020 Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (6) (entfernen)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (6)
Schlagworte
- Digitalisierung (2)
- Archiv (1)
- Archivbestand (1)
- Bibliografische Daten (1)
- Bibliothek (1)
- Curriculumentwicklung (1)
- Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Forschungsprojekt (1)
- Graphische Benutzeroberfläche (1)
Institut
- FB4 Design (6) (entfernen)
This poster summary offers a brief overview of the methodical approach behind the process of curriculum development for the design degree programmes at the University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (Fachhochschule Potsdam [FHP]), in adherence to the underlying principle of an iterative ideation process as part of the interdisciplinary project entitled “Design NOT plain vanilla”. It presents an approach enriched by the example of “student” stakeholder group integration. First, the shared attributes linked to digitalisation that characterise the transformation of job descriptions found in the epistemic cultures of design and information sciences, and the differences in existing curricula concepts were outlined. Based on this, an explanation is provided as to why – as per the authors’ interpretation – the methodical approach that shapes the development of curricula as well as the underlying paradigms of the curriculum concept within the design degree programmes could provide prudent impetus for the process of curriculum development, as well as for the structure of curricula in information Science
degree programmes.
Wie sieht die Zukunft der Recherche in digitalen Bibliothekskatalogen aus? Wie können umfangreiche und heterogene Sammlungsbestände mit Hilfe von Datenvisualisierungen besser zugänglich gemacht werden? Kann man durch eine digitale Bibliothek flanieren und dabei den Bestand auf ganz neue Art entdecken? Diese Fragen standen im Zentrum eines Forschungsprojekts, das ein interdisziplinäres Team von Forscherinnen und Forschern des Urban Complexity Lab der FHP im vergangenen Jahr in Kooperation mit der DNB durchgeführt hat. Dieser Artikel stellt das Hauptergebnis des Projekts vor: DNBVIS, der Prototyp eines experimentellen Kataloginterfaces. Anschließend werden die Vorgehensweise und wichtigsten Erkenntnisse des Projekts zusammengefasst.
In this paper, we present a field study that examines the development, application and maintenance of classification systems and controlled vocabularies in three archives documenting lesbian, trans* and queer-feminist histories. Queer archives face the challenge of documenting identities that are inherently characterized by embracing fluidity and ambiguity. Thus, queer identities are diametrically opposed to archival procedures of unambiguous classification. At the same time, queer activism relies partly on coherent identity categories in order to be able to act politically. We examine the pragmatic solutions that queer archives establish when dealing with tensions between those requirements. Our goal is to contribute to the ongoing discussions about the ethical dimensions of classification practices. Following the work of Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star (1999) we use the concept of boundary objects as a central theoretical foundation of our research. This concept allows for tracing the negotiations and decision-making processes that influenced the creation of a specific classification system. Through conducting semi-structured interviews with staff members of queer archives in Germany we collected data about their efforts to archive the history of queer communities. Although there are initiatives developing metadata standards for queer identities, these standards are only used to a limited extent by the queer archives we examined. Rather, those archives established individual strategies for categorizing objects that are rooted in their specific history. We argue that classification systems and controlled vocabularies themselves can be understood as artifacts documenting the history of queer movements.