@inproceedings{MichelGriesbaum, author = {Michel, Antje and Griesbaum, Joachim}, title = {AI tool usage by students: tool selection, use cases, quality of results}, series = {ISIC 2024 Adjunct Proceedings : The 15th Information Behaviour Conference}, booktitle = {ISIC 2024 Adjunct Proceedings : The 15th Information Behaviour Conference}, editor = {Skov, Mette and Innocenti, Perla and Late, Elina and Gorichanaz, Tim and Greifeneder, Elke}, publisher = {Aalborg University Open Publishing}, address = {Aalborg}, isbn = {978-87-94563-82-6}, doi = {10.54337/aau738071833}, pages = {33 -- 36}, abstract = {The aim of the workshop is to jointly reflect on theses and initial findings on information behaviour of information science students in the context of their use of AI tools and to draw conclusions from them for the further development of the teaching of information literacy. The workshop hosts suggest viewing the event as a kick-off for further collaboration in this topic area. The workshop connects insights from an empirical study conducted by the workshop hosts with theoretical considerations of information literacy and AI literacy. The study offers insights into the use of AI tools by information science students as well as the use cases for the use of AI tools. It also deals with the criteria that are relevant for the use of AI tools as well as the assessment criteria that students apply to the tools and their results. Building on that, the relation of AI information literacy on existing information literacy and AI literacy models will be discussed within the workshop to develop a first approach on the question, what constitutes AI information literacy. The workshop aims to lay a foundation for an ongoing discussion on the question what constitutes AI information literacy and how to foster it.}, subject = {Informationskompetenz}, language = {en} } @incollection{GriesbaumMichelDreisiebneretal., author = {Griesbaum, Joachim and Michel, Antje and Dreisiebner, Stefan and G{\"a}de, Maria and Wittich, Anke}, title = {Information literacy}, series = {Handbook on Information Sciences}, booktitle = {Handbook on Information Sciences}, editor = {Heisig, Peter}, publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing}, address = {Cheltenham}, isbn = {978-1-0353-4369-0}, doi = {10.4337/9781035343706.00026}, publisher = {Fachhochschule Potsdam}, pages = {312 -- 324}, subject = {Bildung}, language = {en} } @article{TappenbeckMichelWittichetal., author = {Tappenbeck, Inka and Michel, Antje and Wittich, Anke and Werr, Naoka and G{\"a}de, Maria and Spree, Ulrike and Gl{\"a}ser, Christine and Griesbaum, Joachim and Mandl, Thomas and Keller-Loibl, Kerstin and Stang, Richard}, title = {Framework Informationskompetenz}, series = {O-Bib : das Offene Bibliotheksjournal}, volume = {9}, journal = {O-Bib : das Offene Bibliotheksjournal}, number = {1}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, organization = {Verein Deutscher Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, issn = {2363-9814}, doi = {10.5282/o-bib/5794}, pages = {1 -- 18}, abstract = {Der Beitrag stellt Ergebnisse der Fachgruppe Informationskompetenz der KIBA vor, in der alle Lehrenden im Bereich der Vermittlung von Medien- und Informationskompetenz an bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Studieng{\"a}ngen in Deutschland zusammenarbeiten. Ausgangspunkt ist das „Framework Informationskompetenz", ein Anforderungsrahmen, der gemeinsame Standards in der Qualifikation von Studierenden der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft f{\"u}r das Aufgabenfeld der F{\"o}rderung von Informationskompetenz sichern soll. Es wird aufgezeigt, wie die in diesem Rahmenmodell formulierten Qualifikationsstandards in den verschiedenen Studieng{\"a}ngen umgesetzt werden und wo es bedarfsbezogene Auspr{\"a}gung und Gewichtung in den Qualifikationszielen gibt.}, subject = {Informationskompetenz}, language = {de} } @article{MichelGriesbaum, author = {Michel, Antje and Griesbaum, Joachim}, title = {Forschungsperspektiven zu KI, Informationsverhalten und Informationskompetenz}, series = {Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis}, volume = {49}, journal = {Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis}, number = {1}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1865-7648}, doi = {10.1515/bfp-2024-0081}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:525-35826}, pages = {121 -- 125}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag berichtet {\"u}ber Konzept und Ergebnisse eines Workshops der Autor*innen auf der internationalen Konferenz f{\"u}r Informationsverhaltensforschung (ISIC 2024). Das Ziel des Workshops bestand darin, einen Diskursraum f{\"u}r den internationalen Erfahrungsaustausch von Forschenden mit Schwerpunkten im Bereich der Informationsverhaltensforschung, der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz sowie verwandten Themenbereichen der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften zu schaffen. Den Ausgangspunkt f{\"u}r die Diskussion bildete eine Pilotstudie, die die Autor*innen im Juni/Juli 2024 an deutschen Hochschulen mit informationswissenschaftlichen Studieng{\"a}ngen zum Informationsverhalten der Studierenden im Umgang mit KI-Tools durchgef{\"u}hrt haben.}, subject = {Hochschulbildung}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{GriesbaumDreisiebnerMicheletal., author = {Griesbaum, Joachim and Dreisiebner, Stefan and Michel, Antje and Tappenbeck, Inka and Wittich, Anke}, title = {Information Literacy and Artificial Intelligence}, series = {Information Literacy in an AI-Driven World : 9th European Conference, ECIL 2025, Bamberg, Germany, September 22-25, 2025, Revised Selected Papers}, booktitle = {Information Literacy in an AI-Driven World : 9th European Conference, ECIL 2025, Bamberg, Germany, September 22-25, 2025, Revised Selected Papers}, editor = {Kurbanoğlu, Serap and Boustany, Joumana and Špiranec, Sonja and {\"U}nal, Yurdag{\"u}l and Şencan, İpek and Kos, Denis and Grassian, Esther and Roy, Loriene and Mizrachi, Diane}, publisher = {Springer International Publishing}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-032-17272-3}, issn = {1865-0937}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-032-17272-3_1}, pages = {3 -- 13}, abstract = {This article summarizes the results of a workshop at which thirteen librarians and information scientists discussed the following topics: 1. The impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on information literacy. 2. Questions arising from AI for research on information literacy. 3. Challenges and opportunities for the promotion of information literacy through AI. Results indicate: 1. Generative AI is transforming information markets by reshaping how information is produced and used. New search services emerge, creating new opportunities for the provision and use of information, but also challenging established competencies for assessing quality and transparency. 2. Key research questions include: How does AI reshape user behavior? How can content quality and transparency be ensured? Can labelling and regulation work? How can AI skills and lifelong learning be advanced? 3. AI offers benefits like automating tasks and supporting learning but also raises concerns about transparency and autonomy. Information literacy requires interdisciplinary education and a critical evaluation of AI tools.}, subject = {Benutzerverhalten}, language = {en} }