Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2017 (2) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (2)
Referierte Publikation
- ja (2) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Cone calorimeter (2) (entfernen)
The rapid mass calorimeter based on reduced‐size specimens is proposed for accelerated fire
testing and put up for discussion, particularly for flame retarded polymeric materials. A mass loss
calorimeter is combined with a semiautomatic sample changer. Experiments on specimens of
reduced size were conducted on poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(propylene), polyamide 66,
poly(ether ether ketone), and pine sapwood square samples with edge lengths of 100, 75, 50,
25, 20, and 10 mm. Specimens of 20 × 20 mm2 were selected to achieve a crucial reduction in
specimen size and a measuring protocol developed. A total of 71 different polymeric materials
were investigated in the rapid mass calorimeter and cone calorimeter for comparison and several
materials with different heat release rate characteristics in the pyrolysis combustion flow calorimeter to test this additional screening method as well. The important fire properties obtained in the rapid mass calorimeter show reasonable correlation with the cone calorimeter results but also with the oxygen index. All in all, the rapid mass calorimeter produces reliable and meaningful results and, despite acceleration and size reduction, still allows for a certain degree of burning behavior interpretation. Material savings of 96% and time savings of around 60%‐70% are achieved compared to measure cone calorimeter.
The effects of reducing specimen size on the fire behavior of polymeric materials were investigated by means of the rapid mass calorimeter, a high-throughput Screening instrument. Results from the rapid mass calorimeter were compared with those from the cone calorimeter. Correlation coefficients between the different measures of each method and between the two methods are discussed to elucidate the differences and similarities in the two methods. Materials with characteristic heat release rate (HRR) curves in the cone calorimeter were evaluated in detail. The rapid mass calorimeter produces valuable and interpretable results with HRR curve characteristics similar to cone calorimeter results. Compared to cone calorimeter measurements, material savings of 96% are achieved, while maintaining the Advantages of a macroscopic fire test.