@book{Kmuche, author = {Kmuche, Wolfgang}, title = {Umgang mit externen Datenbanken}, edition = {4. v{\"o}llig {\"u}berarb. und erw. Aufl.}, publisher = {WRS}, address = {Landshut}, isbn = {3-8092-0939-2}, pages = {169}, subject = {Datenbank}, language = {de} } @article{HawlitschekKoeppen, author = {Hawlitschek, Anja and K{\"o}ppen, Veit}, title = {Personalisiertes Lernen mit und durch IT}, series = {Handbuch Qualit{\"a}t in Studium, Lehre und Forschung}, journal = {Handbuch Qualit{\"a}t in Studium, Lehre und Forschung}, number = {88}, publisher = {DUZ Verlags- und Medienhaus GmbH}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1614-0451}, pages = {55 -- 88}, abstract = {In diesem Artikel werden M{\"o}glichkeiten und Herausforderungen des personalisierten Lernens mit und durch IT-Systeme aufgezeigt. Zielstellung ist es, Lehrende bei diesbez{\"u}glichen Entscheidungen zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Daf{\"u}r wird zum einen eine wissenschaftlich empirische Perspektive eingenommen und herausgearbeitet, welche Ans{\"a}tze zur Umsetzung personalisierten Lernens evidenzbasiert sind. Zum anderen werden niedrigschwellige Umsetzungsm{\"o}glichkeiten vorgestellt sowie anhand eines Fallbeispiels Erfahrungen und Herausforderungen mit personalisiertem Lernen in der Lehre diskutiert.}, subject = {Datenverarbeitungssystem}, language = {de} } @article{Falkenburg, author = {Falkenburg, Philipp}, title = {Praxisbericht institutionalisiertes Grassroots Open Access}, series = {LIBREAS - Library Ideas}, journal = {LIBREAS - Library Ideas}, number = {44}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Institut f{\"u}r Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Humboldt Universit{\"a}t zu Berlin}, issn = {1860-7950}, pages = {1 -- 5}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @techreport{TothCzifraBłaszczyńskaGelatietal., author = {T{\´o}th-Czifra, Erzs{\´e}bet and Błaszczyńska, Marta and Gelati, Francesco and Admiraal, Femmy and Bl{\"u}mm, Mirjam and Buelinckx, Erik and Chiquet, Vera and Gautschy, Rita and Gietz, Peter and Kir{\´a}ly, P{\´e}ter and Vivas-Romero, Maria and Scholger, Walter and Szleszyński, Bartłomiej and Wuttke, Ulrike}, title = {Research Data Management for Arts and Humanities}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.8059626}, pages = {97}, abstract = {The idea behind the DARIAH Research Data Management Working Group is to tackle the challenges associated with the implementation of new FAIR and open data sharing mandates, and offer a unique space for collaboration among representatives of all major arts and humanities disciplines, cultural heritage professionals, and data management experts. More specifically, we are building a knowledge hub for new professionals around data management support (data managers, data stewards, open science officers, subject librarians etc.) from across DARIAH's national hubs to exchange across the discipline-specific dimension. During our meetings, the conflict between the need for and emergence of new data support roles, and the lack of any established domain-specific curriculum to train them, or, in some cases, even a lack of established good practices, became a recurrent topic which we aimed to address. Instead of embarking on the giant endeavour of curating an exhaustive and authoritative textbook for research data support specialists who work in the arts and humanities field, our idea is to give a snapshot of our own activities in the field and highlight the valuable work of others. Accordingly, the present publication can be read as the written form of a roundtable (or town hall) discussion where experts from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Poland, and Spain have come and sat together to report and discuss past or ongoing work, share their fields of interests and provide honest and critical reflections, reveal how their institutions have developed capacities for data support, share their own stories of becoming data support professionals in the domain, and, most importantly, explore together what solutions, tools, practices, and other resources could be used and could be generalised across borders and disciplines. This publication is the result of the Working Group's first writing sprint, held between the 23 and 24 June 2022 at the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IBL PAN), in the Staszic Palace. The event was made possible by the DARIAH third Working Groups' (WG) Funding Scheme Call for the years 2021-2023 and the resulting grant, which was administered by the Digital Humanities Centre at the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IBL PAN).