@misc{Riedel2019, author = {Riedel, Rafał}, title = {Review: "Populist Political Communication in Europe" / Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, Claes De Vreese (ed.). New York: Routledge, 2017. ISBN: 9781138614826}, organization = {Digitale Wissenschaftsplattform Pol-Int (www.pol-int.org)}, doi = {10.11584/opus4-734}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:521-opus4-7341}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The volume Populist Political Communication in Europe, edited by a group of prominent scholars representing various disciplines, including sociology, political science, media and communication studies, consisting of Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes H. de Vreese, is the first one in the newly established series Routledge Research in Communication Studies. It comes as no surprise that the first position in this series is dedicated to populism, which has recently become the dominating force in European politics. This collection covers twenty-four countries in case studies, analysing new developments in and contributing to the knowledge about three inter-related areas within populist political communication: populist actors as communicators, the media and populism, and citizens and populism.}, language = {en} } @misc{Riedel2019, author = {Riedel, Rafał}, title = {Review: "The Politics of Memory in Post-Authoritarian Transitions, vol. I: Case Studies, and vol. II: Comparative Analysis" / Joanna Marszałek-Kawa, Joanna Piechowiak-Lamparska, Anna Ratke-Majewska, Patryk Wawrzyński (ed.). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. ISBN: 978-1-4438-1706-6}, organization = {Digitale Wissenschaftsplattform Pol-Int (www.pol-int.org)}, doi = {10.11584/opus4-736}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:521-opus4-7366}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The Politics of Memory in Post-Authoritarian Transitions consists of two volumes, the first one covering six case studies, edited by Joanna Marszałek-Kawa, Joanna Piechowiak-Lamparska, Patryk Wawrzyński, Anna Ratke-Majewska, and the second one focussing on comparative analysis, edited by Joanna Marszałek-Kawa, Patryk Wawrzyński and Anna Ratke-Majewska. The two volumes constitute one entity, being the result of a research project funded by Narodowe Centrum Nauki (i.e. the Polish National Centre for Science) and should, therefore, be reviewed together. The general objective of the whole research project is to identify the role of remembrance narratives in the process of the reconstruction of state and society. This overarching goal is tackled in two research problems: one deals with the question as to what degree new remembrance narratives were used in the transition period, and the other one addresses the issue of the particular models of politics of memory that were used to construct a new political identity during the transformation. The main hypothesis is formulated as a statement about the universality of the model of transition from an authoritarian to a democratic system at the level of the state's usage of remembrance policies to create a new political identity for society.}, language = {en} } @misc{Riedel2019, author = {Riedel, Rafał}, title = {Recenzja: "Polska jako peryferie" / Tomasz Zarycki (red.). Warszawa: Scholar, 2016. ISBN: 978-83-7383-844-4}, organization = {Digitale Wissenschaftsplattform Pol-Int (www.pol-int.org)}, doi = {10.11584/opus4-739}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:521-opus4-7396}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Praca pt. „Polska jako peryferie" pod redakcją Tomasza Zaryckiego stanowi interesujące studium z zakresu problematyki relacji centrum - peryferia oraz pokrewnych dyskurs{\´o}w, np. pułapki średniego dochodu, teorii zależności czy szeroko rozumianej teorii systemu światowego. Jest to lektura zar{\´o}wno inspirująca, co przygnębiająca. Inspirująca w tym znaczeniu, że stymuluje refleksję naukową na ważny temat, przywołując wiele istotnych dyskurs{\´o}w naukowych, co więcej - czyni to z perspektywy prawdziwie interdyscyplinarnej. Przygnębiająca zaś gł{\´o}wnie ze względu na konkluzje autor{\´o}w, wskazujące na trwałość strukturalnych barier rozwojowych Polski. Jest ona jednak przede wszystkim realistycznym głosem w dyskusji na temat miejsca i roli Polski we wsp{\´o}łczesnym świecie.}, language = {pl} }