Ingenieurwissenschaften und zugeordnete Tätigkeiten
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Sonstiges (45)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (31)
- Vortrag (31)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (23)
- Forschungsbericht (4)
- Posterpräsentation (3)
Schlagworte
- Corrosion (59)
- Geothermal (18)
- Korrosion (15)
- CCS (14)
- Steel (12)
- CCUS (11)
- Coating (11)
- Geothermal energy (11)
- CO2 (10)
- Carbon steel (9)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (105)
- 7.6 Korrosion und Korrosionsschutz (105)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (31)
- 5.1 Mikrostruktur Design und Degradation (30)
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (5)
- 3.2 Gefahrguttanks und Unfallmechanik (5)
- 6 Materialchemie (5)
- 5.6 Glas (3)
- 6.2 Material- und Oberflächentechnologien (3)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (2)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (31)
BAM, IKS Dresden und ThyssenKrupp VDM haben ein umfangreiches Versuchsprogramm mit geschweißten Werkstoffprüfblechen durchgeführt, um neue Erkenntnisse über das Korrosionsverhalten der Superaustenite und der Nickelbasislegierung zu gewinnen und um diese Bewertungen im Abschnitt 5 der BAM-Liste zu berücksichtigen. Das Versuchsprogramm umfasste Korrosionsbeständigkeitsbewertungen der drei höherlegierten Werkstoffe in Stoffen aus 12 Gruppen von korrosiven Gefahrgütern, wie z. B. anorganische Halogenide, organische Säurehalogenide, Halogencarbonsäuren, Chlorsilane, Chlorate, Perchlorate, Chlorite, Hypochlorite, Hydrogensulfate und Nitriersäuren.
In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ist die „BAM-Liste - Anforderungen an Tanks für die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter” die Grundlage für die stoffbezogenen Baumusterzulassungen für Tankcontainer und ortsbewegliche Tanks zur Beförderung gefährlicher Güter durch die BAM Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung. Beständigkeitsbewertungen sowohl von ausgewählten metallischen Werkstoffgruppen als auch von polymeren Dichtungs- und Beschichtungswerkstoffen unter dem Einfluss von Gefahrgütern und wassergefährdenden Stoffen sind in der BAM-Liste enthalten. Sofern nicht anders angegeben, gelten die Werkstoffbeständigkeitsbewertungen für Betriebstemperaturen bis max. 50 °C und für handelsüblich technisch reine Stoffe. Entsprechend den gültigen Gefahrgutverordnungen für den Transport von Gefahrgütern auf der Straße, derSchiene und zur See wird eine innere Besichtigung der Tanks nach einer vorgegebenen Prüffrist der Tanks gefordert. Für die Dauer der Prüfintervalle ist die Werkstoffbeständigkeit zu gewährleisten. Unter den über 7000 in der BAM-Liste enthaltenen Stoffen ist ein großer Anteil von Gefahrgütern und wassergefährdenden Stoffen mit hohem Transportaufkommen enthalten, die nicht korrosiv auf die meisten metallischen Werkstoffe wirken und somit bestehen keine Unterschiede in der Bewertung der Beständigkeit zwischen den häufig im Tankbau eingesetzten austenitischen CrNi- oder CrNiMo-Stählen 1.4401 (X5CrNiMo17-12-2), 1.4404 (X2CrNiMo17-12-2) und 1.4571 (X6CrNiMoTi17-12-2) und dem Duplexstahl 1.4362 (X2CrNiN23-4, UNS S 32304). Es gibt nur eine sehr geringe Anzahl von Ergebnissen von Korrosionsversuchen mit diesem Werkstoff unter dem Einfluss von korrosiven Gefahrgütern. Zur Gewinnung von Korrosionsdaten wurden in Absprache mit dem Auftraggeber relevante Stoffe aus der BAMListe ausgewählt, in denen die im Transporttankbau gebräuchlichen CrNiMo-Werkstoffe unter Berücksichtigung stoffspezifischer und betrieblicher Auflagen einsetzbar sind. Die Korrosionstests sollen zeigen, inwieweit der betrachtete Duplexstahl in Analogie zu den austenitischen CrNiMo-Stählen bewertet werden kann. Aus den Versuchsergebnissen kann die Schlussfolgerung gezogen werden, dass der untersuchte Duplexstahl in alkalischen Medien eine Alternative zu austenitischen Stählen für den Transport von Gefahrgütern darstellt. Aufgrund des verringerten Legierungsgehaltes, insbesondere an Nickel (3,7 %) und Molybdän (0,15 %), wurde eine geringere Korrosionsbeständigkeit des untersuchten Duplexstahls 1.4362 im Vergleich zu den austenitischen CrNiMo-Stählen, insbesondere in „sauren“ Medien beobachtet. Die Beständigkeitsbewertungen dieses Werkstoffes werden in der 10. Auflage der BAM-Liste veröffentlicht und dem interessierten Anwenderkreis auch in Form von Beständigkeitslisten zur Verfügung gestellt.
