Analytische Chemie
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Sonstiges (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (2)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (2)
Schlagworte
- Supernatant (2) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
In this thesis a protocol based on a direct competitive and non-competitive immunoassay using the microarray format was developed to screen emulated hybridoma supernatants against the drug carbamazepine (CBZ). As support, epoxy slides were manufactured by coating microscope glass slides with epoxy silanes. The manufactured epoxy slides showed similar capacity for protein immobilization as commercially available NEXTERION slides, but showed a higher autofluorescence background. On the epoxy slides, protein A, Cys-A, G and Cys-G were immobilized as antibody capturing coating. It could be shown that the Cys-tag considerably increased the immobilization of all compared proteins, especially of protein G. Protein Cys-G immobilized at pH 8-9 was considered the most suitable protein for antibody immobilization due to good spot uniformity and a high binding capacity for IgG. Additionally, in immobilization experiments it could be shown, that 10-500 fold excess of bovine IgG, introduced by two different fetal bovine serum (FBS) products, showed no significant competition on the immobilization of mice or goat IgG on protein Cys-G. To examine the captured antibodies for affinity to CBZ, the CBZ-TOTA-DY654 tracer was custom synthesized. It could be demonstrated, that the tracer antibody interaction was competitive with the tracer precursor, CBZ-TOTA-NH2 and CBZ. Furthermore, the synthesized tracer was also successfully used by externals to evaluate CBZ affine hybriodoma cells in flow cytometry. In the simulated screening, five antibodies with known affinity to CBZ were diluted in a cell culture medium. The screening method allowed to differentiate between affine antibodies (IC50 < 20 µg/ml) and unaffine antibodies (IC50 > 20 µg/ml), when concentrations of 0.1 µg/ml IgG or greater have been used. Of five applied antibodies, all highly affine clones (CE2 and B3212M) were reported as positives while no false-positive samples were observed. The screening included competitive, with around 89500 fold excess of CBZ, and non-competitive tracer incubation on different segments of the same chip, which resulted in total signal suppression on the competitive segment. The screening was performed in 20 hours, only a few nanoliters, of each simulated supernatant, were consumed in the screening process, furthermore in the method standard 96 well MTPs were used and no cleanroom facilities were required.
Protein immobilization for the functionalization of particles is used in various applications, including biosensors, lateral-flow immunoassays (LFIA), bead-based assays, and others. Common methods for the quantification of bound protein are measuring protein in the supernatant before and after coating and calculating the difference. This popular approach has the potential for a significant overestimation of the amount of immobilized protein since layers not directly bound to the surface (soft protein corona) are usually lost during washing and handling. Only the layer directly bound to the surface (hard corona) can be used in subsequent assays. A simplified amino acid analysis method based on acidic hydrolysis and RP-HPLC-FLD of tyrosine and phenylalanine (aromatic amino acid analysis, AAAA) is proposed to directly quantify protein bound to the surface of gold nano- and latex microparticles. The results are compared with indirect methods such as colorimetric protein assays, such as Bradford, bicinchoninic acid (BCA), as well as AAAA of the supernatant. For both particle types, these indirect quantification techniques show a protein overestimation of up to 1700% compared to the direct AAAA measurements. In addition, protein coating on latex particles was performed both passively through adsorption and covalently through EDC/sulfo-NHS chemistry. Our results showed no difference between the immobilization methodologies. This finding suggests that usual protein determination methods are no unambiguous proof of a covalent conjugation on particles or beads.