@article{GrosseSimonSoemeretal., author = {Große, Gerlind and Simon, Antonia and Soemer, Alexander and Sch{\"o}nfeld, Romy and Barth, Stefanie and Linde, Nadine}, title = {Teacher-Child Interaction Quality Fosters Working Memory and Social-Emotional Behavior in Two- and-Three-Year-Old Children}, series = {International Journal of Early Childhood}, volume = {54}, journal = {International Journal of Early Childhood}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, issn = {1878-4658}, doi = {10.1007/s13158-022-00327-w}, pages = {421 -- 444}, subject = {Interaktionsp{\"a}dagogik}, language = {en} } @article{GlauerHildebrandt, author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {No facts without perspectives}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {199}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {1/2}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1573-0964}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-020-02958-9}, pages = {3825 -- 3851}, abstract = {Perner and Roessler (in: Aguilar J, Buckareff A (eds) Causing human action: new perspectives on the causal theory of action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 199-228, 2010) hold that children who do not yet have an understanding of subjective perspectives, i.e., mental states, explain actions by appealing to objective facts. In this paper, we criticize this view. We argue that in order to understand objective facts, subjects need to understand perspectives. By analysing basic fact-expressing assertions, we show that subjects cannot refer to facts if they do not understand two types of perspectivity, namely, spatial and doxastic perspectivity. To avoid conceptual confusion regarding different ways of referring to facts, we distinguish between reference to facts de re and de dicto.}, subject = {Theory of mind}, language = {en} } @article{HoeySchroeder, author = {Hoey, Jesse and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias}, title = {Disruption of Social Orders in Societal Transitions as Affective Control of Uncertainty}, series = {American behavioral scientist}, volume = {67}, journal = {American behavioral scientist}, number = {2}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {Thousand Oaks}, issn = {1552-3381}, doi = {10.1177/00027642211066055}, pages = {311 -- 331}, abstract = {Bayesian affect control theory is a model of affect-driven social interaction underconditions of uncertainty. In this paper, we investigate how the operationalization of uncertainty in the model can be related to the disruption of social orders—societal pressures to adapt to ongoing environmental and technological change. First, we study the theoretical tradeoffs between three kinds of uncertainty as groups navigate external problems: validity (the predictability of the environment, including of other agents), coherence (the predictability of interpersonal affective dynamics), and dependence (the predictability of affective meanings). Second, we discuss how these uncertainty tradeoffs are related to contemporary political conflict and polarization in the context of societal transitions. To illustrate the potential of our model to analyze the socio-emotional consequences of uncertainty, we present a simulation of diverging individual affective meanings of occupational identities under uncertainty in a climate change mitigation scenario based on events in Germany. Finally, we sketch a possible research agenda to substantiate the novel, but yet mostly conjectural, ideas put forward in this paper.}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Becoming episodic : the development of objectivity}, series = {Philosophical Psychology}, journal = {Philosophical Psychology}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1465-394X}, doi = {10.1080/09515089.2023.2181152}, abstract = {We argue that objectivity is acquired by learning to refer to particular situations, that is, by developing episodicity. This contrasts with the widespread idea that genericity is crucial in developing humans' ability to conceive of an objective world. According to the collective intentionality account, objectivity is acquired by contrasting one's particular perspective in the "here and now" with a generic group perspective on how things are generally. However, this line of argument rests on confusing two independent notions of genericity: social and worldly genericity. Holding these two notions apart shows that there is no coherent developmental route from episodicity to objectivity via genericity. In effect, the collective intentionality account presupposes objectivity. Alternatively, episodicity may develop by enculturation into the common practice of spatial-indexical use. This ability establishes an initial, socially shared spatiotemporal reference system comprising the basis for objectivity.