@article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Entdecken, forschen, kommunizieren}, series = {Welt des Kindes : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Kindertageseinrichtungen}, journal = {Welt des Kindes : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Kindertageseinrichtungen}, number = {3}, publisher = {Lambertus-Verlag GmbH}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0373-5885}, pages = {8 -- 13}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandt, author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {No facts without perspectives}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {199}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {1/2}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1573-0964}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-020-02958-9}, pages = {3825 -- 3851}, abstract = {Perner and Roessler (in: Aguilar J, Buckareff A (eds) Causing human action: new perspectives on the causal theory of action, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 199-228, 2010) hold that children who do not yet have an understanding of subjective perspectives, i.e., mental states, explain actions by appealing to objective facts. In this paper, we criticize this view. We argue that in order to understand objective facts, subjects need to understand perspectives. By analysing basic fact-expressing assertions, we show that subjects cannot refer to facts if they do not understand two types of perspectivity, namely, spatial and doxastic perspectivity. To avoid conceptual confusion regarding different ways of referring to facts, we distinguish between reference to facts de re and de dicto.}, subject = {Theory of mind}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Becoming episodic : the development of objectivity}, series = {Philosophical Psychology}, journal = {Philosophical Psychology}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1465-394X}, doi = {10.1080/09515089.2023.2181152}, abstract = {We argue that objectivity is acquired by learning to refer to particular situations, that is, by developing episodicity. This contrasts with the widespread idea that genericity is crucial in developing humans' ability to conceive of an objective world. According to the collective intentionality account, objectivity is acquired by contrasting one's particular perspective in the "here and now" with a generic group perspective on how things are generally. However, this line of argument rests on confusing two independent notions of genericity: social and worldly genericity. Holding these two notions apart shows that there is no coherent developmental route from episodicity to objectivity via genericity. In effect, the collective intentionality account presupposes objectivity. Alternatively, episodicity may develop by enculturation into the common practice of spatial-indexical use. This ability establishes an initial, socially shared spatiotemporal reference system comprising the basis for objectivity.}, subject = {Objektivit{\"a}t}, language = {en} } @incollection{RothmalerThomasHildebrandtetal., author = {Rothmaler, Joseph and Thomas, Stefan and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Budde, Rebecca and Pigorsch, Stephanie}, title = {Partizipation als Gegenstand und Methode der Bildungsforschung}, series = {Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung}, booktitle = {Partizipation in der Bildungsforschung}, editor = {Thomas, Stefan and Rothmaler, Joseph and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Budde, Rebecca and Pigorsch, Stephanie}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, isbn = {978-3-7799-6483-4}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {7 -- 13}, abstract = {Das Thema Partizipation hat in den letzten Jahren in verschiedenen Bereichen der Bildungsforschung zweifellos an Bedeutung gewonnen. Auf der einen Seite werden in fachlichen und wissenschaftlichen Diskursen Beteiligungsm{\"o}glichkeiten und -formen in Bildungsinstitutionen und -prozessen verhandelt (Baraldi/Cockburn 2018; G{\"u}rlevik/Hurrelmann/Palentien 2016). Auf der anderen Seite ist mit dem Anwachsen des Interesses an partizipativen Forschungsmethoden auch eine st{\"a}rkere Beteiligung von Akteur*innen an kollaborativen Forschungsprojekten in p{\"a}dagogischen und sozialen Bildungskontexten unter Einbezug von Kindern und Jugendlichen zu beobachten.}, subject = {Bildungsforschung}, language = {de} } @book{MachaHildebrandt, author = {Macha, Katrin and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Wir m{\"u}ssen mittags nicht mehr schlafen!}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-945810-98-9}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {119}, language = {de} } @article{LohseHildebrandtHildebrandt, author = {Lohse, Karoline and Hildebrandt, Andrea and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Hypotheses in adult-child interactions stimulate children's reasoning and verbalizations}, series = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, volume = {58}, journal = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0885-2006}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.014}, pages = {254 -- 263}, abstract = {Adult-child interactions can support children's development and are established as predictors of program quality in early childhood settings. However, the linguistic components that constitute positive interactions have not yet been studied in detail. This study investigates the effects of hypotheses proposed by adults on children's responses in a dyadic