Wissenschaftliche Artikel der BAM
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Gefahrgutverpackungen (3)
- Helium (3)
- Angle of repose (2)
- Dangerous goods packagings (2)
- Dichtheit (2)
- Flow properties (2)
- Flowability (2)
- Hausner ratio (2)
- Powders (2)
- Sift-proofness (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
The flow properties of powdery or granular filling substances for dangerous goods packagings are safety-relevant parameters. To specify the flow behavior, the angle of repose is measured in the recognized test centers for dangerous goods packagings in Germany. Previous investigations performed on non-hazardous substances revealed that some of the methods currently used have disadvantages in application. Additionally, for occupational health and safety reasons, it was generally viewed critically to carry out measurements of the angle of repose for dangerous goods at all. Instead, the dimensionless Hausner ratio to describe the flow behavior was proposed.
In this work, the investigations were extended to real hazardous substances to concretize the assessment. Five exemplary hazardous substances were tested for their angle of repose using the methods commonly applied in the test centers. The Hausner ratio was also determined. In addition, the influence of a different climatic preconditioning on the angle of repose measurement was examined using three selected non-hazardous bulk materials.
The results show that the measurement of the angle of repose is not fundamentally excluded for dangerous goods. However, for reasons of applicability, repeatability and occupational health and safety, only the ISO method can be applied for dangerous filling substances. This method provides conservative results regarding a safety-related evaluation of flow properties for the transport of dangerous goods.
In principle, both the ISO method and the determination of the Hausner ratio can be used for dangerous goods. It is also essential especially with finely powdered filling goods, to carry out controlled preconditioning.
To ensure safety when transporting dangerous goods, it is important to specify the flow properties of the respective solid filling substance of the packagings. For this purpose, the angle of repose is currently used for the UN approvals in Germany. Measurements were carried out on 12 powdery or granular substances applying the angle of repose measuring methods customary in the test centres. The results of the methods differ significantly from each other. In addition, some of the techniques cannot be applied for very cohesive or coarse-grained materials. The results for the angle of repose show a strong scatter for some constellations (coefficient of variation more than 20 %). Safety during transport of dangerous goods cannot be guaranteed with this currently practiced system of measuring the angle of repose. As a consequence, an alternative parameter to characterize the flow properties of bulk materials should be used in the recognized test centers for dangerous goods packagings, such as the Hausner ratio. This approach leads to more precise test results for the substances examined (maximum coefficient of variation 2.8 %). It also has advantages in terms of applicability and occupational safety.
Since the flow properties are safety-relevant, both in terms of mechanical safety and safety against the release of dangerous substances, the testing practice in the recognized test labs should be improved and standardized.
The Dangerous Goods Regulations currently do not include limit leakage rates orsensitivity requirements for industrial leak testing procedures that are equivalent tothe bubble test, which is the prescribed test method for design type testing ofdangerous goods packagings. During series production of such packagings, variousmethods are used, which often do not meet the requirements of the bubble test withregard to important criteria.Sensitivity, flow direction, pressure level and automatability are particularly importantfactors when selecting a suitable industrial leak testing method.The following methods are in principle both suitable and equally effective as thebubble test: pressure rise test (vacuum chamber), ultrasonic bubble leak detectionand gas detection methods (pressure technique by accumulation and vacuumchamber technique).To ensure a uniform test level during design type testing and production line leaktesting and therefore a comparable safety level as required by the Dangerous GoodsRegulations, it is necessary to include a more precise specification in these regula-tions. This requires, on the one hand, information about the sensitivity of the bubbletest and, on the other hand, the inclusion of a list of suitable, equally effective indus-trial test methods with their specific boundary conditions.
