@article{SchoenfeldRangeLonnemannetal., author = {Sch{\"o}nfeld, Romy and Range, Anna-Katharina and Lonnemann, Jan and Walter-Laager, Catherine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Einsatz partizipationsf{\"o}rderlicher Elemente in Bilderbuchbetrachtungen mit Krippenkindern und die Einstellungen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkr{\"a}fte zur Partizipation}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {13}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9186}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000651}, pages = {142 -- 150}, abstract = {P{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}ften in Kindertagesst{\"a}tten kommt die Verantwortung zu, den Kindern altersunabh{\"a}ngig umfassende Beteiligungsm{\"o}glichkeiten zu gew{\"a}hren. Das Erleben von Selbst- und Mitbestimmung in allt{\"a}glichen Angelegenheiten der Kinder, ihre Teilhabe an kognitiv anregenden partizipativen Interaktionen, wird als besonders entwicklungsf{\"o}rderlich betrachtet. Es fehlen allerdings weitgehend Forschungsergebnisse zur Frequenz einzelner Elemente dieser Interaktionsformate insbesondere f{\"u}r Krippenkinder. Es wurde daher in Krippen das Vorkommen einzelner Elemente partizipationsf{\"o}rderlicher sprachlicher Interaktionen in einer Buchbetrachtungssituation bei 72 Fachkr{\"a}ften erfasst und weiter {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft, ob diese mit den Einstellungen der Fachkr{\"a}fte zur Partizipation korrelieren. P{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}ften ist es vermehrt - in 87,4\% der Lesesituationen - gelungen, epistemische Markierungen als bedeutsames Element partizipationsf{\"o}rderlicher kognitiv anregender Interaktionen zu zeigen. Hingegen verbalisierten Fachkr{\"a}fte emotionale Innenwelten anderer in lediglich 29,9\% der Situationen und deren {\"U}berzeugungen gar nur in 2,3\% der Situationen. Es zeigt sich außerdem, dass p{\"a}dagogische Fachkr{\"a}fte eher nicht den pessimistischen Aussagen {\"u}ber Partizipation zustimmen. Des Weiteren konnte ein signifikanter negativer Zusammenhang zwischen einer pessimistischen Einstellung zu Partizipation und der partizipationsf{\"o}rderlichen Strategie des Aufgreifens kindlicher Themen und dem Folgen des kindlichen Fokus gefunden werden. Insgesamt gibt diese Studie Aufschluss {\"u}ber die Pr{\"a}senz von Elementen sprachlichen partizipationsf{\"o}rderlichen Handelns von Fachkr{\"a}ften wie das Einsetzen epistemischer Markierungen, das Begr{\"u}nden von Sprechakten oder das Verbalisieren innerer Zust{\"a}nde im p{\"a}dagogischen Alltag von Krippenkindern und nimmt Fortbildungsbedarfe f{\"u}r eine weitere Professionalisierung des Feldes in den Blick.}, subject = {Kleinkinderziehung}, language = {de} } @article{SzymanskiHildebrandtWronski, author = {Szymanski, Laura and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Sustained Shared Thinking f{\"o}rdert das innovative Verhalten vier- bis sechsj{\"a}hriger Kinder}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {13}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9194}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000642}, pages = {127 -- 132}, abstract = {Empirische Studien zeigen, dass in p{\"a}dagogischen Interaktionen mit Erwachsenen die kindliche Imitation beobachteter Handlungen {\"u}berwiegt. Diese Imitationstendenz kann durch einen instruktiven Interaktionsstil der erwachsenen Person verst{\"a}rkt werden. Innovatives Verhalten wird dabei verringert. Die Generierung eigener, neuer Handlungsm{\"o}glichkeiten ist jedoch wichtiger Bestandteil von Exploration und aktivem Lernen. Das p{\"a}dagogische Interaktionsformat des Sustained Shared Thinking (SST) hat sich als f{\"o}rderlich f{\"u}r die Hypothesengenerierung bei Kindern erwiesen. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden Einfl{\"u}sse von SST-Sprachelementen auf das innovative Verhalten im Kindergartenalter untersucht. Dazu wurde 4- bis 6-j{\"a}hrigen Kindern (N = 51) in drei unterschiedlichen Interaktionsbedingungen (instruktiv, SST und neutral) eine neuartiges Kartenlegespiel demonstriert, das sie anschließend selbst nachlegen konnten. Handlungen der Kinder wurden als innovativ (Abweichung von Muster und Anzahl der gelegten Karten) oder imitativ (Kopie von Muster und Anzahl der gelegten Karten) codiert. Kinder in der SST-Bedingung zeigten mehr innovative Handlungen als Kinder in der instruktiven Bedingung. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass Anwendung von SST-Sprechhandlungen einen positiven Einfluss auf das innovative Verhalten von Kindern haben kann.}, subject = {Innovation}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Mit Kindern essen und trinken - aber wie?}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {1}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {14 -- 26}, abstract = {Im Sommer 2021 erschien die bundesweite Studie „Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag", die Fachhochschule Potsdam und die Universit{\"a}t Graz hatten sie im Auftrag des Bundesfamilienministeriums erstellt. Ein Team aus Wissenschaftlerinnen hatte Alltagssituationen in 89 Kitas und Krippen offen gefilmt und ausgewertet. Vor allem beim Essen beobachteten die Forscherinnen immer wieder „grenz{\"u}berschreitenden K{\"o}rperkontakt" und nicht angemessenes Verhalten der p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}fte: Sie schoben etwa den Stuhl samt Kind so nah an den Tisch, dass das Kind den Oberk{\"o}rper kaum bewegen konnte. Andere stellten den Teller auf dem L{\"a}tzchen ab, ebenfalls um zu verhindern, dass