@article{HildebrandtScheidtHildebrandtetal., author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Scheidt, Alexander and Hildebrandt, Andrea and H{\´e}derv{\´a}ri-Heller, {\´E}va and Dreier, Annette}, title = {Sustained shared thinking als Interaktionsformat und das Sprachverhalten von Kindern}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {5}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {2}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9186}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000256}, pages = {82 -- 90}, abstract = {Die Interaktion zwischen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkraft und Kind ist eine zentrale Qualit{\"a}tsdimension in der fr{\"u}hen Bildung. Ein Interaktionsformat wurde als besonders wirksam f{\"u}r weitere Bildungsverl{\"a}ufe identifiziert: sustained shared thinking (SST). SST ist eine Form kognitiver Kooperation. Es setzt aktive Partizipation der Interagierenden voraus und zielt auf gemeinsame gedankliche Probleml{\"o}sungen, Begriffskl{\"a}rungen und Bewertungen von Ereignissen. Ziel der Untersuchung ist es, mit Hilfe eines standardisierten experimentellen Settings Aufschluss {\"u}ber die Einfl{\"u}sse von zentralen SST-Sprechhandlungen auf quantitativ-sprachliche und sprachlich-kognitive abh{\"a}ngige Variablen bei Kindern zu gewinnen. Dazu wurde das Dialogverhalten von Kindern im Alter von 2 bis 6 Jahren (N = 38) mit ihren Bezugserzieherinnen bei der Betrachtung von Bildkarten in 1:1-Situationen untersucht. Die Ergebnisse sprechen daf{\"u}r, dass die Anwendung von SST-Sprechhandlungen einen positiven Einfluss auf das Sprachverhalten von Kindern hat und dass diese Effekte unabh{\"a}ngig vom sozio{\"o}konomischen Status und kognitiver Leistung (hier Arbeitsged{\"a}chtnis als Proxy f{\"u}r fluide kognitive F{\"a}higkeiten) der Kinder auftreten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{SzymanskiHildebrandtWronski, author = {Szymanski, Laura and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Sustained Shared Thinking f{\"o}rdert das innovative Verhalten vier- bis sechsj{\"a}hriger Kinder}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {13}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9194}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000642}, pages = {127 -- 132}, abstract = {Empirische Studien zeigen, dass in p{\"a}dagogischen Interaktionen mit Erwachsenen die kindliche Imitation beobachteter Handlungen {\"u}berwiegt. Diese Imitationstendenz kann durch einen instruktiven Interaktionsstil der erwachsenen Person verst{\"a}rkt werden. Innovatives Verhalten wird dabei verringert. Die Generierung eigener, neuer Handlungsm{\"o}glichkeiten ist jedoch wichtiger Bestandteil von Exploration und aktivem Lernen. Das p{\"a}dagogische Interaktionsformat des Sustained Shared Thinking (SST) hat sich als f{\"o}rderlich f{\"u}r die Hypothesengenerierung bei Kindern erwiesen. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden Einfl{\"u}sse von SST-Sprachelementen auf das innovative Verhalten im Kindergartenalter untersucht. Dazu wurde 4- bis 6-j{\"a}hrigen Kindern (N = 51) in drei unterschiedlichen Interaktionsbedingungen (instruktiv, SST und neutral) eine neuartiges Kartenlegespiel demonstriert, das sie anschließend selbst nachlegen konnten. Handlungen der Kinder wurden als innovativ (Abweichung von Muster und Anzahl der gelegten Karten) oder imitativ (Kopie von Muster und Anzahl der gelegten Karten) codiert. Kinder in der SST-Bedingung zeigten mehr innovative Handlungen als Kinder in der instruktiven Bedingung. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass Anwendung von SST-Sprechhandlungen einen positiven Einfluss auf das innovative Verhalten von Kindern haben kann.}, subject = {Innovation}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Teaching rationality : sustained shared thinking as a means for learning to navigate the space of reasons}, series = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, volume = {54}, journal = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Malden, Mass.}, issn = {1467-9752}, doi = {10.1111/1467-9752.12407}, pages = {582 -- 599}, abstract = {Human thought can be characterised as being situated in the 'space of reasons'. That is to say that human thought is guided by the norms of theoretical and practical rationality which, in turn, enable autonomous thinking. But how do children learn to navigate the space of reasons? Building on the work of Tugendhat and Bakhurst, among others, we argue, first, that this process involves the acquisition of propositional thought and that it is an essentially social one in which both children and adults take an active role. Second, and more specifically, by drawing on Brandom's theory of meaning, we provide a philosophical analysis of empirical findings with respect to the efficacy of 'Sustained Shared Thinking' (SST) in early educational settings. We argue that the efficacy of SST is based on its emphasising, modelling and practising those elements of communication that are essential for gaining proficiency in 'playing the game of giving and asking for reasons', namely drawing inferences between propositions and concepts and providing justifications for one's assertions. This is achieved by making explicit the inferential relationships between concepts and propositions and by the use of modal and doxastic markers that function as an invitation to a joint search for reasons.