@article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Sich selbst wahrnehmen}, series = {Kindergarten heute}, journal = {Kindergarten heute}, number = {5}, publisher = {Herder}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0344-3949}, pages = {8 -- 14}, subject = {Lebensalter}, language = {de} } @article{Hildebrandt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Die Welt entdecken}, series = {Kindergarten heute}, journal = {Kindergarten heute}, number = {4}, publisher = {Herder}, address = {Freiburg}, issn = {0344-3949}, pages = {9 -- 14}, subject = {Lebensalter}, language = {de} } @article{LuthardtBormannHildebrandt, author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Bormann, Inka and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Einstellungen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkr{\"a}fte zu anregenden Interaktionen in Kindertagesst{\"a}tten}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung : interdisziplin{\"a}re Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis}, volume = {10}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung : interdisziplin{\"a}re Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung, Ausbildung und Praxis}, number = {3}, publisher = {Hogrefe Verlag}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9194}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000531}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-25462}, pages = {151 -- 160}, abstract = {Wie eine p{\"a}dagogische Fachkraft mit den Kindern interagiert und sie damit in ihrer Entwicklung unterst{\"u}tzt, h{\"a}ngt maßgeblich davon ab, wie sie lernanregenden Interaktionen gegen{\"u}ber eingestellt ist. Diese Einstellungen werden im Beitrag mit sogenannten cognitive-affective maps (CAMs) erfasst. Zur Erstellung der CAMs wurden leitfadengest{\"u}tzte Interviews mit p{\"a}dagogischen Fachkr{\"a}ften (N = 18) aus sechs verschiedenen Einrichtungen analysiert. Die CAMs zeigen, dass die befragten Fachkr{\"a}fte haupts{\"a}chlich auf sozial-emotionale Aspekte von Interaktionen rekurrieren und ihre t{\"a}glichen Interaktionen mit den Kindern selbst positiv bewerten. Konkretes Wissen zu lernanregenden Interaktionsformaten benennen sie hingegen kaum. Ein Vergleich der Einstellungen der Fachkr{\"a}fte deutet auf teamspezifische Besonderheiten hin. In einigen Einrichtungen sind die Einstellungen der Fachkr{\"a}fte deutlich homogener als in anderen. Die Ergebnisse werden in ihrer Bedeutung f{\"u}r Fortbildungsangebote diskutiert und CAMs als gewinnbringende Methode zur Eruierung teamspezifischer Fortbildungsbedarfe und als Fortbildungsmethode selbst vorgeschlagen.}, subject = {Kindertagesst{\"a}tte}, language = {de} } @article{LuthardtSchroederHildebrandtetal., author = {Luthardt, Jasmin and Schr{\"o}der, Tobias and Hildebrandt, Frauke and Bormann, Inka}, title = {"And then we'll just check if it suits us" : cognitive-affective maps of social innovation in early childhood education}, series = {Frontiers in Education}, volume = {5}, journal = {Frontiers in Education}, publisher = {Frontiers Media}, address = {Lausanne}, issn = {2504-284X}, doi = {10.3389/feduc.2020.00033}, pages = {19}, abstract = {The idea that a simple execution of an innovation invented by actors other than those who are expected to apply it is not likely to take place is a truism. We assume, however, in this paper the idea of a discursive production of knowledge on the application of an innovation across different levels of the education system. We aim to shed light on an innovation's 'journey' from educational policy over training providers to teams of professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC). By investigating knowledge and emotions associated with the introduction of an intended innovation using the example of "stimulation interactions" in day care-centers, the paper contributes to research on the transfer of innovations in education. To better understand challenges occurring during the transfer of innovations, we triangulate methods from discourse theory (coding techniques based on GTM) and cognitive science, namely cognitive-affective mapping (according to the scholarly conventions). The data corpus includes educational plans (N = 2), in-service training programs (N = 123) and group discussions of pedagogical teams (N = 6) who participated in an in-service training on the subject, stimulating interaction. Findings underline that similar messages from the inventors on the educational policy level are received and processed heterogeneously by the teams of pedagogues as a result of their preexisting views, routine practices and experiences with intended innovations through in-service trainings. Besides, a diffuse mixture of competing and contradictory information is communicated to the professionals and, hence, collides with the in-service training providers' and educational policy actors' expectations on the processing of the intended innovation. Specific knowledge elements and their valences are diametrically opposed to each other. Dissonances like these are considered as obstacles to social innovation. The obstacles are caused by the lack of a 'common language' beyond all levels. Hence, policy-makers and in-service-training providers should anticipate the supportive as well as competing knowledge-emotional complexes of professionals and take these into account when communicating an intended innovation.}, subject = {Sozialinnovation}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Teaching rationality : sustained shared thinking as a means for learning to navigate the space of reasons}, series = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, volume = {54}, journal = {Journal of Philosophy of Education}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Malden, Mass.