@incollection{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {K{\"u}sse dein Gehirn : wie wir uns und die Welt sch{\"o}ner und reicher machen}, series = {Spielplatz Sprache : Kindersprachen st{\"a}rken}, booktitle = {Spielplatz Sprache : Kindersprachen st{\"a}rken}, publisher = {wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-017-9}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {11 -- 17}, subject = {Spielplatz}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Entdecken, forschen, kommunizieren}, series = {Welt des Kindes : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Kindertageseinrichtungen}, journal = {Welt des Kindes : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Kindertageseinrichtungen}, number = {3}, publisher = {Lambertus-Verlag GmbH}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0373-5885}, pages = {8 -- 13}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Becoming episodic : the development of objectivity}, series = {Philosophical Psychology}, journal = {Philosophical Psychology}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1465-394X}, doi = {10.1080/09515089.2023.2181152}, abstract = {We argue that objectivity is acquired by learning to refer to particular situations, that is, by developing episodicity. This contrasts with the widespread idea that genericity is crucial in developing humans' ability to conceive of an objective world. According to the collective intentionality account, objectivity is acquired by contrasting one's particular perspective in the "here and now" with a generic group perspective on how things are generally. However, this line of argument rests on confusing two independent notions of genericity: social and worldly genericity. Holding these two notions apart shows that there is no coherent developmental route from episodicity to objectivity via genericity. In effect, the collective intentionality account presupposes objectivity. Alternatively, episodicity may develop by enculturation into the common practice of spatial-indexical use. This ability establishes an initial, socially shared spatiotemporal reference system comprising the basis for objectivity.}, subject = {Objektivit{\"a}t}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauerKachel, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro and Kachel, Gregor}, title = {Coming from a world without objects}, series = {Mind \& Language}, volume = {37}, journal = {Mind \& Language}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, address = {Oxford, UK}, doi = {10.1111/mila.12313}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25000}, pages = {159 -- 176}, abstract = {While research on object individuation assumes that even very young children are able to perceive objects as particulars, we argue that the results of relevant studies can be explained in terms of feature discrimination. We propose that children start out navigating the world with a feature-based ontology and only later become able to individuate objects spatiotemporally. Furthermore, object individuation is a cognitively demanding achievement resting on a uniquely human form of enculturation, namely the acquisition of deictic demonstratives. We conclude by outlining empirical expectations for operationalizations of our proposal.}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauerMoore, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro and Moore, Richard}, title = {Rethinking how children individuate objects}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {202}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0039-7857}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-023-04300-5}, pages = {1 -- 25}, abstract = {The current understanding of cognitive development rests on the premise that infants can individuate objects early on. However, the so-called object-first account faces severe difficulties explaining extant empirical findings in object individuation tasks while alternative, more parsimonious explanations are available. In this paper, we assume that children start as feature-thinkers without being able to individuate objects and show how this ability can be learned by thinkers who do not already implicitly possess the notion of an object. Based on Tugendhat's ideas on the relation between singular terms and object reference, we argue that spatial indexicals comprise the fundamental means of object individuation and describe how feature thinkers might acquire the complex substitutional system of spatial indexicals. In closing, two accounts of object cognition that do not rely on symbolic capacities, namely Pylyshyn's FINST indexes and Burge's perceptual objectivity, are critically discussed.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {en} } @book{HildebrandtHildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Hildebrandt, Elske}, title = {Dialoge mit Kindern im Kita-Alltag}, publisher = {Version-Verl.}, address = {Woltersdorf}, isbn = {978-3-9817121-0-0}, pages = {16}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtLonnemannGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Lonnemann, Jan and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Why Not Just Features? Reconsidering Infants' Behavior in Individuation Tasks}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, number = {Okt.