picture-book viewing situation. In 2 experiments, adults' use of hypotheses (e.g., "Maybe this is a dwarf's door") was tested against the use of instructive statements ("This is a dwarf's door") and in combination with open questions ("What do you think, why is the door so small?"). In Experiment 1, hypotheses differed from instructions only by the modal marker "maybe". Children's responses to hypotheses were longer and contained more self-generated explanations as compared to responses to instructions. The use of hypotheses also seemed to encourage children to attach more importance to their own explanations. In Experiment 2, combining hypotheses with open-ended why questions elicited longer responses but no more self-generated explanations in children than open-ended questions alone. Results indicate that subtle differences in adults' utterances can directly influence children's reasoning and children's contributions to dialogues.}, subject = {Parent-child interaction therapy}, language = {en} } @article{MachaUrbanLonnemannetal., author = {Macha, Katrin and Urban, Mathias and Lonnemann, Jan and Wronski, Caroline and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Children's perspectives on quality in ECEC as a specific form of participation}, series = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, volume = {32}, journal = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor and Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0966-9760}, doi = {10.1080/09669760.2023.2299267}, pages = {246 -- 260}, abstract = {In this paper, we want to present research on children's perspectives in the context of participation. We emphasize that the survey of children's perspectives is a form of participation. We understand participation based on children's rights. We refer to the Lundy model ([2007]. "'Voice' Is Not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child." British Educational Research Journal 33 (6): 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033), which emphasizes that it is not enough to simply ask children to speak their minds. Rather, they also need the experience that their views have an influence. In the discourse on quality in ECEC, children's perspectives became only recently the focus of extended research. In evaluation instruments, at least in Germany, the inclusion of children's perspectives is rare. In the study presented here, these two aspects are brought together using the example of the evaluation instrument QuaSi. We describe how children's perspectives are taken into account in the evaluation and feedback process in contrast to everyday life in ECEC centres. It becomes clear that the collection of children's perspectives and their feedback to the pedagogues in the centre does not automatically lead to their views influencing the quality of the centre.}, subject = {Partizipation}, language = {en} } @incollection{HildebrandtPergande, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Pergande, Bianka}, title = {Konflikte in der Kita}, series = {Denken lernen}, booktitle = {Denken lernen}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-010-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {68 -- 81}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauerMoore, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro and Moore, Richard}, title = {Rethinking how children individuate objects}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {202}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0039-7857}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-023-04300-5}, pages = {1 -- 25}, abstract = {The current understanding of cognitive development rests on the premise that infants can individuate objects early on. However, the so-called object-first account faces severe difficulties explaining extant empirical findings in object individuation tasks while alternative, more parsimonious explanations are available. In this paper, we assume that children start as feature-thinkers without being able to individuate objects and show how this ability can be learned by thinkers who do not already implicitly possess the notion of an object. Based on Tugendhat's ideas on the relation between singular terms and object reference, we argue that spatial indexicals comprise the fundamental means of object individuation and describe how feature thinkers might acquire the complex substitutional system of spatial indexicals. In closing, two accounts of object cognition that do not rely on symbolic capacities, namely Pylyshyn's FINST indexes and Burge's perceptual objectivity, are critically discussed.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {en} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Ohne Bindung keine Bildung}, series = {Grundschule aktuell : Zeitschrift des Grundschulverbandes}, journal = {Grundschule aktuell : Zeitschrift des Grundschulverbandes}, number = {144}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, organization = {Der Vorstand des Grundschulverbandes}, issn = {1860-8604}, pages = {9 -- 12}, abstract = {Durch die Studien von John Bowlby und Mary Ainsworth zur Bildungstheorie wissen wir, dass Kinder durch vielf{\"a}ltige Interaktionen eine Bindung zu Erwachsenen aufbauen, also eine emotionale Beziehung, die {\"u}ber einen l{\"a}ngeren Zeitraum anh{\"a}lt. Diese Bindung an ihre Bezugspersonen brauchen die Kinder, um aktiv und selbstbestimmt lernen zu k{\"o}nnen.