}, subject = {Forschungsdaten}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SchneemannMertzenNeuroth, author = {Schneemann, Carsten and Mertzen, Daniela and Neuroth, Heike}, title = {"Forschungsdatenmanagement f{\"u}r Studierende"}, series = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, booktitle = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, editor = {Semar, Wolfgang}, publisher = {Verlag Werner H{\"u}lsbusch}, address = {Gl{\"u}ckstadt}, isbn = {978-3-86488-200-5}, issn = {0938-8710}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10009338}, pages = {422 -- 428}, abstract = {Es ist mittlerweile national und international anerkannt, dass ein professionelles Forschungsdatenmanagement die Nachvollziehbarkeit und Nachnutzbarkeit von Forschungsdaten verbessert. W{\"a}hrend Forschende hierzu auf eine stetig wachsende Zahl an Schulungs- und Qualifizierungsangeboten zur{\"u}ckgreifen k{\"o}nnen, sind Angebote f{\"u}r Studierende immer noch rar. Auch Qualifizierungsarbeiten f{\"u}r Master- und auch Bachelorabschl{\"u}sse nutzen und/oder produzieren Forschungsdaten, welche einen professionellen Umgang erfordern. Daher entwickelte die Landesinitiaitive Forschungsdatenmanagement in Brandenburg (FDM-BB), ein Verbund der acht forschenden staatlichen Hochschulen Brandenburgs, im Rahmen des Projektes IN-FDM-BB ein Konzept f{\"u}r einen Zertifikatskurs zum Forschungsdatenmanagement f{\"u}r Studierende. Basierend auf diesem Konzept fand der erste Zertifikatskurs im M{\"a}rz 2023 als einw{\"o}chige Online-Spring-School statt. Elf Dozent*innen mit unterschiedlichem beruflichem Hintergrund (Forschung und Lehre, Forschungsservice, Bibliothek) betreuten im Rahmen dieses ersten Zertifikatskurses 30 Studierende, deren Leistung, je nach Pr{\"u}fungsform, mit 2, 3, oder 4 ECTS anrechenbar war. Das Poster stellt das Schulungskonzept mit den zugrunde liegenden Konzepten vor und liefert einen ersten Erfahrungsbericht aus der Spring-School 2023.}, subject = {Forschungsdaten}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{BarronCedenoAlamGalassietal., author = {Barr{\´o}n-Cede{\~n}o, Alberto and Alam, Firoj and Galassi, Andrea and Da San Martino, Giovanni and Nakov, Preslav and Elsayed, Tamer and Azizov, Dilshod and Caselli, Tommaso and Cheema, Gullal S. and Haouari, Fatima and Hasanain, Maram and Kutlu, Mucahid and Li, Chengkai and Ruggeri, Federico and Struß, Julia Maria and Zaghouani, Wajdi}, title = {Overview of the CLEF-2023 CheckThat! Lab on Checkworthiness, Subjectivity, Political Bias, Factuality, and Authority of News Articles and Their Source}, series = {Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction}, booktitle = {Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction}, editor = {Arampatzis, Avi and Kanoulas, Evangelos and Tsikrika, Theodora and Vrochidis, Stefanos and Giachanou, Anastasia and Li, Dan and Aliannejadi, Mohammad and Vlachos, Michalis and Faggioli, Guglielmo and Ferro, Nicola}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-42448-9}, issn = {1611-3349}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-42448-9_20}, pages = {251 -- 275}, abstract = {We describe the sixth edition of the CheckThat! lab, part of the 2023 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The five previous editions of CheckThat! focused on the main tasks of the information verification pipeline: check-worthiness, verifying whether a claim was fact-checked before, supporting evidence retrieval, and claim verification. In this sixth edition, we zoom into some new problems and for the first time we offer five tasks in seven languages: