@incollection{SchmidtWenzelRubel, author = {Schmidt-Wenzel, Alexandra and Rubel, Katrin}, title = {Inquiry-Based Learning in Social Work}, series = {Inquiry-Based Learning : Undergraduate Research}, booktitle = {Inquiry-Based Learning : Undergraduate Research}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-14223-0}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0_13}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-26335}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {139 -- 147}, abstract = {Research-led teaching is designed to give students the opportunity to engage with their learning process and develop the skills needed to build their professional identity through active participation in the scientific cognitive process. Here in particular, social workers need research-oriented behavior, hermeneutic competencies and reflexivity in order to master the imminent requirements of case comprehension and case processing in a professional way.}, subject = {Ausbildung}, language = {en} } @article{MichelWronskiPauenetal., author = {Michel, Christine and Wronski, Caroline and Pauen, Sabina and Daum, Moritz M. and Hoehl, Stefanie}, title = {Infants' object processing is guided specifically by social cues}, series = {Neuropsychologia}, volume = {126}, journal = {Neuropsychologia}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0028-3932}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.022}, pages = {54 -- 61}, abstract = {Previous studies showed that the movements of another person's eyes and head guides infants' attention and promotes social learning by leading to enhanced encoding of cued objects. However, it is an open question whether social features like eyes are required or if the lateral movement of any arbitrary stimulus can elicit similar effects. The current experiments investigate the effects of the movement of a nonsocial cue and a perceptually similar social cue on object processing in 4-month-olds using event-related potentials (ERPs). Infants were presented with one of two central cues, either a box with a checkerboard pattern or a box with eye-like features on the front, which turned to one side. The cue thereby either turned toward a novel object or turned away from it. Afterwards, the object was presented again and ERPs in response to these previously cued or uncued objects were compared. When the nonsocial box served as the cue, no difference in neural processing of previously cued and uncued objects was found. In contrast, when the box with eyes served as the cue, we found an enhanced positive slow wave (PSW) for uncued as compared to cued objects. While the turning of the box with eyes promoted the encoding of cued objects, uncued objects needed enhanced activity for processing when presented for a second time. Results suggest that not every dynamic cue can influence infants' object processing but that the presence of a basic social characteristic like isolated schematic eyes is sufficient to enhance social learning processes in early infancy. This hints on a specific sensitivity of the infant brain to social information which helps infants to focus on relevant information in the environment during social learning.}, subject = {S{\"a}ugling}, language = {en} } @incollection{McRobert, author = {McRobert, Korinna}, title = {Young survivors of sexual abuse as 'children out of place'}, series = {Intersectionality and Difference in Childhood and Youth}, booktitle = {Intersectionality and Difference in Childhood and Youth}, edition = {1st Edition}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London}, isbn = {978-0-367-72916-5}, doi = {10.4324/9780429466588-10}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {143 -- 157}, abstract = {This chapter looks at children 'out of place' as a category, focusing on the example of the sexually abused and thus sexually exposed child as experiencing an 'out of place' childhood. It focuses on the child who has been sexually abused and exploited, in contexts involving no compensation - monetary or otherwise. A code for childhood sexuality also developed in the West, with the focus on the innocence and malleability of young people. The projection onto children by adults, in terms of what they should be, can thus eventually be damaging. Children are presented as incapable of being responsible subjects with their own agency in the context of sexuality. Children's agency in the context of their sexuality is highly restricted through laws dictating minimum ages of sexual activity and consent, as well as social expectations of a child as a non-sexual and innocent being.