}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564807}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-24896}, pages = {9}, abstract = {It counts as empirically proven that infants can individuate objects. Object individuation is assumed to be fundamental in the development of infants' ontology within the object-first account. It crucially relies on an object-file (OF) system, representing both spatiotemporal ("where") and categorical ("what") information about objects as solid, cohesive bodies moving continuously in space and time. However, infants' performance in tasks requiring them to use featural information to detect individuation violations appears to be at odds with the object-first account. In such cases, infants do not appear to be able to develop correct expectations about the numerosity of objects. Recently, proponents of the object-first account proposed that these individuation failures result from integration errors between the OF system and an additional physical reasoning system. We are going to argue that the predictions of a feature-based physical-reasoning (PR) system are sufficient for explaining infants' behavior. The striking predictive power of the PR system calls into question the relevance of the OF system and, thereby, challenges the assumption that infants can individuate objects early on.}, subject = {Individuation}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Teaching rationality : sustained shared thinking as a means for learning to navigate the space of reasons}, series = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, volume = {54}, journal = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Malden, Mass.}, issn = {1467-9752}, doi = {10.1111/1467-9752.12407}, pages = {582 -- 599}, abstract = {Human thought can be characterised as being situated in the 'space of reasons'. That is to say that human thought is guided by the norms of theoretical and practical rationality which, in turn, enable autonomous thinking. But how do children learn to navigate the space of reasons? Building on the work of Tugendhat and Bakhurst, among others, we argue, first, that this process involves the acquisition of propositional thought and that it is an essentially social one in which both children and adults take an active role. Second, and more specifically, by drawing on Brandom's theory of meaning, we provide a philosophical analysis of empirical findings with respect to the efficacy of 'Sustained Shared Thinking' (SST) in early educational settings. We argue that the efficacy of SST is based on its emphasising, modelling and practising those elements of communication that are essential for gaining proficiency in 'playing the game of giving and asking for reasons', namely drawing inferences between propositions and concepts and providing justifications for one's assertions. This is achieved by making explicit the inferential relationships between concepts and propositions and by the use of modal and doxastic markers that function as an invitation to a joint search for reasons.}, subject = {Denken}, language = {en} } @incollection{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog: Wie kommen Kinder in den "Raum der Gr{\"u}nde"?}, series = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, booktitle = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {dohrmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-938620-46-5}, pages = {33 -- 52}, subject = {Kommunikation}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog}, series = {Denken lernen}, booktitle = {Denken lernen}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-010-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {28 -- 47}, subject = {Kommunikation}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtPergande, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Pergande, Bianka}, title = {Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag}, series = {Demokratische Partizipation und Inklusion in Kindertageseinrichtungen}, booktitle = {Demokratische Partizipation und Inklusion in Kindertageseinrichtungen}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-7091-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {280 -- 307}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtPergande, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Pergande, Bianka}, title = {Konflikte in der Kita}, series = {Denken lernen}, booktitle = {Denken lernen}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-010-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {68 -- 81}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtPreissing, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Preissing, Christa}, title = {Wertebildung in der Kita}, series = {Werte lernen und leben : Theorie und Praxis der Wertebildung in Deutschland}, booktitle = {Werte lernen und leben : Theorie und Praxis der Wertebildung in Deutschland}, publisher = {Bertelsmann Stiftung}, address = {G{\"u}tersloh}, isbn = {978-3-86793-676-7}, pages = {93 -- 114}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtScheidt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Scheidt, Alexander}, title = {Wie lernen Kinder?