Selektion und Bias in traditionellen und Internet-Informationsintermediären. Forschungsstand

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:29-opus4-102405
  • The selection of information on the internet is causing massive concerns and discussion. Critics fear the polarization of internet users and warn of echo chambers and filter bubbles. Especially search engines and social networking sites are being held responsible: as information intermediaries they are positioned between content producers and recipients, selecting and rating content. However, empirical findings on selection and bias in internet information intermediaries are scarce and disparate. Moreover, the preselection of information by intermediaries is not a specific characteristic of the digital world, but is equally done by traditional intermediaries such as mass media, bookshops orThe selection of information on the internet is causing massive concerns and discussion. Critics fear the polarization of internet users and warn of echo chambers and filter bubbles. Especially search engines and social networking sites are being held responsible: as information intermediaries they are positioned between content producers and recipients, selecting and rating content. However, empirical findings on selection and bias in internet information intermediaries are scarce and disparate. Moreover, the preselection of information by intermediaries is not a specific characteristic of the digital world, but is equally done by traditional intermediaries such as mass media, bookshops or libraries. This paper summarizes the current state of research on selection and bias in traditional and internet information intermediaries. Different concepts, definitions and implications of the term information intermediary are analyzed in the context of the adjacent term gatekeeper. Furthermore, empirical findings on the theories of filter bubbles, echo chambers and fragmentation are summed up, as well as the state of knowledge on selection in different types of intermediaries. As a basis for further research, two models for analyzing selection and bias in intermediaries are introduced: Bozdag’s Filter Model and Jürgens & Stark’s Intermediary Effects Model. Lastly, aspects that distinguish selection in internet information intermediaries from selection in traditional contexts are compiled. This paper concludes that the production or reinforcement of bias and fragmentation by internet intermediaries is not sufficiently proven. Moreover, there is a research gap on whether traditional intermediaries have comparable effects. Further research requires a comprehensive analysis on the selection mechanisms in both traditional and internet information intermediaries.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author:Katharina Leyrer
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:29-opus4-102405
Series (Volume number):Erlanger Beiträge zur Medienwirtschaft (10)
Contributor:Svenja Hagenhoff
Document Type:Working Paper
Language:German
Year of Completion:2018
Embargo Date:2018/12/06
Publishing Institution:Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
Release Date:2018/12/10
Tag:Bias; Bibliothek; Buchhandlung; Echokammer; Filterblase; Fragmentierung; Gatekeeper; Informationsintermediär; Journalismus; Literaturkritik; Multimedia-Plattform; Selektion; Soziale Netzwerk-Seite; Suchmaschine
Edition:1. Auflage
Pagenumber:52
Institutes:Philosophische Fakultät und Fachbereich Theologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:0 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 00 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme / 003 Systeme
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
Licence (German):Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International