Taking stock of urban data governance in German small towns

  • As data are becoming increasingly important resources for municipal administrations in the context of urban development, formalization of urban data governance (DG) is considered a prerequisite to systematic municipal data practice for the common good. Unlike for larger cities, it is unclear how common such formalized DG is in rural districts and small towns. We therefore mapped the current status quo in small municipalities in Germany as a case exemplifying the broader phenomenon. We systematically searched online for policy documents on DG in all metropolitan regions, all rural districts, and a quota sample of nearly a sixth of all German small towns. We then performed content analysis of the identified documents along predefined categories of urban development. Results show that hardly any small towns dispose of relevant policy documents. Rural districts are somewhat more active in formally defining DG. Identified policy documents tend to address mostly economic activities, social infrastructure, and demography, whereas Housing andAs data are becoming increasingly important resources for municipal administrations in the context of urban development, formalization of urban data governance (DG) is considered a prerequisite to systematic municipal data practice for the common good. Unlike for larger cities, it is unclear how common such formalized DG is in rural districts and small towns. We therefore mapped the current status quo in small municipalities in Germany as a case exemplifying the broader phenomenon. We systematically searched online for policy documents on DG in all metropolitan regions, all rural districts, and a quota sample of nearly a sixth of all German small towns. We then performed content analysis of the identified documents along predefined categories of urban development. Results show that hardly any small towns dispose of relevant policy documents. Rural districts are somewhat more active in formally defining DG. Identified policy documents tend to address mostly economic activities, social infrastructure, and demography, whereas Housing and Urban design and public space are among the least mentioned categories of urban development.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar
Metadaten
Verfasserangaben:Leonard HigiORCiD, Tobias SchröderORCiDGND, Silke Weidner, Heike NeurothORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2025.10051
ISSN:2632-3249
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):Data & Policy
Verlag:Cambridge University Press
Verlagsort:Cambridge
Dokumentart:Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache:Englisch
Jahr der Erstveröffentlichung:2026
Veröffentlichende Institution:Fachhochschule Potsdam
Datum der Freischaltung:26.01.2026
GND-Schlagwort:Deutschland; Gemeindeverwaltung; Kleinstadt; Nachhaltigkeit; Stadtplanung
Jahrgang:8
Aufsatznummer:e5
Seitenzahl:22
Fachbereiche und Zentrale Einrichtungen:FB5 Informationswissenschaften
Forschungs- und An-Institute / Inst. für angewandte Forschung Urbane Zukunft (IaF)
FB5 Informationswissenschaften / Publikationen des FB Informationswissenschaften
DDC-Klassifikation:300 Sozialwissenschaften / 300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften / 350 Öffentliche Verwaltung, Militärwissenschaft
Open Access:Gold Open Access
Lizenz (Deutsch):Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.