@article{AckermannEgger, author = {Ackermann, Judith and Egger, Benjamin}, title = {Empathische Feedbackschleifen f{\"u}r ein postdigitales Theater}, series = {Theater der Zeit : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Theater und Politik}, volume = {2021}, journal = {Theater der Zeit : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Theater und Politik}, number = {7/8}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Interessengemeinschaft Theater der Zeit e.V.}, issn = {0040-5418}, pages = {120 -- 123}, subject = {R{\"u}ckmeldung}, language = {de} } @article{AckermannFruechtel, author = {Ackermann, Judith and Fr{\"u}chtel, Frank}, title = {Lehre im Lockdown : Corona als Reallabor digitaler Hochschule}, series = {Medien + Erziehung : Merz}, volume = {65}, journal = {Medien + Erziehung : Merz}, number = {1}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, organization = {KoP{\"a}d, Kommunikation u. P{\"a}dagogik e.V.}, issn = {0176-4918}, pages = {45 -- 52}, abstract = {Der Artikel gibt am Beispiel des Fachbereichs Sozial- und Bildungswissenschaften der FH Potsdam Einblicke in den Ablauf der digitalen Transformation der Hochschullehre w{\"a}hrend der Corona-Pandemie. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus werden aus den Erfahrungen des Sommersemesters 2020 Chancen und Herausforderungen f{\"u}r eine nachhaltige Implementierung digital-hybrider Formate in die Hochschulbildung abgeleitet.}, subject = {Fernunterricht}, language = {de} } @techreport{HoeyNagappanRogersetal., author = {Hoey, Jesse and Nagappan, Meiyappan and Rogers, Kimberly B. and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Dametto, Diego and De Zoysa, Nalin and Iyer, Rahul and Morgan, Jonathan H. and Rishi, Deepak and Sirianni, Antonio D. and Yun, Seonghu and Zhao, Jun and Z{\"o}ller, Nikolas}, title = {Theoretical and Empirical Modeling of Identity and Sentiments in Collaborative Groups}, doi = {10.31235/osf.io/4hukx}, pages = {1 -- 36}, abstract = {Theoretical and Empirical Modeling of Identity and Sentiments in Collaborative Groups (THEMIS.COG) was an interdisciplinary research collaboration of computer scientists and social scientists from the University of Waterloo (Canada), Potsdam University of Applied Sciences (Germany), and Dartmouth College (USA). This white paper summarizes the results of our research at the end of the grant term. Funded by the Trans-Atlantic Platform's Digging Into Data initiative, the project aimed at theoretical and empirical modeling of identity and sentiments in collaborative groups. Understanding the social forces behind self-organized collaboration is important because technological and social innovations are increasingly generated through informal, distributed processes of collaboration, rather than in formal organizational hierarchies or through market forces. Our work used a data-driven approach to explore the social psychological mechanisms that motivate such collaborations and determine their success or failure. We focused on the example of GitHub, the world's current largest digital platform for open, collaborative software development. In contrast to most, purely inductive contemporary approaches leveraging computational techniques for social science, THEMIS.COG followed a deductive, theory-driven approach. We capitalized on affect control theory, a mathematically formalized theory of symbolic interaction originated by sociologist David R. Heise and further advanced in previous work by some of the THEMIS.COG collaborators, among others. Affect control theory states that people control their social behaviours by intuitively attempting to verify culturally shared feelings about identities, social roles, and behaviour settings. From this principle, implemented in computational simulation models, precise predictions about group dynamics can be derived. It was the goal of THEMIS.COG to adapt and apply this approach to study the GitHub collaboration ecosystem through a symbolic interactionist lens. The project contributed substantially to the novel endeavor of theory development in social science based on large amounts of naturally occurring digital data.