Arabic, Dutch, English, German, Italian, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 asks to determine whether an item - text or text plus image- is check-worthy. Task 2 aims to predict whether a sentence from a news article is subjective or not. Task 3 asks to assess the political bias of the news at the article and at the media outlet level. Task 4 focuses on the factuality of reporting of news media. Finally, Task 5 looks at identifying authorities in Twitter that could help verify a given target claim. For a second year, CheckThat! was the most popular lab at CLEF-2023 in terms of team registrations: 127 teams. About one-third of them (a total of 37) actually participated.}, subject = {Desinformation}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GalassiRuggeriBarronCedenoetal., author = {Galassi, Andrea and Ruggeri, Federico and Barr{\´o}n-Cede{\~n}o, Alberto and Alam, Firoj and Caselli, Tommaso and Kutlu, Mucahid and Struß, Julia Maria and Antici, Francesco and Hasanain, Maram and K{\"o}hler, Juliane and Korre, Katerina and Leistra, Folkert and Muti, Arianna and Siegel, Melanie and T{\"u}rkmen, Mehmet Deniz and Wiegand, Michael and Zaghouani, Wajdi}, title = {Overview of the CLEF-2023 CheckThat! Lab: Task 2 on Subjectivity in News Articles}, series = {CLEF 2023 Working Notes}, booktitle = {CLEF 2023 Working Notes}, editor = {Aliannejadi, Mohammad and Faggiolo, Guglielmo and Ferro, Nicola and Vlachos, Michalis}, address = {Thessaloniki}, organization = {Centre for Research and Technology Hellas}, pages = {236 -- 249}, abstract = {We describe the outcome of the 2023 edition of the CheckThat!Lab at CLEF. We focus on subjectivity (Task 2), which has been proposed for the first time. It aims at fostering the technology for the identification of subjective text fragments in news articles. For that, we produced corpora consisting of 9,530 manually-annotated sentences, covering six languages - Arabic, Dutch, English, German, Italian, and Turkish. Task 2 attracted 12 teams, which submitted a total of 40 final runs covering all languages. The most successful approaches addressed the task using state-of-the-art multilingual transformer models, which were fine-tuned on language-specific data. Teams also experimented with a rich set of other neural architectures, including foundation models, zero-shot classifiers, and standard transformers, mainly coupled with data augmentation and multilingual training strategies to address class imbalance. We publicly release all the datasets and evaluation scripts, with the purpose of promoting further research on this topic.}, subject = {Desinformation}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{Schneemann, author = {Schneemann, Carsten}, title = {Digital qualifiziert - Kompetenzbereiche f{\"u}r die Zukunft}, series = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, booktitle = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, editor = {Semar, Wolfgang}, publisher = {Verlag Werner H{\"u}lsbusch}, address = {Gl{\"u}ckstadt}, isbn = {978-3-86488-200-5}, issn = {0938-8710}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10009338}, pages = {485 -- 494}, abstract = {Digital qualifiziertes Personal ist die Grundlage f{\"u}r eine zukunftsf{\"a}hige Wissenschaftslandschaft. Die Omnipr{\"a}senz von digitalen Daten und Informationen, von Tools f{\"u}r Kommunikation und Kollaboration stellt nicht nur Wissenschaft und Forschung vor neue Herausforderungen, sondern die gesamte Gesellschaft. {\"U}berall bedarf es digitaler Kompetenzen, um mit den M{\"o}glichkeiten der digitalen Transformation bewusst und m{\"u}ndig umgehen zu k{\"o}nnen. Hier bietet die Informationswissenschaft gemeinsam mit der Informatik als Basiswissenschaft f{\"u}r alle Wissenschaften Ans{\"a}tze und L{\"o}sungen, so zum Beispiel im Bereich Data Science und Data Stewardship. Basierend auf einem Diskussionspapier (Attallah et al., 2020) widmeten sich 19 Expert*innen im Kontext eines Interview-Podcasts der AG 6 „Digital qualifiziertes Personal" der Allianz der Wissenschaftsorganisationen diesem komplexen Thema. Die 15 durchgef{\"u}hrten (Doppel-) Interviews bildeten die Basis f{\"u}r die Datengrundlage und wurden explorativ und softwaregest{\"u}tzt qualitativ analysiert. Ziel war die ergebnisoffene, aber m{\"o}glichst umf{\"a}ngliche Abbildung und Analyse der von den Expert*innen angesprochenen Handlungsfelder, um unter anderem folgende Forschungsfragen beantworten zu k{\"o}nnen: Welche Kompetenzen werden f{\"u}r die digitale Qualifikation in den Wissenschaftsorganisationen ben{\"o}tigt? Welche M{\"o}glichkeiten und Verantwortlichkeiten f{\"u}r eine Kompetenzvermittlung gibt es? Welchen Beitrag k{\"o}nnen die Informationswissenschaften leisten?