Changes in fuel composition and the introduction of alternative fuels often create problems of corrosion and degradation in materials. The objective of this research was to determine the corrosion behaviour of commercial metallic tank materials (unalloyed steels, austenitic CrNi- and CrNiMo-steels, aluminium and its alloys) in fuels and heating oil with admixtures of biogenic sources, such as gasoline with addition of ethanol (E10, E85), pure biodiesel and heating oil with 10 % biodiesel (B10).
Metallic tank materials were evaluated as resistant in a liquid if the annual corrosion rate due to uniform corrosion did not exceed 0.1 mm/year, and localized corrosion effects in the form of pitting corrosion, stress corrosion cracking and crevice corrosion did not occur.
The corrosion rates of the tank materials after exposure to E10, E85, non-aged and two-year aged pure biodiesel, and non-aged and one-year aged heating oil B10 for four weeks at 50 °C, according to DIN 50905/4, were well below the limit of 0.1 mm/year. For the unalloyed steels, the formation of rust was observed independently of the biofuels amount of ageing. U-bend specimens made of unalloyed steel were not damaged in form of stress corrosion cracking in all test fuels at this test temperature.
Geothermal brines often contain high amounts of lead and copper ions that can precipitate as native Cu and Pb as consequence of galvanic corrosion when brines react with carbon steel materials. This contribution evaluates which materials could overcome the problem of galvanic corrosion at geothermal environment.
The behavior of these materials in water containing high chloride concentration (> 100 g/L NaCl) as well as various amounts of dissolved bCl2 and/or CuCl2 was characterized by electrochemical and exposure measurements.
Both methods reveal carbon steel suffers corrosion susceptibility, accompanied by Cu◦ and/or Pb◦ precipitation on the surface. Electrochemical measurements on stainless steels result in significant difference in corrosion and repassivation potentials (Ecorr = -189 mV, Erep = 70 mV), indicating a good corrosion resistance.
Corrosion Resistance of the Super-Austenitic Stainless Steel UNS S31266 for Geothermal Applications
(2017)
Super-austenitic stainless steels cover grades with high chromium (20 to 27 %), high nickel (18 to 31 %) and high molybdenum (4 to 6 %) contents. Within this family, the 6%Mo high nitrogen grade S31266 was developed to combine the beneficial influence of chromium, tungsten, molybdenum and nitrogen on its mechanical and corrosion properties. Due to 22 % nickel, 24 % chromium and 0.4 % nitrogen additions, this alloy exhibits a very stable microstructure, being less prone to intermetallic phase precipitation than the other highly alloyed super-austenitic stainless steels.
This paper deals with the corrosion resistance of S31266 in artificial geothermal water with moderate salinity and low pH. Long-term static exposures and electrochemical tests were conducted at various temperatures to evaluate the pitting, crevice and stress corrosion cracking resistance of this material.
