@article{ZoellerMorganSchroeder, author = {Z{\"o}ller, Nikolas and Morgan, Jonathan H. and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias}, title = {Modeling interaction in collaborative groups}, series = {Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation}, volume = {24}, journal = {Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation}, number = {4}, publisher = {Guildford}, address = {SimSoc Consortium}, issn = {1460-7425}, doi = {10.18564/jasss.4699}, pages = {25}, abstract = {This paper studies the dynamics of identity and status management within groups in collaborative settings. We present an agent-based simulation model for group interaction rooted in social psychological theory. The model integrates affect control theory with networked interaction structures and sequential behavior protocols as they are often encountered in task groups. By expressing status hierarchy through network structure, we build a bridge between expectation states theory and affect control theory, and are able to reproduce central results from the expectation states research program in sociological social psychology. Furthermore, we demonstrate how the model can be applied to analyze specialized task groups or sub-cultural domains by combining it with empirical data sources. As an example, we simulate groups of open-source software developers and analyze how cultural expectations influence the occupancy of high status positions in these groups.}, subject = {Affekt}, language = {en} } @incollection{SchoenwetterStaats, author = {Sch{\"o}nwetter, Aline and Staats, Hermann}, title = {Angstst{\"o}rungen : Pr{\"a}valenz, Bedeutung und Implikationen f{\"u}r die Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung}, series = {Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung}, booktitle = {Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin, Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-662-62425-8}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-62426-5_60}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {933 -- 946}, abstract = {Angst ist in unterschiedlichen Formen allt{\"a}glicher Begleiter unseres Lebens. Sie {\"a}ußert sich k{\"o}rperlich, psychisch und im zwischenmenschlichen Verhalten und sie nimmt Einfluss darauf, wie wir Situationen bewerten und mit ihnen umgehen. Das Eingehen von Risiken („Exposition") und ihre „Vermeidung" stehen bei gesundem Verhalten in einem individuell ausgewogenen Gleichgewicht. F{\"u}r die F{\"o}rderung von Gesundheit und die Pr{\"a}vention von Erkrankungen spielt Angst und spielen Angstst{\"o}rungen eine große Rolle. Angstst{\"o}rungen sind h{\"a}ufig und vielgestaltig. Sie werden oft sp{\"a}t erkannt und vielfach unzureichend behandelt. Zur Chronifizierung von Angstst{\"o}rungen tragen Aspekte unseres Versorgungssystems und auch Interaktionen mit Helfern h{\"a}ufig bei. Fr{\"u}hzeitig und ad{\"a}quat behandelt, sind die Ergebnisse von Psychotherapie bei Angstst{\"o}rungen gut.}, subject = {Angstst{\"o}rung}, language = {de} } @article{HoeyMacKinnonSchroeder, author = {Hoey, Jesse and MacKinnon, Neil J. and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias}, title = {Denotative and connotative management of uncertainty}, series = {Judgment and Decision Making}, volume = {16}, journal = {Judgment and Decision Making}, number = {2}, publisher = {Society for Judgment and Decision Making}, issn = {1930-2975}, doi = {10.1017/S1930297500008652}, pages = {505 -- 550}, abstract = {The interplay between intuitive and deliberative processing is known to be important for human decision making. As independent modes, intuitive processes can take on many forms from associative to constructive, while deliberative processes often rely on some notion of decision theoretic rationality or pattern matching. Dual process models attempt to unify these two modes based on parallel constraint networks or on socially or emotionally oriented adjustments to utility functions. This paper presents a new kind of dual process model that unifies decision theoretic deliberative reasoning with intuitive reasoning based on shared cultural affective meanings in a single Bayesian sequential model. Agents constructed according to this unified model are motivated by a combination of affective alignment (intuitive) and decision theoretic reasoning (deliberative), trading the two off as a function of the uncertainty or unpredictability of the situation. The model also provides a theoretical bridge between decision-making research and sociological symbolic interactionism. Starting with a high-level view of existing models, we advance Bayesian Affect Control Theory (BayesACT) as a promising new type of dual process model that explicitly and optimally (in the Bayesian sense) trades off motivation, action, beliefs and utility. We demonstrate a key component of the model as being sufficient to account for some aspects of classic cognitive biases about fairness and dissonance, and outline how this new theory relates to parallel constraint satisfaction models.