@article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Kinderrechte im Kita-Alltag}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {4}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {32 -- 40}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GrosseStreubelGunzenhauseretal., author = {Große, Gerlind and Streubel, Berit and Gunzenhauser, Catherine and Saalbach, Henrik}, title = {Let's Talk About Emotions}, series = {Affective Science}, volume = {2}, journal = {Affective Science}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, issn = {2662-205X}, doi = {10.1007/s42761-021-00040-2}, pages = {150 -- 162}, abstract = {Learning to use language in an adult-like way is a long-lasting process. This may particularly apply to complex conceptual domains such as emotions. The present study examined children's and adults' patterns of emotion word usage regarding their convergence and underlying semantic dimensions, and the factors influencing the ease of emotion word learning. We assessed the production of emotion words by 4- to 11-year-old children (N = 123) and 27 adults (M = 37 years) using a vignette test. We found that the older the children, the more emotion words they produced. Moreover, with increasing age, children's pattern of emotion word usage converged with adult usage. The analysis for semantic dimensions revealed one clear criterion—the differentiation of positive versus negative emotions—for all children and adults. We further found that broad covering emotion words are produced earlier and in a more adult-like way.}, subject = {Kleinkind}, language = {en} } @article{MachaHildebrandtWronskietal., author = {Macha, Katrin and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Wronski, Caroline and Lonnemann, Jan and Urban, Mathias}, title = {Making it explicit}, series = {British educational research journal}, journal = {British educational research journal}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0141-1926}, doi = {10.1002/berj.4054}, pages = {1 -- 17}, abstract = {To negotiate quality in early childhood education and care, we must ask from different perspectives what constitutes a good centre for children. The children themselves have only recently been identified as a resource to contribute to that discussion. Several studies have described profound methodologies to obtain children's perspectives by observing, interviewing and conducting group discussions. This article introduces research that combines exploring children's perspectives with sustained shared thinking (SST). Focussing on the dialogue following the rules of SST, we conducted and analysed group discussions with children about their lives within a children's centre in Berlin, Germany. The children were asked to think about aspects of quality. They expressed their ideas, wishes, likes and dislikes within the centre explicitly and profoundly. Following the lead of these children, a dialogue developed in which children and researchers contributed equally and led the way. This showed how well children could act out their agency and were capable of expressing rational and reasonable opinions. Here, we argue that SST helps to see the pedagogical side of exploring children's perspectives and acknowledges this as a pedagogical and political act. Children experience being heard and having a say in shaping situations. This is in itself a pedagogical situation a researcher should be aware of.}, subject = {Erfahrung}, language = {en} } @article{MaywaldPergande, author = {Maywald, J{\"o}rg and Pergande, Bianka}, title = {Missachtet und abgeh{\"a}ngt}, series = {Sozial Extra}, volume = {46}, journal = {Sozial Extra}, number = {2}, publisher = {VS Verl. f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaften}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1863-8953}, doi = {10.1007/s12054-022-00466-3}, pages = {99 -- 104}, abstract = {Obwohl Kinder in besonderer Weise von den Einschr{\"a}nkungen aufgrund der COVID-19-Pandemie betroffen sind, wurden ihre Rechte in der Krise nur mit großer Verz{\"o}gerung und sehr unvollst{\"a}ndig ber{\"u}cksichtigt. Um die Interessen von Kindern w{\"a}hrend zuk{\"u}nftiger Krisen nicht erneut zu missachten, ist die Verwirklichung eines Kinderrechtsansatzes auf allen Ebenen notwendig. Besonders wichtig ist daf{\"u}r die Verankerung der Kinderrechte im Grundgesetz.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Mit Kindern essen und trinken - aber wie?}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {1}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {14 -- 26}, abstract = {Im Sommer 2021 erschien die bundesweite Studie „Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag", die Fachhochschule Potsdam und die Universit{\"a}t Graz hatten sie im Auftrag des Bundesfamilienministeriums erstellt. Ein Team aus Wissenschaftlerinnen hatte Alltagssituationen in 89 Kitas und Krippen offen gefilmt und ausgewertet. Vor allem beim Essen beobachteten die Forscherinnen immer wieder „grenz{\"u}berschreitenden K{\"o}rperkontakt" und nicht angemessenes Verhalten der p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}fte: Sie schoben etwa den Stuhl samt Kind so nah an den Tisch, dass das Kind den Oberk{\"o}rper kaum bewegen konnte. Andere stellten den Teller auf dem L{\"a}tzchen ab, ebenfalls um zu verhindern, dass sich die Kinder beim Essen zu viel bewegen. In rund 30 \% der zehnmin{\"u}tigen Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen solche Vorf{\"a}lle ein- bis viermal. In 16 \% der Situationen sogar noch {\"o}fter. Lediglich in einem F{\"u}nftel der ausgewerteten Spielsituationen und 11 \% der Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen {\"u}berhaupt kein grenz­{\"u}berschreitendes Verhalten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{NefLorenzSinai, author = {Nef, Susanne and Lorenz-Sinai, Friederike}, title = {Multilateral generation of violence : on the theorization of microscopic analyses and empirically grounded theories of violence}, series = {Historical Social Research}, volume = {47}, journal = {Historical Social Research}, number = {1}, publisher = {K{\"o}ln}, organization = {Zentrum f{\"u}r Historische Sozialforschung}, issn = {0172-6404}, doi = {10.12759/hsr.47.2022.05}, pages = {111 -- 131}, abstract = {Using two phenomena of violence against children and intimate partner violence and based on two case studies, we explore the extent to which social processes of interpreting and negotiating violence contribute to further theorization efforts. The central unifying element is that both forms of violence are enabled and performed in power relations and have long been socially, legally, and politically legitimized. Therefore, our study's focus is not on violence as a subject but rather on the social negotiation and construction of meanings of actions framed as violent. This perspective is exemplified by two independent case studies and data material that illustrate how such microscopic arguments are developed empirically. The methods used for the two case studies include qualitative analyses of interviews and organizational documents. Hence, we also discuss the researchers' involvement and challenges in these processes. Based on our analytical findings, we argue for the use of an approach of a subject appropriated theorizing violence rather than a formal theory formation of violence. The procedural analysis of violence revealed its importance in making non-public and socially taboo forms of violence analytically accessible.}, subject = {Gewalt}, language = {en} } @article{Dreier, author = {Dreier, Annette}, title = {Ohne Phantasie geht gar nichts}, series = {Theorie und Praxis der Sozialp{\"a}dagogik : TPS}, journal = {Theorie und Praxis der Sozialp{\"a}dagogik : TPS}, number = {5}, publisher = {Klett Kita Gmbh}, address = {Stuttgart}, issn = {0342-7145}, pages = {28 -- 30}, subject = {P{\"a}dagogik}, language = {de} } @article{ScheidtStollreiter, author = {Scheidt, Alexander and Stollreiter, Eva}, title = {Philosophieren mit Kindern}, series = {Kita-Fachtexte}, journal = {Kita-Fachtexte}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Alice Salomon Hochschule Berlin}, pages = {1 -- 19}, abstract = {Dieser Fachtext stellt das Philosophieren mit Kindern als einen integrativen Teil der p{\"a}dagogischen Arbeit mit j{\"u}ngeren Kindern in seinen Grundz{\"u}gen vor. Hierzu behandelt er die entwicklungspsychologischen Voraussetzungen des Philosophierens mit Kindern und zeichnet nach, wie gemeinsame Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che in der Praxis gelingen k{\"o}nnen.}, subject = {Philosophie}, language = {de} } @article{Maywald, author = {Maywald, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Recht haben und Recht bekommen}, series = {Kita-Fachtexte}, journal = {Kita-Fachtexte}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Alice Salomon Hochschule Berlin}, pages = {1 -- 28}, abstract = {Kinder sind von Beginn an (Rechts-)Subjekte und Tr{\"a}ger eigener Rechte. Die UN-Kinderrechtskonvention gilt uneingeschr{\"a}nkt f{\"u}r alle in Deutschland lebenden Kinder. Eine an den Kinderrechten orientierte P{\"a}dagogik versteht sich als Anw{\"a}ltin der im internationalen, europ{\"a}ischen und nationalen Recht niedergelegten Schutz-, F{\"o}rder- und Beteiligungsrechte jedes Kindes. Die p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}fte in Kindertageseinrichtungen haben - in Erg{\"a}nzung zu den Eltern - daf{\"u}r Sorge zu tragen, dass die Kinder altersgem{\"a}ß ihre Rechte kennenlernen und auch tats{\"a}chlich zu ihrem Recht kommen. Die Orientierung an den Kinderrechten und die Umsetzung des Kinderrechtsansatzes sind zentrale Bausteine guter Qualit{\"a}t in der Kita.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauerMoore, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro and Moore, Richard}, title = {Rethinking how children individuate objects}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {202}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0039-7857}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-023-04300-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-31948}, pages = {1 -- 25}, abstract = {The current understanding of cognitive development rests on the premise that infants can individuate objects early on. However, the so-called object-first account faces severe difficulties explaining extant empirical findings in object individuation tasks while alternative, more parsimonious explanations are available. In this paper, we assume that children start as feature-thinkers without being able to individuate objects and show how this ability can be learned by thinkers who do not already implicitly possess the notion of an object. Based on Tugendhat's ideas on the relation between singular terms and object reference, we argue that spatial indexicals comprise the fundamental means of object individuation and describe how feature thinkers might acquire the complex substitutional system of spatial indexicals. In closing, two accounts of object cognition that do not rely on symbolic capacities, namely Pylyshyn's FINST indexes and Burge's perceptual objectivity, are critically discussed.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {en} }