Shaping Digital Cultural Policy Strategically
- The “digital condition” (Stalder, 2018, 8), the new conditio sine qua non of today’s lifestyle in modern societies, not only influences all modes of production and reception both in the publicly funded as well as in the commercial cultural sectors, but also regarding how humans perceive, consume and participate in a digital society and its culture. Cultural policy under the digital condition has been recently described as a “contingent, complex, and convergent policy area field” by cultural policy researchers Ole Marius Hylland and Jaka Primorac (Hylland/ Primorac, 2024, 15). Although the term digital cultural policy “remains to be fully unravelled” according to Roberge and Chantepie (2017, 295), its scope manifests itself “in an intersection between sectorial and culture-specific policies and cross-sectorial policies relevant to all sectors, including general regulation of digital infrastructure”, say Hylland/ Primorac (2024, 193). In a field where “literature that is explicitly relating digitalization to cultural policy is stillThe “digital condition” (Stalder, 2018, 8), the new conditio sine qua non of today’s lifestyle in modern societies, not only influences all modes of production and reception both in the publicly funded as well as in the commercial cultural sectors, but also regarding how humans perceive, consume and participate in a digital society and its culture. Cultural policy under the digital condition has been recently described as a “contingent, complex, and convergent policy area field” by cultural policy researchers Ole Marius Hylland and Jaka Primorac (Hylland/ Primorac, 2024, 15). Although the term digital cultural policy “remains to be fully unravelled” according to Roberge and Chantepie (2017, 295), its scope manifests itself “in an intersection between sectorial and culture-specific policies and cross-sectorial policies relevant to all sectors, including general regulation of digital infrastructure”, say Hylland/ Primorac (2024, 193). In a field where “literature that is explicitly relating digitalization to cultural policy is still quite sparse” (ibid., 12), Hylland and Primorac offer a new working definition. They understand digital cultural policy as “the part of cultural policy that explicitly relates to digital production, distribution or consumption of cultural expressions” (Hylland/ Primorac, 2024, 14) and that is explicitly “treating the nexus created by digitalization, culture, and
policy” (ibid., 15).…


| Verfasserangaben: | Julia GlesnerGND |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://encatc.org/media/7559-tracker_issue-8.pdf#TRACKER_Issue%208.indd%3ASegnalibro%206%3A259 |
| ISSN: | 2959-2364 |
| Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch): | ENCATC Cultural Policy Tracker |
| Verlag: | European network on cultural management |
| Verlagsort: | Ixelles |
| Dokumentart: | Wissenschaftlicher Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung: | 2025 |
| Veröffentlichende Institution: | Fachhochschule Potsdam |
| Datum der Freischaltung: | 25.08.2025 |
| GND-Schlagwort: | Digitalisierung; Kulturpolitik |
| Ausgabe / Heft: | 8 |
| Erste Seite: | 28 |
| Letzte Seite: | 33 |
| Fachbereiche und Zentrale Einrichtungen: | FB2 Stadt | Bau | Kultur / Kulturarbeit |
| DDC-Klassifikation: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften / 300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie |
| 700 Künste und Unterhaltung / 700 Künste | |
| Lizenz (Deutsch): |
