@inproceedings{JahnGoldVeerkampReuteretal.2019, author = {Jahn, Sabrina and Gold-Veerkamp, Carolin and Reuter, Rebecca and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Abke, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Secure Software Engineering in Academic Education: Students' Preconceptions of IT Security}, series = {Proceedings of the 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Inno-vation (ICERI) 2019}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Inno-vation (ICERI) 2019}, isbn = {978-84-09-14755-7}, pages = {6825 -- 6834}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Over the last years, IT Security has slowly found its way into teaching in higher education. It is becoming increasingly important to integrate knowledge about the development of secure systems (secure software engineering) into academic teaching. However, teaching security and secure software engineering to non-computer-scientists is rare. Therefore, we focus our research on the integration of IT Security into software engineering education of non-computer scientists, particularly electrical engineers, by means of inductive teaching- and learning-arrangements. As a prerequisite for inductive teaching, our paper deals with engineering and computer science students' preconceptions of the topics IT Security and secure software engineering to identify learning contents and corresponding teaching methods to improve academic learning and teaching in both areas in the future. To identify those preconceptions, we conducted guided interviews with freshmen of engineering and computer science studies from different German Universities of Applied Sciences, containing questions about what they have heard about the topic of IT Security. The interviews were coded according to the coding process of the Grounded Theory Method of Corbin and Strauss [1], with focus on open and axial coding. The goal was to derive a first catalogue of students' preconceptions according to IT Security and secure software engineering. We present the first version of the catalogue in the paper.}, subject = {Software Engineering}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KloppGoldVeerkampAbkeetal.2020, author = {Klopp, Marco and Gold-Veerkamp, Carolin and Abke, J{\"o}rg and Borgeest, Kai and Reuter, Rebecca and Jahn, Sabrina and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Sedelmaier, Yvonne and Lehmann, Alexander and Landes, Dieter}, title = {Totally Different and yet so Alike - Three Concepts to Use Scrum in Higher Education}, series = {ECSEE '20: European Conference on Software Engineering Education}, volume = {2020}, booktitle = {ECSEE '20: European Conference on Software Engineering Education}, isbn = {ISBN 78-1-4503-7752-2}, pages = {12 -- 21}, year = {2020}, subject = {Hochschuldidaktik}, language = {en} } @article{KroehnEifertReuteretal.2016, author = {Kr{\"o}hn, Michael and Eifert, Erik and Reuter, Norbert and Hahnle, Michael and Prochus, Tobias and Doll, Konrad}, title = {Gestenbasierte Prozessanalyse}, series = {atp edition}, volume = {2016}, journal = {atp edition}, number = {12}, editor = {Albers, Thomas and Kegel, Gunther and Oprzynski, J{\"o}rn and Otten, Wilhelm and Steckenreiter, Thomas}, pages = {26 -- 33}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Dieser Beitrag beschreibt ein intelligentes Assistenzsystem, das manuelle Montageprozesse beobachten und Auff{\"a}lligkeiten im Ablauf identifizieren kann. Die mit der Montage verbundenen Handgriffe werden als eine Abfolge von Gesten erfasst. Aus den Zeitabst{\"a}nden zwischen den Handgriffen lassen sich statistische Aussagen gewinnen. So kann beispielsweise eine große Streuung auf Qualit{\"a}ts- oder Konzeptprobleme hinweisen. Den Kern des Assistenzsystems bildet die Kinect von Microsoft. Die Autoren stellen das Konzept und erste Ergebnisse des Verfahrens vor.