@incollection{Schork2020, author = {Schork, Sabrina}, title = {Application of the Effective Innovation Leadership Model in a Digital Innovation Project: Case Study}, series = {Digital Innovations for Customer Engagement, Management, and Organizational Improvement}, booktitle = {Digital Innovations for Customer Engagement, Management, and Organizational Improvement}, publisher = {IGI Global}, address = {Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA}, pages = {20 -- 45}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Germany has become sedate and partially missed digital opportunities generating value. Since 1995, the term innovation leadership is getting increasing attention. Still, there exists no clear definition. The effective innovation leadership (EIL) model resulted from a Ph.D. thesis and is grounded in the iteration of six data sets. It has been used in industry since 2014. This chapter examines the application of the EIL model in one German middle-class enterprise in 2018/2019. Core challenges in the systemic context, which hinder the effectiveness of innovation leadership in the organizational context, are the support of people across functions and hierarchies as well as inflexible structures and digital access. Especially negative pressure coming from an overvaluation of the shareholder, egos fighting for power, extensive drama triangular, fixed mindsets, and freeloaders hinder the effectiveness of innovation leadership. A comparison of the EIL model with rival theory shows that innovation leadership is close to entrepreneurial approaches and an integral part of innovation management.}, subject = {Kundenbindung}, language = {en} } @unpublished{SchorkOezdemirKalukZerey2023, author = {Schork, Sabrina and {\"O}zdemir-Kaluk, Dilan and Zerey, Cudi}, title = {An integrative definition of digital, innovation, and sustainable: A bridge between disciplines}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10143498}, year = {2023}, abstract = {It needs to be clarified how digital, innovation, and sustainable concepts are interdependent and what dimensions they encompass from an organizational perspective. This article aims to fill these gaps. 12,249 articles are analyzed, of which 776 are minimum C-ranked according to VHB-Jourqual, and 457 pass the quality filters. Only 48 publications deal with all three concepts, and 24 offer definitions. This results from an eight-step systematic literaturereview. Three dimensions for 'digital' (data, technologies, and networks), three dimensions for 'sustainable'(environmental, social, and economic), and four dimensions for 'innovation'(product, service, business model, and process) are elaborated in a framework. Based on this, an integrated definition is derivedusing a content analysis.The DIS-definition can be used for strategic decision-making processes and bridges the disciplines of technology, innovation, and sustainability management. Finally, a canvas that clarifies the concepts and their connections is proposed for interdisciplinary management discussions.}, subject = {Digitalisierung}, language = {en} }