@book{OPUS4-3169, title = {Handreichungen f{\"u}r die Praxis : zum Bildungsprogramm f{\"u}r saarl{\"a}ndische Kinderg{\"a}rten}, editor = {Preissing, Christa}, publisher = {Das Netz}, address = {Weimar}, organization = {Freie Universit{\"a}t Berlin. Internationale Akademie f{\"u}r Innovative P{\"a}dagogik, Psychologie und {\"O}konomie}, isbn = {978-3-937785-59-2}, pages = {193}, subject = {Saarland}, language = {de} } @article{FlechtnerDewitzMaueetal., author = {Flechtner, Rahel and Dewitz, Leyla and Mau{\´e}, Rahel and Tost, Jordi and Schuster, Paula L. and Ackermann, Judith and Heidmann, Frank}, title = {Facing fears, facing opportunities: Lessons learned from a participatory design format with people affected by social anxiety}, address = {Potsdam}, doi = {10.34678/opus4-3116}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-31168}, pages = {1 -- 19}, abstract = {Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed anxiety disorders and a health concern that has a significant impact on the affected individuals' quality of life. Although there is a need to develop methods and tools to support those affected by SAD, it is especially challenging to conduct participatory design with this psychologically vulnerable group of people. This paper presents the design, implementation and evaluation of a participatory format built on a toolkit, a cultural probe and an online prototyping workshop to gain insights into the challenges and needs experienced in the everyday lives of those affected by severe social anxiety. We provide the theoretical framework for designing a participatory format for this vulnerable group, introduce and discuss our methodological approach, and present the lessons learned from implementing and evaluating the format in two workshop sessions with a total of 15 participants.}, subject = {Angstst{\"o}rung}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtLonnemannGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Lonnemann, Jan and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Why Not Just Features? Reconsidering Infants' Behavior in Individuation Tasks}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, number = {Okt.}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564807}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-24896}, pages = {9}, abstract = {It counts as empirically proven that infants can individuate objects. Object individuation is assumed to be fundamental in the development of infants' ontology within the object-first account. It crucially relies on an object-file (OF) system, representing both spatiotemporal ("where") and categorical ("what") information about objects as solid, cohesive bodies moving continuously in space and time. However, infants' performance in tasks requiring them to use featural information to detect individuation violations appears to be at odds with the object-first account. In such cases, infants do not appear to be able to develop correct expectations about the numerosity of objects. Recently, proponents of the object-first account proposed that these individuation failures result from integration errors between the OF system and an additional physical reasoning system. We are going to argue that the predictions of a feature-based physical-reasoning (PR) system are sufficient for explaining infants' behavior. The striking predictive power of the PR system calls into question the relevance of the OF system and, thereby, challenges the assumption that infants can individuate objects early on.}, subject = {Individuation}, language = {en} } @techreport{HoeyNagappanRogersetal., author = {Hoey, Jesse and Nagappan, Meiyappan and Rogers, Kimberly B. and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Dametto, Diego and De Zoysa, Nalin and Iyer, Rahul and Morgan, Jonathan H. and Rishi, Deepak and Sirianni, Antonio D. and Yun, Seonghu and Zhao, Jun and Z{\"o}ller, Nikolas}, title = {Theoretical and Empirical Modeling of Identity and Sentiments in Collaborative Groups}, doi = {10.31235/osf.io/4hukx}, pages = {1 -- 36}, abstract = {Theoretical and Empirical Modeling of Identity and Sentiments in Collaborative Groups (THEMIS.COG) was an interdisciplinary research collaboration of computer scientists and social scientists from the University of Waterloo (Canada), Potsdam University of Applied Sciences (Germany), and Dartmouth College (USA). This white paper summarizes the results of our research at the end of the grant term. Funded by the Trans-Atlantic Platform's Digging Into Data initiative, the project aimed at theoretical and empirical modeling of identity and sentiments in collaborative groups. Understanding the social forces behind self-organized collaboration is important because technological and social innovations are increasingly generated through informal, distributed processes of collaboration, rather than in formal organizational hierarchies or through market forces. Our work used a data-driven approach to explore the social psychological mechanisms that motivate such collaborations and determine their success or failure. We focused on the example of GitHub, the world's current largest digital platform for open, collaborative software development. In contrast to most, purely inductive contemporary approaches leveraging computational techniques for social science, THEMIS.COG followed a deductive, theory-driven approach. We capitalized on affect control theory, a mathematically formalized theory of symbolic interaction originated by sociologist David R. Heise and further advanced in previous work by some of the THEMIS.COG collaborators, among others. Affect control theory states that people control their social behaviours by intuitively attempting to verify culturally shared feelings about identities, social roles, and behaviour settings. From this principle, implemented in computational simulation models, precise predictions about group dynamics can be derived. It was the goal of THEMIS.COG to adapt and apply this approach to study the GitHub collaboration ecosystem through a symbolic interactionist lens. The project contributed substantially to the novel endeavor of theory development in social science based on large amounts of naturally occurring digital data.