Chemische Charakterisierung und Spurenanalytik
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (3)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (5)
Schlagworte
- Triple isotope fractionation (5) (entfernen)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (3)
The calibration of isotope ratio measurements is an ongoing challenge since instrumental isotope fractionation (IIF) has been detected in mass spectrometry (MS). There is a variety of approaches which either bypass IIF such as delta measurements or refer to reference materials (RMs) and thus shifting the problem of calibration to somebody else: the RM producer. For certifying isotope RMs with absolute isotope ratios only a few approaches are available, namely the isotope mixture approach, the double spike approach, the mass bias regression model and total evaporation in TIMS. All of them require either enriched isotopes, isotope RMs of another element or an RM for correcting residual error. As the enriched isotopes required for the isotope mixture and the double spike approach need to be fully characterized beforehand, all mentioned calibration approaches require a standard.
Here, a new and standard-free calibration approach for obtaining absolute isotope ratios of multi-isotopic elements has been developed. The underlying principle is that each MS suffers from IIF and thus yields a specific isotope fractionation line in a three-isotope diagram. When applying a second MS featuring a different ionization mechanism, we obtain a second isotope fractionation line with a different slope in the same three-isotope diagram. In both cases the absolute isotope ratios range somewhere on the isotope fractionation line. Consequentially, the intersect of both lines yield the absolute isotope ratios of the measured sample. This theory has been tested by measuring Cd and Pb isotope ratios of suitable isotope RMs with a TIMS and an ICP-MS, both equipped with multi-collector array. During the measurements the ionization conditions were changed such that different extent of the isotope fractionation has been achieved. With the resulting data set the theory described above could be verified. The obtained absolute isotope ratios were metrologically compatible with the certified isotope ratios. The remaining average bias of -5 ‰ can be reduced with further improvements. The calibration approach is universal and can be applied to any multi-isotopic element and it is not limited by the type of the mass spectrometer.
The presentations gives a short introduction into isotope analysis illustrated by examples from archaeology, food provenancing and metrology. In the main part current projects on the provenance determination of cement, the intercalibration of Mg isotope reference materials and the development of a new calibration approach for isotope measurements are presented.
The theory of a new calibration approach for obtaining absolute isotope ratios of multi-isotopic elements without the use of any standard has been developed. The calibration approach basically uses the difference in the instrumental isotope fractionation of two different types of mass spectrometers, leading to two different fractionation lines in a three-isotope diagram. When measuring the same sample with both mass spectrometers, the different fractionation lines have one point in common: this is the ‘true’ logarithmized isotope ratio pair of the sample. Thus, the intersection of both fractionation lines provides us with the absolute isotope ratios of the sample. This theory has been tested in practice by measuring Cd and of Pb isotope ratios in the certified reference materials BAM-I012 and NIST SRM981 by thermal ionization mass spectrometry and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry while varying the ionization conditions for both mass spectrometers. With this experiment, the theory could be verified, and absolute isotope ratios were obtained, which were metrologically compatible with the certified isotope ratios. The so-obtained absolute isotope ratios are biased by − 0.5% in average, which should be improved with further developments of the method. This calibration approach is universal, as it can be applied to all elements with three or more isotopes and it is not limited to the type of mass spectrometers applied; it can be applied as well to secondary ion mass spectrometry or others. Additionally, this approach provides information on the fractionation process itself via the triple-isotope fractionation exponent θ.
The continuous improvement of analytical procedures using multi-collector technologies in ICP-mass spectrometry has led to an increased demand for isotope standards with improved homogeneity and reduced measurement uncertainty. For magnesium, this has led to a variety of available standards with different quality levels ranging from artefact standards to isotope reference materials certified for absolute isotope ratios. This required an intercalibration of all standards and reference materials, which we present in this interlaboratory comparison study. The materials Cambridge1, DSM3, ERMAE143, ERM-AE144, ERM-AE145, IRMM-009 and NIST SRM 980 were cross-calibrated with expanded measurement uncertainties (95% confidence level) of less than 0.030‰ for the δ25/24Mg values and less than 0.037‰ for the δ26/24Mg values. Thus, comparability of all magnesium isotope delta (δ) measurements based on these standards and reference materials is established. Further, ERM-AE143 anchors all magnesium δ-scales to absolute isotope ratios and therefore establishes SI traceability, here traceability to the SI base unit mole. This applies especially to the DSM3 scale, which is proposed to be maintained. With ERM-AE144 and ERM-AE145, which are product and educt of a sublimation-condensation process, for the first time a set of isotope reference materials is available with a published value for the apparent triple isotope fractionation exponent θapp, the fractionation relationship ln α(25/24Mg)/ln α(26/24Mg).
Multi-collector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) has evolved significantly since its introduction in 1992. The second and third generation instruments now allow isotope ratio measurements at unprecedented precisions, 0.001 % or better. However, precision alone is not enough for producing accurate and reliable isotope ratio measurements. Metrological considerations such as the selection of suitable calibration strategies, proper assessment of instrumental biases, and the estimation of overall measurement uncertainty remain critical to the measurement process. Properly assessed, measurement uncertainty then provides the interval within which a result can be considered both accurate and precise.
All mass spectrometric measurements are affected by instrumental mass discrimination and produce isotope ratios that are biased relative to their “true” ratio. To produce accurate and traceable isotope ratio measurements, it is imperative that certified isotope reference materials (iCRMs) be used for calibration and validation purposes. iCRMs reporting absolute isotope ratios are an analyst’s first choice, particularly when its uncertainty is sufficient for the intended use. However, when smaller uncertainties are required to resolve subtle differences between samples, delta-scale measurements become important. Here, the difference between an isotope ratio measured in a sample and in an internationally accepted isotope reference material (iRM) is determined. This deviation can be positive or negative relative to the iRM, is called a delta value, and is often expressed in per mil units.
This presentation will highlight the potential for MC-ICP-MS to produce isotope ratio measurements with minimal uncertainties by examining three applications involving Mg isotopes: 1) the certification of a set of iCRMs for their absolute isotope ratio using a gravimetric isotope mixture approach; 2) the comparison of these iCRMs with currently accepted Mg delta-scale reference materials through intercalibration, and 3) the determination of isotope fractionation exponents for geochemical applications.