}, subject = {Qualifikation}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{KoehlerStrussDriesen, author = {K{\"o}hler, Juliane and Struß, Julia Maria and Driesen, Maria}, title = {Seeking for Information about Environmental Sustainability}, series = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, booktitle = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, editor = {Semar, Wolfgang}, publisher = {Verlag Werner H{\"u}lsbusch}, address = {Gl{\"u}ckstadt}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10009338}, pages = {404 -- 410}, abstract = {In a time of climate change and growing activism, understanding how people access information is crucial. This research arises from ongoing government discussions on ecological policies and recent debates in Germany about ecological heating regulations and their cost implications. This study specifically focuses on the information seeking behavior on topics related to environmental sustainability. After reviewing existing research on information behavior, risk perception, and climate change communication, we investigate how participants search for information by surveying students. The findings could potentially inform strategies for sharing information and promoting action in Germany's context of climate change and sustainability.}, subject = {Nachhaltigkeit}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HigiNeurothStruss, author = {Higi, Leonard and Neuroth, Heike and Struß, Julia Maria}, title = {From Data Life Cycle to Urban Data Practice}, series = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, booktitle = {Nachhaltige Information - Information f{\"u}r Nachhaltigkeit}, editor = {Semar, Wolfgang}, publisher = {Verlag Werner H{\"u}lsbusch}, address = {Gl{\"u}ckstadt}, isbn = {978-3-86488-200-5}, issn = {0938-8710}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10009338}, pages = {393 -- 400}, abstract = {This paper presents a project that aims at supporting municipal stakeholders in rural areas by developing data-based applications in a collaborative process of stakeholders and a transfer team. In order to foster knowledge transfer in the domains of data literacy and data management on multiple levels a new approach is proposed that organizes the team competencies along the data life cycle.}, subject = {Forschungsdaten}, language = {en} } @incollection{Heisig, author = {Heisig, Peter}, title = {Knowledge Management Essentials}, series = {The Future of Knowledge Management}, booktitle = {The Future of Knowledge Management}, editor = {Bratianu, Constantin and Handzic, Meliha and Bolisani, Ettore}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-38696-1}, issn = {2199-8671}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-38696-1_5}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {91 -- 109}, abstract = {Reflecting on the history and development of the knowledge management discipline from an academic and applied research perspective, this chapter will outline the KM essentials as core of the discipline and open questions to be addressed in the future. Secondly, the author will discuss in particular the role of KM within organizational practice in regard to the overall societal challenges all organizations are facing today globally. Thirdly, the chapter will provide an outlook of the discipline in the light of future developments and suggests some research topics to be addressed by interdisciplinary KM research in the future. Beside on drawing on more than 35 years of experience in the KM field, this contribution will profit from previous research undertaken on the future of KM (2002 and 2012), contributions to guidelines and standards for KM (e.g., CEN, DIN, ISO), as well as from working with European Fortune 500 companies over the past 25 years.