@article{BertramAubrevilleGurtneretal.2020, author = {Bertram, Christof and Aubreville, Marc and Gurtner, Corinne and Bartel, Alexander and Corner, Sarah M. and Dettwiler, Martina and Kershaw, Olivia and Noland, Erica L. and Schmidt, Anja and Sledge, Dodd G. and Smedley, Rebecca C. and Thaiwong, Tuddow and Kiupel, Matti and Maier, Andreas and Klopfleisch, Robert}, title = {Mitotic count in canine cutaneous mast cell tumours}, volume = {2020}, journal = {Journal of Comparative Pathology}, subtitle = {not accurate but reproducible}, number = {174}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {London}, issn = {1532-3129}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2019.10.015}, pages = {143}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @unpublished{WilmFragosoGarciaBertrametal.2022, author = {Wilm, Frauke and Fragoso-Garcia, Marco and Bertram, Christof and Stathonikos, Nikolas and {\"O}ttl, Mathias and Qiu, Jingna and Klopfleisch, Robert and Maier, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc and Breininger, Katharina}, title = {Mind the Gap: Scanner-induced domain shifts pose challenges for representation learning in histopathology}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.16141}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AubrevilleKrappmannBertrametal.2017, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Krappmann, Maximilian and Bertram, Christof and Klopfleisch, Robert and Maier, Andreas}, title = {A Guided Spatial Transformer Network for Histology Cell Differentiation}, booktitle = {VCBM '17: Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine}, publisher = {Eurographics Association}, address = {Goslar}, isbn = {978-3-03868-036-9}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.2312/vcbm.20171233}, pages = {21 -- 25}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AubrevilleBertramKlopfleischetal.2018, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Bertram, Christof and Klopfleisch, Robert and Maier, Andreas}, title = {SlideRunner}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2018: Algorithmen - Systeme - Anwendungen}, subtitle = {a tool for massive cell annotations in whole slide images}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-662-56537-7}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7_81}, pages = {309 -- 314}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Large-scale image data such as digital whole-slide histology images pose a challenging task at annotation software solutions. Today, a number of good solutions with varying scopes exist. For cell annotation, however, we find that many do not match the prerequisites for fast annotations. Especially in the field of mitosis detection, it is assumed that detection accuracy could significantly benefit from larger annotation databases that are currently however very troublesome to produce. Further, multiple independent (blind) expert labels are a big asset for such databases, yet there is currently no tool for this kind of annotation available. To ease this tedious process of expert annotation and grading, we introduce SlideRunner, an open source annotation and visualization tool for digital histopathology, developed in close cooperation with two pathologists. SlideRunner is capable of setting annotations like object centers (for e.g. cells) as well as object boundaries (e.g. for tumor outlines). It provides single-click annotations as well as a blind mode for multi-annotations, where the expert is directly shown the microscopy image containing the cells that he has not yet rated.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MarzahlBertramAubrevilleetal.2020, author = {Marzahl, Christian and Bertram, Christof and Aubreville, Marc and Petrick, Anne and Weiler, Kristina and Gl{\"a}sel, Agnes C. and Fragoso-Garcia, Marco and Merz, Sophie and Bartenschlager, Florian and Hoppe, Judith and Langenhagen, Alina and Jasensky, Anne-Katherine and Voigt, J{\"o}rn and Klopfleisch, Robert and Maier, Andreas}, title = {Are Fast Labeling Methods Reliable? A Case Study of Computer-Aided Expert Annotations on Microscopy Slides}, booktitle = {Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2020}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-59710-8}, issn = {1611-3349}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_3}, pages = {24 -- 32}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BertramVetaMarzahletal.2020, author = {Bertram, Christof and Veta, Mitko and Marzahl, Christian and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Maier, Andreas and Klopfleisch, Robert and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Are Pathologist-Defined Labels Reproducible? Comparison of the TUPAC16 Mitotic Figure Dataset with an Alternative Set of Labels}, booktitle = {Interpretable and Annotation-Efficient Learning for Medical Image Computing}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-61166-8}, issn = {1611-3349}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61166-8_22}, pages = {204 -- 213}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KrappmannAubrevilleMaieretal.2018, author = {Krappmann, Maximilian and Aubreville, Marc and Maier, Andreas and Bertram, Christof and Klopfleisch, Robert}, title = {Classification of Mitotic Cells}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2018}, subtitle = {Potentials Beyond the Limits of Small Data Sets}, editor = {Maier, Andreas and Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Palm, Christoph and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-662-56536-0}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7_66}, pages = {245 -- 250}, year = {2018}, language = {en} } @unpublished{AubrevilleKrappmannBertrametal.2017, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Krappmann, Maximilian and Bertram, Christof and Klopfleisch, Robert and Maier, Andreas}, title = {A Guided Spatial Transformer Network for Histology Cell Differentiation}, publisher = {arXiv}, address = {Ithaca}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.08525}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @article{HaghoferFuchsBaumgartingerLipniketal.2023, author = {Haghofer, Andreas and Fuchs-Baumgartinger, Andrea and Lipnik, Karoline and Klopfleisch, Robert and Aubreville, Marc and Scharinger, Josef and Weissenb{\"o}ck, Herbert and Winkler, Stephan M. and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Histological classification of canine and feline lymphoma using a modular approach based on deep learning and advanced