@article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Mit Kindern essen und trinken - aber wie?}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {1}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {14 -- 26}, abstract = {Im Sommer 2021 erschien die bundesweite Studie „Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag", die Fachhochschule Potsdam und die Universit{\"a}t Graz hatten sie im Auftrag des Bundesfamilienministeriums erstellt. Ein Team aus Wissenschaftlerinnen hatte Alltagssituationen in 89 Kitas und Krippen offen gefilmt und ausgewertet. Vor allem beim Essen beobachteten die Forscherinnen immer wieder „grenz{\"u}berschreitenden K{\"o}rperkontakt" und nicht angemessenes Verhalten der p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}fte: Sie schoben etwa den Stuhl samt Kind so nah an den Tisch, dass das Kind den Oberk{\"o}rper kaum bewegen konnte. Andere stellten den Teller auf dem L{\"a}tzchen ab, ebenfalls um zu verhindern, dass sich die Kinder beim Essen zu viel bewegen. In rund 30 \% der zehnmin{\"u}tigen Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen solche Vorf{\"a}lle ein- bis viermal. In 16 \% der Situationen sogar noch {\"o}fter. Lediglich in einem F{\"u}nftel der ausgewerteten Spielsituationen und 11 \% der Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen {\"u}berhaupt kein grenz­{\"u}berschreitendes Verhalten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Kinderrechte im Kita-Alltag}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {4}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {32 -- 40}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Wie wir Kinder bei Konflikten begleiten k{\"o}nnen}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {2}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {20 -- 21}, subject = {Konflikt}, language = {de} } @article{MachaUrbanLonnemannetal., author = {Macha, Katrin and Urban, Mathias and Lonnemann, Jan and Wronski, Caroline and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Children's perspectives on quality in ECEC as a specific form of participation}, series = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, volume = {32}, journal = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor and Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0966-9760}, doi = {10.1080/09669760.2023.2299267}, pages = {246 -- 260}, abstract = {In this paper, we want to present research on children's perspectives in the context of participation. We emphasize that the survey of children's perspectives is a form of participation. We understand participation based on children's rights. We refer to the Lundy model ([2007]. "'Voice' Is Not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child." British Educational Research Journal 33 (6): 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033), which emphasizes that it is not enough to simply ask children to speak their minds. Rather, they also need the experience that their views have an influence. In the discourse on quality in ECEC, children's perspectives became only recently the focus of extended research. In evaluation instruments, at least in Germany, the inclusion of children's perspectives is rare. In the study presented here, these two aspects are brought together using the example of the evaluation instrument QuaSi. We describe how children's perspectives are taken into account in the evaluation and feedback process in contrast to everyday life in ECEC centres. It becomes clear that the collection of children's perspectives and their feedback to the pedagogues in the centre does not automatically lead to their views influencing the quality of the centre.}, subject = {Partizipation}, language = {en} }