}, subject = {Wissensmanagement}, language = {en} } @incollection{Hobohm, author = {Hobohm, Hans-Christoph}, title = {Zensur}, series = {Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Ged{\"a}chtnisforschung}, volume = {2}, booktitle = {Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Ged{\"a}chtnisforschung}, editor = {Sebald, Gerd and Berek, Mathias and Chmelar, Kristina and Dimbath, Oliver and Haag, Hanna and Heinlein, Michael and Leonhard, Nina and Rauer, Valentin}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-26555-7}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-26556-4_99}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {717 -- 732}, abstract = {Unter Zensur werden in der Forschung mehr oder weniger explizite Formen der Kommunikationskontrolle verstanden. Nach einer Phase der Anekdotisierung des Ph{\"a}nomens setzt sich {\"u}ber historiographische und sozio-kommunikative Ans{\"a}tze nun ein integrierendes, zeichentheoretisch-tiefenpsychologisches Verst{\"a}ndnis von Zensur durch. Die Auswirkungen von Zensur auf soziale Ged{\"a}chtnisse und die Explizierungsbedingungen von individuellem oder kollektivem Wissen sind jedoch noch wenig thematisiert. Im Folgenden wird nach einer Begriffsherleitung des politischen und psychologischen Aspektes der Sprach- und Zeitbezug des Themas diskutiert und als praktische Beispiele die Konzepte Funktions- und Speicherged{\"a}chtnis als Formen der Kommunikationskontrolle diskutiert.}, subject = {Diskurs}, language = {de} } @incollection{EichlerEppelinKampkasparetal., author = {Eichler, Frederik and Eppelin, Anita and Kampkaspar, Dario and Schrader, Antonia C. and S{\"o}llner, Konstanze and Vierkant, Paul and Withanage, Dulip}, title = {Technik und Infrastrukturen}, series = {Wissenschaftsgeleitetes Publizieren : Sechs Handreichungen mit Praxistipps und Perspektiven}, booktitle = {Wissenschaftsgeleitetes Publizieren : Sechs Handreichungen mit Praxistipps und Perspektiven}, editor = {Wrzesinski, Marcel}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Alexander von Humboldt Institut f{\"u}r Internet und Gesellschaft}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.8208578}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {7 -- 18}, abstract = {In der vorliegenden Handreichung stellen wir unterschiedliche technische Ressourcen vor, die redaktionelle Arbeiten unterst{\"u}tzen k{\"o}nnen. Dabei empfiehlt es sich, Software und Systeme zu nutzen, die den Wandel hin zu einer offenen, niederschwelligen und nachhaltigen Wissenschaftskultur f{\"o}rdern. Hierzu z{\"a}hlt in erster Linie die Verwendung von Open-Source-Software. Unsere Empfehlungen haben dabei eine begrenzte Reichweite: Serviceanbieter, Software und Projekte sind zu einem sp{\"a}teren Zeitpunkt ggf. nicht mehr verf{\"u}gbar. Auch sind gerade die Infrastruktureinrichtungen in das f{\"o}derale Wissenschaftssystem integriert, was sie bestimmten Unw{\"a}gbarkeiten aussetzt.}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @incollection{BlumentrittEulerFadeevaetal., author = {Blumentritt, Ute and Euler, Ellen and Fadeeva, Yuliya and Pohle, J{\"o}rg and Rack, Fabian}, title = {Urheberrecht und Datenschutz}, series = {Wissenschaftsgeleitetes Publizieren : Sechs Handreichungen mit Praxistipps und Perspektiven}, booktitle = {Wissenschaftsgeleitetes Publizieren : Sechs Handreichungen mit Praxistipps und Perspektiven}, editor = {Wrzesinski, Marcel}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Alexander von Humboldt Institut f{\"u}r Internet und Gesellschaft}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.8208582}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {19 -- 34}, abstract = {Die vorliegende Handreichung adressiert wissenschaftsgeleitete Zeitschriften sowie herausgebende Einrichtungen. Sie sollen in die Lage versetzt werden, erste urheberrechtliche wie datenschutzrechtliche Fragen zu beantworten und dabei Qualit{\"a}tsstandards einzuhalten. Dieser Text ersetzt keine Rechtsberatung, sondern bietet grunds{\"a}tzliche Informationen, gibt Empfehlungen zum Weiterlesen f{\"u}r klassische Fragestellungen und verweist auf gelungene Beispiele im weiteren Feld des wissenschaftsgeleiteten Publizierens.