TY - CHAP A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Musholt, Kristina ED - Hebenstreit-Müller, Sabine ED - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog BT - Wie kommen Kinder in den „Raum der Gründe“? T2 - Denken lernen KW - Kommunikation KW - Kind KW - Denken KW - Autonomie Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-96791-010-0 SP - 28 EP - 47 PB - Wamiki CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Luthardt, Jasmin A1 - Bormann, Inka A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Einstellungen pädagogischer Fachkräfte zu anregenden Interaktionen in Kindertagesstätten BT - Fortbildungsbedarfe entdecken mit Cognitive-Affective Maps (CAMs) JF - Frühe Bildung : interdisziplinäre Zeitschrift für Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis N2 - Wie eine pädagogische Fachkraft mit den Kindern interagiert und sie damit in ihrer Entwicklung unterstützt, hängt maßgeblich davon ab, wie sie lernanregenden Interaktionen gegenüber eingestellt ist. Diese Einstellungen werden im Beitrag mit sogenannten cognitive-affective maps (CAMs) erfasst. Zur Erstellung der CAMs wurden leitfadengestützte Interviews mit pädagogischen Fachkräften (N = 18) aus sechs verschiedenen Einrichtungen analysiert. Die CAMs zeigen, dass die befragten Fachkräfte hauptsächlich auf sozial-emotionale Aspekte von Interaktionen rekurrieren und ihre täglichen Interaktionen mit den Kindern selbst positiv bewerten. Konkretes Wissen zu lernanregenden Interaktionsformaten benennen sie hingegen kaum. Ein Vergleich der Einstellungen der Fachkräfte deutet auf teamspezifische Besonderheiten hin. In einigen Einrichtungen sind die Einstellungen der Fachkräfte deutlich homogener als in anderen. Die Ergebnisse werden in ihrer Bedeutung für Fortbildungsangebote diskutiert und CAMs als gewinnbringende Methode zur Eruierung teamspezifischer Fortbildungsbedarfe und als Fortbildungsmethode selbst vorgeschlagen. KW - Kindertagesstätte KW - Kindergartenerziehung KW - Fachkraft KW - Interaktion KW - Bewertung KW - Berufliche Fortbildung Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25462 SN - 2191-9194 VL - 10 IS - 3 SP - 151 EP - 160 PB - Hogrefe Verlag CY - Göttingen ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glauer, Ramiro A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - No facts without perspectives JF - Synthese N2 - Perner and Roessler (in: Aguilar J, Buckareff A (eds) Causing human action: new perspectives on the causal theory of action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 199–228, 2010) hold that children who do not yet have an understanding of subjective perspectives, i.e., mental states, explain actions by appealing to objective facts. In this paper, we criticize this view. We argue that in order to understand objective facts, subjects need to understand perspectives. By analysing basic fact-expressing assertions, we show that subjects cannot refer to facts if they do not understand two types of perspectivity, namely, spatial and doxastic perspectivity. To avoid conceptual confusion regarding different ways of referring to facts, we distinguish between reference to facts de re and de dicto. KW - Theory of mind KW - Objektivität KW - Subjektivität KW - Sachverhalt Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02958-9 SN - 1573-0964 VL - 199 IS - 1/2 SP - 3825 EP - 3851 PB - Springer Nature CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Rothmaler, Joseph A1 - Thomas, Stefan A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Budde, Rebecca A1 - Pigorsch, Stephanie ED - Thomas, Stefan ED - Rothmaler, Joseph ED - Hildebrandt, Frauke ED - Budde, Rebecca ED - Pigorsch, Stephanie T1 - Partizipation als Gegenstand und Methode der Bildungsforschung BT - Zur Einführung T2 - Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung N2 - Das Thema Partizipation hat in den letzten Jahren in verschiedenen Bereichen der Bildungsforschung zweifellos an Bedeutung gewonnen. Auf der einen Seite werden in fachlichen und wissenschaftlichen Diskursen Beteiligungsmöglichkeiten und -formen in Bildungsinstitutionen und -prozessen verhandelt (Baraldi/Cockburn 2018; Gürlevik/Hurrelmann/Palentien 2016). Auf der anderen Seite ist mit dem Anwachsen des Interesses an partizipativen Forschungsmethoden auch eine stärkere Beteiligung von Akteur*innen an kollaborativen Forschungsprojekten in pädagogischen und sozialen Bildungskontexten unter Einbezug von Kindern und Jugendlichen zu beobachten. KW - Bildungsforschung KW - Partizipation Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-7799-6483-4 SP - 7 EP - 13 PB - Beltz Juventa CY - Weinheim ; Basel ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Luthardt, Jasmin A1 - Schröder, Tobias A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Bormann, Inka T1 - “And then we’ll just check if it suits us” : cognitive-affective maps of social innovation in early childhood education JF - Frontiers in Education N2 - The idea that a simple execution of an innovation invented by actors other than those who are expected to apply it is not likely to take place is a truism. We assume, however, in this paper the idea of a discursive production of knowledge on the application of an innovation across different levels of the education system. We aim to shed light on an innovation’s ‘journey’ from educational policy over training providers to teams of professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC). By investigating knowledge and emotions associated with the introduction of an intended innovation using the example of “stimulation interactions” in day care-centers, the paper contributes to research on the transfer of innovations in education. To better understand challenges occurring during the transfer of innovations, we triangulate methods from discourse theory (coding techniques based on GTM) and cognitive science, namely cognitive-affective mapping (according to the scholarly conventions). The data corpus includes educational plans (N = 2), in-service training programs (N = 123) and group discussions of pedagogical teams (N = 6) who participated in an in-service training on the subject, stimulating interaction. Findings underline that similar messages from the inventors on the educational policy level are received and processed heterogeneously by the teams of pedagogues as a result of their preexisting views, routine practices and experiences with intended innovations through in-service trainings. Besides, a diffuse mixture of competing and contradictory information