Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (4)
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (4)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (4)
Schlagworte
- Desinformation (4)
- Fehlinformation (4)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Check-worthiness estimation (2)
- Fact-checking (2)
We describe the seventh edition of the CheckThat! lab, part of the 2024 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). Previous editions of CheckThat! focused on the main tasks of the information verification pipeline: check-worthiness, identifying previously fact-checked claims, supporting evidence retrieval, and claim verification. In this edition, we introduced some new challenges, offering six tasks in fifteen languages (Arabic, Bulgarian, English, Dutch, French, Georgian, German, Greek, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Slovene, Spanish, and code-mixed Hindi-English): Task 1 on estimation of check-worthiness (the only task that has been present in all CheckThat! editions), Task 2 on identification of subjectivity (a follow up of the CheckThat! 2023 edition), Task 3 on identification of the use of persuasion techniques (a follow up of SemEval 2023), Task 4 on detection of hero, villain, and victim from memes (a follow up of CONSTRAINT 2022), Task 5 on rumor verification using evidence from authorities (new task), and Task 6 on robustness of credibility assessment with adversarial examples (new task). These are challenging classification and retrieval problems at the document and at the span level, including multilingual and multimodal settings. This year, CheckThat! was one of the most popular labs at CLEF-2024 in terms of team registrations: 130 teams. More than one-third of them (a total of 46) actually participated.
We describe the sixth edition of the CheckThat! lab, part of the 2023 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The five previous editions of CheckThat! focused on the main tasks of the information verification pipeline: check-worthiness, verifying whether a claim was fact-checked before, supporting evidence retrieval, and claim verification. In this sixth edition, we zoom into some new problems and for the first time we offer five tasks in seven languages: Arabic, Dutch, English, German, Italian, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 asks to determine whether an item - text or text plus image- is check-worthy. Task 2 aims to predict whether a sentence from a news article is subjective or not. Task 3 asks to assess the political bias of the news at the article and at the media outlet level. Task 4 focuses on the factuality of reporting of news media. Finally, Task 5 looks at identifying authorities in Twitter that could help verify a given target claim. For a second year, CheckThat! was the most popular lab at CLEF-2023 in terms of team registrations: 127 teams. About one-third of them (a total of 37) actually participated.
Overview of the CLEF-2022 CheckThat! Lab on Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic and Fake News Detection
(2022)
We describe the fifth edition of the CheckThat! lab, part of the 2022 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The lab evaluates technology supporting tasks related to factuality in multiple languages: Arabic, Bulgarian, Dutch, English, German, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 asks to identify relevant claims in tweets in terms of check-worthiness, verifiability, harmfullness, and attention-worthiness. Task 2 asks to detect previously fact-checked claims that could be relevant to fact-check a new claim. It targets both tweets and political debates/speeches. Task 3 asks to predict the veracity of the main claim in a news article. CheckThat! was the most popular lab at CLEF-2022 in terms of team registrations: 137 teams. More than one-third (37%) of them actually participated: 18, 7, and 26 teams submitted 210, 37, and 126 official runs for tasks 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
The fifth edition of the CheckThat! Lab is held as part of the 2022 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The lab evaluates technology supporting various factuality tasks in seven languages: Arabic, Bulgarian, Dutch, English, German, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 focuses on disinformation related to the ongoing COVID-19 infodemic and politics, and asks to predict whether a tweet is worth fact-checking, contains a verifiable factual claim, is harmful to the society, or is of interest to policy makers and why. Task 2 asks to retrieve claims that have been previously fact-checked and that could be useful to verify the claim in a tweet. Task 3 is to predict the veracity of a news article. Tasks 1 and 3 are classification problems, while Task 2 is a ranking one.