}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @incollection{BergmannDalkilicGanzetal., author = {Bergmann, Max and Dalkilic, Evin and Ganz, Kathrin and Heinig, Julia and Junker, Judith and Kaden, Ben and Kalte, Isabella}, title = {Arbeitsabl{\"a}ufe und Workflows}, series = {Wissenschaftsgeleitetes Publizieren : Sechs Handreichungen mit Praxistipps und Perspektiven}, booktitle = {Wissenschaftsgeleitetes Publizieren : Sechs Handreichungen mit Praxistipps und Perspektiven}, editor = {Wrzesinski, Marcel}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Alexander von Humboldt Institut f{\"u}r Internet und Gesellschaft}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.8208678}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {35 -- 54}, abstract = {Diese Handreichung spricht gezielt neue und etablierte wissenschaftsgeleitete Zeitschriften an und m{\"o}chte detailliert {\"u}ber redaktionelle Arbeitsabl{\"a}ufe und deren Effekte auf verschiedene Qualit{\"a}tsebenen informieren. Erkl{\"a}rtes Ziel ist es, die Prozessqualit{\"a}t durch Vorschl{\"a}ge zu den Abl{\"a}ufen zu verbessern und eine Reflektion {\"u}ber Qualit{\"a}tsstandards anzuregen.}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @book{BrachtBulleEuleretal., author = {Bracht, Christian and Bulle, Klaus and Euler, Ellen and Klimpel, Paul}, title = {Open Access Policy: ein Leitfaden f{\"u}r Kulturerbe-Einrichtungen in Hessen}, publisher = {arthistoricum.net}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-98501-090-5}, doi = {10.11588/arthistoricum.1023}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {70}, abstract = {Kultureinrichtungen verf{\"u}gen {\"u}ber umfangreiche Kulturg{\"u}ter, die einen universellen und {\"u}berzeitlichen Wert haben. Die Digitalisierung vereinfacht den Zugang und erweitert und vervielfacht die Nutzbarkeit des von diesen Einrichtungen verwalteten Kulturschatzes. Der offene Zugang wird jedoch h{\"a}ufig durch rechtliche, technische oder finanzielle Beschr{\"a}nkungen stark behindert. Daher haben sich im Jahr 2021 die wichtigsten Kulturerbe-Einrichtungen des Landes Hessen zu einer gemeinsamen Open Access Policy verpflichtet. Der vorliegende Leitfaden erl{\"a}utert diese Policy und gibt Mitarbeitenden in Kulturerbe-Einrichtungen - nicht nur in Hessen - praktische Hinweise, wie sie umgesetzt werden kann.}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{OPUS4-3043, title = {Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Knowledge Management}, editor = {Heisig, Peter}, address = {Denton}, organization = {University of North Texas}, pages = {332}, abstract = {The 17th International Conference on Knowledge Management was held in the historic city of Potsdam, Germany. The conference was among the first post-pandemic face to face conferences, and the overall theme of the 17th edition of the ICKM conference rightly focused on "Knowledge, Uncertainty and Risks: From individual to global scale" at different levels of analysis and agency.}, subject = {Wissensmanagement}, language = {en} } @techreport{BruchNeurothSenst, author = {Bruch, Christoph and Neuroth, Heike and Senst, Henriette}, title = {Data At Your Fingertips : Wegmarken einer exzellenten und vertrauensw{\"u}rdigen Datenlandschaft}, publisher = {Bonifatius GmbH Druck - Buch - Verlag}, address = {Paderborn}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.5837408}, pages = {12}, abstract = {Mit dem BMBF gef{\"o}rderten Verbundprojekt EcoDM (F{\"o}rderkennzeichen 16DWWQP) wurde erforscht, welche Herausforderungen, Chancen und Hindernisse sich im Bereich des rasanten digitalen Datenwachstums ergeben und wie Rahmenbedingungen aussehen k{\"o}nnten, Daten systematisch und FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) nutzen und teilen zu k{\"o}nnen. Einen zentralen Teil der Untersuchung bildeten neben Landscape- und Gap-Analysen Leitfaden-gest{\"u}tzte Interviews mit Expert:innen aus den Bereichen Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft, Public Sector und Qualifikation. Basierend auf den Projektergebnissen wurden 31 bereichs{\"u}bergreifende Empfehlungen zur F{\"o}rderung des Teilens und Nachnutzens von Daten entwickelt, die in dieser Brosch{\"u}re mit einem Begleitwort ver{\"o}ffentlicht werden.