Scaffolding Reflection, not Generation

  • In the context of design education, this study explores how a non-directive social robot (Furhat) can support early-stage idea generation. The robot was intentionally designed not to offer suggestions or solutions, distinguishing it from typical generative AI tools. Instead, it engaged students using metaphors, open-ended questions, and active listening. The aim was to examine how participants responded to a system that deliberately resisted the generative behavior commonly associated with tools like ChatGPT. Many participants appreciated the robot’s reflective role, noting that it helped them clarify and structure ideas without imposing direction. However, as the design process progressed, some expressed frustration and a desire for more proactive input—ranging from creative suggestions and emotional feedback to auditory elements, such as singing or whistling a melody. This mismatch between the robot’s expressive embodiment and its intentionally limited functionality led to moments of tension. Rather than viewing this as aIn the context of design education, this study explores how a non-directive social robot (Furhat) can support early-stage idea generation. The robot was intentionally designed not to offer suggestions or solutions, distinguishing it from typical generative AI tools. Instead, it engaged students using metaphors, open-ended questions, and active listening. The aim was to examine how participants responded to a system that deliberately resisted the generative behavior commonly associated with tools like ChatGPT. Many participants appreciated the robot’s reflective role, noting that it helped them clarify and structure ideas without imposing direction. However, as the design process progressed, some expressed frustration and a desire for more proactive input—ranging from creative suggestions and emotional feedback to auditory elements, such as singing or whistling a melody. This mismatch between the robot’s expressive embodiment and its intentionally limited functionality led to moments of tension. Rather than viewing this as a shortcoming, we frame it as a deliberate design strategy: by withholding generative output, the robot fosters independent ideation. These findings contribute to broader discussions in human-robot interaction, particularly concerning creativity, user expectations, and the design of non-directive AI systems.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Wisanukorn Boribun, Frank HeidmannORCIDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-2379-5_36
ISBN:978-981-95-2379-5
ISSN:0302-9743
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):Social Robotics + AI : 17th International Conference, ICSR+AI 2025, Naples, Italy, September 10–12, 2025, Proceedings, Part I
Untertitel (Englisch):Exploring Non-Directive Social Robot Interaction in Early-Stage Ideation
Verlag:Springer Nature
Verlagsort:Berlin
Herausgeber*in:Mariacarla Staffa, John-John Cabibihan, Bruno Siciliano, Shuzhi Sam Ge, Leon Bodenhagen, Adriana Tapus, Silvia Rossi, Filippo Cavallo, Laura Fiorini, Marco Matarese, Hongsheng He
Dokumentart:Konferenzveröffentlichung
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2026
Veröffentlichende Institution:Fachhochschule Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:08.01.2026
GND-Schlagwort:Benutzererlebnis; Prompt Engineering; Soziale Robotik
Erste Seite:482
Letzte Seite:489
Fachbereiche und Zentrale Einrichtungen:FB4 Design
Forschungs- und An-Institute / Inst. für angewandte Forschung Urbane Zukunft (IaF)
DDC-Klassifikation:000 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 000 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme
Lizenz (Deutsch): Keine öffentliche Lizenz - es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.