}, subject = {Objektivit{\"a}t}, language = {en} } @article{DamettoVieiraSchroederetal., author = {Dametto, Diego and Vieira, Luc and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Blaison, Christophe}, title = {Charlemagne's Legacy}, series = {Social Psychology Quarterly}, journal = {Social Psychology Quarterly}, publisher = {Sage Publications}, address = {London}, issn = {0190-2725}, doi = {10.1177/01902725231205855}, abstract = {We investigate between- and within-country consensus about affective meanings of social identities along the evaluation, potency, and activity dimensions from the affect control theory research tradition. Ratings for 387 (194 male and 193 female) identities were collected from two samples representative of the French (N = 700) and German (N = 700) populations for age, gender, and region. Guided by two preregistered hypotheses based on previous cross-cultural research, our analysis points to considerable cultural consensus between French and Germans who seem to share a common "Carolingian" affective culture; yet some culture-specific patterns concerning the evaluation dimension and evaluation-potency interactions were found to be statistically significant. We interpret these results in terms of known cross-cultural features such as power distance and conceptions of power.}, subject = {Karlssage}, language = {en} } @article{LohseHildebrandtHildebrandt, author = {Lohse, Karoline and Hildebrandt, Andrea and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Hypotheses in adult-child interactions stimulate children's reasoning and verbalizations}, series = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, volume = {58}, journal = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0885-2006}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.014}, pages = {254 -- 263}, abstract = {Adult-child interactions can support children's development and are established as predictors of program quality in early childhood settings. However, the linguistic components that constitute positive interactions have not yet been studied in detail. This study investigates the effects of hypotheses proposed by adults on children's responses in a dyadic picture-book viewing situation. In 2 experiments, adults' use of hypotheses (e.g., "Maybe this is a dwarf's door") was tested against the use of instructive statements ("This is a dwarf's door") and in combination with open questions ("What do you think, why is the door so small?"). In Experiment 1, hypotheses differed from instructions only by the modal marker "maybe". Children's responses to hypotheses were longer and contained more self-generated explanations as compared to responses to instructions. The use of hypotheses also seemed to encourage children to attach more importance to their own explanations. In Experiment 2, combining hypotheses with open-ended why questions elicited longer responses but no more self-generated explanations in children than open-ended questions alone. Results indicate that subtle differences in adults' utterances can directly influence children's reasoning and children's contributions to dialogues.}, subject = {Parent-child interaction therapy}, language = {en} } @article{NefLorenzSinai, author = {Nef, Susanne and Lorenz-Sinai, Friederike}, title = {Multilateral generation of violence : on the theorization of microscopic analyses and empirically grounded theories of violence}, series = {Historical Social Research}, volume = {47}, journal = {Historical Social Research}, number = {1}, publisher = {K{\"o}ln}, organization = {Zentrum f{\"u}r Historische Sozialforschung}, issn = {0172-6404}, doi = {10.12759/hsr.47.2022.05}, pages = {111 -- 131}, abstract = {Using two phenomena of violence against children and intimate partner violence and based on two case studies, we explore the extent to which social processes of interpreting and negotiating violence contribute to further theorization efforts. The central unifying element is that both forms of violence are enabled and performed in power relations and have long been socially, legally, and politically legitimized. Therefore, our study's focus is not on violence as a subject but rather on the social negotiation and