}, subject = {Zwei-Prozess-Modell}, language = {en} } @article{Krauskopf, author = {Krauskopf, Karsten}, title = {Wenn die Kamera dunkel bleibt}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychodrama und Soziometrie}, volume = {20}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychodrama und Soziometrie}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1862-2526}, doi = {10.1007/s11620-021-00602-3}, pages = {209 -- 222}, abstract = {Dieser Beitrag der Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychodrama und Soziometrie (ZPS) entwickelt aus psychodramatischer Perspektive die These, digitale Medien nicht nur als Lernwerkzeuge auf einer kognitiven, sozialen und handlungsnahen Ebene zu verstehen, sondern auch ihren Einfluss auf Begrenzung und Erm{\"o}glichung soziometrischer Wahlen in Lehr-Lern-Settings zu betrachten. Ausgehend von einem Einblick in aktuelle Konzepte der p{\"a}dagogisch-psychologischen Forschung wird das Konzept des Aufforderungscharakters - Affordanzen - digitaler Medien eingef{\"u}hrt. Anhand einer Vignette aus dem hochschuldidaktischen Kontext werden m{\"o}gliche „Verf{\"u}hrungen" durch Medien im Hinblick auf soziometrisches Handeln rekonstruiert und vor dem Hintergrund von Rollenerwartungen und Morenos Konzept der Begegnung diskutiert.}, subject = {Lernsituation}, language = {de} } @article{LuthardtMorganBormannetal., author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Morgan, Jonathan Howard and Bormann, Inka and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias}, title = {Quantifying emotionally grounded discursive knowledge with cognitive-affective maps}, series = {Quality \& Quantity - International Journal of Methodology}, volume = {56}, journal = {Quality \& Quantity - International Journal of Methodology}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1573-7845}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01195-7}, pages = {1557 -- 1595}, abstract = {Belief systems matter for all kinds of human social interaction. People have individual cognitions and feelings concerning processes in their environment, which is why they may evaluate them differently. Belief systems can be visualized with cognitive-affective maps (CAMs; as reported by Thagard (in: McGregor (ed) EMPATHICA: A computer support system with visual representations for cognitive-affective mapping, AAAI Press, CA, 2010)). However, it is unclear whether CAMs can be constructed in an intersubjective way by different researchers attempting to map the beliefs of a third party based on qualitative text data. To scrutinize this question, we combined qualitative strategies and quantitative methods of text and network analysis in a case study examining belief networks about participation. Our data set consists of 10 sets of two empirical CAMs: the first CAM was created based on participants' freely associating concepts related to participation in education (N = 10), the second one was created based on given text data which the participants represented as a CAM following a standardized instruction manual (N = 10). Both CAM-types were compared along three dimensions of similarity (network similarity, concept association similarity, affective similarity). On all dimensions of similarity, there was substantially higher intersubjective agreement in the text-based CAMs than in the free CAMs, supporting the viability of cognitive affective mapping as an intersubjective research method for studying the emotional coherence of belief systems and discursive knowledge. In addition, this study highlights the potential for identifying group-level differences based on how participants associate concepts.}, language = {en} } @article{GrosseStreubelGunzenhauseretal., author = {Große, Gerlind and Streubel, Berit and Gunzenhauser, Catherine and Saalbach, Henrik}, title = {Let's Talk About Emotions}, series = {Affective Science}, volume = {2}, journal = {Affective Science}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2662-205X}, doi = {10.1007/s42761-021-00040-2}, pages = {150 -- 162}, abstract = {Learning to use language in an adult-like way is a long-lasting process. This may particularly apply to complex conceptual domains such as emotions. The present study examined children's and adults' patterns of emotion word usage regarding their convergence and underlying semantic dimensions, and the factors influencing the ease of emotion word learning. We assessed the production of emotion words by 4- to 11-year-old children (N = 123) and 27 adults (M = 37 years) using a vignette test. We found that the older the children, the more emotion words they produced. Moreover, with increasing age, children's pattern of emotion word usage converged with adult usage. The analysis for semantic dimensions revealed one clear criterion—the differentiation of positive versus negative emotions—for all children and adults. We further found that broad covering emotion words are produced earlier and in a more adult-like way.}, subject = {Kleinkind}, language = {en} } @article{GlauerHildebrandt, author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {No facts without perspectives}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {199}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {1/2}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1573-0964}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-020-02958-9}, pages = {3825 -- 3851}, abstract = {Perner and Roessler (in: Aguilar J, Buckareff A (eds) Causing human action: new perspectives on the causal theory of action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 199-228, 2010) hold that children who do not yet have an understanding of subjective perspectives, i.e., mental states, explain actions by appealing to objective facts. In this paper, we criticize this view. We argue that in order to understand objective facts, subjects need to understand perspectives. By analysing basic fact-expressing assertions, we show that subjects cannot refer to facts if they do not understand two types of perspectivity, namely, spatial and doxastic perspectivity. To avoid conceptual confusion regarding different ways of referring to facts, we distinguish between reference to facts de re and de dicto.}, subject = {Theory of mind}, language = {en} }