Datei im Netzwerk der BAM verfügbar ("Closed Access")
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2017 (2)
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (2)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (2)
Schlagworte
- Artificial weathering (2) (entfernen)
Different climatic conditions and weather variables during natural and artificial exposure of polymers may be reasons for an unsatisfying correlation between the ageing results. Here the main differences are discussed for:
- Global solar radiation
In weathering devices there is a constant spectral irradiance which is 5 times higher than the averaged spectral irradiance outdoors, which is strongly varying in its diurnal course. Intensified weathering using Fresnel reflectors concentrates only the direct solar radiation with a relatively low UV proportion. Problems of reciprocity may arise from the different mean of irradiance levels.
- Temperatures at specimen surfaces.
Because of the high irradiance levels mentioned above, artificial exposures may lead to high surface temperatures and large temperature differences between differently coloured specimen surfaces, if the artificial radiation source emits much VIS- and IR-radiation. Outdoors the surface temperature and temperature differences of exposed specimens are influenced by considerably lower irradiance levels and additionally by an effective radiation loss in the night.
- Relative humidity at specimen surfaces
In weathering devices the relative humidity at specimen surfaces is very low if it is uncontrolled. If controlled by ultrasonic humidifiers or spray nozzles, the additional exposure to water droplets is quite likely.
- Wetness on specimen surfaces
All usual spray programs prescribed in weathering standards recommend frequently changing of short spray/dry periods and result in total times of wetness (TOW) of the exposed specimen surfaces which is only about 30 % of the outdoor TOW.
- Acidic precipitation and bio films
Acidic precipitation and bio films are usual outdoor conditions which are only considered in special weathering tests.
In this paper, we demonstrate the effects of radiation exposures of polymeric materials with UV-A 340 nm lamps (ISO 4892-3, Type 1A) at -10 °C in comparison to an irradiation at +50 °C using a Global UV Test 200 fluorescent lamp device from Weiss Umwelttechnik GmbH, which incorporates an active cooling appliance. While the effects at -10 °C actually are lower than at + 50°C their extent was clearly beyond expectations.