}, series = {Betrifft Kinder}, journal = {Betrifft Kinder}, number = {10}, publisher = {Verl. Das Netz}, address = {Kiliansroda/Weimar}, issn = {1613-737X}, pages = {20 -- 26}, subject = {Entwicklungspsychologie}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtScheidtHildebrandtetal., author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Scheidt, Alexander and Hildebrandt, Andrea and H{\´e}derv{\´a}ri-Heller, {\´E}va and Dreier, Annette}, title = {Sustained shared thinking als Interaktionsformat und das Sprachverhalten von Kindern}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {5}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {2}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9186}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000256}, pages = {82 -- 90}, abstract = {Die Interaktion zwischen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkraft und Kind ist eine zentrale Qualit{\"a}tsdimension in der fr{\"u}hen Bildung. Ein Interaktionsformat wurde als besonders wirksam f{\"u}r weitere Bildungsverl{\"a}ufe identifiziert: sustained shared thinking (SST). SST ist eine Form kognitiver Kooperation. Es setzt aktive Partizipation der Interagierenden voraus und zielt auf gemeinsame gedankliche Probleml{\"o}sungen, Begriffskl{\"a}rungen und Bewertungen von Ereignissen. Ziel der Untersuchung ist es, mit Hilfe eines standardisierten experimentellen Settings Aufschluss {\"u}ber die Einfl{\"u}sse von zentralen SST-Sprechhandlungen auf quantitativ-sprachliche und sprachlich-kognitive abh{\"a}ngige Variablen bei Kindern zu gewinnen. Dazu wurde das Dialogverhalten von Kindern im Alter von 2 bis 6 Jahren (N = 38) mit ihren Bezugserzieherinnen bei der Betrachtung von Bildkarten in 1:1-Situationen untersucht. Die Ergebnisse sprechen daf{\"u}r, dass die Anwendung von SST-Sprechhandlungen einen positiven Einfluss auf das Sprachverhalten von Kindern hat und dass diese Effekte unabh{\"a}ngig vom sozio{\"o}konomischen Status und kognitiver Leistung (hier Arbeitsged{\"a}chtnis als Proxy f{\"u}r fluide kognitive F{\"a}higkeiten) der Kinder auftreten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{LindnerMoellerHildebrandtetal., author = {Lindner, Nadja and Moeller, Korbinian and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Hasselhorn, Marcus and Lonnemann, Jan}, title = {Children's use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language is related to their numerical magnitude understanding}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943191}, pages = {13}, abstract = {Numerical magnitude information is assumed to be spatially represented in the form of a mental number line defined with respect to a body-centred, egocentric frame of reference. In this context, spatial language skills such as mastery of verbal descriptions of spatial position (e.g., in front of, behind, to the right/left) have been proposed to be relevant for grasping spatial relations between numerical magnitudes on the mental number line. We examined 4- to 5-year-old's spatial language skills in tasks that allow responses in egocentric and allocentric frames of reference, as well as their relative understanding of numerical magnitude (assessed by a number word comparison task). In addition, we evaluated influences of children's absolute understanding of numerical magnitude assessed by their number word comprehension (montring different numbers using their fingers) and of their knowledge on numerical sequences (determining predecessors and successors as well as identifying missing dice patterns of a series). Results indicated that when considering responses that corresponded to the egocentric perspective, children's spatial language was associated significantly with their relative numerical magnitude understanding, even after controlling for covariates, such as children's SES, mental rotation skills, and also absolute magnitude understanding or knowledge on numerical sequences. This suggests that the use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language may facilitate spatial representation of numbers along a mental number line and thus seem important for preschoolers' relative understanding of numerical magnitude.}, subject = {R{\"a}umliches Wissen}, language = {en} } @article{LohseHildebrandtHildebrandt, author = {Lohse, Karoline and Hildebrandt, Andrea and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Hypotheses in adult-child interactions stimulate children's reasoning and verbalizations}, series = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, volume = {58}, journal = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0885-2006}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.014}, pages = {254 -- 263}, abstract = {Adult-child interactions can support children's development and are established as predictors of program quality in early childhood settings. However, the linguistic components that constitute positive interactions have not yet been studied in detail. This study investigates the effects of hypotheses proposed by adults on children's responses in a dyadic picture-book viewing situation. In 2 experiments, adults' use of hypotheses (e.g., "Maybe this is a dwarf's door") was tested against the use of instructive statements ("This is a dwarf's door") and in combination with open questions ("What do you think, why is the door so small?"). In Experiment 1, hypotheses differed from instructions only by the modal marker "maybe". Children's responses to hypotheses were longer and contained more self-generated explanations as compared to responses to instructions. The use of hypotheses also seemed to encourage children to attach more importance to their own explanations. In Experiment 2, combining hypotheses with open-ended why questions elicited longer responses but no more self-generated explanations in children than open-ended questions alone. Results indicate that subtle differences in adults' utterances can directly influence children's reasoning and children's contributions to dialogues.