}, subject = {Computational social science}, language = {en} } @incollection{Spaete, author = {Sp{\"a}te, Julius}, title = {Mehr als nur Zitiertechniken}, series = {Verl{\"a}ssliche Wissenschaft : Bedingungen, Analysen, Reflexionen}, booktitle = {Verl{\"a}ssliche Wissenschaft : Bedingungen, Analysen, Reflexionen}, publisher = {wbg Academic}, address = {Darmstadt}, isbn = {978-3-534-40608-1}, doi = {10.53186/1025976}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {187 -- 202}, subject = {Zitat}, language = {de} } @article{LindnerMoellerHildebrandtetal., author = {Lindner, Nadja and Moeller, Korbinian and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Hasselhorn, Marcus and Lonnemann, Jan}, title = {Children's use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language is related to their numerical magnitude understanding}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943191}, pages = {13}, abstract = {Numerical magnitude information is assumed to be spatially represented in the form of a mental number line defined with respect to a body-centred, egocentric frame of reference. In this context, spatial language skills such as mastery of verbal descriptions of spatial position (e.g., in front of, behind, to the right/left) have been proposed to be relevant for grasping spatial relations between numerical magnitudes on the mental number line. We examined 4- to 5-year-old's spatial language skills in tasks that allow responses in egocentric and allocentric frames of reference, as well as their relative understanding of numerical magnitude (assessed by a number word comparison task). In addition, we evaluated influences of children's absolute understanding of numerical magnitude assessed by their number word comprehension (montring different numbers using their fingers) and of their knowledge on numerical sequences (determining predecessors and successors as well as identifying missing dice patterns of a series). Results indicated that when considering responses that corresponded to the egocentric perspective, children's spatial language was associated significantly with their relative numerical magnitude understanding, even after controlling for covariates, such as children's SES, mental rotation skills, and also absolute magnitude understanding or knowledge on numerical sequences. This suggests that the use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language may facilitate spatial representation of numbers along a mental number line and thus seem important for preschoolers' relative understanding of numerical magnitude.}, subject = {R{\"a}umliches Wissen}, language = {en} } @incollection{Dreier, author = {Dreier, Annette}, title = {Reggiop{\"a}dagogik - Fr{\"u}hkindliche Bildung f{\"u}r eine Zivilgesellschaft}, series = {Handbuch Reformp{\"a}dagogik}, booktitle = {Handbuch Reformp{\"a}dagogik}, publisher = {Beltz}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-407-83190-3}, pages = {191 -- 204}, subject = {Kleinkinderziehung}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Mit Kindern essen und trinken - aber wie?}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {1}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {14 -- 26}, abstract = {Im Sommer 2021 erschien die bundesweite Studie „Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag", die Fachhochschule Potsdam und die Universit{\"a}t Graz hatten sie im Auftrag des Bundesfamilienministeriums erstellt. Ein Team aus Wissenschaftlerinnen hatte Alltagssituationen in 89 Kitas und Krippen offen gefilmt und ausgewertet. Vor allem beim Essen beobachteten die Forscherinnen immer wieder „grenz{\"u}berschreitenden K{\"o}rperkontakt" und nicht angemessenes Verhalten der p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}fte: Sie schoben etwa den Stuhl samt Kind so nah an den Tisch, dass das Kind den Oberk{\"o}rper kaum bewegen konnte. Andere stellten den Teller auf dem L{\"a}tzchen ab, ebenfalls um zu verhindern, dass sich die Kinder beim Essen zu viel bewegen. In rund 30 \% der zehnmin{\"u}tigen Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen solche Vorf{\"a}lle ein- bis viermal. In 16 \% der Situationen sogar noch {\"o}fter. Lediglich in einem F{\"u}nftel der ausgewerteten Spielsituationen und 11 \% der Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen {\"u}berhaupt kein grenz­{\"u}berschreitendes Verhalten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Kinderrechte im Kita-Alltag}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {4}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {32 -- 40}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Wie wir Kinder bei Konflikten begleiten k{\"o}nnen}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {2}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {20 -- 21}, subject = {Konflikt}, language = {de} }