construction of meanings of actions framed as violent. This perspective is exemplified by two independent case studies and data material that illustrate how such microscopic arguments are developed empirically. The methods used for the two case studies include qualitative analyses of interviews and organizational documents. Hence, we also discuss the researchers' involvement and challenges in these processes. Based on our analytical findings, we argue for the use of an approach of a subject appropriated theorizing violence rather than a formal theory formation of violence. The procedural analysis of violence revealed its importance in making non-public and socially taboo forms of violence analytically accessible.}, subject = {Gewalt}, language = {en} } @article{ChernivskyLorenzSinai, author = {Chernivsky, Marina and Lorenz-Sinai, Friederike}, title = {Antisemitismus in institutionellen Kontexten}, series = {Migration und Soziale Arbeit}, volume = {45}, journal = {Migration und Soziale Arbeit}, number = {1}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, issn = {1432-6000}, pages = {54 -- 61}, abstract = {Der Beitrag geht der Frage nach, wie sich aktueller Antisemitismus in institutionellen Kontexten vollzieht und auswirkt. Das Untersuchungsfeld bildet die Schule auf der empirischen Basis einer qualitativen Bundesl{\"a}nderstudienreihe. Im Fokus der Studienreihe steht die Frage, wie Antisemitismus durch Lehrkr{\"a}fte, Schulleitungen und junge j{\"u}dische Erwachsene wahrgenommen, bearbeitet und eingeordnet wird. Das Studiendesign umfasst Gruppendiskussionen und narrative Interviews. Schul{\"u}bergreifend zeigen sich Praktiken im Umgang mit Antisemitismus, in denen die Situation Betroffener kaum Ber{\"u}cksichtigung findet. Die Befunde verweisen auf eine Perspektivendivergenz in der Rezeption und Einordnung von Antisemitismus. Sie verweisen auf die Notwendigkeit schulischer Schutzkonzepte zum Umgang mit Antisemitismus f{\"u}r strukturelle Ver{\"a}nderungen statt individueller Bew{\"a}ltigungsversuche einzelner Lehrkr{\"a}fte und Sch{\"u}ler*innen.}, subject = {Antisemitismus}, language = {de} } @article{KesslLevensonLorenzSinaietal., author = {Kessl, Fabian and Levenson, Lance and Lorenz-Sinai, Friederike and Resnik, Julia}, title = {Wie erleben Lehrkr{\"a}fte eine Weiterbildung zur Shoah?}, series = {P{\"a}dagogik}, volume = {2023}, journal = {P{\"a}dagogik}, number = {3}, publisher = {Beltz}, address = {Weinheim}, issn = {0933-422X}, pages = {42 -- 45}, abstract = {Die Shoah ist in allen deutschen Schulen ein verpflichtender Unterrichtsgegenstand. Entsprechend viele Lehrkr{\"a}fte m{\"u}ssen sich mit diesem Thema auseinandersetzen. Mit welchen Haltungen und Erwartungen nehmen sie an der Weiterbildung teil, die in einer israelischen Gedenkst{\"a}tte stattfindet?}, subject = {Judenvernichtung}, language = {de} } @article{LorenzSinai, author = {Lorenz-Sinai, Friederike}, title = {Dimensionen der Verwirklichung von Kinderrechten am Beispiel des Rechts auf Schutz vor Gewalt in Institutionen}, series = {Treffpunkt B{\"u}cherei}, journal = {Treffpunkt B{\"u}cherei}, number = {2}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, organization = {Sankt Michaelsbund Landesverband Bayern e.V.}, issn = {2194-1092}, pages = {6 -- 7}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{ChernivskyLorenzSinai, author = {Chernivsky, Marina and Lorenz-Sinai, Friederike}, title = {„Keine schwerwiegenden Vorf{\"a}lle" : Deutungen von Antisemitismus durch p{\"a}dagogische Teams an Gedenkst{\"a}tten zu ehemaligen Konzentrationslagern}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Rechtsextremismusforschung}, volume = {2}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Rechtsextremismusforschung}, number = {1}, publisher = {Verlag Barbara Budrich}, address = {Leverkusen-Opladen}, issn = {2701-9632}, doi = {10.3224/zrex.v2i1.02}, pages = {22 -- 40}, abstract = {An Gedenkst{\"a}tten zu ehemaligen Konzentrationslagern konkretisiert sich die Geschichte des Nationalsozialismus, die gesellschaftlich, institutionell und familienbiografisch weiterwirkt. In diesem Artikel werden ausgew{\"a}hlte Befunde aus einer qualitativen Studie zu Antisemitismus vorgestellt, die auf Gruppendiskussionen mit p{\"a}dagogischen Teams an vier Gedenkst{\"a}tten zu ehemaligen Konzentrationslagern basieren. Neben der Schilderung von antisemitischen Situationen und p{\"a}dagogischen Ans{\"a}tzen unternehmen die Studienteilnehmer:innen den Versuch einer Einordnung ihres Arbeitsfeldes in Bezug auf Antisemitismus. Beschrieben wird ein „Fantasiefeld", das in der gesellschaftlichen Rezeption von Gedenkst{\"a}tten entstehe. Die Orte und die damit verbundenen historischen Ereignisse w{\"u}rden nicht als mehrheitsgesellschaftliches, sondern als prim{\"a}r j{\"u}disches Thema assoziiert, das in der Gegenwart durch Juden:J{\"u}dinnen vermittelt werde. Insgesamt verweist die Studie auf die Notwendigkeit eines strukturellen Antisemitismusverst{\"a}ndnisses und einer umfassenden Reflexion {\"u}ber soziale Konstellationen in der Gedenkst{\"a}ttenp{\"a}dagogik der postnationalsozialistischen Gesellschaft.