}, subject = {Bindungstheorie }, language = {de} } @article{GrosseHildebrandt, author = {Große, Gerlind and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Bildung und Interesse}, series = {Grundschule Aktuell : Zeitschrift des Grundschulverbandes}, journal = {Grundschule Aktuell : Zeitschrift des Grundschulverbandes}, number = {145}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, organization = {Grundschulverband}, issn = {1860-8604}, pages = {30 -- 33}, abstract = {In diesem Beitrag geht es um die Kr{\"a}fte, die Kinder beim Lernen antreiben: Neugierde, Interesse, Spaß und Selbstwirksamkeitserfahrungen. Und um die p{\"a}dagogischen Ans{\"a}tze, die in der Fr{\"u}hkindlichen Bildung entwickelt wurden, um diese Triebkr{\"a}fte zu f{\"o}rdern und zu erhalten.}, subject = {Grundschule}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog}, series = {Denken lernen}, booktitle = {Denken lernen}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-010-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {28 -- 47}, subject = {Kommunikation}, language = {de} } @article{SzymanskiHildebrandtWronski, author = {Szymanski, Laura and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Sustained Shared Thinking f{\"o}rdert das innovative Verhalten vier- bis sechsj{\"a}hriger Kinder}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {13}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9194}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000642}, pages = {127 -- 132}, abstract = {Empirische Studien zeigen, dass in p{\"a}dagogischen Interaktionen mit Erwachsenen die kindliche Imitation beobachteter Handlungen {\"u}berwiegt. Diese Imitationstendenz kann durch einen instruktiven Interaktionsstil der erwachsenen Person verst{\"a}rkt werden. Innovatives Verhalten wird dabei verringert. Die Generierung eigener, neuer Handlungsm{\"o}glichkeiten ist jedoch wichtiger Bestandteil von Exploration und aktivem Lernen. Das p{\"a}dagogische Interaktionsformat des Sustained Shared Thinking (SST) hat sich als f{\"o}rderlich f{\"u}r die Hypothesengenerierung bei Kindern erwiesen. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden Einfl{\"u}sse von SST-Sprachelementen auf das innovative Verhalten im Kindergartenalter untersucht. Dazu wurde 4- bis 6-j{\"a}hrigen Kindern (N = 51) in drei unterschiedlichen Interaktionsbedingungen (instruktiv, SST und neutral) eine neuartiges Kartenlegespiel demonstriert, das sie anschließend selbst nachlegen konnten. Handlungen der Kinder wurden als innovativ (Abweichung von Muster und Anzahl der gelegten Karten) oder imitativ (Kopie von Muster und Anzahl der gelegten Karten) codiert. Kinder in der SST-Bedingung zeigten mehr innovative Handlungen als Kinder in der instruktiven Bedingung. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass Anwendung von SST-Sprechhandlungen einen positiven Einfluss auf das innovative Verhalten von Kindern haben kann.}, subject = {Innovation}, language = {de} } @article{SchoenfeldRangeLonnemannetal., author = {Sch{\"o}nfeld, Romy and Range, Anna-Katharina and Lonnemann, Jan and Walter-Laager, Catherine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Einsatz partizipationsf{\"o}rderlicher Elemente in Bilderbuchbetrachtungen mit Krippenkindern und die Einstellungen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkr{\"a}fte zur Partizipation}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {13}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9186}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000651}, pages = {142 -- 150}, abstract = {P{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}ften in Kindertagesst{\"a}tten kommt die Verantwortung zu, den Kindern altersunabh{\"a}ngig umfassende Beteiligungsm{\"o}glichkeiten zu gew{\"a}hren. Das Erleben von Selbst- und Mitbestimmung in allt{\"a}glichen Angelegenheiten der Kinder, ihre Teilhabe an kognitiv anregenden partizipativen Interaktionen, wird als besonders entwicklungsf{\"o}rderlich betrachtet. Es fehlen allerdings weitgehend Forschungsergebnisse zur Frequenz einzelner Elemente dieser Interaktionsformate insbesondere f{\"u}r Krippenkinder. Es wurde daher in Krippen das Vorkommen einzelner Elemente partizipationsf{\"o}rderlicher sprachlicher Interaktionen in einer Buchbetrachtungssituation bei 72 Fachkr{\"a}ften erfasst und weiter {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft, ob diese mit den Einstellungen der Fachkr{\"a}fte zur Partizipation korrelieren. P{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}ften ist es vermehrt - in 87,4\% der Lesesituationen - gelungen, epistemische Markierungen als bedeutsames Element partizipationsf{\"o}rderlicher kognitiv anregender Interaktionen zu zeigen. Hingegen verbalisierten Fachkr{\"a}fte emotionale Innenwelten anderer in lediglich 29,9\% der Situationen und deren {\"U}berzeugungen gar nur in 2,3\% der Situationen. Es zeigt sich außerdem, dass p{\"a}dagogische Fachkr{\"a}fte eher nicht den pessimistischen Aussagen {\"u}ber Partizipation zustimmen. Des Weiteren konnte ein signifikanter negativer Zusammenhang zwischen einer pessimistischen Einstellung zu Partizipation und der partizipationsf{\"o}rderlichen Strategie des Aufgreifens kindlicher Themen und dem Folgen des kindlichen Fokus gefunden werden. Insgesamt gibt diese Studie Aufschluss {\"u}ber die Pr{\"a}senz von Elementen sprachlichen partizipationsf{\"o}rderlichen Handelns von Fachkr{\"a}ften wie das Einsetzen epistemischer Markierungen, das Begr{\"u}nden von Sprechakten oder das Verbalisieren innerer Zust{\"a}nde im p{\"a}dagogischen Alltag von Krippenkindern und nimmt Fortbildungsbedarfe f{\"u}r eine weitere Professionalisierung des Feldes in den Blick.}, subject = {Kleinkinderziehung}, language = {de} }