initial investigation focused on a single medical specialty and diagnostic task, this study aims to lay the groundwork for future research to explore these phenomena across diverse clinical contexts, ultimately supporting the establishment of appropriate reliance on automated systems and the safe, effective integration of human-AI collaboration in medical decision-making.}, language = {en} } @article{PugetGanzOstermaieretal.2024, author = {Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Ganz, Jonathan and Ostermaier, Julian and Conrad, Thomas and Parlak, Eda and Bertram, Christof and Kiupel, Matti and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc and Klopfleisch, Robert}, title = {Artificial intelligence can be trained to predict c-KIT-11 mutational status of canine mast cell tumors from hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological slides}, volume = {62}, journal = {Veterinary Pathology}, number = {2}, publisher = {Sage}, address = {London}, issn = {1544-2217}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858241286806}, pages = {152 -- 160}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Numerous prognostic factors are currently assessed histologically and immunohistochemically in canine mast cell tumors (MCTs) to evaluate clinical behavior. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is often performed to detect internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations in exon 11 of the c-KIT gene ( c-KIT-11-ITD) to predict the therapeutic response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This project aimed at training deep learning models (DLMs) to identify MCTs with c-KIT-11-ITD solely based on morphology. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slides of 368 cutaneous, subcutaneous, and mucocutaneous MCTs (195 with ITD and 173 without) were stained consecutively in 2 different laboratories and scanned with 3 different slide scanners. This resulted in 6 data sets (stain-scanner variations representing diagnostic institutions) of whole-slide images. DLMs were trained with single and mixed data sets and their performances were assessed under stain-scanner variations (domain shifts). The DLM correctly classified HE slides according to their c-KIT-11-ITD status in up to 87\% of cases with a 0.90 sensitivity and a 0.83 specificity. A relevant performance drop could be observed when the stain-scanner combination of training and test data set differed. Multi-institutional data sets improved the average accuracy but did not reach the maximum accuracy of algorithms trained and tested on the same stain-scanner variant (ie, intra-institutional). In summary, DLM-based morphological examination can predict c-KIT-11-ITD with high accuracy in canine MCTs in HE slides. However, staining protocol and scanner type influence accuracy. Larger data sets of scans from different laboratories and scanners may lead to more robust DLMs to identify c- KIT mutations in HE slides.}, language = {en} } @article{AubrevilleWilmStathonikosetal.2023, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Wilm, Frauke and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Breininger, Katharina and Donovan, Taryn and Jabari, Samir and Veta, Mitko and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and van Diest, Paul J and Klopfleisch, Robert and Bertram, Christof}, title = {A comprehensive multi-domain dataset for mitotic figure detection}, volume = {10}, pages = {484}, journal = {Scientific Data}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {London}, issn = {2052-4463}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02327-4}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The prognostic value of mitotic figures in tumor tissue is well-established for many tumor types and automating this task is of high research interest. However, especially deep learning-based methods face performance deterioration in the presence of domain shifts, which may arise from different tumor types, slide preparation and digitization devices. We introduce the MIDOG++ dataset, an extension of the MIDOG 2021 and 2022 challenge datasets. We provide region of interest images from 503 histological specimens of seven different tumor types with variable morphology with in total labels for 11,937 mitotic figures: breast carcinoma, lung carcinoma, lymphosarcoma, neuroendocrine tumor, cutaneous mast cell tumor, cutaneous melanoma, and (sub)cutaneous soft tissue sarcoma. The specimens were processed in several laboratories utilizing diverse scanners. We evaluated the extent of the domain shift by using state-of-the-art approaches, observing notable differences in single-domain training. In a leave-one-domain-out setting, generalizability improved considerably. This mitotic figure dataset is the first that incorporates a wide domain shift based on different tumor types, laboratories, whole slide image scanners, and species.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AubrevilleGanzAmmelingetal.2024, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Ganz, Jonathan and Ammeling, Jonas and Kaltenecker, Christopher and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Model-based Cleaning of the QUILT-1M Pathology Dataset for Text-Conditional Image Synthesis}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.07676}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The QUILT-1M dataset is the first openly available dataset containing images harvested from various online sources. While it provides a huge data variety, the image quality and composition is highly heterogeneous, impacting its utility for text-conditional image synthesis. We propose an automatic pipeline that provides predictions of the most common impurities within the images, e.g., visibility of narrators, desktop environment and pathology software, or text within the image. Additionally, we propose to use semantic alignment filtering of the image-text pairs. Our findings demonstrate that by rigorously filtering the dataset, there is a substantial enhancement of image fidelity in text-to-image tasks.}, language = {en} }