sich die Kinder beim Essen zu viel bewegen. In rund 30 \% der zehnmin{\"u}tigen Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen solche Vorf{\"a}lle ein- bis viermal. In 16 \% der Situationen sogar noch {\"o}fter. Lediglich in einem F{\"u}nftel der ausgewerteten Spielsituationen und 11 \% der Essenssequenzen beobachteten die Forscherinnen {\"u}berhaupt kein grenz­{\"u}berschreitendes Verhalten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Kinderrechte im Kita-Alltag}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {4}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {32 -- 40}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Wie wir Kinder bei Konflikten begleiten k{\"o}nnen}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {2}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {20 -- 21}, subject = {Konflikt}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Becoming episodic : the development of objectivity}, series = {Philosophical Psychology}, journal = {Philosophical Psychology}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1465-394X}, doi = {10.1080/09515089.2023.2181152}, abstract = {We argue that objectivity is acquired by learning to refer to particular situations, that is, by developing episodicity. This contrasts with the widespread idea that genericity is crucial in developing humans' ability to conceive of an objective world. According to the collective intentionality account, objectivity is acquired by contrasting one's particular perspective in the "here and now" with a generic group perspective on how things are generally. However, this line of argument rests on confusing two independent notions of genericity: social and worldly genericity. Holding these two notions apart shows that there is no coherent developmental route from episodicity to objectivity via genericity. In effect, the collective intentionality account presupposes objectivity. Alternatively, episodicity may develop by enculturation into the common practice of spatial-indexical use. This ability establishes an initial, socially shared spatiotemporal reference system comprising the basis for objectivity.}, subject = {Objektivit{\"a}t}, language = {en} } @article{MachaUrbanLonnemannetal., author = {Macha, Katrin and Urban, Mathias and Lonnemann, Jan and Wronski, Caroline and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Children's perspectives on quality in ECEC as a specific form of participation}, series = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, volume = {32}, journal = {International Journal of Early Years Education}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor and Francis}, address = {London}, issn = {0966-9760}, doi = {10.1080/09669760.2023.2299267}, pages = {246 -- 260}, abstract = {In this paper, we want to present research on children's perspectives in the context of participation. We emphasize that the survey of children's perspectives is a form of participation. We understand participation based on children's rights. We refer to the Lundy model ([2007]. "'Voice' Is Not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child." British Educational Research Journal 33 (6): 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033), which emphasizes that it is not enough to simply ask children to speak their minds. Rather, they also need the experience that their views have an influence. In the discourse on quality in ECEC, children's perspectives became only recently the focus of extended research. In evaluation instruments, at least in Germany, the inclusion of children's perspectives is rare. In the study presented here, these two aspects are brought together using the example of the evaluation instrument QuaSi. We describe how children's perspectives are taken into account in the evaluation and feedback process in contrast to everyday life in ECEC centres. It becomes clear that the collection of children's perspectives and their feedback to the pedagogues in the centre does not automatically lead to their views influencing the quality of the centre.}, subject = {Partizipation}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauerMoore, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro and Moore, Richard}, title = {Rethinking how children individuate objects}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {202}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0039-7857}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-023-04300-5}, pages = {1 -- 25}, abstract = {The current understanding of cognitive development rests on the premise that infants can individuate objects early on. However, the so-called object-first account faces severe difficulties explaining extant empirical findings in object individuation tasks while alternative, more parsimonious explanations are available. In this paper, we assume that children start as feature-thinkers without being able to individuate objects and show how this ability can be learned by thinkers who do not already implicitly possess the notion of an object. Based on Tugendhat's ideas on the relation between singular terms and object reference, we argue that spatial indexicals comprise the fundamental means of object individuation and describe how feature thinkers might acquire the complex substitutional system of spatial indexicals. In closing, two accounts of object cognition that do not rely on symbolic capacities, namely Pylyshyn's FINST indexes and Burge's perceptual objectivity, are critically discussed.