TY - JOUR A1 - Witter, Stefanie T1 - Resettlement Services: Room for Improvement in Pre-departure and Post-arrival Services JF - Quarterly on Refugee Problems - AWR Bulletin Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v62i1.41 VL - 62 IS - 1 SP - 35 EP - 58 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Cazan, Ana-Maria A1 - David, Laura Teodora A1 - Truța, Camelia A1 - Maican, Cătălin Ioan A1 - Henter, Ramona A1 - Năstasă, Laura Elena A1 - Nummela, Niko A1 - Vesterinen, Olli A1 - Rosnes, Arne Morten A1 - Tungland, Tobias A1 - Gudevold, Eirin A1 - Digernes, Mari A1 - Unz, Dagmar A1 - Witter, Stefanie A1 - Pavalache-Ilie, Mariela T1 - Technostress and time spent online - A cross-cultural comparison for teachers and students JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Introduction Research shows that ICT is beneficial for academics and students, aiding in overcoming distance barriers, streamlining administration, and improving teaching and learning processes. However, the negative impact of technology, particularly technostress, are garnering attention. In the context of the concerns about technostress among higher education institutions (HEI), the aim of the study is to analyze the technostress creators and inhibitors for university teachers and students in different European countries. The topical concept of digital well-being is seen as “a subjective individual experience of optimal balance between the benefits and drawbacks obtained from mobile connectivity, focusing on the personal perception of what amount of time spent using technology is optimal so that well-being is preserved”. Method To explore specific aspects related to use of technology, two – parallel online surveys for academics (N = 446) and students (N = 660) from four European countries (Romania, Germany, Norway, and Finland) were conducted between November 2022 – January 2023. The surveys included the Technostress scale and the Technostress Inhibitors Scale, the Technology self-efficacy Scale, and a questionnaire focusing on socio-demographic aspects, work experience, academic field, dimensions related to the actual use of technology and participants perception on the optimal use of technology for work, learning or personal tasks, in terms of the period of day/week and amount of time spent. We also inquired about the social support given and received when using technology and the formal and informal rules, expectations, policies, punishments, and rewards regarding the use of technology. Results The findings suggest that the perceived optimal use of technology is significantly lower than the actual use for all the contexts. Overuse of technology was associated with technostress. Our results also showed that technology self-efficacy and social support from colleagues and teachers are negatively associated with technostress. Country differences regarding technostress and time spent online were also observed. Discussions Despite the needed caution in interpreting the results because of the unbalanced sample size across countries, the results could be used to develop research and support interventions within European countries to promote digital well-being, a better work-life balance with further positive effects on academic satisfaction and work/learning productivity. KW - technostress KW - digital wellbeing KW - technology self-efficacy KW - optimal use of technology Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1377200 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 15 PB - Frontiers Media SA ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Witter, Stefanie A1 - Schwab, Frank A1 - Unz, Dagmar T1 - Toleranz statt Schlagabtausch JF - mediendiskurs Rache Vergeltung in den Medien N2 - Von Hart aber fair über Markus Lanz bis hin zu Maischberger: In Talkshows werden täglich kontroverse Themen diskutiert – häufig gesellschaftspolitische Dilemmata, bei denen es nicht die eine richtige Lösung gibt. Schnell bilden sich zwei Lager, die beide überzeugt sind, im Recht zu sein (Schwarz 2014). Solche Zielkonflikte erzeugen Spannung – vermutlich ein Erfolgsfaktor für hohe Einschaltquoten. Doch viele Sendungen beanspruchen für sich mehr und wollen ihrem Bildungsauftrag gerecht werden: Sie wollen individuelle und öffentliche Meinungsbildung fördern und Verständnis für andere Perspektiven anregen. Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.65409/TSSW7277112 SN - 2751-0379 VL - 112 IS - 2/2025 SP - 72 EP - 79 PB - Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle Fernsehen e.V. ER -