is communicated to the professionals and, hence, collides with the in-service training providers’ and educational policy actors’ expectations on the processing of the intended innovation. Specific knowledge elements and their valences are diametrically opposed to each other. Dissonances like these are considered as obstacles to social innovation. The obstacles are caused by the lack of a ‘common language’ beyond all levels. Hence, policy-makers and in-service-training providers should anticipate the supportive as well as competing knowledge-emotional complexes of professionals and take these into account when communicating an intended innovation. KW - Sozialinnovation KW - Kartierung KW - Kleinkindpädagogik KW - Bildungspolitik KW - Lehrerfortbildung KW - Triangulierung Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00033 SN - 2504-284X VL - 5 PB - Frontiers Media CY - Lausanne ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Musholt, Kristina T1 - Teaching rationality : sustained shared thinking as a means for learning to navigate the space of reasons JF - Journal of Philosophy of Education N2 - Human thought can be characterised as being situated in the ‘space of reasons’. That is to say that human thought is guided by the norms of theoretical and practical rationality which, in turn, enable autonomous thinking. But how do children learn to navigate the space of reasons? Building on the work of Tugendhat and Bakhurst, among others, we argue, first, that this process involves the acquisition of propositional thought and that it is an essentially social one in which both children and adults take an active role. Second, and more specifically, by drawing on Brandom's theory of meaning, we provide a philosophical analysis of empirical findings with respect to the efficacy of ‘Sustained Shared Thinking’ (SST) in early educational settings. We argue that the efficacy of SST is based on its emphasising, modelling and practising those elements of communication that are essential for gaining proficiency in ‘playing the game of giving and asking for reasons’, namely drawing inferences between propositions and concepts and providing justifications for one's assertions. This is achieved by making explicit the inferential relationships between concepts and propositions and by the use of modal and doxastic markers that function as an invitation to a joint search for reasons. KW - Sustained Shared Thinking KW - Denken KW - Kind KW - Vernunft KW - Interaktion Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12407 SN - 1467-9752 VL - 54 IS - 3 SP - 582 EP - 599 PB - Wiley-Blackwell CY - Malden, Mass. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Lonnemann, Jan A1 - Glauer, Ramiro T1 - Why Not Just Features? Reconsidering Infants’ Behavior in Individuation Tasks JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - It counts as empirically proven that infants can individuate objects. Object individuation is assumed to be fundamental in the development of infants’ ontology within the object-first account. It crucially relies on an object-file (OF) system, representing both spatiotemporal (“where”) and categorical (“what”) information about objects as solid, cohesive bodies moving continuously in space and time. However, infants’ performance in tasks requiring them to use featural information to detect individuation violations appears to be at odds with the object-first account. In such cases, infants do not appear to be able to develop correct expectations about the numerosity of objects. Recently, proponents of the object-first account proposed that these individuation failures result from integration errors between the OF system and an additional physical reasoning system. We are going to argue that the predictions of a feature-based physical-reasoning (PR) system are sufficient for explaining infants’ behavior. The striking predictive power of the PR system calls into question the relevance of the OF system and, thereby, challenges the assumption that infants can individuate objects early on. KW - Individuation KW - function-based learning KW - spatiotemporal individuation KW - individuation failures KW - feature-based learning KW - frame of reference KW - Individuationsprozess KW - Säugling Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-24896 SN - 1664-1078 VL - 11 IS - Okt. PB - Frontiers Media S.A. CY - Lausanne ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Macha, Katrin A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Wir müssen mittags nicht mehr schlafen! BT - Veränderungsprozesse mit Kita-Kindern gestalten Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-3-945810-98-9 PB - Wamiki CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke A1 - Glauer, Ramiro A1 - Kachel, Gregor T1 - Coming from a world without objects JF - Mind & Language N2 - While research on object individuation assumes that even very young children are able to perceive objects as particulars, we argue that the results of relevant studies can be explained in terms of feature discrimination. We propose that children start out navigating the world with a feature‐based ontology and only later become able to individuate objects spatiotemporally. Furthermore, object individuation is a cognitively demanding achievement resting on a uniquely human form of enculturation, namely the acquisition of deictic demonstratives. We conclude by outlining empirical expectations for operationalizations of our proposal. KW - demonstratives KW - infant cognition KW - kind‐bias KW - object individuation KW - reference Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25000 VL - 37 IS - 2 SP - 159 EP - 176 PB - Wiley Blackwell Publishing Ltd CY - Oxford, UK ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Große, Gerlind A1 - Hildebrandt, Frauke T1 - Bildung und Interesse BT - Warum die Interessen der Kinder für das Lernen bedeutsam sind und wie sie aufgegriffen werden können JF - Grundschule Aktuell : Zeitschrift des Grundschulverbandes N2 - In diesem Beitrag geht es um die Kräfte, die Kinder beim Lernen antreiben: Neugierde, Interesse, Spaß und Selbstwirksamkeitserfahrungen. Und um die pädagogischen Ansätze, die in der Frühkindlichen Bildung entwickelt wurden, um diese Triebkräfte zu fördern und zu erhalten. KW - Grundschule KW - Pädagogik KW - Entwicklung KW - Kind KW - Lernen Y1 - 2019 UR - https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/read/62368034/gsa145-190118-web SN - 1860-8604 IS - 145 SP - 30 EP - 33 CY - Frankfurt am Main ER -