}, subject = {Datenmanagement}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{NakovBarronCedenoDaSanMartinoetal., author = {Nakov, Preslav and Barr{\´o}n-Cede{\~n}o, Alberto and Da San Martino, Giovanni and Alam, Firoj and Struß, Julia Maria and Mandl, Thomas and M{\´i}guez, Rub{\´e}n and Caselli, Tommaso and Kutlu, Mucahid and Zaghouani, Wajdi and Li, Chengkai and Shaar, Shaden and Shahi, Gautam Kishore and Mubarak, Hamdy and Nikolov, Alex and Babulkov, Nikolay and Kartal, Yavuz Selim and Wiegand, Michael and Siegel, Melanie and K{\"o}hler, Juliane}, title = {Overview of the CLEF-2022 CheckThat! Lab on Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic and Fake News Detection}, series = {Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2022.}, booktitle = {Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2022.}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-13643-6}, issn = {0302-9743}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-13643-6_29}, pages = {495 -- 520}, abstract = {We describe the fifth edition of the CheckThat! lab, part of the 2022 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The lab evaluates technology supporting tasks related to factuality in multiple languages: Arabic, Bulgarian, Dutch, English, German, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 asks to identify relevant claims in tweets in terms of check-worthiness, verifiability, harmfullness, and attention-worthiness. Task 2 asks to detect previously fact-checked claims that could be relevant to fact-check a new claim. It targets both tweets and political debates/speeches. Task 3 asks to predict the veracity of the main claim in a news article. CheckThat! was the most popular lab at CLEF-2022 in terms of team registrations: 137 teams. More than one-third (37\%) of them actually participated: 18, 7, and 26 teams submitted 210, 37, and 126 official runs for tasks 1, 2, and 3, respectively.}, subject = {Desinformation}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{NakovBarronCedenoDaSanMartinoetal., author = {Nakov, Preslav and Barr{\´o}n-Cede{\~n}o, Alberto and Da San Martino, Giovanni and Alam, Firoj and Struß, Julia Maria and Mandl, Thomas and M{\´i}guez, Rub{\´e}n and Caselli, Tommaso and Kutlu, Mucahid and Zaghouani, Wajdi and Li, Chengkai and Shaar, Shaden and Shahi, Gautam Kishore and Mubarak, Hamdy and Nikolov, Alex and Babulkov, Nikolay and Kartal, Yavuz Selim and Beltr{\´a}n, Javier}, title = {The CLEF-2022 CheckThat! Lab on Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic and Fake News Detection}, series = {Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2022}, booktitle = {Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2022}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-99739-7}, issn = {0302-9743}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-99739-7_52}, pages = {416 -- 428}, abstract = {The fifth edition of the CheckThat! Lab is held as part of the 2022 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). The lab evaluates technology supporting various factuality tasks in seven languages: Arabic, Bulgarian, Dutch, English, German, Spanish, and Turkish. Task 1 focuses on disinformation related to the ongoing COVID-19 infodemic and politics, and asks to predict whether a tweet is worth fact-checking, contains a verifiable factual claim, is harmful to the society, or is of interest to policy makers and why. Task 2 asks to retrieve claims that have been previously fact-checked and that could be useful to verify the claim in a tweet. Task 3 is to predict the veracity of a news article. Tasks 1 and 3 are classification problems, while Task 2 is a ranking one.}, subject = {Desinformation}, language = {en} }