}, subject = {Computational social science}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MorganZhaoZoelleretal., author = {Morgan, Jonathan Howard and Zhao, Jun and Z{\"o}ller, Nikolas and Sedlacek, Andrea and Chen, Lena and Piper, Hayley and Beck, Yliana and Rogers, Kimberly B. and Hoey, Jesse and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias}, title = {Modeling the Culture of Online Collaborative Groups with Affect Control Theory}, series = {Advances in Social Simulation}, booktitle = {Advances in Social Simulation}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-61503-1}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-61503-1_14}, pages = {147 -- 160}, abstract = {We review Affect Control Theory (ACT) as a promising basis for equipping computational agents in social simulations with a sense of sociality. ACT is a computational theory that integrates sociological insights about the symbolic construction of the social order with psychological knowledge about cognitive-affective mechanisms. After explaining the theoretical foundations of ACT and applications of the theory at the dyadic and group level, we describe a case study applying the theory from an ongoing research project examining self-organized online collaboration in software development.}, subject = {Gruppendynamik}, language = {en} } @incollection{RothmalerThomasHildebrandtetal., author = {Rothmaler, Joseph and Thomas, Stefan and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Budde, Rebecca and Pigorsch, Stephanie}, title = {Partizipation als Gegenstand und Methode der Bildungsforschung}, series = {Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung}, booktitle = {Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung}, editor = {Thomas, Stefan and Rothmaler, Joseph and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Budde, Rebecca and Pigorsch, Stephanie}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, isbn = {978-3-7799-6483-4}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {7 -- 13}, abstract = {Das Thema Partizipation hat in den letzten Jahren in verschiedenen Bereichen der Bildungsforschung zweifellos an Bedeutung gewonnen. Auf der einen Seite werden in fachlichen und wissenschaftlichen Diskursen Beteiligungsm{\"o}glichkeiten und -formen in Bildungsinstitutionen und -prozessen verhandelt (Baraldi/Cockburn 2018; G{\"u}rlevik/Hurrelmann/Palentien 2016). Auf der anderen Seite ist mit dem Anwachsen des Interesses an partizipativen Forschungsmethoden auch eine st{\"a}rkere Beteiligung von Akteur*innen an kollaborativen Forschungsprojekten in p{\"a}dagogischen und sozialen Bildungskontexten unter Einbezug von Kindern und Jugendlichen zu beobachten.}, subject = {Bildungsforschung}, language = {de} } @incollection{Thomas, author = {Thomas, Stefan}, title = {Wahrheit und Vernunft : das Research Forum als methodologischer Rahmen partizipativer Forschung}, series = {Zur Kritik der partizipativen Forschung}, booktitle = {Zur Kritik der partizipativen Forschung}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, isbn = {978-3-7799-6300-4}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {41 -- 64}, subject = {Partizipative Forschung}, language = {de} } @incollection{Thomas, author = {Thomas, Stefan}, title = {Partizipative Forschung mit Kindern und Jugendlichen}, series = {Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung}, booktitle = {Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung}, editor = {Thomas, Stefan and Rothmaler, Joseph and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Budde, Rebecca and Pigorsch, Stephanie}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, isbn = {978-3-7799-6483-4}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {16 -- 66}, abstract = {Partizipative Methoden finden eine immer breitere Akzeptanz in der Kindheits und Jugendforschung. Der Beitrag unternimmt den Versuch, methodische Begr{\"u}ndungsperspektiven einer partizipativen Kindheits- und Jugendforschung zu systematisieren. Vor dem Hintergrund eigener Erfahrungen in einem Peer-Forschungsprojekt mit unbegleiteten minderj{\"a}hrigen Gefl{\"u}chteten werden zentrale Aspekte f{\"u}r eine kinder- und jugendgerechte Umsetzung partizipativer Methodik entwickelt. In Form eines Werkzeugkastens werden partizipative und kreative Forschungsstrategien f{\"u}r gemeinsame Wissenschaftsprojekte mit Kindern und Jugendlichen dargestellt: das ā€˛Research Forum"; partizipative Gestaltung von Workshops und Interviews; visuelle, kreative und aktivit{\"a}tsbezogene Forschungsmethoden; Spiele, Fantasiereisen, Theaterauff{\"u}hrungen; eigenes Schreiben; Sozialraumexploration etc. Am Ende werden unter einer erkenntnistheoretischen Fragestellung die Potentiale und Grenzen partizipativer Methodik diskutiert.}, subject = {Partizipative Forschung}, language = {de} }