The results show that S31266 is resistant up to 220 °C. As a consequence, it can be a good candidate material for geothermal applications involving a highly corrosive environment, especially salinity and low pH.
CO2 streams captured from power stations or industrial plants may contain impurities that impact the consecutive steps of the CO2 capture and storage (CCS) chain. As the basis for an optimization of CO2 purity over the whole CCS chain, impacts of different impurities were investigated at key steps including studies on (i) corrosion of metallic materials in CO2 streams and brine, (ii) fluid and interfacial properties as a function of pressure, temperature and CO2 stream composition and their implications for CO2 transport, injection and geological storage, (iii) costs of different pipeline design options, (iv) geochemical alterations at typical reservoir conditions and their implications for geomechanical rock properties. Major findings are synthesized for two exemplary single source-single sink CCS chain scenarios involving CO2 stream compositions typical for pre-combustion capture and oxyfuel combustion. Recommendations for material selection for compression, transport and injection were derived for various CO2 stream compositions. To reliably control corrosion, a limitation of water contents to 50 ppmv is recommended for pipeline transportation of all CO2 streams. At geological storage conditions, the presence of either O2, NOx or SO2 only weakly affected fluid-mineral/rock interactions that still impacted geomechanical rock properties.
To set up recommendations on how to define “reasonable minimum composition thresholds” for CO2 streams to access CO2 pipeline networks, we investigated potential impacts of CO2 streams with different and temporally variable compositions and mass flow rates along the CCS chain. All investigations were based on a generic “CCS cluster scenario” in which CO2 streams captured from a spatial cluster of eleven emitters (seven fossil-fired power plants, two cement plants, one refinery and one steel mill) are collected in a regional pipeline network. The resulting CO2 stream (19.78 Mio t impure CO2 per year) is transported in a trunk line (onshore and offshore) and injected into five generic replicate storage structures (Buntsandstein saline aquifers) offshore. Experimental investigations and modeling of selected impacts revealed beneficial as well as adverse impacts of different impurities and their combinations. Overall, no fundamental technical obstacles for transporting, injecting and storing CO2 streams of the considered variable compositions and mass flow rates were observed. We recommend to define minimum composition thresholds for each specific CCS project through limiting
i) the overall CO2 content,
ii) maximum contents of relevant impurities or elements,
iii) acceptable variability of concentrations of critical impurities, and defining impurity combinations to be avoided.
The collaborative project “Impacts of impurities in CO2 streams captured from different emitters in a regional cluster on transport, injection and storage (CLUSTER)” aimed to set up recommendations on how to define “reasonable minimum composition thresholds” that CO2 streams should meet when accessing CO2 transport pipeline networks. Within CLUSTER, we investigated potential impacts of CO2 streams with different and temporally variable compositions and mass flow rates along the whole CCS chain. Investigations included, amongst others, impacts on: Corrosion of pipeline steel, pipeline network design and related transport costs, alteration of well bore cements, pressure development and rock integrity, geochemical reactions, and petrophysical and geomechanical rock properties.
All investigations are based on a generic CCS chain scenario. In this scenario, CO2 streams are captured from a spatial cluster of eleven emitters and collected in a regional pipeline network. Emitters comprise seven fossil fuel-fired power plants equipped with different capture technologies, two cement plants, one refinery and one integrated iron and steel plant. In total, 19.78 Mio t CO2 (including impurities) are captured in the emitter cluster annually. The combined CO2 stream is transported in a trunk line with a length of 400 km (100 km of these offshore) and is injected into five generic storage structures. The storage reservoirs are saline aquifers of the Buntsandstein.