}, subject = {Parent-child interaction therapy}, language = {en} } @article{LuthardtBormannHildebrandt, author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Bormann, Inka and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Einstellungen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkr{\"a}fte zu anregenden Interaktionen in Kindertagesst{\"a}tten}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung : interdisziplin{\"a}re Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis}, volume = {10}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung : interdisziplin{\"a}re Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe Verlag}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9194}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000531}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25462}, pages = {151 -- 160}, abstract = {Wie eine p{\"a}dagogische Fachkraft mit den Kindern interagiert und sie damit in ihrer Entwicklung unterst{\"u}tzt, h{\"a}ngt maßgeblich davon ab, wie sie lernanregenden Interaktionen gegen{\"u}ber eingestellt ist. Diese Einstellungen werden im Beitrag mit sogenannten cognitive-affective maps (CAMs) erfasst. Zur Erstellung der CAMs wurden leitfadengest{\"u}tzte Interviews mit p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}ften (N = 18) aus sechs verschiedenen Einrichtungen analysiert. Die CAMs zeigen, dass die befragten Fachkr{\"a}fte haupts{\"a}chlich auf sozial-emotionale Aspekte von Interaktionen rekurrieren und ihre t{\"a}glichen Interaktionen mit den Kindern selbst positiv bewerten. Konkretes Wissen zu lernanregenden Interaktionsformaten benennen sie hingegen kaum. Ein Vergleich der Einstellungen der Fachkr{\"a}fte deutet auf teamspezifische Besonderheiten hin. In einigen Einrichtungen sind die Einstellungen der Fachkr{\"a}fte deutlich homogener als in anderen. Die Ergebnisse werden in ihrer Bedeutung f{\"u}r Fortbildungsangebote diskutiert und CAMs als gewinnbringende Methode zur Eruierung teamspezifischer Fortbildungsbedarfe und als Fortbildungsmethode selbst vorgeschlagen.}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{LuthardtSchroederHildebrandtetal., author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Bormann, Inka}, title = {"And then we'll just check if it suits us" : cognitive-affective maps of social innovation in early childhood education}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.00033}, pages = {19}, abstract = {The idea that a simple execution of an innovation invented by actors other than those who are expected to apply it is not likely to take place is a truism. We assume, however, in this paper the idea of a discursive production of knowledge on the application of an innovation across different levels of the education system. We aim to shed light on an innovation's 'journey' from educational policy over training providers to teams of professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC). By investigating knowledge and emotions associated with the introduction of an intended innovation using the example of "stimulation interactions" in day care-centers, the paper contributes to research on the transfer of innovations in education. To better understand challenges occurring during the transfer of innovations, we triangulate methods from discourse theory (coding techniques based on GTM) and cognitive science, namely cognitive-affective mapping (according to the scholarly conventions). The data corpus includes educational plans (N = 2), in-service training programs (N = 123) and group discussions of pedagogical teams (N = 6) who participated in an in-service training on the subject, stimulating interaction. Findings underline that similar messages from the inventors on the educational policy level are received and processed heterogeneously by the teams of pedagogues as a result of their preexisting views, routine practices and experiences with intended innovations through in-service trainings. Besides, a diffuse mixture of competing and contradictory information is communicated to the professionals and, hence, collides with the in-service training providers' and educational policy actors' expectations on the processing of the intended innovation. Specific knowledge elements and their valences are diametrically opposed to each other. Dissonances like these are considered as obstacles to social innovation. The obstacles are caused by the lack of a 'common language' beyond all levels. Hence, policy-makers and in-service-training providers should anticipate the supportive as well as competing knowledge-emotional complexes of professionals and take these into account when communicating an intended innovation.}, subject = {Sozialinnovation}, language = {en} } @book{MachaHildebrandt, author = {Macha, Katrin and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Wir m{\"u}ssen mittags nicht mehr schlafen!}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-945810-98-9}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {119}, language = {de} }