}, subject = {Antisemitismus}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauerKachel, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro and Kachel, Gregor}, title = {Coming from a world without objects}, series = {Mind \& Language}, volume = {37}, journal = {Mind \& Language}, number = {2}, publisher = {Wiley Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, address = {Oxford, UK}, doi = {10.1111/mila.12313}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25000}, pages = {159 -- 176}, abstract = {While research on object individuation assumes that even very young children are able to perceive objects as particulars, we argue that the results of relevant studies can be explained in terms of feature discrimination. We propose that children start out navigating the world with a feature-based ontology and only later become able to individuate objects spatiotemporally. Furthermore, object individuation is a cognitively demanding achievement resting on a uniquely human form of enculturation, namely the acquisition of deictic demonstratives. We conclude by outlining empirical expectations for operationalizations of our proposal.}, language = {en} } @article{ThomasAlbrechtKorntheueretal., author = {Thomas, Stefan and Albrecht, Pauline and Korntheuer, Annette and Bucher, Judith}, title = {Researching educational barriers in participatory real-world labs}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2024.1250886}, pages = {1 -- 18}, abstract = {Introduction: As a result of the large-scale arrivals of refugees and migrants, Germany is facing the challenge of providing inclusive education pathways not at least for a successful integration into the labor market. In our research project laeneAs (L{\"a}ndliche Bildugnsumwelten junger Gefl{\"u}chteter in der beruflichen Ausbildung/The Rural Educational Environments of Young Refugees in Vocational Training), we focus on educational barriers and good practices within the vocational education and training system (VET) for refugees in rural counties. In particular, racism and discrimination are significant barriers to refugee participation in society and education. Our contribution addresses the following research question: How is educational inclusion discussed and defined in and through real-world labs among stakeholders in four rural districts: social workers, educators, policymakers, administration, and young refugees? Methods: We initiated real-world labs as a space for collaborative research, reflection, and development to promote inclusive pathways for young refugees in vocational education and training in four research sites. We used futures labs as a method to identify key challenges and develop action plans as an activating method with stakeholders and refugee trainees. Our data consisted of audio recordings of group discussions in the real-world future labs, which were analyzed using deductive content analysis. Results: The analysis identified the following areas as important barriers to education and for practice transformation: (1) infrastructural and cultural barriers; (2) day-to-day problems in vocational schools and companies (3) restrictive immigration policies and regulations. Discussion: Educational barriers are imbedded in a contradictory immigration regime with reciprocal effects so that refugee trainees have difficulties in completing their education and further their social inclusion. On the other side of this contradictory immigration regime, social work and social networks provide fundamental support in obtaining a vocational qualification.