image processing}, volume = {13}, pages = {19436}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {London}, issn = {2045-2322}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46607-w}, year = {2023}, abstract = {AbstractHistopathological examination of tissue samples is essential for identifying tumor malignancy and the diagnosis of different types of tumor. In the case of lymphoma classification, nuclear size of the neoplastic lymphocytes is one of the key features to differentiate the different subtypes. Based on the combination of artificial intelligence and advanced image processing, we provide a workflow for the classification of lymphoma with regards to their nuclear size (small, intermediate, and large). As the baseline for our workflow testing, we use a Unet++ model trained on histological images of canine lymphoma with individually labeled nuclei. As an alternative to the Unet++, we also used a publicly available pre-trained and unmodified instance segmentation model called Stardist to demonstrate that our modular classification workflow can be combined with different types of segmentation models if they can provide proper nuclei segmentation. Subsequent to nuclear segmentation, we optimize algorithmic parameters for accurate classification of nuclear size using a newly derived reference size and final image classification based on a pathologists-derived ground truth. Our image classification module achieves a classification accuracy of up to 92\% on canine lymphoma data. Compared to the accuracy ranging from 66.67 to 84\% achieved using measurements provided by three individual pathologists, our algorithm provides a higher accuracy level and reproducible results. Our workflow also demonstrates a high transferability to feline lymphoma, as shown by its accuracy of up to 84.21\%, even though our workflow was not optimized for feline lymphoma images. By determining the nuclear size distribution in tumor areas, our workflow can assist pathologists in subtyping lymphoma based on the nuclei size and potentially improve reproducibility. Our proposed approach is modular and comprehensible, thus allowing adaptation for specific tasks and increasing the users' trust in computer-assisted image classification.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GanzLipnikAmmelingetal.2023, author = {Ganz, Jonathan and Lipnik, Karoline and Ammeling, Jonas and Richter, Barbara and Puget, Chlo{\´e} and Parlak, Eda and Diehl, Laura and Klopfleisch, Robert and Donovan, Taryn and Kiupel, Matti and Bertram, Christof and Breininger, Katharina and Aubreville, Marc}, title = {Deep Learning-based Automatic Assessment of AgNOR-scores in Histopathology Images}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2023: Proceedings, German Workshop on Medical Image Computing, Braunschweig, July 2-4, 2023}, editor = {Deserno, Thomas Martin and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Palm, Christoph and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-41657-7}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41657-7_49}, pages = {226 -- 231}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WilmFragosoGarciaBertrametal.2023, author = {Wilm, Frauke and Fragoso-Garcia, Marco and Bertram, Christof and Stathonikos, Nikolas and {\"O}ttl, Mathias and Qiu, Jingna and Klopfleisch, Robert and Maier, Andreas and Aubreville, Marc and Breininger, Katharina}, title = {Mind the Gap: Scanner-Induced Domain Shifts Pose Challenges for Representation Learning in Histopathology}, booktitle = {2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {Piscataway}, isbn = {978-1-6654-7358-3}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI53787.2023.10230458}, year = {2023}, language = {en} } @article{AubrevilleStathonikosDonovanetal.2024, author = {Aubreville, Marc and Stathonikos, Nikolas and Donovan, Taryn and Klopfleisch, Robert and Ammeling, Jonas and Ganz, Jonathan and Wilm, Frauke and Veta, Mitko and Jabari, Samir and Eckstein, Markus and Annuscheit, Jonas and Krumnow, Christian and Bozaba, Engin and Cayir, Sercan and Gu, Hongyan and Chen, Xiang and Jahanifar, Mostafa and Shephard, Adam and Kondo, Satoshi and Kasai, Satoshi and Kotte, Sujatha and Saipradeep, Vangala and Lafarge, Maxime W. and Koelzer, Viktor H. and Wang, Ziyue and Zhang, Yongbing and Yang, Sen and Wang, Xiyue and Breininger, Katharina and Bertram, Christof}, title = {Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species — Insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge}, volume = {2024}, pages = {103155}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, number = {94}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1361-8423}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2024.103155}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Recognition of mitotic figures in histologic tumor specimens is highly relevant to patient outcome assessment. This task is challenging for algorithms and human experts alike, with deterioration of algorithmic performance under shifts in image representations. Considerable covariate shifts occur when assessment is performed on different tumor types, images are acquired using different digitization devices, or specimens are produced in different laboratories. This observation motivated the inception of the 2022 challenge on MItosis Domain Generalization (MIDOG 2022). The challenge provided annotated histologic tumor images from six different domains and evaluated the algorithmic approaches for mitotic figure detection provided by nine challenge participants on ten independent domains. Ground truth for mitotic figure detection was established in two ways: a three-expert majority vote and an independent, immunohistochemistry-assisted set of labels. This work represents an overview of the challenge tasks, the algorithmic strategies employed by the participants, and potential factors contributing to their success. With an score of 0.764 for the top-performing team, we summarize that domain generalization across various tumor domains is possible with today's deep learning-based recognition pipelines. However, we also found that domain characteristics not present in the training set (feline as new species, spindle cell shape as new morphology and a new scanner) led to small but significant decreases in performance. When assessed against the immunohistochemistry-assisted reference standard, all methods resulted in reduced recall scores, with only minor changes in the order of participants in the ranking.}, language = {en} }