Distickstoffmonoxid (N2O, Lachgas) und Helium (He) sind gängige Prüfgase für Dichtheitsprüfungen. Die einfachste Leckgeometrie stellt ein ideal zylindrisches Rohr dar. Es wurden Glaskapillaren verschiedener Abmessungen mit Lachgas und Helium durchströmt. Der Überdruck am Kapillareingang lag zwischen 100 mbar und 400 mbar. Es handelte sich um vier annähernd zylindrische Glaskapillaren mit den mittleren Durchmessern: Kapillare 1: ca. 102 μm; Kapillare 2: ca. 71 μm; Kapillare 3B: ca. 49 μm; Kapillare 4: ca. 53 μm. Zudem wurde eine nichtzylindrische Kapillare geprüft (Kapillare 3A). Die Kapillaren 1, 2 und 3B wurden mit beiden Prüfgasen getestet. Kapillare 3A wurde nur mit Lachgas durchströmt, Kapillare 4 nur mit Helium. Für die Messung der Leckageraten kam das Überdruckverfahren mit Ansammlung (Verfahren B3 nach DIN EN 1779: 1999-10) zum Einsatz. Als Detektor für Lachgas diente der Lachgasdetektor Maihak Unor 6 N, für Helium der Leckdetektor T-Guard der Firma Inficon.
Es wurden verschiedene Theorieansätze verglichen. Beim Theorieansatz Ib erfolgte die Umrechnung der Lachgas-Messwerte auf die Helium-Messwerte und umgekehrt anhand der Druck-, Temperatur- und Gasartabhängigkeit der Leckagerate für laminar-viskose Gasströmung (DIN EN 1779: 1999-10; DGZfP-Richtlinie DP2: 2009-12). Beim Theorieansatz II wurde die Berechnung der Leckagerate für die laminar-viskose Rohrströmung unter der Annahme einer ideal zylindrischen Kapillare durchgeführt. Zusätzlich wurde mit „ANSYS Fluent“ eine CFD-Simulation vorgenommen. Bei Kapillare 3A wurde eine Serienschaltung der Strömungsleitwerte von Rohr und Düse angesetzt. Bei Anwendung des Ansatzes Ib werden bei Umrechnung der Helium-Messwerte auf Lachgas die Lachgas-Messwerte überschätzt. Umgekehrt werden bei der Umrechnung der Lachgas-Messwerte auf Helium die Helium-Messwerte unterschätzt. Bei Analyse der Einlauflängen der Rohrdurchströmung ist festzustellen, dass diese für Lachgas stets größer als für Helium sind. Bei Lachgas liegt daher für einige Messwerte noch keine ausgebildete laminare Rohrströmung vor. Einlaufeffekte können somit nicht vernachlässigt werden. Als Fazit ergibt sich, dass bei Verwendung von Helium als Prüfgas und Umrechnung der Helium-Messwerte auf Lachgas die Lachgas-Leckageraten sicherheitstechnisch konservativ abgeschätzt werden.
The International Dangerous Goods Regulations prescribe the immersion under water method (“bubble test”) as standard method for the leakproofness test of dangerous goods packagings. But this test procedure acts as a test method for leak localisation, not for quantitative leakage rates measurement. Additionally, the sensitivity in detecting leaks of small diameters is restricted, depending on the test liquid and the test pressure. The bubble test is not suitable for a comparison with quantitative limit leakage rates based on realistic transport conditions. This is especially important when estimating the risk of the formation of an explosive atmosphere during the intercontinental carriage of dangerous goods packagings in freight containers. To compare measured leakage rates with limit leakage rates, a quantitative leak testing procedure is required. Therefore a new approach for dangerous goods packagings is implemented: The pressure technique by accumulation using Helium as a tracer gas. This work presents the test equipment necessary for the quantitative measurement of Helium leakage rates through closures of different kinds of dangerous goods packagings. The essential steps to achieve good repeatable results are: A controlled Helium filling process to reach a defined test pressure in the test sample, a sufficient homogenisation of the Helium-air-mixture inside the test sample and the ensuring of a constant pressure level of the test sample during the test. The Helium loss rate of the accumulation chamber has to be measured separately to receive a correction factor for the measured leakage rates. Different constructional measures are introduced to prevent a disturbing influence of the Helium leakage rate of the filling valves on the measurement results. Methods to estimate the disturbing effect of Helium permeation through permeable parts of the test sample are also presented. As a supporting method for the experimental investigations the Helium sniffer test can be applied. This practical application-oriented advice can enable other users to establish a pressure technique by accumulation for their own technical field.
