TY - JOUR A1 - Lindner, Nadja A1 - Moeller, Korbinian A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Hasselhorn, Marcus A1 - Lonnemann, Jan T1 - Children’s use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language is related to their numerical magnitude understanding JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Numerical magnitude information is assumed to be spatially represented in the form of a mental number line defined with respect to a body-centred, egocentric frame of reference. In this context, spatial language skills such as mastery of verbal descriptions of spatial position (e.g., in front of, behind, to the right/left) have been proposed to be relevant for grasping spatial relations between numerical magnitudes on the mental number line. We examined 4- to 5-year-old’s spatial language skills in tasks that allow responses in egocentric and allocentric frames of reference, as well as their relative understanding of numerical magnitude (assessed by a number word comparison task). In addition, we evaluated influences of children’s absolute understanding of numerical magnitude assessed by their number word comprehension (montring different numbers using their fingers) and of their knowledge on numerical sequences (determining predecessors and successors as well as identifying missing dice patterns of a series). Results indicated that when considering responses that corresponded to the egocentric perspective, children’s spatial language was associated significantly with their relative numerical magnitude understanding, even after controlling for covariates, such as children’s SES, mental rotation skills, and also absolute magnitude understanding or knowledge on numerical sequences. This suggests that the use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language may facilitate spatial representation of numbers along a mental number line and thus seem important for preschoolers’ relative understanding of numerical magnitude. KW - Räumliches Wissen KW - Vorschulkind KW - Zahlenverständnis KW - Zahlengerade Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943191 SN - 1664-1078 PB - Frontiers Media S.A. CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lohse, Karoline A1 - Hildebrandt, Andrea A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Hypotheses in adult-child interactions stimulate children's reasoning and verbalizations JF - Early Childhood Research Quarterly N2 - Adult-child interactions can support children's development and are established as predictors of program quality in early childhood settings. However, the linguistic components that constitute positive interactions have not yet been studied in detail. This study investigates the effects of hypotheses proposed by adults on children's responses in a dyadic picture-book viewing situation. In 2 experiments, adults’ use of hypotheses (e.g., “Maybe this is a dwarf's door”) was tested against the use of instructive statements (“This is a dwarf's door”) and in combination with open questions (“What do you think, why is the door so small?”). In Experiment 1, hypotheses differed from instructions only by the modal marker “maybe”. Children's responses to hypotheses were longer and contained more self-generated explanations as compared to responses to instructions. The use of hypotheses also seemed to encourage children to attach more importance to their own explanations. In Experiment 2, combining hypotheses with open-ended why questions elicited longer responses but no more self-generated explanations in children than open-ended questions alone. Results indicate that subtle differences in adults’ utterances can directly influence children's reasoning and children's contributions to dialogues. KW - Parent-child interaction therapy KW - Hypothese KW - Kinderfrage KW - Sustained shared thinking Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.014 SN - 0885-2006 VL - 58 SP - 254 EP - 263 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Musholt, Kristina ED - Hebenstreit-Müller, Sabine ED - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog BT - Wie kommen Kinder in den „Raum der Gründe“? T2 - Denken lernen KW - Kommunikation KW - Kind KW - Denken KW - Autonomie Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-96791-010-0 SP - 28 EP - 47 PB - Wamiki CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Luthardt, Jasmin A1 - Bormann, Inka A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Einstellungen pädagogischer Fachkräfte zu anregenden Interaktionen in Kindertagesstätten BT - Fortbildungsbedarfe entdecken mit Cognitive-Affective Maps (CAMs) JF - Frühe Bildung : interdisziplinäre Zeitschrift für Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis N2 - Wie eine pädagogische Fachkraft mit den Kindern interagiert und sie damit in ihrer Entwicklung unterstützt, hängt maßgeblich davon ab, wie sie lernanregenden Interaktionen gegenüber eingestellt ist. Diese Einstellungen werden im Beitrag mit sogenannten cognitive-affective maps (CAMs) erfasst. Zur Erstellung der CAMs wurden leitfadengestützte Interviews mit pädagogischen Fachkräften (N = 18) aus sechs verschiedenen Einrichtungen analysiert. Die CAMs zeigen, dass die befragten Fachkräfte hauptsächlich auf sozial-emotionale Aspekte von Interaktionen rekurrieren und ihre täglichen Interaktionen mit den Kindern selbst positiv bewerten. Konkretes Wissen zu lernanregenden Interaktionsformaten benennen sie hingegen kaum. Ein Vergleich der Einstellungen der Fachkräfte deutet auf teamspezifische Besonderheiten hin. In einigen Einrichtungen sind die Einstellungen der Fachkräfte deutlich homogener als in anderen. Die Ergebnisse werden in ihrer Bedeutung für Fortbildungsangebote diskutiert und CAMs als gewinnbringende Methode zur Eruierung teamspezifischer Fortbildungsbedarfe und als Fortbildungsmethode selbst vorgeschlagen. KW - Kindertagesstätte KW - Kindergartenerziehung KW - Fachkraft KW - Interaktion KW - Bewertung KW - Berufliche Fortbildung Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25462 SN - 2191-9194 VL - 10 IS - 3 SP - 151 EP - 160 PB - Hogrefe Verlag CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glauer, Ramiro A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - No facts without perspectives JF - Synthese N2 - Perner and Roessler (in: Aguilar J, Buckareff A (eds) Causing human action: new perspectives on the causal theory of action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 199–228, 2010) hold that children who do not yet have an understanding of subjective perspectives, i.e., mental states, explain actions by appealing to objective facts. In this paper, we criticize this view. We argue that in order to understand objective facts, subjects need to understand perspectives. By analysing basic fact-expressing assertions, we show that subjects cannot refer to facts if they do not understand two types of perspectivity, namely, spatial and doxastic perspectivity. To avoid conceptual confusion regarding different ways of referring to facts, we distinguish between reference to facts de re and de dicto. KW - Theory of mind KW - Objektivität KW - Subjektivität KW - Sachverhalt Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02958-9 SN - 1573-0964 VL - 199 IS - 1/2 SP - 3825 EP - 3851 PB - Springer Nature CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Rothmaler, Joseph A1 - Thomas, Stefan A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Budde, Rebecca A1 - Pigorsch, Stephanie ED - Thomas, Stefan ED - Rothmaler, Joseph ED - Hildebrandt, Frauke ED - Budde, Rebecca ED - Pigorsch, Stephanie T1 - Partizipation als Gegenstand und Methode der Bildungsforschung BT - Zur Einführung T2 - Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung N2 - Das Thema Partizipation hat in den letzten Jahren in verschiedenen Bereichen der Bildungsforschung zweifellos an Bedeutung gewonnen. Auf der einen Seite werden in fachlichen und wissenschaftlichen Diskursen Beteiligungsmöglichkeiten und -formen in Bildungsinstitutionen und -prozessen verhandelt (Baraldi/Cockburn 2018; Gürlevik/Hurrelmann/Palentien 2016). Auf der anderen Seite ist mit dem Anwachsen des Interesses an partizipativen Forschungsmethoden auch eine stärkere Beteiligung von Akteur*innen an kollaborativen Forschungsprojekten in pädagogischen und sozialen Bildungskontexten unter Einbezug von Kindern und Jugendlichen zu beobachten. KW - Bildungsforschung KW - Partizipation Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-7799-6483-4 SP - 7 EP - 13 PB - Beltz Juventa CY - Weinheim ; Basel ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke ED - Kowalczuk, Ilko-Sascha ED - Ebert, Frank ED - Kulick, Holger T1 - "Affirmative Action" im Osten BT - Hintergründe, Einwandstypen und Stand der Dinge - ein Erfahrungsbericht aus Brandenburg und Berlin T2 - (Ost)Deutschlands Weg : 35 weitere Studien, Prognosen & Interviews : Teil II – Gegenwart und Zukunft KW - Berlin KW - Brandenburg KW - Deutschland (Östliche Länder) KW - Quotierung Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-7425-0676-4 SP - 251 EP - 270 PB - Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung CY - Bonn ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Glauer, Ramiro T1 - Küsse dein Gehirn! BT - Wie können wir uns und die Welt schöner und reicher machen? Navigiere im Raum der Gründe! JF - WamiKi : Das pädagogische Fachmagazin KW - Kindersprache KW - Spielplatz KW - Spracherwerb Y1 - 2021 SN - 2363-7714 VL - 2021 IS - 5 SP - 35 EP - 41 PB - Was mit Kindern GmbH CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Lonnemann, Jan A1 - Glauer, Ramiro T1 - Why Not Just Features? Reconsidering Infants’ Behavior in Individuation Tasks JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - It counts as empirically proven that infants can individuate objects. Object individuation is assumed to be fundamental in the development of infants’ ontology within the object-first account. It crucially relies on an object-file (OF) system, representing both spatiotemporal (“where”) and categorical (“what”) information about objects as solid, cohesive bodies moving continuously in space and time. However, infants’ performance in tasks requiring them to use featural information to detect individuation violations appears to be at odds with the object-first account. In such cases, infants do not appear to be able to develop correct expectations about the numerosity of objects. Recently, proponents of the object-first account proposed that these individuation failures result from integration errors between the OF system and an additional physical reasoning system. We are going to argue that the predictions of a feature-based physical-reasoning (PR) system are sufficient for explaining infants’ behavior. The striking predictive power of the PR system calls into question the relevance of the OF system and, thereby, challenges the assumption that infants can individuate objects early on. KW - Individuation KW - function-based learning KW - spatiotemporal individuation KW - individuation failures KW - feature-based learning KW - frame of reference KW - Individuationsprozess KW - Säugling Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-24896 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 11 IS - Okt. PB - Frontiers Media S.A. CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Luthardt, Jasmin A1 - Schröder, Tobias A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Bormann, Inka T1 - “And then we’ll just check if it suits us” : cognitive-affective maps of social innovation in early childhood education JF - Frontiers in Education N2 - The idea that a simple execution of an innovation invented by actors other than those who are expected to apply it is not likely to take place is a truism. We assume, however, in this paper the idea of a discursive production of knowledge on the application of an innovation across different levels of the education system. We aim to shed light on an innovation’s ‘journey’ from educational policy over training providers to teams of professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC). By investigating knowledge and emotions associated with the introduction of an intended innovation using the example of “stimulation interactions” in day care-centers, the paper contributes to research on the transfer of innovations in education. To better understand challenges occurring during the transfer of innovations, we triangulate methods from discourse theory (coding techniques based on GTM) and cognitive science, namely cognitive-affective mapping (according to the scholarly conventions). The data corpus includes educational plans (N = 2), in-service training programs (N = 123) and group discussions of pedagogical teams (N = 6) who participated in an in-service training on the subject, stimulating interaction. Findings underline that similar messages from the inventors on the educational policy level are received and processed heterogeneously by the teams of pedagogues as a result of their preexisting views, routine practices and experiences with intended innovations through in-service trainings. Besides, a diffuse mixture of competing and contradictory information is communicated to the professionals and, hence, collides with the in-service training providers’ and educational policy actors’ expectations on the processing of the intended innovation. Specific knowledge elements and their valences are diametrically opposed to each other. Dissonances like these are considered as obstacles to social innovation. The obstacles are caused by the lack of a ‘common language’ beyond all levels. Hence, policy-makers and in-service-training providers should anticipate the supportive as well as competing knowledge-emotional complexes of professionals and take these into account when communicating an intended innovation. KW - Sozialinnovation KW - Kartierung KW - Kleinkindpädagogik KW - Bildungspolitik KW - Lehrerfortbildung KW - Triangulierung Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00033 SN - 2504-284X VL - 5 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER -