Business Transformation and Innovation Management
Refine
Labor/Institute
Keywords
- Innovationsmanagement (9) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Preprint (1)
The following contribution deals with the environmental conditions of highly gifted and
sensitive people (HGSP). Three researchers from different perspectives (physics, pedagogy,
and innovation management) empathize with the target group and try to understand their
experiences. From three interviews with adults, a first point of view is defined adopting the
Grounded Theory methodology. Adult interviews are compared with the perceptions of an
adolescent from today moving between state and private education systems. By comparing
both perspectives, differences and similarities are worked out. The discussions are used to
develop an online test focusing on creativity, motivation for achievement, and cognitive
capacities, as these are core categories identified that seem to be highly important in
combination. The empirical test is intended to provide the state education system with a simple
and interactive solution to identify a large group of people who need further support. To
achieve a high participation rate, the test will be designed for a maximum of one hour and the
implementation and evaluation will be carried out digitally. The authors' vision is to create an
adaptive environment that can effectively adjust to and educate diverse groups of learners
without over- or under burdening teachers and learners. A key finding of our case-based
research is that the existing school and higher education structures are not able to provide
sufficient support and challenge for HGSP. Support measures for HGSP are needed as well
as a new understanding of learning and teaching, so that new competencies can be built that
consider people's self-regulation, creativity, and motivation for achievement, in addition to
cognition and meta-cognition. Kuhl (2004, 18) explains why the capacities of self-regulation
are paramount for highly gifted students. When they want to meet a challenge, they face
problems that are more difficult and therefore need more persistence, resilience, and selfmotivation. However, to support these special needs, teachers are often not ready or capable
to do so, nor do these needs fit with the performance requirements of the regular curriculum.
Circular Innovator Education
(2021)
The following article is a first step towards raising the awareness of these new trainers (who are conscious and innovators themselves) and giving them methods, tools, and inspiration to develop sustainable innovators to think holistically. Innovators are the proportion of entrepreneurs who do not copy or optimize what already exists but commercialize new technologies or new ideas. Circular innovators are the doers who create systemic innovations solving our current social and ecological crisis.
In this chapter, the EIL (Effective Innovation Leadership) framework is tested empirically. First, peer-reviewed journals in the innovation management, leadership, and transformation discipline are analyzed. Second, a pre-test with 58 executives takes place. The response behavior of the participants varies depending on the company's degree of digital maturity. Third, 20 innovation leaders employed in mature digital companies answer the survey. The participants perceive their company as innovative and state that up to 89% of created innovations are digital. Values relevant to digital innovation leaders are innovation, responsibility, positivity, and transparency. Relevant strengths are creativity and learning. Both strongly correlate with a few efficacy items. Decisiveness correlates with innovation strategy. Entrepreneurship, self-regulation, and culture correlate with each other. Creativity connects the value of innovation and the practice of communication. The insights from this chapter contribute to building a reliable and valid factor-based effective digital innovation leadership questionnaire in the future.
Application of the Effective Innovation Leadership Model in a Digital Innovation Project: Case Study
(2020)
Germany has become sedate and partially missed digital opportunities generating value. Since 1995, the term innovation leadership is getting increasing attention. Still, there exists no clear definition. The effective innovation leadership (EIL) model resulted from a Ph.D. thesis and is grounded in the iteration of six data sets. It has been used in industry since 2014. This chapter examines the application of the EIL model in one German middle-class enterprise in 2018/2019. Core challenges in the systemic context, which hinder the effectiveness of innovation leadership in the organizational context, are the support of people across functions and hierarchies as well as inflexible structures and digital access. Especially negative pressure coming from an overvaluation of the shareholder, egos fighting for power, extensive drama triangular, fixed mindsets, and freeloaders hinder the effectiveness of innovation leadership. A comparison of the EIL model with rival theory shows that innovation leadership is close to entrepreneurial approaches and an integral part of innovation management.
The Benefit of Management Accounting in Idea Management Systems: Evidence from German Industries
(2011)
Das Ideenmanagement im Unternehmen ist kein statischer Prozess, sondern entwickelt sich, ebenso wie das Unternehmen, weiter. Dies geschieht nicht nur strukturell oder organisatorisch, sondern auch in der Köpfen der Mitarbeiter. Um die Mitarbeiter – die entscheidende Ressource des Ideenmanagements – nicht zu verlieren, können Evaluationen hilfreich sein. Sie ermöglichen eine Analyse der vielschichtigen Bewertungsebenen der Mitarbeiter und ihrer tatsächlichen Haltung zum Ideenmanagement. Dies ermöglicht ein wirksames Controlling des Ideenmanagements und der Innovation im Unternehmen. Die Nutzung des Instrumentes Evaluation für das Ideenmanagement anzuregen, ist Ziel dieses Aufsatzes.
Das Gesundheitswesen ist einem kontinuierlichen Wandel unterworfen. Knapper werdende Mittel im Gesundheitsbereich zwingen Krankenhäuser zu einer stetigen Effizienzsteigerung. Fluktuierende Rahmenbedingungen erfordern ein hohes Maß an Flexibilität. Innovation und Rationalisierung bestimmen das Vokabular der Mitarbeiter. Dabei geht es nicht um die Maximierung des Gewinns, sondern in vielen Bereichen um das Überleben eines Krankenhauses. Was sich der soziale Bereich nicht leisten kann, ist der Verzicht auf die Ideen seiner Mitarbeiter. Konventionelles, in der Industrie verwurzeltes Ideenmanagement lässt sich nicht einfach auf den Krankenhausalltag übertragen. Dieser Beitrag bietet eine Analyse des ökonomischen Denkens von Krankenhauspersonal.
Der Beitrag stellt mögliche Vor- und Nachteile einer Verknüpfung von Ideen- und Innovationsmanagement gegenüber und zeigt anhand einer empirischen Analyse die Auswirkungen dieser Verknüpfung auf zentrale Performance-Maße des Ideenmanagements. Des Weiteren wird eine mögliche Ausgestaltung der Schnittstelle zwischen Ideen- und Innovationsmanagement entwickelt und diskutiert.
This article explores the relationships between innovation idea value, innovators’ perceptions of fairness, and their participation behavior and knowledge sharing behavior in the intrafirm social network. The study uses survey data and a database from a large company that is one of Europe’s top performers in idea management. In addition to the idea database, this study surveys participating employees about their perceptions of fairness and their participation behavior and knowledge sharing behavior. The results show that there is a clear relationship between innovation idea value, employees’ perceptions of fairness, and employees’ participation behavior and knowledge sharing behavior. Furthermore, there is clear evidence that tenure increases the value of innovation ideas. The findings suggest a number of implications for ideation management and for the design of social networks for innovation ideas. To increase the value of innovation ideas, social networks for innovation ideas can be used if the allocation of rewards for idea providers is positively associated with the fairness perceptions of network members.