The investigations revealed beneficial and deteriorating impacts of different impurities and combinations thereof. Overall, no fundamental technical obstacles for transporting, injecting and storing CO2 streams of the modelled variable compositions and mass flow rates were observed. Based on the results, the CLUSTER project team recommends not to define “minimum composition thresholds” for CO2 streams as strict threshold values for each individual impurity in the stream. Instead, CO2 stream compositions and variabilities for specific CCS projects should be constrained with regard to a set of parameters including i) the overall CO2 content, ii) maximum contents of relevant impurities or elements, iii) acceptable variability of CO2 stream composition, and iv) impurity combinations to be avoided.
The collaborative project “Impacts of impurities in CO2 streams captured from different emitters in a regional cluster on transport, injection and storage (CLUSTER)” aimed to set up recommendations on how to define “reasonable minimum composition thresholds” that CO2 streams should meet when accessing CO2 transport pipeline networks. Within CLUSTER, we investigated potential impacts of CO2 streams with different and temporally variable compositions and mass flow rates along the whole CCS chain. Investigations included, amongst others, impacts on:
• corrosion of pipeline steel,
• pipeline network design and related transport costs,
• alteration of well bore cements,
• pressure development and rock integrity,
• geochemical reactions, and
• petrophysical and geomechanical rock properties.
All investigations are based on a generic CCS chain scenario. In this scenario, CO2 streams are captured from a spatial cluster of eleven emitters and collected in a regional pipeline network. Emitters comprise seven fossil fuel-fired power plants equipped with different capture technologies, two cement plants, one refinery and one integrated iron and steel plant. In total, 19.78 Mio t CO2 (including impurities) are captured in the emitter cluster annually. The combined CO2 stream is transported in a trunk line with a length of 400 km (100 km of these offshore) and is injected into five generic storage structures. The storage reservoirs are saline aquifers of the Buntsandstein.
The investigations revealed beneficial and deteriorating impacts of different impurities and combinations thereof. Overall, no fundamental technical obstacles for transporting, injecting and storing CO2 streams of the modelled variable compositions and mass flow rates were observed. Based on the results, the CLUSTER project team recommends not to define “minimum composition thresholds” for CO2 streams as strict threshold values for each individual impurity in the stream. Instead, CO2 stream compositions and variabilities for specific CCS projects should be constrained with regard to a set of parameters including i) the overall CO2 content, ii) maximum contents of relevant impurities or elements, iii) acceptable variability of CO2 stream composition, and iv) impurity combinations to be avoided.
Biodiesel (FAME) from rapeseed is an environmentally friendly alternative to common fossil fuels. It is also suitable to serve as blending component to fuels like heating oil. If the fuel composition is changed, materials compatibility must be guaranteed. Adding polar biodiesel to nonpolar heating oil, changes the blend’s solvency and might cause swelling, extraction and solvation of polymers. The objective of this research was to investigate the compatibility of polymeric materials, which are commonly used for components in middle distillate facilities, along with blends of heating oil and 20 % biodiesel (B20). For this propose, ACM, HNBR, FKM, PE, PA 6, POM, PUR and PVC were exposed to heating oil and B20 for 42 and 84 days at 40 °C. In addition, the polymers HNBR, FKM, PA, POM and PVC were also exposed at 70 °C. Furthermore, the resistance of polymers in eight-year aged B10 at 40 °C was evaluated. Ageing of biodiesel increases acidity which might propagate polymer corrosion. The materials were evaluated as resistant, if the loss in tensile properties (tensile strength and elongation at break) and Shore hardness remained under 15 % compared to the initial unexposed material values. For investigations under compressed conditions, the compression set was determined for specimens of ACM, FKM and HNBR after exposure in heating oil B0 and B20 for 3,7,14, 28, 56 and 90 days at 40 °C according to ISO 815-1. It was found that the resistance in B20 at 40 °C was given for all tested polymers except PUR. In the 8 years aged B10, PUR and POM were not compatible and ACM just conditionally compatible. At 70 °C, FKM and PVC were resistant in B20, whereas HNBR and PA 6 were not compatible. Swelling occurred for the elastomers ACM, HNBR and PUR.