Analytische Chemie
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (6)
- Vortrag (1)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (8)
Schlagworte
- Metaproteomics (8) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- VP Vizepräsident (8)
- VP.1 eScience (8)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (1)
Although metaproteomics, the study of the collective proteome of microbial communities, has become increasingly powerful and popular over the past few years, the field has lagged behind on the availability of user-friendly, end-to-end pipelines for data analysis. We therefore describe the Connection from two commonly used metaproteomics data processing tools in the field, MetaProteomeAnalyzer and PeptideShaker, to Unipept for downstream analysis.
Through these connections, direct end-to-end pipelines are built from database searching to taxonomic and functional annotation.
Metaproteomics, the study of the collective protein composition of multi-organism systems, provides deep insights into the biodiversity of microbial communities and the complex functional interplay between microbes and their hosts or environment. Thus, metaproteomics has become an indispensable tool in various fields such as microbiology and related medical applications. The computational challenges in the analysis of corresponding datasets differ from those of pure-culture proteomics, e.g., due to the higher complexity of the samples and the larger reference databases demanding specific computing pipelines. Corresponding data analyses usually consist of numerous manual steps that must be closely synchronized. With MetaProteomeAnalyzer and Prophane, we have established two open-source software solutions specifically developed and optimized for metaproteomics. Among other features, peptide-spectrum matching is improved by combining different search engines and, compared to similar tools, metaproteome annotation benefits from the most comprehensive set of available databases (such as NCBI, UniProt, EggNOG, PFAM, and CAZy). The workflow described in this protocol combines both tools and leads the user through the entire data analysis process, including protein database creation, database search, protein grouping and annotation, and results visualization. To the best of our knowledge, this protocol presents the most comprehensive, detailed and flexible guide to metaproteomics data analysis to date. While beginners are provided with robust, easy-to-use, state-of-the-art data analysis in a reasonable time (a few hours, depending on, among other factors, the protein database size and the number of identified peptides and inferred proteins), advanced users benefit from the flexibility and adaptability of the workflow.
To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional relevance of expressed microbial genes or proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein expression of microbiomes. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, to enable researchers to make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental caries plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN5, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the NCBI non-redundant database revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation varied between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated more accurate GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.
Metaproteomics has substantially grown over the past years and supplements other omics approaches by bringing valuable functional information, enabling genotype- phenotype linkages and connections to metabolic outputs. Currently, a wide variety of metaproteomic workflows is available, yet their impact on the results remains to be thoroughly assessed.
Here, we carried out the first community-driven, multi-lab comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation (CAMPI) study. Based on well-established workflows, we evaluated the influence of sample preparation, mass spectrometry acquisition, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, lab-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample.
Although bioinformatic pipelines contributed to variability in peptide identification, wet-lab workflows were the most important source of differences between analyses. Overall, these peptide-level differences largely disappeared at the protein group level. Differences were observed between peptide- and protein-centric approaches for the predicted community composition but similar functional profiles were found across workflows.
The CAMPI findings demonstrate the robustness of current metaproteomics research and provide a perspective for future benchmarking studies.
Through connecting genomic and metabolic information, metaproteomics is an essential approach for understanding how microbiomes function in space and time. The international metaproteomics community is delighted to announce the launch of the Metaproteomics Initiative (www.metaproteomics.org), the goal of which is to promote dissemination of metaproteomics fundamentals, advancements, and applications through collaborative networking in microbiome research. The Initiative aims to be the central information hub and open meeting place where newcomers and experts interact to communicate, standardize, and accelerate experimental and bioinformatic methodologies in this feld. We invite the entire microbiome community to join and discuss potential synergies at the interfaces with other disciplines, and to collectively promote innovative approaches to gain deeper insights into microbiome functions and dynamics.
Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carry out a community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluate the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observe that variability at the peptide level is predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappear at the protein group level. While differences are observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles are obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.
Introduction:
With the introduction of accurate deep learning predictors, spectral matching applications might experience a renaissance in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) driven proteomics. Deep learning models, e.g., Prosit, predict complete MS/MS spectra from peptide sequences and give the unprecedented ability to accurately predict mass spectra that may arise from any given proteome. However, the amount of spectral data is enormous when querying large search spaces, e.g., metaproteomes composed of many different species.
Current spectral library search software, such as SpectraST, is not equipped to meet run time and memory constraints imposed by such large MS/MS databases, covering several millions of peptide spectrum predictions.
Methods:
Inspired by the fragment index data structure that had been introduced with MSFragger, we implement an efficient peak matching algorithm for computing spectral similarity between query and library spectra. Mistle (Metaproteomic index and spectral library search engine) uses index partitioning and SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) intrinsics, which greatly improves speed and memory efficiency for searching large spectral libraries. Mistle is written in C++20 and highly parallelized.
Results:
We demonstrate the efficiency of Mistle on two predicted spectral libraries for the lab-assembled microbial communities 9MM and SIHUMIx. Compared to the spectral library search engine SpectraST, Mistle shows a >10-fold runtime improvement and is also faster than msSLASH, which uses locality-sensitive hashing. Although Mistle is slower than MSFragger, Mistle‘s memory footprint is an order of magnitude smaller. Furthermore, we find evidence that the spectral matching approach to predicted libraries identifies peptides with higher precision. Mistle detects peptides not found by database search via MSFragger and in turn uncovers unnoticed false discoveries among their matches.
Conclusion:
In this study, we show that predicted spectral libraries can enhance peptide identification for metaproteomics. Mistle provides the means to efficiently search large-scale spectral libraries, highlighted for the microbiota 9MM and SIHUMIx.
Mistle: bringing spectral library predictions to metaproteomics with an efficient search index
(2023)
Motivation: Deep learning has moved to the forefront of tandem mass spectrometry-driven proteomics and authentic prediction for peptide fragmentation is more feasible than ever. Still, at this point spectral prediction is mainly used to validate database search results or for confined search spaces. Fully predicted spectral libraries have not yet been efficiently adapted to large search space problems that often occur in metaproteomics or proteogenomics.
Results: In this study, we showcase a workflow that uses Prosit for spectral library predictions on two common metaproteomes and implement an indexing and search algorithm, Mistle, to efficiently identify experimental mass spectra within the library. Hence, the workflow emulates a classic protein sequence database search with protein digestion but builds a searchable index from spectral predictions as an in-between step.
We compare Mistle to popular search engines, both on a spectral and database search level, and provide evidence that this approach is more accurate than a database search using MSFragger. Mistle outperforms other spectral library search engines in terms of run time and proves to be extremely memory efficient with a 4- to 22-fold decrease in RAM usage. This makes Mistle universally applicable to large search spaces, e.g. covering comprehensive sequence databases of diverse microbiomes.
Availability and implementation: Mistle is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/BAMeScience/Mistle.