Nano
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (351)
- Vortrag (339)
- Posterpräsentation (102)
- Forschungsdatensatz (53)
- Sonstiges (19)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (16)
- Buchkapitel (10)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (10)
- Forschungsbericht (9)
- Zeitschriftenheft (Herausgeberschaft für das komplette Heft) (6)
Sprache
- Englisch (880)
- Deutsch (52)
- Spanisch (2)
- Mehrsprachig (1)
Schlagworte
- Nanoparticles (124)
- Nano (70)
- SAXS (64)
- XPS (60)
- Laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) (59)
- Fluorescence (52)
- Quantum yield (52)
- Nanoparticle (49)
- Electron microscopy (48)
- X-ray scattering (46)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 6 Materialchemie (666)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (348)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (186)
- 1.2 Biophotonik (161)
- 6.6 Physik und chemische Analytik der Polymere (136)
- 6.5 Synthese und Streuverfahren nanostrukturierter Materialien (131)
- 6.2 Material- und Oberflächentechnologien (90)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (62)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (46)
- 5.4 Multimateriale Fertigungsprozesse (33)
- 6.3 Strukturanalytik (27)
- 7 Bauwerkssicherheit (27)
- 4.2 Material-Mikrobiom Wechselwirkungen (26)
- 9 Komponentensicherheit (25)
- 9.5 Tribologie und Verschleißschutz (20)
- 4.1 Biologische Materialschädigung und Referenzorganismen (19)
- 7.5 Technische Eigenschaften von Polymerwerkstoffen (17)
- 1.5 Proteinanalytik (14)
- 6.7 Materialsynthese und Design (14)
- 8 Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (14)
- 5.1 Mikrostruktur Design und Degradation (13)
- 5.6 Glas (11)
- 8.5 Röntgenbildgebung (9)
- VP Vizepräsident (9)
- VP.1 eScience (9)
- 1.9 Chemische und optische Sensorik (8)
- 6.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (7)
- 1.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (5)
- 7.6 Korrosion und Korrosionsschutz (5)
- 1.1 Anorganische Spurenanalytik (4)
- 7.4 Baustofftechnologie (4)
- 1.8 Umweltanalytik (3)
- P Präsident (3)
- 1.7 Organische Spuren- und Lebensmittelanalytik (2)
- 3 Gefahrgutumschließungen; Energiespeicher (2)
- 5.2 Metallische Hochtemperaturwerkstoffe (2)
- 5.5 Materialmodellierung (2)
- 8.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (2)
- 9.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (2)
- 9.4 Integrität von Schweißverbindungen (2)
- P.0 Präsident und andere (2)
- 1.3 Instrumentelle Analytik (1)
- 1.4 Prozessanalytik (1)
- 2 Prozess- und Anlagensicherheit (1)
- 2.1 Sicherheit von Energieträgern (1)
- 3.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (1)
- 3.5 Sicherheit von Gasspeichern (1)
- 4.5 Kunst- und Kulturgutanalyse (1)
- 5.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (1)
- 5.3 Polymere Verbundwerkstoffe (1)
- 6.4 Materialinformatik (1)
- 7.1 Baustoffe (1)
- 7.2 Ingenieurbau (1)
- 8.1 Sensorik, mess- und prüftechnische Verfahren (1)
- 8.4 Akustische und elektromagnetische Verfahren (1)
- 8.6 Faseroptische Sensorik (1)
- 9.2 Versuchsanlagen und Prüftechnik (1)
- 9.3 Schweißtechnische Fertigungsverfahren (1)
- MP Mitglied des Präsidiums (1)
- MP.0 Mitglied des Präsidiums und andere (1)
- PST Präsidiale Stabsstelle (1)
Paper des Monats
- ja (16)
A major source of capacity fade of the common vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) is the vanadium ion transport through the separator. However, different transport models disagree significantly in the diffusion coefficient for the different V species and the influence of different transport mechanisms. The underlying hypothesis of this work is that reactions inside the membrane are partly responsible for these discrepancies. Accordingly, it was investigated if redox reactions inside the nanoscopic water body of Nafion 117 can occur. X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) was used to distinguish between the different V species inside hydrated Nafion 117 and novel PVDF-based membranes. It was validated that the speciation of vanadium can be performed using the pre-edge peak energy and intensity. The experiments were performed as follows: strips of the membrane were exposed from one site to a V3+ solution (green) and from the other site to a VO2+ solution (yellow). The ions could diffuse into the membrane from both sides. A change of color of the membrane strip was observed. The blue color in the middle of the strip indicated that VO2+ was formed where V3+ and VO2+ got in contact. Using XANES this reaction inside Nafion was proven.
