@article{Spaete, author = {Sp{\"a}te, Julius}, title = {Empirische Ann{\"a}herungen an Digitalisierungsprozesse bei Tr{\"a}gern sozialer Dienste}, series = {Gilde-Rundbrief / Gilde Soziale Arbeit}, volume = {77}, journal = {Gilde-Rundbrief / Gilde Soziale Arbeit}, number = {1-2}, address = {Hamburg}, organization = {Gilde Soziale Arbeit e.V.}, issn = {2940-8822}, pages = {20 -- 26}, subject = {Digitalisierung}, language = {de} } @article{FlechtnerDewitzMaueetal., author = {Flechtner, Rahel and Dewitz, Leyla and Mau{\´e}, Rahel and Tost, Jordi and Schuster, Paula L. and Ackermann, Judith and Heidmann, Frank}, title = {Facing fears, facing opportunities: Lessons learned from a participatory design format with people affected by social anxiety}, address = {Potsdam}, doi = {10.34678/opus4-3116}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-31168}, pages = {1 -- 19}, abstract = {Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed anxiety disorders and a health concern that has a significant impact on the affected individuals' quality of life. Although there is a need to develop methods and tools to support those affected by SAD, it is especially challenging to conduct participatory design with this psychologically vulnerable group of people. This paper presents the design, implementation and evaluation of a participatory format built on a toolkit, a cultural probe and an online prototyping workshop to gain insights into the challenges and needs experienced in the everyday lives of those affected by severe social anxiety. We provide the theoretical framework for designing a participatory format for this vulnerable group, introduce and discuss our methodological approach, and present the lessons learned from implementing and evaluating the format in two workshop sessions with a total of 15 participants.}, subject = {Angstst{\"o}rung}, language = {en} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Mit Kindern essen und trinken - aber wie?}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {1}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {14 -- 26}, abstract = {Im Sommer 2021 erschien die bundesweite Studie „Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag", die Fachhochschule Potsdam und die Universit{\"a}t Graz hatten sie im Auftrag des Bundesfamilienministeriums erstellt. Ein Team aus Wissenschaftlerinnen hatte Alltagssituationen in 89 Kitas und Krippen offen gefilmt und ausgewertet. Vor allem beim Essen beobachteten die Forscherinnen immer wieder „grenz{\"u}berschreitenden K{\"o}rperkontakt" und nicht angemessenes Verhalten der p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}fte: Sie schoben etwa den Stuhl samt Kind so nah an den Tisch, dass das Kind den Oberk{\"o}rper kaum bewegen konnte. Andere stellten den Teller auf dem L{\"a}tzchen ab, ebenfalls um zu verhindern, dass sich die Kinder beim Essen zu viel bewegen. In rund 30 \% der zehnmin{\"u}tigen Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen solche Vorf{\"a}lle ein- bis viermal. In 16 \% der Situationen sogar noch {\"o}fter. Lediglich in einem F{\"u}nftel der ausgewerteten Spielsituationen und 11 \% der Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen {\"u}berhaupt kein grenz­{\"u}berschreitendes Verhalten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Kinderrechte im Kita-Alltag}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {4}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {32 -- 40}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Wie wir Kinder bei Konflikten begleiten k{\"o}nnen}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {2}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {20 -- 21}, subject = {Konflikt}, language = {de} } @book{CzollekPerko, author = {Czollek, Leah Carola and Perko, Gudrun}, title = {Antiromaismus und Antisintiismus}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-7282-2}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {154}, abstract = {Antiromaismus und Antisintiismus werden im Studium der Sozialen Arbeit zu wenig thematisiert. In dem Buch berichten Expert*innen, in welchen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen Rom*nja und Sinti*zze jahrhundertelang Strukturelle Diskriminierung erlebten, aber auch heute noch erleben. Gleichzeitig erfahren Lesende von Empowermentstrategien und politischen Aktivit{\"a}ten gegen diese Diskriminierungsformen. F{\"u}r die Ver{\"a}nderung der Lebenswirklichkeiten von Rom*nja und Sinti*zze zugunsten gesellschaftlicher Teilhabe, Inklusion und Partizipation steht die Soziale Arbeit vor großen Herausforderungen. So ben{\"o}tigen Sozialarbeiter*innen ein umfangreiches Wissen, ein K{\"o}nnen im Sinne sozialarbeiterischen Handelns sowie eine diskriminierungskritische Haltung in der Arbeit mit Rom*nja und Sinti*zze. Hierzu bietet das Buch einen Reflexionsraum.}, subject = {Sinti}, language = {de} } @article{ColleGrosseBehneetal., author = {Colle, Livia and Große, Gerlind and Behne, Tanya and Tomasello, Michael}, title = {Just teasing! - Infants' and toddlers' understanding of teasing interactions and its effect on social bonding}, series = {Cognition}, journal = {Cognition}, number = {231}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1873-7838}, doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105314}, abstract = {The current study investigates infants' and toddlers' understanding of teasing interactions and its effect on subsequent social interactions. Teasing is a special kind of social interaction due to its dual nature: It consists of a slightly provocative contingent action accompanied by positive ostensive emotional cues. Teasing thus presents an especially interesting test case to inform us about young children's abilities to deal with complex social intentions. In a first experiment, we looked at 9-, 12-, and 18-month-old infants' ability to understand and differentiate a teasing intention from a trying intention and a refuse intention. We found that by 12 months of age, infants react