Datei für die Öffentlichkeit verfügbar ("Open Access")
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (3)
- Vortrag (2)
- Posterpräsentation (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (6)
Schlagworte
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Paper des Monats
- ja (1)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (2)
Since its isolation, graphene has received growing attention from academia and industry due to its unique properties. However, the “what is my material” barrier hinders further commercialization. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is considered as a method of choice for the determination of the elemental and chemical composition. In this work the influence of the morphology of graphene particles on the XPS results is studied and investigated as a function of X-ray energy, using conventional XPS with Al K𝜶 radiation and hard X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (HAXPES) using Cr K𝜶 radiation. Thereby, the information depth is varied between 10 and 30 nm. For this purpose, two commercial powders containing graphene nanoplatelets with lateral dimensions of either ≈100 nm or in the micrometer range are compared. These larger ones exist as stack of graphene layers which is inspected with scanning electron microscopy. Both kinds of particles are then functionalized with either oxygen or fluorine. The size of the graphene particles is found to influence the degree of functionalization. Only the combination of XPS and HAXPES allows to detect the functionalization at the outermost surface of the particles or even of the stacks and to provide new insights into the functionalization process.
The obvious benefits derived from the increasing use of engineered nano-, new, and advanced materials and associated products have to be weighed out by a governance process against their possible risks. Differences in risk perception (beliefs about potential harm) among stakeholders, in particular nonscientists, and low transparency of the underlying decision processes can lead to a lack of support and acceptance of nano-, new, and other advanced material enabled products. To integrate scientific outcomes with stakeholders needs, this work develops a new approach comprising a nine-level, stepwise categorization and guidance system entitled “Knowledge, Information, and Data Readiness Levels” (KaRLs), analogous to the NASA Technology Readiness Levels. The KaRL system assesses the type, extent, and usability of the available data, information, and knowledge and integrates the participation of relevant and interested stakeholders in a cocreation/codesign process to improve current risk assessment, communication, and governance. The novelty of the new system is to communicate and share all available and relevant elements on material related risks in a user/stakeholder-friendly, transparent, flexible, and holistic way and so stimulate reflection, awareness, communication, and a deeper understanding that ultimately enables the discursive process that is needed for the sustainable risk governance of new materials.
Nanomaterials bring various benefits and have become a part of our daily lives. However, the risks emerging from nanotechnology need to be minimized and controlled at the regulatory level and therefore, there is a need for nanorisk governance. One of the prerequisites for successful nanorisk governance is the availability of high-quality data on nanomaterials and their impact with the human body and the environment. In recent decades, a countless number of publications and studies on nanomaterials and their properties have been produced due to the fast development of nanotechnology. Despite such a vast amount of data and information, there are certain knowledge gaps hindering an efficient nanorisk governance process. Knowing the state of the available data and information is an important requirement for any decision maker in dealing with risks. In the specific case of nanotechnology, where most of the risks are complex, ambiguous, and uncertain in nature, it is essential to obtain complete data and metadata, to fill knowledge gaps, and to transform the available knowledge into functional knowledge. This can become possible using a novel approach developed within the NANORIGO project (Grant agreement No. 814530) – the Knowledge Readiness Level (KaRL). In analogy to NASA’s Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs), we define KaRLs as a categorization system of data, information, and knowledge which enables transformation of data and information into functional knowledge for nanorisk governance. Our approach goes beyond the technical curation of data and metadata and involves quality and completeness filters, regulatory compliance requirements, nanorisk-related tools, and most importantly, human input (inclusion of all stakeholder groups). With the KaRL approach we also address key issues in nanotechnology such as societal and ethical concerns, circular economies and sustainability, the Green Deal, and the traceability of data, knowledge, and decisions. The KaRL approach could be used for nanorisk governance by a nanorisk governance council (NRGC), which is currently under development by three EU projects (NANORIGO, GOV4NANO, and RISKGONE).
Nanomaterials bring various benefits and have become a part of our daily lives. However, the risks emerging from nanotechnology need to be minimized and controlled at the regulatory level and therefore, there is a need for nanorisk governance. One of the prerequisites for successful nanorisk governance is the availability of high-quality data on nanomaterials and their impact with the human body and the environment. In recent decades, a countless number of publications and studies on nanomaterials and their properties have been produced due to the fast development of nanotechnology. Despite such a vast amount of data and information, there are certain knowledge gaps hindering an efficient nanorisk governance process. Knowing the state of the available data and information is an important requirement for any decision maker in dealing with risks. In the specific case of nanotechnology, where most of the risks are complex, ambiguous, and uncertain in nature, it is essential to obtain complete data and metadata, to fill knowledge gaps, and to transform the available knowledge into functional knowledge. This can become possible using a novel approach developed within the NANORIGO project (Grant agreement No. 814530) – the Knowledge Readiness Level (KaRL). In analogy to NASA’s Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs), we define KaRLs as a categorization system of data, information, and knowledge which enables transformation of data and information into functional knowledge for nanorisk governance. Our approach goes beyond the technical curation of data and metadata and involves quality and completeness filters, regulatory compliance requirements, nanorisk-related tools, and most importantly, human input (inclusion of all stakeholder groups). With the KaRL approach we also address key issues in nanotechnology such as societal and ethical concerns, circular economies and sustainability, the Green Deal, and the traceability of data, knowledge, and decisions. The KaRL approach could be used for nanorisk governance by a nanorisk governance council (NRGC), which is currently under development by three EU projects (NANORIGO, GOV4NANO, and RISKGONE).
Regulatory decisions require reliable data and knowledge derived from this. Among stakeholders in nanotechnology, however, there is often uncertainty about the quality of data for regulatory purposes. In addition, the general public often finds itself excluded from nanoregulation and policy decisions. This creates uncertainty in the nanotechnology field and also in other branches of technology and leads to concerns among the society.
To address these issues, NANORIGO elaborates a framework to support decision making as well as data, information and knowledge sharing and use. We refer to “reliability” of data and knowledge as a degree of readiness or maturity. According to these criteria we worked out a 9-level scale in analogy to TRL (technology readiness level), the KaRL system (Knowledge, Data and Information Readiness Level). KaRL allows assessment of knowledge readiness for decision making by applying defined quality criteria for each level. It also provides guidance on how to enhance the readiness level by the help of available tools and procedures. KaRL addresses SEIN[1] principles, circular economy and thus involves the public concerns in regulation. A specialized nanorisk governance council (being under development in NANORIGO) is suggested to perform quality check of an actionable document, thus, aiding in consensus on the reliability (maturity) of knowledge for decision making. Moreover, KaRL facilitates traceability of knowledge before its use in decision making. This enables the transparency demanded by all stakeholders.
The minimum information requirements needed to guarantee high-quality surface Analysis data of nanomaterials are described with the aim to provide reliable and traceable Information about size, shape, elemental composition and surface chemistry for risk assessment approaches.
The widespread surface analysis methods electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) were considered. The complete analysis sequence from sample preparation, over measurements, to data analysis and data format for reporting and archiving is outlined. All selected methods are used in surface analysis since many years so that many aspects of the analysis (including (meta)data formats) are already standardized. As a practical analysis use case, two coated TiO2 reference nanoparticulate samples, which are available on the Joint Research Centre (JRC) repository, were selected. The added value of the complementary analysis is highlighted based on the minimum information requirements, which are well-defined for the analysis methods selected. The present paper is supposed to serve primarily as a source of understanding of the high standardization level already available for the high-quality data in surface analysis of nanomaterials as reliable input for the nanosafety community.