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {en} } @article{GlauerHildebrandt, author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Sortals, bodies, and variables : a critique of Quine's theory of reference}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {200}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1573-0964}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-022-03767-y}, pages = {21}, abstract = {Among the philosophical accounts of reference, Quine's (1974) The Roots of Reference stands out in offering an integrated account of the acquisition of linguistic reference and object individuation. Based on a non-referential ability to distinguish bodies, the acquisition of sortals and quantification are crucial steps in learning to refer to objects. In this article, we critically re-assess Quine's account of reference. Our critique will proceed in three steps with the aim of showing that Quine effectively presupposes what he sets out to explain, namely, reference to objects. We are going to argue (i) that sortals do not individuate, (ii) that bodies are already objects, and (iii) that the acquisition of variables presupposes a notion of identity. The result is diagnostic of a central desideratum for any theory of reference: an explanation of spatiotemporal object individuation.}, subject = {Referenz }, language = {en} } @incollection{HildebrandtPergande, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Pergande, Bianka}, title = {Beteiligung von Kindern im Kita-Alltag}, series = {Demokratische Partizipation und Inklusion in Kindertageseinrichtungen}, booktitle = {Demokratische Partizipation und Inklusion in Kindertageseinrichtungen}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-7091-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {280 -- 307}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Singular reference : the turn to propositional thinking}, series = {Grazer Philosophische Studien : International Journal for Analytic Philosophy}, volume = {99}, journal = {Grazer Philosophische Studien : International Journal for Analytic Philosophy}, number = {2}, publisher = {Brill}, address = {Leiden}, issn = {0165-9227}, doi = {10.1163/18756735-00000164}, pages = {159 -- 185}, abstract = {The ability to refer to objects - singular reference - is arguably the decisive innovation on the way to human propositional cognition. This article argues that object individuation requires singular reference because basic singular terms, namely spatial indexicals, provide a symbolic frame of reference for object individuation. The authors suggest that singular reference is intrinsically connected to essential characteristics of propositionality: among other things, it guarantees the situation-independence of meaning, allows for the distinction between truth and falsehood, and enables us to think about possibilities. The authors sketch how singular reference gives rise to the development of predication, the powerful logical tool of quantification, and forms the basis for differentiating between belief and desire.}, subject = {Aussagenlogik}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Ich will das und ich schaffe das! : {\"u}ber die F{\"a}higkeit, eine Idee umzusetzen}, series = {Kindergarten heute}, volume = {52}, journal = {Kindergarten heute}, number = {9}, publisher = {Verlag Herder}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {2628-5541}, pages = {10 -- 14}, abstract = {Manchmal scheint aufgeben leichter als durchhalten. Um gesteckte Ziele zu erreichen, brauchen Kinder vor allem eins: motivierende Erwachsene.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {„Ich denke, dass es so ist. - Und was meinst du?" : Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che mit Kindern f{\"u}hren}, series = {Lehren \& lernen : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schule und Innovation aus Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg}, volume = {48}, journal = {Lehren \& lernen : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schule und Innovation aus Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg}, number = {8-9}, publisher = {Neckar-Verlag}, address = {Villingen-Schwenningen}, issn = {0341-8294}, pages = {69 -- 73}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag erl{\"a}utert Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che mit Kindern, beginnend in der Kita. Explikative Gespr{\"a}che regen das Spekulieren und Nachdenken an, ergr{\"u}nden Zusammenh{\"a}nge, stellen den Augenschein in Frage, fragen „was w{\"a}re, wenn …?". Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che er{\"o}ffnen M{\"o}glichkeitsr{\"a}ume, die gedanklich durchschritten werden, stoßen Prozesse an, die wir denken nennen. Dies ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung f{\"u}r das Lernen und Ein{\"u}ben von elementaren Prozessen (Denkstrukturen), mit denen wir am Beginn unserer bewusst gemachten kognitiven Entwicklung auf den Weg gebracht werden, die sprachlichen M{\"o}glichkeiten bei der Suche nach Gr{\"u}nden und Erkl{\"a}rungen f{\"u}r allt{\"a}gliche oder besondere Sachverhalte zu finden.