}, subject = {Berufsausbildung}, language = {en} } @article{MachaUrbanLonnemannetal., author = {Macha, Katrin and Urban, Mathias and Lonnemann, Jan and Wronski, Caroline and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Children's perspectives on quality in ECEC as a specific form of participation}, series = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, volume = {32}, journal = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor and Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0966-9760}, doi = {10.1080/09669760.2023.2299267}, pages = {246 -- 260}, abstract = {In this paper, we want to present research on children's perspectives in the context of participation. We emphasize that the survey of children's perspectives is a form of participation. We understand participation based on children's rights. We refer to the Lundy model ([2007]. "'Voice' Is Not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child." British Educational Research Journal 33 (6): 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033), which emphasizes that it is not enough to simply ask children to speak their minds. Rather, they also need the experience that their views have an influence. In the discourse on quality in ECEC, children's perspectives became only recently the focus of extended research. In evaluation instruments, at least in Germany, the inclusion of children's perspectives is rare. In the study presented here, these two aspects are brought together using the example of the evaluation instrument QuaSi. We describe how children's perspectives are taken into account in the evaluation and feedback process in contrast to everyday life in ECEC centres. It becomes clear that the collection of children's perspectives and their feedback to the pedagogues in the centre does not automatically lead to their views influencing the quality of the centre.}, subject = {Partizipation}, language = {en} } @article{EggerAckermann, author = {Egger, Benjamin and Ackermann, Judith}, title = {Meta-curating : online exhibitions questioning curatorial practices in the postdigital age}, series = {International Journal for Digital Art History}, volume = {2020}, journal = {International Journal for Digital Art History}, number = {5}, address = {Heidelberg}, organization = {Heidelberg University Library}, issn = {2363-5401}, doi = {10.11588/dah.2020.5.72123}, pages = {18 -- 35}, abstract = {Curatorial activities provide (infra)structure and meaning to artworks through the selection and combination of different pieces and their public display. Therefore the way context is added shapes people's perspective towards art. (Post-)digital art and online exhibitions come with specific constraints concerning curation and have a potential to overcome the hierarchies between curators, artists and visitors. In discussing selected digital exhibition formats from the 1990s until today, the article illustrates how the genre has evolved in response to technological changes and concepts of democratization as well as user involvement. Looking at the online exhibition "UN/NATURAL SURROGATES" (2019) the article opens up a perspective towards meta-curating that allows to conceive (online) exhibitions as a means of reflecting on curatorial processes in the postdigital era.}, subject = {Virtuelle Ausstellung}, language = {en} } @article{MaueDewitzAckermann, author = {Mau{\´e}, Rahel and Dewitz, Leyla and Ackermann, Judith}, title = {Wohlbefinden auf Umwegen}, series = {MedienConcret : Magazin f{\"u}r die p{\"a}dagogische Praxis}, volume = {2023}, journal = {MedienConcret : Magazin f{\"u}r die p{\"a}dagogische Praxis}, publisher = {JFC Medienzentrum}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, issn = {0931-9808}, pages = {94 -- 97}, abstract = {Unter Jugendlichen zwischen 14 und 21 Jahren ist sie weitverbreitet: die soziale Phobie. VR-Anwendungen k{\"o}nnen soziale Angstst{\"o}rungen nicht heilen, doch sie k{\"o}nnen psychotherapeutische Prozesse unterst{\"u}tzen. Die im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes „DISA - Digitale Inklusion im Kontext Sozialer Angstst{\"o}rungen" entwickelte Virtual Reality Erfahrung „hopopopo" vermittelt Wissen {\"u}ber soziale Angst und l{\"a}sst die Nutzer:innen den Alltag einer betroffenen Person immersiv nacherleben. „Hopopopo" ist damit ein Beispiel f{\"u}r eine unter ethischen Kriterien entwickelte Technologie, die das Wohlbefinden psychisch erkrankter Menschen steigert.