}, subject = {Denken}, language = {en} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Unabh{\"a}ngig sein, neugierig bleiben und mit Schicksalsschl{\"a}gen umgehen k{\"o}nnen…}, series = {Betrifft Kinder}, journal = {Betrifft Kinder}, number = {5}, publisher = {Verl. Das Netz}, address = {Kiliansroda/Weimar}, issn = {1613-737X}, pages = {54 -- 57}, subject = {P{\"a}dagogik}, language = {de} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Vorbilder : Wie Kinder im Alltag von Modellen lernen}, series = {Kindergarten heute}, volume = {45}, journal = {Kindergarten heute}, number = {3}, publisher = {Herder}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0344-3949}, pages = {8 -- 14}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Was lernen wir, wenn wir sprechen lernen?}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {3}, publisher = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {17 -- 21}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Was meinst du?}, series = {Kindergarten heute}, journal = {Kindergarten heute}, number = {3}, publisher = {Herder}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0344-3949}, pages = {8 -- 13}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @book{HildebrandtDreier, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Dreier, Annette}, title = {Was w{\"a}re, wenn...?}, publisher = {das netz}, address = {Weimar}, isbn = {978-3-86892-065-9}, pages = {91}, subject = {Soziale Bindung}, language = {de} } @incollection{HildebrandtPreissing, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Preissing, Christa}, title = {Wertebildung in der Kita}, series = {Werte lernen und leben : Theorie und Praxis der Wertebildung in Deutschland}, booktitle = {Werte lernen und leben : Theorie und Praxis der Wertebildung in Deutschland}, publisher = {Bertelsmann Stiftung}, address = {G{\"u}tersloh}, isbn = {978-3-86793-676-7}, pages = {93 -- 114}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtLonnemannGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Lonnemann, Jan and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {Why Not Just Features? Reconsidering Infants' Behavior in Individuation Tasks}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, number = {Okt.}, publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564807}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-24896}, pages = {9}, abstract = {It counts as empirically proven that infants can individuate objects. Object individuation is assumed to be fundamental in the development of infants' ontology within the object-first account. It crucially relies on an object-file (OF) system, representing both spatiotemporal ("where") and categorical ("what") information about objects as solid, cohesive bodies moving continuously in space and time. However, infants' performance in tasks requiring them to use featural information to detect individuation violations appears to be at odds with the object-first account. In such cases, infants do not appear to be able to develop correct expectations about the numerosity of objects. Recently, proponents of the object-first account proposed that these individuation failures result from integration errors between the OF system and an additional physical reasoning system. We are going to argue that the predictions of a feature-based physical-reasoning (PR) system are sufficient for explaining infants' behavior. The striking predictive power of the PR system calls into question the relevance of the OF system and, thereby, challenges the assumption that infants can individuate objects early on.}, subject = {Individuation}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtScheidt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Scheidt, Alexander}, title = {Wie lernen Kinder?}, series = {Betrifft Kinder}, journal = {Betrifft Kinder}, number = {10}, publisher = {Verl. Das Netz}, address = {Kiliansroda/Weimar}, issn = {1613-737X}, pages = {20 -- 26}, subject = {Entwicklungspsychologie}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandtHuweretal., author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Huwer, Julia and Lonnemann, Jan and Kl{\"u}ber, Nadin and Macha, Katrin and Marusch, Tina and Vesova, Nadica and Wronski, Caroline}, title = {Wie wir Kinder bei Konflikten begleiten k{\"o}nnen}, series = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, journal = {WamiKi : Das p{\"a}dagogische Fachmagazin}, number = {2}, address = {Berlin}, organization = {Was mit Kindern GmbH}, issn = {2363-7714}, pages = {20 -- 21}, subject = {Konflikt}, language = {de} } @book{MachaHildebrandt, author = {Macha, Katrin and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Wir m{\"u}ssen mittags nicht mehr schlafen!