}, subject = {Kognitive Entwicklung}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {K{\"u}sse dein Gehirn : wie wir uns und die Welt sch{\"o}ner und reicher machen}, series = {Spielplatz Sprache : Kindersprachen st{\"a}rken}, booktitle = {Spielplatz Sprache : Kindersprachen st{\"a}rken}, publisher = {wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-017-9}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {11 -- 17}, subject = {Spielplatz}, language = {de} } @incollection{WronskiHildebrandt, author = {Wronski, Caroline and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Lernen und Entwicklung in Interaktion}, series = {Handbuch interdisziplin{\"a}re Bildungsforschung}, booktitle = {Handbuch interdisziplin{\"a}re Bildungsforschung}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim ; Basel}, isbn = {978-3-7799-5587-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {296 -- 310}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{WronskiHildebrandt, author = {Wronski, Caroline and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Das Recht auf Beteiligung im Krippenalltag}, series = {Kita aktuell - Recht}, journal = {Kita aktuell - Recht}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wolters Kluwer Deutschland}, address = {Kronach}, issn = {1612-0809}, pages = {10 -- 13}, subject = {Kinderkrippe}, language = {de} } @article{LindnerMoellerHildebrandtetal., author = {Lindner, Nadja and Moeller, Korbinian and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Hasselhorn, Marcus and Lonnemann, Jan}, title = {Children's use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language is related to their numerical magnitude understanding}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943191}, pages = {13}, abstract = {Numerical magnitude information is assumed to be spatially represented in the form of a mental number line defined with respect to a body-centred, egocentric frame of reference. In this context, spatial language skills such as mastery of verbal descriptions of spatial position (e.g., in front of, behind, to the right/left) have been proposed to be relevant for grasping spatial relations between numerical magnitudes on the mental number line. We examined 4- to 5-year-old's spatial language skills in tasks that allow responses in egocentric and allocentric frames of reference, as well as their relative understanding of numerical magnitude (assessed by a number word comparison task). In addition, we evaluated influences of children's absolute understanding of numerical magnitude assessed by their number word comprehension (montring different numbers using their fingers) and of their knowledge on numerical sequences (determining predecessors and successors as well as identifying missing dice patterns of a series). Results indicated that when considering responses that corresponded to the egocentric perspective, children's spatial language was associated significantly with their relative numerical magnitude understanding, even after controlling for covariates, such as children's SES, mental rotation skills, and also absolute magnitude understanding or knowledge on numerical sequences. This suggests that the use of egocentric reference frames in spatial language may facilitate spatial representation of numbers along a mental number line and thus seem important for preschoolers' relative understanding of numerical magnitude.}, subject = {R{\"a}umliches Wissen}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Entdecken, forschen, kommunizieren}, series = {Welt des Kindes : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Kindertageseinrichtungen}, journal = {Welt des Kindes : die Fachzeitschrift f{\"u}r Kindertageseinrichtungen}, number = {3}, publisher = {Lambertus-Verlag GmbH}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0373-5885}, pages = {8 -- 13}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{LohseHildebrandtHildebrandt, author = {Lohse, Karoline and Hildebrandt, Andrea and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Hypotheses in adult-child interactions stimulate children's reasoning and verbalizations}, series = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, volume = {58}, journal = {Early Childhood Research Quarterly}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0885-2006}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.014}, pages = {254 -- 263}, abstract = {Adult-child interactions can support children's development and are established as predictors of program quality in early childhood settings. However, the linguistic components that constitute positive interactions have not yet been studied in detail. This study investigates the effects of hypotheses proposed by adults on children's responses in a dyadic picture-book viewing situation. In 2 experiments, adults' use of hypotheses (e.g., "Maybe this is a dwarf's door") was tested against the use of instructive statements ("This is a dwarf's door") and in combination with open questions ("What do you think, why is the door so small?"). In Experiment 1, hypotheses differed from instructions only by the modal marker "maybe". Children's responses to hypotheses were longer and contained more self-generated explanations as compared to responses to instructions. The use of hypotheses also seemed to encourage children to attach more importance to their own explanations. In Experiment 2, combining hypotheses with open-ended why questions elicited longer responses but no more self-generated explanations in children than open-ended questions alone. Results indicate that subtle differences in adults' utterances can directly influence children's reasoning and children's contributions to dialogues.}, subject = {Parent-child interaction therapy}, language = {en} } @incollection{HildebrandtPergande, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Pergande, Bianka}, title = {Konflikte in der Kita}, series = {Denken lernen}, booktitle = {Denken lernen}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96791-010-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {68 -- 81}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} }