}, subject = {Sozialangst}, language = {de} } @article{AckermannDewitz, author = {Ackermann, Judith and Dewitz, Leyla}, title = {Soziale Medien als Mittel der Krisenbew{\"a}ltigung}, series = {Medien + Erziehung}, volume = {2020}, journal = {Medien + Erziehung}, number = {4}, publisher = {Kopaed Verlagsgmbh}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0176-4918}, pages = {19 -- 26}, abstract = {Welche Potenziale hat TikTok f{\"u}r die individuelle und gesellschaftliche Bew{\"a}ltigung der Corona-Pandemie? In einer qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse von 100 Videos unter \#Corona wurden zentrale Narrative in Bezug auf digitales Storytelling herausgearbeitet und aus psychologischer Perspektive auf m{\"o}gliche Coping-Strategien untersucht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen die meist unbewusste Auseinandersetzung mit pers{\"o}nlichen Bed{\"u}rfnissen und M{\"o}glichkeiten korrektiver emotionaler Erfahrungen auf TikTok.}, subject = {Social Media}, language = {de} } @article{AckermannEgger, author = {Ackermann, Judith and Egger, Benjamin}, title = {Empathische Feedbackschleifen f{\"u}r ein postdigitales Theater}, series = {Theater der Zeit : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Theater und Politik}, volume = {2021}, journal = {Theater der Zeit : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Theater und Politik}, number = {7/8}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Interessengemeinschaft Theater der Zeit e.V.}, issn = {0040-5418}, pages = {120 -- 123}, subject = {R{\"u}ckmeldung}, language = {de} } @article{Egger, author = {Egger, Benjamin}, title = {The next documenta should be curated by a machine. I tell you why it shouldn't. Or how.}, series = {Zeitschrift Kunst Medien Bildung ; Sammlung: Postdigital Landscapes. Kunst und Medienbildung in der digital vernetzten Welt}, journal = {Zeitschrift Kunst Medien Bildung ; Sammlung: Postdigital Landscapes. Kunst und Medienbildung in der digital vernetzten Welt}, address = {Hamburg}, issn = {2193-2980}, abstract = {Im vorliegenden Artikel werden Praktiken des Kuratierens vor dem Hintergrund ihrer algorithmischen, d.h. berechenbaren, und {\"O}konomie-strategischen Potentiale diskutiert. Eingenommen wird eine medienphilosophische Perspektive, aus der heraus das Kuratieren angelehnt an Heideggers Denkbegriff zu einem {\"a}sthetischen Denken dekonstruiert und an die F{\"a}higkeit zur Krise gekn{\"u}pft wird. Dem gegen{\"u}ber wird ein berechnender Modus des Kuratierens positioniert, der sich von kalkulierbaren Strategien der Selbstoptimierung und der Selbsterhaltung im Sinne einer ,Care-Arbeit' ableitet. {\"U}ber Formen der Opazit{\"a}t, hier als Undurchl{\"a}ssigkeit gemeint, werden Kurationsformen - unter dem Gesichtspunkt des kuratorischen Wissens (Konzeptideen, K{\"u}nstler*innen-Kontakte, Raumzugriffe etc.) - und Algorithmen - als Verschleierungstaktik von Unternehmensstrategien - parallelisiert. Vorgeschlagen wird ein Open-Access-Modell, das {\"u}ber digitale Netzwerke Formen kuratorischer Kollaboration erm{\"o}glicht und opake Prozesse in mehrfacher Hinsicht transparenter gestaltet.}, subject = {Algorithmus}, language = {de} } @article{BendauMichnevichPetzoldetal., author = {Bendau, Antonia and Michnevich, Twyla and Petzold, Moritz B. and Piest, Andrea and Schmolke, R{\"u}diger and Jakobson, Daniel and Ahrend, Katharin and Reitz, Thale and Roediger, Lukas and Betzler, Felix}, title = {Spiking Versus Speculation? Perceived Prevalence, Probability, and Fear of Drink and Needle Spiking}, series = {Journal of Drug Issues}, journal = {Journal of Drug Issues}, publisher = {Sage Publications}, address = {London}, issn = {0022-0426}, doi = {10.1177/00220426231197826}, pages = {1 -- 15}, abstract = {Contrasting widespread speculation in the media and public debate about spiking (administration of a substance to a person without their knowledge/consent), empirical evidence on the subject is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the assumed prevalence, perceived likelihood, and fear of drink-versus needle-spiking, and associated mental strain. Data from a cross-sectional online-survey (November 2022 - January 2023) of 1916 adults connected to Berlin's nightlife-scene were analyzed. Almost a quarter reported having experienced drink-spiking, but only a small fraction sought medical or police attention; about 1\% suspected needle-spiking. Presumptive victims of drink-spiking rated the likelihood and fear of spiking significantly higher and exhibited more symptoms of depression and anxiety. Considering toxicological and police findings, the reported prevalence and perceived likelihood of spiking seem to be highly overestimated. This, in conjunction with associated mental strain, highlights the importance of adequately addressing the issue of spiking through psychoeducation, prevention, and interprofessional investigation.}, subject = {Tropfen}, language = {en} }