Supramolecular copolymerization driven by integrative self-sorting of hydrogen-bonded rosettes
(2020)
Molecular recognition to preorganize noncovalently polymerizable supramolecular complexes is a characteristic process of natural supramolecular polymers, and such recognition processes allow for dynamic self-alteration, yielding complex polymer systems with extraordinarily high efficiency in their targeted function. We herein show an example of such molecular recognition-controlled kinetic assembly/disassembly processes within artificial supramolecular polymer systems using six-membered hydrogen-bonded supramolecular complexes (rosettes). Electron-rich and poor monomers are prepared that kinetically coassemble through a temperature-controlled protocol into amorphous coaggregates comprising a diverse mixture of rosettes. Over days, the electrostatic interaction between two monomers induces an integrative self-sorting of rosettes. While the electron-rich monomer inherently forms toroidal homopolymers, the additional electrostatic interaction that can also guide rosette association allows helicoidal growth of supramolecular copolymers that are comprised of an alternating array of two monomers. Upon heating, the helicoidal copolymers undergo a catastrophic transition into amorphous coaggregates via entropy-driven randomization of the monomers in the rosette.
Antibody-gated indicator delivery (gAID) systems based on mesoporous silica nano- and microparticle scaffolds are a promising class of materials for the sensitive chemical detection of small-molecule analytes in simple test formats such as lateral flow assays (LFAs) or microfluidic chips. Their architecture is reminiscent of drug delivery systems, only that reporter molecules instead of drugs are stored in the voids of a porous host particle. In addition, the pores are closed with macromolecular “caps” through a tailored “gatekeeping” recognition chemistry so that the caps are opened when an analyte has reacted with a “gatekeeper”. The subsequent uncapping leads to a release of a large number of indicator molecules, endowing the system with signal amplification features. Particular benefits of such systems are their modularity and adaptability. With the example of the immunochemical detection of type-I pyrethroids by fluorescent dye-releasing gAID systems, the influence of several tuning modes on the optimisation of such hybrid sensory materials is introduced here. In particular, different mesoporous silica supports (from nano- and microparticles to platelets and short fibres), different functionalisation routes and different loading sequences were assessed. The materials’ performances were evaluated by studying their temporal response behaviour and detection sensitivity, including the tightness of pore closure (through the amount of blank release in the absence of analyte) and the release kinetics. Our results indicate that the better the paratope-accommodating Fab region of the antibody “cap” fits into the host material's pore opening, the better the closing/opening mechanism can be controlled. Because such materials are well-suited for LFAs, performance assessment included a test-strip format besides conventional assays in suspension. In combination with dyes as indicators and smartphones for read-out, simple analytical tests for use by untrained personnel directly at a point-of-need such as an aeroplane cabin can be devised, allowing for sensitivities down to the μg kg−1 range in <5 min with case-required selectivities.
Recorded at the Better with Scattering workshop 2020, this talk highlights the complete set of data correction steps that we do for the MAUS, and how they can be used elsewhere too. This links well with the talk in this series by Dr. Tim Snow, and also highlights the details of the background subtraction that needs to be done.
In contrast to the crisp, clear images you can get from electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) patterns are rather featureless. These patterns, however, contain averaged structural information of all of the finest material structures that were illuminated by the X-ray beam. With careful and precise investigation, and supplementary information from complementary techniques, this bulk material structure can be quantified to reveal structural information spanning four or even five decades in size. Additionally, while the data correction and analysis is complex, sample preparation is very straightforward, also allowing for in-situ and operando measurements to be performed without breaking a sweat. In the right hands, then, this technique can be the most powerful tool in your analytical arsenal.
After a colleague sent me a more useful measurement from a laboratory instrument than what I could get from the beamline, I knew it was time to reassess my life's choices. Over the course of several subsequent post-doc and permanent positions around lab instruments, I managed to refine a flexible, comprehensive methodology for data collection, correction and analysis which can be applied to many X-ray scattering investigations at the lab and at the synchrotron. With the help of friends at round places, this methodology was implemented and put into production, and has been delivering high-quality data since then. Now, we have almost all possible data corrections (for X-ray scattering) implemented, and are improving the hardware to deliver higher-quality metadata to enable the corrections to be performed to a higher accuracy.
Simultaneously, we have set up a mini-large facility at BAM with the MAUS, the Multi-scale Analyzer for Ultrafine Structures. The MAUS combines the freedom of a laboratory instrument, with the spectrum of users of a beamline: besides measuring our own samples, and performing our own machine and methodology developments, we have opened this instrument for collaboration with fellow scientists from within BAM and from external institutes and universities. Here, we provide a comprehensive support for these collaborations, guiding the user from concept to sample selection, to interpretation and analysis. In 2019, we have supported over 30 different projects this way, leading to seven co-authored publications involving the MAUS in that year alone. As the MAUS uses the latest iteration of our comprehensive measurement methodology, the data quality is unmatched by any other lab instrument, and fully traceable to boot.
The freedom of the laboratory allows for more proof-of-principle experimentation than what is possible at the synchrotron. Therefore, the MAUS provides a good first (and sometimes final) step towards many experimental materials science investigations, nicely complementing the capabilities of the synchrotron. If and when more flux is needed, the step to the synchrotron is now smaller than ever, in particular with the same method
X-ray generation
(2020)
The SPONGE
(2020)