Refine
Has Fulltext
- no (2)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Three-dimensional (3D) C-arm computed tomography is a new and innovative imaging technique. It uses two-dimensional (2D) X-ray projections acquired with a flat-panel detector C-arm angiography system to generate CT-like images. To this end, the C-arm system performs a sweep around the patient, acquiring up to several hundred 2D views. They serve as input for 3D cone-beam reconstruction. Resulting voxel data sets can be visualized either as cross-sectional images or as 3D data sets using different volume rendering techniques. Initially targeted at 3D high-contrast neurovascular applications, 3D C-arm imaging has been continuously improved over the years and is now capable of providing CT-like soft-tissue image quality. In combination with 2D fluoroscopic or radiographic imaging, information provided by 3D C-arm imaging can be valuable for therapy planning, guidance, and outcome assessment all in the interventional suite.
Purpose: Catheter ablation is a common treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF). Interventional C-arm X-ray systems are used for guiding AF procedures, employing standard view positions. Since the projection angles are not adapted to the individual patient anatomy, standard projections do not necessarily offer the best views of important anatomical structures. Using a pre-procedural 3D data set acquired with MRI or CT, suitable ablation sites (lines) can be identified in advance so an ablation plan can be superimposed on fluoroscopic images to guide the procedure.
Methods: A method was developed to estimate optimized projection views for biplane X-ray C-arm systems based on planning data for AF ablation procedures. The estimated viewing angles were compared to standard angulations using an objective quality metric, the length of the planned ablation line as seen under X-ray. This method was tested using 35 clinical datasets annotated with planned ablation lines for ipsilateral pulmonary vein isolation.
Results: The optimized views computed using the new method yielded 28 % less foreshortening of pre-planned ablation lines on average. In one case, anatomy-based view calculation lead to a 69 % reduction in foreshortening.
Conclusion: The commonly used standard views provide reasonable a priori choices, and some improvement is possible by switching among common angulations depending on the treatment region. Further gains are possible by using anatomy-optimized biplane C-arm angulations.