The International Dangerous Goods Regulations prescribe the immersion under water method (“bubble test”) as standard method for the leakproofness test of dangerous goods packagings. But this test procedure acts as a test method for leak localisation, not for quantitative leakage rates measurement. Additionally, the sensitivity in detecting leaks of small diameters is restricted, depending on the test liquid and the test pressure. The bubble test is not suitable for a comparison with quantitative limit leakage rates based on realistic transport conditions. This is especially important when estimating the risk of the formation of an explosive atmosphere during the intercontinental carriage of dangerous goods packagings in freight containers.
To compare measured leakage rates with limit leakage rates, a quantitative leak testing procedure is required. Therefore a new approach for dangerous goods packagings is implemented: The pressure technique by accumulation using Helium as a tracer gas.
This work presents the test equipment necessary for the quantitative measurement of Helium leakage rates through closures of different kinds of dangerous goods packagings. The essential steps to achieve good repeatable results are: A controlled Helium filling process to reach a defined test pressure in the test sample, a sufficient homogenisation of the Helium-air-mixture inside the test sample and the ensuring of a constant pressure level of the test sample during the test. The Helium loss rate of the accumulation chamber has to be measured separately to receive a correction factor for the measured leakage rates. Different constructional measures are introduced to prevent a disturbing influence of the Helium leakage rate of the filling valves on the measurement results. Methods to estimate the disturbing effect of Helium permeation through permeable parts of the test sample are also presented. As a supporting method for the experimental investigations the Helium sniffer test can be applied. This practical application-oriented advice can enable other users to establish a pressure technique by accumulation for their own technical field.
Für die Durchführung einer Dichtheitsprüfung und für die Bewertung des Ergebnisses ist es wichtig, den sich unter Betriebsbedingungen im Prüfobjekt einstellenden Überdruck zu kennen. Entspricht der Prüfüberdruck nicht dem Betriebsüberdruck, so ist es oft erforderlich, die unter Prüfbedingungen gemessenen Leckageraten auf den realen Betriebsüberdruck umzurechnen. Im Bereich der Gefahrgutverpackungen ist jedoch der spätere maximale Betriebsüberdruck nicht genau bekannt. Er hängt für jede einzelne Verpackungsbauart von dem eingefüllten Füllmedium mit seinen spezifischen Stoffeigenschaften, dem Füllgrad sowie den Beförderungsbedingungen, insbesondere der mittleren Transporttemperatur, ab. Es werden Berechnungsansätze vorgestellt, mit denen sich der Überdruck in Gefahrgutverpackungen unter Beförderungsbedingungen rechnerisch ermitteln lässt. Die theoretisch berechneten Überdrücke werden mit Überdruck-Messwerten verglichen, die mit verschiedenen Füllmedien in unterschiedlichen Verpackungsbauarten ermittelt wurden.
Nondestructive testing (NDT) methods are applicable in many ways for defect detection as well as optimization of packaging production processes. The visual inspection method is the technique which is mostly used, although neither the customer nor a skilled inspector may be aware of this.
Techniques like ultrasound for wall thickness measurement, the application of x-ray techniques or the use of dye penetrant techniques for crack detection are rather well known to the NDT family. However, acoustic emission techniques can also be helpful for the characterization of packaging materials. In this paper the employment of x-ray computer tomography (CT) for measurement of wall thickness in plastic jerrycans, especially on the edges, and its possible optimization of production processes will be discussed.
A comparison of the CT and ultrasonic examinations of wall thickness and the reliability of this measured data are also important points for the discussion, especially if some safety factors can be derived from the results.
The leakage test is also good for jerrycans, IBCs or other kinds of drums for the transportation and storage of dangerous goods. The disadvantage of this kind of test is that a lack of quality, e.g. wall thickness deterioration, cannot be detected if the wall thickness withstands the internal pressure. Therefore, especially for Quality assurance, the other, previously mentioned techniques are better for a statistical assessment of a batch. This paper is focused on the comparison of different NDT results with special emphasis on the large range of material mechanical properties.