Shaping Digital Cultural Policy Strategically

  • The “digital condition” (Stalder, 2018, 8), the new conditio sine qua non of today’s lifestyle in modern societies, not only influences all modes of production and reception both in the publicly funded as well as in the commercial cultural sectors, but also regarding how humans perceive, consume and participate in a digital society and its culture. Cultural policy under the digital condition has been recently described as a “contingent, complex, and convergent policy area field” by cultural policy researchers Ole Marius Hylland and Jaka Primorac (Hylland/ Primorac, 2024, 15). Although the term digital cultural policy “remains to be fully unravelled” according to Roberge and Chantepie (2017, 295), its scope manifests itself “in an intersection between sectorial and culture-specific policies and cross-sectorial policies relevant to all sectors, including general regulation of digital infrastructure”, say Hylland/ Primorac (2024, 193). In a field where “literature that is explicitly relating digitalization to cultural policy is stillThe “digital condition” (Stalder, 2018, 8), the new conditio sine qua non of today’s lifestyle in modern societies, not only influences all modes of production and reception both in the publicly funded as well as in the commercial cultural sectors, but also regarding how humans perceive, consume and participate in a digital society and its culture. Cultural policy under the digital condition has been recently described as a “contingent, complex, and convergent policy area field” by cultural policy researchers Ole Marius Hylland and Jaka Primorac (Hylland/ Primorac, 2024, 15). Although the term digital cultural policy “remains to be fully unravelled” according to Roberge and Chantepie (2017, 295), its scope manifests itself “in an intersection between sectorial and culture-specific policies and cross-sectorial policies relevant to all sectors, including general regulation of digital infrastructure”, say Hylland/ Primorac (2024, 193). In a field where “literature that is explicitly relating digitalization to cultural policy is still quite sparse” (ibid., 12), Hylland and Primorac offer a new working definition. They understand digital cultural policy as “the part of cultural policy that explicitly relates to digital production, distribution or consumption of cultural expressions” (Hylland/ Primorac, 2024, 14) and that is explicitly “treating the nexus created by digitalization, culture, and policy” (ibid., 15).zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Julia GlesnerGND
URL:https://encatc.org/media/7559-tracker_issue-8.pdf#TRACKER_Issue%208.indd%3ASegnalibro%206%3A259
ISSN:2959-2364
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):ENCATC Cultural Policy Tracker
Verlag:European network on cultural management
Verlagsort:Ixelles
Dokumentart:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2025
Veröffentlichende Institution:Fachhochschule Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:25.08.2025
GND-Schlagwort:Digitalisierung; Kulturpolitik
Ausgabe / Heft:8
Erste Seite:28
Letzte Seite:33
Fachbereiche und Zentrale Einrichtungen:FB2 Stadt | Bau | Kultur / Kulturarbeit
DDC-Klassifikation:300 Sozialwissenschaften / 300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
700 Künste und Unterhaltung / 700 Künste
Lizenz (Deutsch):Keine öffentliche Lizenz - es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.