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {en} } @incollection{AckermannDoerkSeitz, author = {Ackermann, Judith and D{\"o}rk, Marian and Seitz, Hanne}, title = {PKKB : Postdigitale Kunstpraktiken}, series = {Forschung zur Digitalisierung in der Kulturellen Bildung}, booktitle = {Forschung zur Digitalisierung in der Kulturellen Bildung}, publisher = {kopaed}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-86736-522-2}, pages = {173 -- 184}, abstract = {Das interdisziplin{\"a}re Forschungsvorhaben widmet sich postdigitalen Kulturszenen, die an der Schnittstelle von Kunst, Bildung und Technologie innovative Formate {\"a}sthetischer Aneignung, Produktion und Vermittlung hervorbringen. Gemeint sind k{\"u}nstlerische Praktiken, die die Computertechnik zum Ausgangspunkt nehmen, um durch sie bedingte und {\"u}ber sie hinausgehende Fragestellungen {\"a}sthetisch neu zu verhandeln. Ausgangspunkt ist die postdigitale Beobachtung, dass Algorithmen und Daten die Gesellschaft l{\"a}ngst durchziehen, unsere Verh{\"a}ltnisse zur sozialen und materiellen Welt zunehmend {\"u}ber digitale Repr{\"a}sentationen vermitteln und die Komplexit{\"a}t ihrer technologischen Konstituierung unsichtbar wird (Bolter/Gruisin 1999; Cramer 2015; Berry/Dieter 2015; Contreras-Koterbay/Mirocha 2016). Vor diesem Hintergrund erlauben Kunstpraktiken, die mit digitalen Methoden generiert, aber nicht notwendigerweise digital vermittelt werden, in besonderem Maße Prozesse der Digitalisierung kritisch zu reflektieren und so die Beziehungen zwischen digitalen und physischen R{\"a}umen nicht aus dem Blick zu verlieren, sondern aktiv mitzugestalten. Dennoch finden sie in der Kulturellen Bildung (KuBi), deren Zielgruppen kaum Bewusstsein f{\"u}r das k{\"u}nstlerische und kritische Potenzial digitaler Formate haben, bislang wenig Ber{\"u}cksichtigung. Es scheint, als ob postdigitaler Kunst {\"u}ber die Altersgruppen hinweg ein hohes Maß an Affirmation von Digitalisierungsprozessen zugesprochen wird. Im Kontrast hierzu veranschaulichen prominente Vertreterinnen und Vertreter, wie digitale Methoden produktiv eingesetzt werden, um kritische Fragen zur Digitalisierung zu artikulieren (Bridle 2013). Hervorzuheben ist die Reflexionsf{\"a}higkeit medienimmanenter Ausdrucksformen postdigitaler Kunst, die eine rezeptive und kreative Auseinandersetzung mit ihrer soziotechnischen Spezifik erm{\"o}glicht, wenngleich sie im Kunstverst{\"a}ndnis der j{\"u}ngeren Generation kaum eine Rolle spielen (Meyer 2010, Seitz 2013a; Rat f{\"u}r Kulturelle Bildung 2015a). Es fehlt die notwendige Grundlagenforschung, um eine angemessene Anwendung postdigitalen Kunstschaffens f{\"u}r verschiedene Zielgruppen der KuBi zu erm{\"o}glichen. In dem folgenden Beitrag umreißen wir kurz den Status Quo der KuBi, reflektieren wesentliche Entwicklungslinien postdigitaler Kunst und formulieren Anspr{\"u}che f{\"u}r transdisziplin{\"a}re Forschung an deren Schnittmenge.}, subject = {Kulturp{\"a}dagogik}, language = {de} } @incollection{Maue, author = {Mau{\´e}, Ruben}, title = {Nachdenken mit Kindern : Interaktion und Dialog}, series = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, booktitle = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {dohrmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-938620-46-5}, pages = {183 -- 199}, abstract = {Der folgende Beitrag setzt sich mit der Bedeutung von Evaluation und Evaluationsforschung im p{\"a}dagogischen Kontext auseinander, um von hier ausgehend Kriterien guter Fortbildung zu entwickeln. Diese werden angelegt an die Evaluation der Fortbildung "KAI - kognitiv anregende Interaktion" mit Kindern und erste Ergebnisse werden vorgestellt.}, subject = {Evaluationsforschung}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog: Wie kommen Kinder in den "Raum der Gr{\"u}nde"?}, series = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, booktitle = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {dohrmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-938620-46-5}, pages = {33 -- 52}, subject = {Kommunikation}, language = {de} } @incollection{Scheidt, author = {Scheidt, Alexander}, title = {Kognitiv feinf{\"u}hlige Interaktion in der Kita als gesellschaftliche Querschnittsaufgabe}, series = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita-Alltag}, booktitle = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita-Alltag}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {dohmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-938620-46-5}, pages = {53 -- 74}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @incollection{Wronski, author = {Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Imagination und Nachdenken {\"u}ber M{\"o}glichkeiten}, series = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita-Alltag}, booktitle = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita-Alltag}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {dohmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-938620-46-5}, pages = {89 -- 108}, subject = {Imagination}, language = {de} } @article{LuthardtSchroederHildebrandtetal., author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Bormann, Inka}, title = {"And then we'll just check if it suits us" : cognitive-affective maps of social innovation in early childhood education}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.00033}, pages = {19}, abstract = {The idea that a simple execution of an innovation invented by actors other than those who are expected to apply it is not likely to take place is a truism. We assume, however, in this paper the idea of a discursive production of knowledge on the application of an innovation across different levels of the education system. We aim to shed light on an innovation's 'journey' from educational policy over training providers to teams of professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC). By investigating knowledge and emotions associated with the introduction of an intended innovation using the example of "stimulation interactions" in day care-centers, the paper contributes to research on the transfer of innovations in education. To better understand challenges occurring during the transfer of innovations, we triangulate methods from discourse theory (coding techniques based on GTM) and cognitive science, namely cognitive-affective mapping (according to the scholarly conventions). The data corpus includes educational plans (N = 2), in-service training programs (N = 123) and group discussions of pedagogical teams (N = 6) who participated in an in-service training on the subject, stimulating interaction. Findings underline that similar messages from the inventors on the educational policy level are received and processed heterogeneously by the teams of pedagogues as a result of their preexisting views, routine practices and experiences with intended innovations through in-service trainings. Besides, a diffuse mixture of competing and contradictory information is communicated to the professionals and, hence, collides with the in-service training providers' and educational policy actors' expectations on the processing of the intended innovation. Specific knowledge elements and their valences are diametrically opposed to each other. Dissonances like these are considered as obstacles to social innovation. The obstacles are caused by the lack of a 'common language' beyond all levels. Hence, policy-makers and in-service-training providers should anticipate the supportive as well as competing knowledge-emotional complexes of professionals and take these into account when communicating an intended innovation.}, subject = {Sozialinnovation}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Teaching rationality : sustained shared thinking as a means for learning to navigate the space of reasons}, series = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, volume = {54}, journal = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Malden, Mass.}, issn = {1467-9752}, doi = {10.1111/1467-9752.12407}, pages = {582 -- 599}, abstract = {Human thought can be characterised as being situated in the 'space of reasons'. That is to say that human thought is guided by the norms of theoretical and practical rationality which, in turn, enable autonomous thinking. But how do children learn to navigate the space of reasons? Building on the work of Tugendhat and Bakhurst, among others, we argue, first, that this process involves the acquisition of propositional thought and that it is an essentially social one in which both children and adults take an active role. Second, and more specifically, by drawing on Brandom's theory of meaning, we provide a philosophical analysis of empirical findings with respect to the efficacy of 'Sustained Shared Thinking' (SST) in early educational settings. We argue that the efficacy of SST is based on its emphasising, modelling and practising those elements of communication that are essential for gaining proficiency in 'playing the game of giving and asking for reasons', namely drawing inferences between propositions and concepts and providing justifications for one's assertions. This is achieved by making explicit the inferential relationships between concepts and propositions and by the use of modal and doxastic markers that function as an invitation to a joint search for reasons.}, subject = {Denken}, language = {en} }