}, issn = {1467-9752}, doi = {10.1111/1467-9752.12407}, pages = {582 -- 599}, abstract = {Human thought can be characterised as being situated in the 'space of reasons'. That is to say that human thought is guided by the norms of theoretical and practical rationality which, in turn, enable autonomous thinking. But how do children learn to navigate the space of reasons? Building on the work of Tugendhat and Bakhurst, among others, we argue, first, that this process involves the acquisition of propositional thought and that it is an essentially social one in which both children and adults take an active role. Second, and more specifically, by drawing on Brandom's theory of meaning, we provide a philosophical analysis of empirical findings with respect to the efficacy of 'Sustained Shared Thinking' (SST) in early educational settings. We argue that the efficacy of SST is based on its emphasising, modelling and practising those elements of communication that are essential for gaining proficiency in 'playing the game of giving and asking for reasons', namely drawing inferences between propositions and concepts and providing justifications for one's assertions. This is achieved by making explicit the inferential relationships between concepts and propositions and by the use of modal and doxastic markers that function as an invitation to a joint search for reasons.}, subject = {Denken}, language = {en} } @incollection{HildebrandtMusholt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Musholt, Kristina}, title = {Selbstbildung, Abrichtung oder Dialog: Wie kommen Kinder in den "Raum der Gr{\"u}nde"?}, series = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, booktitle = {Mit Kindern denken : Gespr{\"a}che im Kita Alltag}, editor = {Hebenstreit-M{\"u}ller, Sabine and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, publisher = {dohrmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-938620-46-5}, pages = {33 -- 52}, subject = {Kommunikation}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtScheidtHildebrandtetal., author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Scheidt, Alexander and Hildebrandt, Andrea and H{\´e}derv{\´a}ri-Heller, {\´E}va and Dreier, Annette}, title = {Sustained shared thinking als Interaktionsformat und das Sprachverhalten von Kindern}, series = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, volume = {5}, journal = {Fr{\"u}he Bildung}, number = {2}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {2191-9186}, doi = {10.1026/2191-9186/a000256}, pages = {82 -- 90}, abstract = {Die Interaktion zwischen p{\"a}dagogischer Fachkraft und Kind ist eine zentrale Qualit{\"a}tsdimension in der fr{\"u}hen Bildung. Ein Interaktionsformat wurde als besonders wirksam f{\"u}r weitere Bildungsverl{\"a}ufe identifiziert: sustained shared thinking (SST). SST ist eine Form kognitiver Kooperation. Es setzt aktive Partizipation der Interagierenden voraus und zielt auf gemeinsame gedankliche Probleml{\"o}sungen, Begriffskl{\"a}rungen und Bewertungen von Ereignissen. Ziel der Untersuchung ist es, mit Hilfe eines standardisierten experimentellen Settings Aufschluss {\"u}ber die Einfl{\"u}sse von zentralen SST-Sprechhandlungen auf quantitativ-sprachliche und sprachlich-kognitive abh{\"a}ngige Variablen bei Kindern zu gewinnen. Dazu wurde das Dialogverhalten von Kindern im Alter von 2 bis 6 Jahren (N = 38) mit ihren Bezugserzieherinnen bei der Betrachtung von Bildkarten in 1:1-Situationen untersucht. Die Ergebnisse sprechen daf{\"u}r, dass die Anwendung von SST-Sprechhandlungen einen positiven Einfluss auf das Sprachverhalten von Kindern hat und dass diese Effekte unabh{\"a}ngig vom sozio{\"o}konomischen Status und kognitiver Leistung (hier Arbeitsged{\"a}chtnis als Proxy f{\"u}r fluide kognitive F{\"a}higkeiten) der Kinder auftreten.}, subject = {Kind}, language = {de} } @incollection{ScheidtHildebrandt, author = {Scheidt, Alexander and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Forscherwelt Blossin}, series = {Handbuch f{\"u}r ErzieherInnen : in Krippe, Kindergarten, Kita und Hort (Losebl.-Ausg.)}, booktitle = {Handbuch f{\"u}r ErzieherInnen : in Krippe, Kindergarten, Kita und Hort (Losebl.-Ausg.)}, number = {78}, publisher = {Olzog}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-7892-1691-6}, subject = {Bildungswesen}, language = {de} } @article{HildebrandtScheidt, author = {Hildebrandt, Frauke and Scheidt, Alexander}, title = {Wie lernen Kinder?}, series = {Betrifft Kinder}, journal = {Betrifft Kinder}, number = {10}, publisher = {Verl. Das Netz}, address = {Kiliansroda/Weimar}, issn = {1613-737X}, pages = {20 -- 26}, subject = {Entwicklungspsychologie}, language = {de} } @article{GlauerHildebrandt, author = {Glauer, Ramiro and Hildebrandt, Frauke}, title = {Sortals, bodies, and variables : a critique of Quine's theory of reference}, series = {Synthese}, volume = {200}, journal = {Synthese}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1573-0964}, doi = {10.1007/s11229-022-03767-y}, pages = {21}, abstract = {Among the philosophical accounts of reference, Quine's (1974) The Roots of Reference stands out in offering an integrated account of the acquisition of linguistic reference and object individuation. Based on a non-referential ability to distinguish bodies, the acquisition of sortals and quantification are crucial steps in learning to refer to objects. In this article, we critically re-assess Quine's account of reference. Our critique will proceed in three steps with the aim of showing that Quine effectively presupposes what he sets out to explain, namely, reference to objects. We are going to argue (i) that sortals do not individuate, (ii) that bodies are already objects, and (iii) that the acquisition of variables presupposes a notion of identity. The result is diagnostic of a central desideratum for any theory of reference: an explanation of spatiotemporal object individuation.}, subject = {Referenz }, language = {en} }