}, publisher = {Wamiki}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-945810-98-9}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {119}, language = {de} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Zahlen und Schrift entdecken}, series = {Kindergarten heute}, journal = {Kindergarten heute}, number = {11/12}, publisher = {Herder}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0344-3949}, pages = {8 -- 14}, subject = {Lebensalter}, language = {de} } @incollection{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {{\"U}bergang in die Grundschule}, series = {Kitas leiten und entwickeln : Ein Lehrbuch zum Kita-Management}, booktitle = {Kitas leiten und entwickeln : Ein Lehrbuch zum Kita-Management}, publisher = {Verlag W. Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-024108-4}, pages = {277 -- 286}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{LuthardtSchroederHildebrandtetal., author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Bormann, Inka}, title = {"And then we'll just check if it suits us" : cognitive-affective maps of social innovation in early childhood education}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.00033}, pages = {19}, abstract = {The idea that a simple execution of an innovation invented by actors other than those who are expected to apply it is not likely to take place is a truism. We assume, however, in this paper the idea of a discursive production of knowledge on the application of an innovation across different levels of the education system. We aim to shed light on an innovation's 'journey' from educational policy over training providers to teams of professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC). By investigating knowledge and emotions associated with the introduction of an intended innovation using the example of "stimulation interactions" in day care-centers, the paper contributes to research on the transfer of innovations in education. To better understand challenges occurring during the transfer of innovations, we triangulate methods from discourse theory (coding techniques based on GTM) and cognitive science, namely cognitive-affective mapping (according to the scholarly conventions). The data corpus includes educational plans (N = 2), in-service training programs (N = 123) and group discussions of pedagogical teams (N = 6) who participated in an in-service training on the subject, stimulating interaction. Findings underline that similar messages from the inventors on the educational policy level are received and processed heterogeneously by the teams of pedagogues as a result of their preexisting views, routine practices and experiences with intended innovations through in-service trainings. Besides, a diffuse mixture of competing and contradictory information is communicated to the professionals and, hence, collides with the in-service training providers' and educational policy actors' expectations on the processing of the intended innovation. Specific knowledge elements and their valences are diametrically opposed to each other. Dissonances like these are considered as obstacles to social innovation. The obstacles are caused by the lack of a 'common language' beyond all levels. Hence, policy-makers and in-service-training providers should anticipate the supportive as well as competing knowledge-emotional complexes of professionals and take these into account when communicating an intended innovation.}, subject = {Sozialinnovation}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtGlauer, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Glauer, Ramiro}, title = {„Ich denke, dass es so ist. - Und was meinst du?" : Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che mit Kindern f{\"u}hren}, series = {Lehren \& lernen : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schule und Innovation aus Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg}, volume = {48}, journal = {Lehren \& lernen : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schule und Innovation aus Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg}, number = {8-9}, publisher = {Neckar-Verlag}, address = {Villingen-Schwenningen}, issn = {0341-8294}, pages = {69 -- 73}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag erl{\"a}utert Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che mit Kindern, beginnend in der Kita. Explikative Gespr{\"a}che regen das Spekulieren und Nachdenken an, ergr{\"u}nden Zusammenh{\"a}nge, stellen den Augenschein in Frage, fragen „was w{\"a}re, wenn …?". Nachdenkgespr{\"a}che er{\"o}ffnen M{\"o}glichkeitsr{\"a}ume, die gedanklich durchschritten werden, stoßen Prozesse an, die wir denken nennen. Dies ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung f{\"u}r das Lernen und Ein{\"u}ben von elementaren Prozessen (Denkstrukturen), mit denen wir am Beginn unserer bewusst gemachten kognitiven Entwicklung auf den Weg gebracht werden, die sprachlichen M{\"o}glichkeiten bei der Suche nach Gr{\"u}nden und Erkl{\"a}rungen f{\"u}r allt{\"a}gliche oder besondere Sachverhalte zu finden.}, subject = {Kognitive Entwicklung}, language = {de} }