differently (gaze, reach) and by 18 months they smile more in reaction to the Tease condition. In the second experiment, we tested 13-, 20- and 30-month-old children in closely matched purely playful and teasing situations. We also investigated potential social effects of teasing interactions on a subsequent affiliation sequence. Twenty- and 30-month-old children smile more in the Teasing than in the Play condition. For the 30-month-old toddlers, additionally, number of laughs is much higher in the Tease than in the Play condition. No effect on affiliation could be found. Thus, from very early in development, infants and toddlers are able to differentiate teasing from superficially similar but serious behavior and from around 18 months of age they enjoy it more. Infants and toddlers are able to process a complex social intention like teasing. Findings are discussed regarding infant and toddler intention understanding abilities.}, subject = {S{\"a}ugling}, language = {en} } @article{GlanzerKrauskopfOrkibietal., author = {Glanzer, Otto and Krauskopf, Karsten and Orkibi, Hod and Schnabel, Konrad and Stadler, Christian}, title = {Zukunft der Psychodramatherapieforschung : Interviews mit Otto Glanzer, Karsten Krauskopf, Hod Orkibi und Christian Stadler}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychodrama und Soziometrie}, volume = {22}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychodrama und Soziometrie}, number = {1}, publisher = {VS Verl. f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaften}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1619-5507}, doi = {10.1007/s11620-022-00709-1}, abstract = {Dieser Artikel der Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychodrama und Soziometrie enth{\"a}lt ein Interview von vier Experten zum derzeitigen Stand und zu m{\"o}glichen zuk{\"u}nftigen Entwicklungen der Psychodramatherapieforschung. Die Interviewten blicken aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven der Gestalttherapie, der Dramatherapie und der analytischen beziehungsweise tiefenpsychologischen Psychotherapie auf Herausforderungen und origin{\"a}r psychodramatische Ans{\"a}tze der Psychodramatherapieforschung. Besondere Ber{\"u}cksichtigung finden Aspekte der Outcome- und Prozess-Forschung, der Gruppentherapie, der Bedeutung von Kreativit{\"a}t und Spontaneit{\"a}t und der mentalisationsbasierten Psychotherapie als ein methoden{\"u}bergreifendes Konzept. Außerdem werden Wege aufgezeigt, um die Forschung verst{\"a}rkt in Ausbildung und praktische therapeutische T{\"a}tigkeit zu integrieren. Die Interviews verdeutlichen, dass eine verbesserte Kooperation der Forschenden und praktisch T{\"a}tigen dazu beitragen kann, die besonderen Potenziale der Psychodramatherapie herauszuarbeiten. Dadurch kann es gelingen, den Stellenwert des Psychodramas als eigenst{\"a}ndiges psychotherapeutisches Verfahren insgesamt auszubauen und zu behaupten.}, subject = {Psychodrama}, language = {de} } @article{HoeySchroeder, author = {Hoey, Jesse and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias}, title = {Disruption of Social Orders in Societal Transitions as Affective Control of Uncertainty}, series = {American behavioral scientist}, volume = {67}, journal = {American behavioral scientist}, number = {2}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {Thousand Oaks}, issn = {1552-3381}, doi = {10.1177/00027642211066055}, pages = {311 -- 331}, abstract = {Bayesian affect control theory is a model of affect-driven social interaction underconditions of uncertainty. In this paper, we investigate how the operationalization of uncertainty in the model can be related to the disruption of social orders—societal pressures to adapt to ongoing environmental and technological change. First, we study the theoretical tradeoffs between three kinds of uncertainty as groups navigate external problems: validity (the predictability of the environment, including of other agents), coherence (the predictability of interpersonal affective dynamics), and dependence (the predictability of affective meanings). Second, we discuss how these uncertainty tradeoffs are related to contemporary political conflict and polarization in the context of societal transitions. To illustrate the potential of our model to analyze the socio-emotional consequences of uncertainty, we present a simulation of diverging individual affective meanings of occupational identities under uncertainty in a climate change mitigation scenario based on events in Germany. Finally, we sketch a possible research agenda to substantiate the novel, but yet mostly conjectural, ideas put forward in this paper.}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Becoming episodic : the development of objectivity}, series = {Philosophical Psychology}, journal = {Philosophical Psychology}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1465-394X}, doi = {10.1080/09515089.2023.2181152}, abstract = {We argue that objectivity is acquired by learning to refer to particular situations, that is, by developing episodicity. This contrasts with the widespread idea that genericity is crucial in developing humans' ability to conceive of an objective world. According to the collective intentionality account, objectivity is acquired by contrasting one's particular perspective in the "here and now" with a generic group perspective on how things are generally. However, this line of argument rests on confusing two independent notions of genericity: social and worldly genericity. Holding these two notions apart shows that there is no coherent developmental route from episodicity to objectivity via genericity. In effect, the collective intentionality account presupposes objectivity. Alternatively, episodicity may develop by enculturation into the common practice of spatial-indexical use. This ability establishes an initial, socially shared spatiotemporal reference system comprising the basis for objectivity.}, subject = {Objektivit{\"a}t}, language = {en} }