}, language = {de} } @article{KroehnReuterHahnleetal.2016, author = {Kr{\"o}hn, Michael and Reuter, Norbert and Hahnle, Michael and Prochus, Tobias and Doll, Konrad}, title = {Gestengesteuerte Prozessanalyse}, series = {atp edition - Automatisierungstechnische Praxis}, volume = {58}, journal = {atp edition - Automatisierungstechnische Praxis}, number = {12}, pages = {26 -- 33}, year = {2016}, subject = {Prozessanalyse}, language = {de} } @incollection{TouboulicMcCarthySannoeetal.2022, author = {Touboulic, Anne and McCarthy, Lucy and Sann{\"o}, Anna and Reuter, Carsten}, title = {Action research for supply chain management: reflections and practical guide}, series = {Handbook of Research Methods for Supply Chain Management}, booktitle = {Handbook of Research Methods for Supply Chain Management}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, isbn = {9781788975865}, doi = {10.4337/9781788975865.00014}, pages = {149 -- 168}, year = {2022}, subject = {Supply Chain Management}, language = {en} } @book{Hofmann2008, author = {Hofmann, Georg Rainer}, title = {Beratungsbetriebe-IT-Beratung}, publisher = {Verlag des LIWS}, address = {Aschaffenburg}, isbn = {3-9808791-3-5}, year = {2008}, subject = {EDV-Beratung}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{HofmannHoldenriederSchuermann2008, author = {Hofmann, Georg Rainer and Holdenrieder, Judith and Sch{\"u}rmann, Gerd}, title = {Verbesserung der Akzeptanz von "Wirtschaftlichkeit" im eGovernment durch ein integriertes Wirtschaftlichkeitsmodell}, series = {E-Government Tagung, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2008, M{\"u}nchen}, booktitle = {E-Government Tagung, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2008, M{\"u}nchen}, year = {2008}, subject = {Electronic Government}, language = {de} } @book{Hofmann2010, author = {Hofmann, Georg Rainer}, title = {Beratungsbetriebslehre - ein gestaltungsorientiertes Modell und Kompendium f{\"u}r die Wirtschaftsinformatik}, series = {Forschungsbericht Nr. 1/2010; TU Ilmenau}, volume = {2010}, journal = {Forschungsbericht Nr. 1/2010; TU Ilmenau}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsbibliothek}, address = {Ilmenau}, isbn = {978-3-938940-26-6}, pages = {67}, year = {2010}, subject = {Wirtschaftsinformatik}, language = {de} } @article{HofmannFrank2009, author = {Hofmann, Georg Rainer and Frank, Ulrich}, title = {IT-Controlling und IT-Produktivit{\"a}t}, series = {Wirtschaftsinformatik}, volume = {2009}, journal = {Wirtschaftsinformatik}, number = {3}, pages = {233 -- 234}, year = {2009}, subject = {Informationstechnik}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{HofmannSchumacher2014, author = {Hofmann, Georg Rainer and Schumacher, Meike}, title = {Studie zur Rezeption des GovData Datenportals des BMI - zur Diskussion der Akzeptanz des "Open Data"-Konzepts}, series = {Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik - Prozesse, Technologie, Anwendungen, Systeme und Management 2014}, booktitle = {Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik - Prozesse, Technologie, Anwendungen, Systeme und Management 2014}, publisher = {Verlag News \& Media}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-936527-38-4}, pages = {177 -- 187}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Im Februar 2013 ist „GovData - Das Datenportal f{\"u}r Deutschland", das von Fraunhofer Institut FOKUS (Berlin) im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums des Inneren (BMI) entwickelt wurde, als Beta-Version in Betrieb gegangen. Im Sommersemester 2013 untersuchte eine studentische Arbeitsgruppe am Information Management Institut (IMI) der Hochschule Aschaffenburg in Kooperation mit Fraunhofer FOKUS, die Rezeption dieses Portals. Ziel dieser Studie war es, auf Grundlage von Internetrecherchen und Experteninterviews, sowohl Kritiker und Kritikpunkte, als auch deren Adressaten zu ermitteln. Weiter wurden auf Grundlage dieser Ergebnisse Handlungsempfehlungen zur Erh{\"o}hung der Akzeptanz gegeben.}, subject = {Electronic Government}, language = {de} }