@article{EulerRack, author = {Euler, Ellen and Rack, Fabian}, title = {CCPL Handbuch und Kommentar}, series = {Rechtswissenschaft : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r rechtswissenschaftliche Forschung}, journal = {Rechtswissenschaft : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r rechtswissenschaftliche Forschung}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, issn = {1868-8098}, doi = {10.5771/9783748950318-68}, pages = {68 -- 73}, abstract = {Der Beitrag gibt einen Einblick in die Entstehungsgeschichte und die Besonderheiten des ersten offen lizenzierten Rechtskommentars f{\"u}r die Creative Commons-Lizenzen in Version 4.0. Als Projekt von OpenRewi e.V. ist er ein Transformationsbeispiel f{\"u}r die offene Rechtswissenschaft, dem hoffentlich weitere folgen werden.}, subject = {Kommentar}, language = {de} } @book{OPUS4-3634, title = {Creative Commons Public License}, editor = {Boehm, Franziska and Euler, Ellen and Klimpel, Paul and Rack, Fabian and Weitzmann, John}, publisher = {Carl Grossmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-941159-73-0}, doi = {10.24921/2025.94115974}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {525}, abstract = {Creative Commons-Lizenzen werden seit rund 20 Jahren eingesetzt und sind als freies Lizenzmodell weltweit etabliert. Mit ihnen k{\"o}nnen Kreative der Allgemeinheit die Nutzung urheberrechtlich gesch{\"u}tzter Materialien unter bestimmten Bedingungen erlauben.Das Buch kommentiert zum ersten Mal den Lizenztext der Creative Commons Public License und leistet somit einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Rechtspraxis mit Creative Commons-Lizenzen.Der Kommentar bietet damit die erste umfassende juristische Analyse der Creative Commons-Lizenzen. Der Handbuchteil stellt Spezifika unter anderem f{\"u}r die Wissenschaft, die {\"o}ffentliche Verwaltung und die Rechtsdurchsetzung dar.}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @incollection{EulerBoehmKlimpeletal., author = {Euler, Ellen and Boehm, Franziska and Klimpel, Paul and Rack, Fabian and Weitzmann, John}, title = {Einleitung}, series = {Creative Commons Public License : Kommentar und Handbuch f{\"u}r die Rechtspraxis}, booktitle = {Creative Commons Public License : Kommentar und Handbuch f{\"u}r die Rechtspraxis}, publisher = {Carl Grossmann Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-941159-73-0}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {7 -- 27}, subject = {Open Access}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Euler, author = {Euler, Ellen}, title = {Rechtsklarheit f{\"u}r User: Creative Commons Lizenzen \& International Rights Statements}, series = {Lizenzangaben und Rechtedokumentation im Dialog : Datenfl{\"u}sse Nachhaltig gestalten}, booktitle = {Lizenzangaben und Rechtedokumentation im Dialog : Datenfl{\"u}sse Nachhaltig gestalten}, address = {Frankfurt am Main}, organization = {Deutsche Nationalbibliothek}, isbn = {978-3-941113-49-7}, pages = {9 -- 17}, subject = {Urheberrecht}, language = {de} } @article{EulerWallace, author = {Euler, Ellen and Wallace, Andrea}, title = {Revisiting Access to Cultural Heritage in the Public Domain: EU and International Developments}, series = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law}, volume = {51}, journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law}, number = {7}, publisher = {Heidelberg}, address = {Springer}, issn = {2195-0237}, doi = {10.1007/s40319-020-00961-8}, pages = {823 -- 855}, abstract = {In the past year, a number of legal developments have accelerated discussions around whether intellectual property rights can be claimed in materials generated during the reproduction of public domain works. This article analyses those developments, focusing on the 2018 German Federal Supreme Court decision Museumsfotos, Article 14 of the 2019 Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market Directive, and relevant provisions of the 2019 Open Data and the Re-use of Public Sector Information Directive. It reveals that despite the growing consensus for protecting the public domain, there is a lack of practical guidance throughout the EU in legislation, jurisprudence, and literature on what reproduction media might attract new intellectual property rights, from scans to photography to 3D data. This leaves ample room for copyright to be claimed in reproduction materials produced by new technologies. Moreover, owners remain able to impose other restrictive measures around public domain works and data, like onsite photography bans, website terms and conditions, and exclusive arrangements with third parties. This article maps out these various legal gaps. It argues the pro-open culture spirit of the EU Directives should be embraced and provides guidance for Member States and heritage institutions around national implementation.}, subject = {Urheberrecht}, language = {en} }