Ingenieurwissenschaften und zugeordnete Tätigkeiten
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (6)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (8) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Pyrotechnics (2)
- BAM-Fallhammer (1)
- CE (1)
- CLP-regulation (1)
- Certification (1)
- Chemicals classification (1)
- Conformity assessments (1)
- EU-CLP (1)
- Explosives (1)
- Explosivstoffe (1)
- Fireworks (1)
- Genetic algorithm (1)
- Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (1)
- Hazardous chemicals (1)
- Market surveillance (1)
- Notified bodies (1)
- Physical hazards (1)
- Polymerisierende Stoffe (1)
- Prüfserie-H (1)
- Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (1)
- Raman spectroscopy (1)
- SAPT (1)
- Schlagempfindlichkeit (1)
- Self-reactive substances (1)
- TAM IV (1)
- Thermal stability (1)
- Thermisches Verhalten (1)
- Transport (1)
- Type and batch tests (1)
- UN-GHS (1)
- Zeitlicher Abbau von Stabilisatoren (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 2.3 Einstufung von Gefahrstoffen und -gütern (8) (entfernen)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (6)
Präsentation zum geplanten BAM-Forschungsvorhaben ("Safe transport of stabilized polymerizing substances: Investigation on the degradation of selected stabilizers"), bezogen auf den sicheren Transport (Straße, See) von polymerisierenden Substanzen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf den systematischen Untersuchungen - mittels Thermal Activity Monitor (TAM IV) - zum zeitlichen Abbau des Stabilisators bei der Polymerisation sowie auf der Bestimmung der entsprechenden volumenabhängigen selbstbeschleunigenden Polymerisation (SAPT).
Self-reactive substances are unstable chemical substances which can easily decompose and may lead to explosion in transport, storage, or process situations. For this reason, their thermal stability properties are required to assess possible process safety issues and for classification purpose. In this study, the first quantitative structure–property relationships (QSPR) dedicated to this class of compounds were developed to predict the heat of decomposition of possible self-reactive substances from their molecular structures. The database used to develop and validate the models was issued from a dedicated experimental campaign on 50 samples using differential scanning calorimetry in homogeneous experimental conditions. QSPR models were derived using the GA-MLR methods (using a genetic algorithm and multi-linear regressions) using molecular descriptors calculated by Dragon software based on two types of inputs: 3D molecular structures determined using the density functional theory (DFT), allowing access to three-dimensional descriptors, and from SMILES codes, favoring the access to simpler models, requiring no preliminary quantum chemical calculations. All models respected the OECD validation guidelines for regulatory ac
ceptability of QSPR models. They were tested by internal and external validation tests and their applicability domains were defined and analyzed.
Testing of the impact sensitivity of explosives is one of the essential characterisation steps in a safety study. Threshold levels have been agreed from experience for certain processing steps and in relation to handling instructions. However, how reliable is the information, that an explosive has an impact sensitivity of X Joule? This will partly depend on the judgement of the test operator, but also on the statistical method, and on the energetic parameters of the test apparatus. This work focuses on the mechanical performance of the BAM-Fallhammer and how much of the initially available potential energy is transferred to the sample. The differences to the nominal value can be quite large under some conditions. Therefore the energy loss has to be characterised and should possibly be taken into account. In addition an attempt is made, to make results more comparable when the amount of energy loss has been determined by a method shown in the presentation.
Übersicht über aktuelle Themen, Probleme, Herausforderungen und Entscheidungen im Forum der benannten Stellen Pyrotechnik nach 2013/29/EU
The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN-GHS) is being implemented in more and more countries all over the world; the EU has done so with the CLP-Regulation (EU-CLP). Compared to the undeniably important questions on health and environmental hazards, the classification of physical hazards of chemicals often has not been in the focus, although their implementation can be challenging and there are traps and pitfalls to be avoided. The following overview of the classification systematics for physical hazards aims at a principle understanding without detailing all criteria or test methods. Similarities and differences between the classification systems of the UN-GHS and EU-CLP, the transport of dangerous goods and the former EU system are reviewed with regard to the physical hazard classes. Available physical hazard classifications for the transport of dangerous goods and according to the former EU system can be used as available information when classifying according to the GHS. However, the interfaces of these classification systems and their limitations have to be understood well when concluding on GHS/CLP classifications. This applies not only to industry when applying CLP but especially to legislators when adapting legislation that in one way or another refers to the classification of chemicals.