@unpublished{SchorkOezdemirKalukZerey2023, author = {Schork, Sabrina and {\"O}zdemir-Kaluk, Dilan and Zerey, Cudi}, title = {An integrative definition of digital, innovation, and sustainable: A bridge between disciplines}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10143498}, year = {2023}, abstract = {It needs to be clarified how digital, innovation, and sustainable concepts are interdependent and what dimensions they encompass from an organizational perspective. This article aims to fill these gaps. 12,249 articles are analyzed, of which 776 are minimum C-ranked according to VHB-Jourqual, and 457 pass the quality filters. Only 48 publications deal with all three concepts, and 24 offer definitions. This results from an eight-step systematic literaturereview. Three dimensions for 'digital' (data, technologies, and networks), three dimensions for 'sustainable'(environmental, social, and economic), and four dimensions for 'innovation'(product, service, business model, and process) are elaborated in a framework. Based on this, an integrated definition is derivedusing a content analysis.The DIS-definition can be used for strategic decision-making processes and bridges the disciplines of technology, innovation, and sustainability management. Finally, a canvas that clarifies the concepts and their connections is proposed for interdisciplinary management discussions.}, subject = {Digitalisierung}, language = {en} } @article{SchorkOezdemirKalukZerey2024, author = {Schork, Sabrina and {\"O}zdemir-Kaluk, Dilan and Zerey, Cudi}, title = {Understanding Innovation and Sustainability in Digital Organizations: A Mixed-Method Approach}, series = {Sustainability}, volume = {2024}, journal = {Sustainability}, number = {17}, editor = {Chen, Ja-Shen}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020415}, pages = {415}, year = {2024}, abstract = {In recent years, organizations have increasingly turned to digital transformation (D) to drive innovation (I) and sustainability (S). However, the rapid growth of studies on this topic, particularly since 2019, has made it challenging to clearly define these concepts, operationalize their constructs, and understand their positive organizational impacts. This article addresses these gaps through a systematic literature review (SLR) that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. This study begins with a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 3099 articles published between 2010 and 2023 in the Scopus database containing the terms "digital," "innovation," and "sustainability" (or "sustainable"). It then covers a detailed qualitative review of 20 high-quality articles from VHB-JOURQUAL-C-ranked journals or higher. By employing an inductive-deductive approach, the authors identify consistent and conflicting definitions, diverse constructs for each D-I-S concept, and numerous positive organizational effects. This article provides a structured overview of existing D-I-S definitions and introduces a model to distinguish environmental, organizational, and solution levels. Additionally, it presents a visual framework of the direct and mediated positive effects of D-I-S in organizations. Overall, these insights underscore the critical role of digital transformation in advancing innovation and sustainability, offering valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners alike.}, subject = {Nachhaltigkeit}, language = {en} }