<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>1582</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>124</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>133</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Sage</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Los Angeles</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-06-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Dissecting the Sociality of Emotion</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In recent years, scholars have come to understand emotions as dynamic and socially constructed—the product of interdependent cultural, relational, situational, and biological influences. While researchers have called for a multilevel theory of emotion construction, any progress toward such a theory must overcome the fragmentation of relevant research across various disciplines and theoretical frameworks. We present affect control theory as a launching point for cross-disciplinary collaboration because of its empirically grounded conceptualization of social mechanisms operating at the interaction, relationship, and cultural levels, and its specification of processes linking social and individual aspects of emotion. After introducing the theory, we illustrate its correspondence with major theories of emotion construction framed at each of four analytical levels: cultural, interactional, individual, and neural.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Emotion review : an international and interdisciplinary journal</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A Multilevel Approach</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1177/1754073913503383</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1754-0739</identifier>
    <author>Kimberly B. Rogers</author>
    <author>Tobias Schröder</author>
    <author>Christian von Scheve</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Gefühl</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Affekt</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Kontrolle</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Sozialität</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="100">Philosophie und Psychologie</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Inst. für angewandte Forschung Urbane Zukunft (IaF)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1583</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>140</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>141</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Sage</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Thousand Oaks, Calif.</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2017-06-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Author Reply</title>
    <abstract language="eng">We are pleased that all the commentators seem to agree that a theory-driven integration across disciplines is a worthwhile endeavor to better understand the social constitution of emotion. In our reply, we first take up the idea of relating affect control theory (ACT) to cultural priming and suggest links to an ACT-inspired constraint satisfaction explanation of priming. Second, we address reservations concerning ACT’s capability to account for emotions with nonconceptual content and to explain stability and change in affective meanings. Third, we clarify the relation of affect control theory to psychological constructionism, in particular with regard to conceptualizations of culture and society. Finally, we suggest that computational models are an adequate tool to address multilevel issues in the study of emotion.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Emotion Review</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="deu">Affect control theory and the sociality of emotion</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1177/1754073913512007</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1754-0747</identifier>
    <author>Kimberly B. Rogers</author>
    <author>Tobias Schröder</author>
    <author>Christian von Scheve</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Affekt</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Kontrolle</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Sozialität</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Gefühl</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="100">Philosophie und Psychologie</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Inst. für angewandte Forschung Urbane Zukunft (IaF)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
