@inproceedings{KuhnKaelbererKrausetal.2014, author = {Kuhn, Martina and K{\"a}lberer, Nina and Kraus, Christian and Abke, J{\"o}rg and Gold, Carolin}, title = {Eine Wiki-Plattform als kollaboratives Kommunikations- und Lernmedium im Software Engineering: Einsatz und Evaluation}, series = {Grundfragen Multimedialen Lehrens und Lernens: der Qualit{\"a}tspakt E-Learning im Hochschulpakt 2020 ; Tagungsband GML 2 2014 [13. - 14. M{\"a}rz]}, booktitle = {Grundfragen Multimedialen Lehrens und Lernens: der Qualit{\"a}tspakt E-Learning im Hochschulpakt 2020 ; Tagungsband GML 2 2014 [13. - 14. M{\"a}rz]}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {GML 2 <2012, Berlin>}, isbn = {978-3-8309-3106-5}, pages = {334 -- 336}, year = {2014}, subject = {Computerunterst{\"u}tztes Lernen}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{JaroschNaujoksWandtneretal.2019, author = {Jarosch, Oliver and Naujoks, Frederik and Wandtner, Bernhard and Gold, Christian and Marberger, Claus and Weidl, Galia and Schrauf, Michael}, title = {The Impact of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Take-over Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving - A Review of the Empirical Evidence}, series = {9. Tagung Automatisiertes Fahren, M{\"u}nchen, Partner T{\"U}V S{\"u}d, November 2019}, booktitle = {9. Tagung Automatisiertes Fahren, M{\"u}nchen, Partner T{\"U}V S{\"u}d, November 2019}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Conditional automated driving (CAD) systems (SAE level 3) will soon be introduced to the public market. This automation level is designed to take care of all aspects of the dynamic driving task in specific application areas and does not require the driver to continuously monitor the system performance. However, in contrast to higher levels of automation the "fallback-ready" user always has to be able to regain control if requested by the system. As CAD allows the driver to engage in non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) past human factors research has looked at their effects on takeover time and quality especially in short-term takeover situations. In order to understand how takeover performance is impacted by different NDRTs, this paper summarizes and compares available results according to the NDRT's impact on the sensoric, motoric and cognitive transition. In addition, aspects of arousal and motivation are considered. Due to the heterogeneity of the empirical work and the available data practically relevant effects can only be attested for NDRTs that cause severe discrepancies between the current driver state and the requirements of the takeover task, such as sensoric and motoric unavailability. The paper concludes by discussing methodological issues and recommending the development of standardized methods for the future.}, subject = {Fahrerassistenzsystem}, language = {en} }