Chemie und Prozesstechnik
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Vortrag (11)
- Posterpräsentation (4)
- Zeitschriftenartikel (3)
Referierte Publikation
- nein (18) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- PFAS (17)
- HR-CS-GFMAS (14)
- Fluorine (10)
- Soil (4)
- SPM (3)
- CIC (2)
- EOF (2)
- Fluor (2)
- SPE (2)
- Schwebstoffe (2)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 1.1 Anorganische Spurenanalytik (18) (entfernen)
Eingeladener Vortrag
- nein (11)
With the continuous release of anthropogenic pollutants into the environment, substantial risks for the human health arise. Concerning are especially persistent substances (e.g., PFAS) as they accumulate in food chains which inevitably result in the transgression of negative impact threshold levels. Environmental Analytical Chemsitry interfaces all disciplines of Risk Assessment. Therefore it is the important tool to identify, monitor, and remediate environmental pollutants. Based on the example of PFAS, a workflow to tackle environmental pollutants in a retro- and pro-spective way is shown. Within the project, the worldwide situation of environmental pollutants will be illustrated for the example of PFAS. As the major discipline to confront the problem, analytical chemistry will be shown as a key tool for contesting PFAS and creating safe-by-design materials in the future.
The combination of non-target analysis (NTA) based on HPLC-ESI-MS with elemental fluorine speciation analysis based on HPLC-PARCI-MS for the identification and quantification of (unknown) organofluorines in environmental samples is associated with several advantages e.g., reduced non-target data treatment workflow and quantification.
PFASs compromise persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic properties and are hence, environmental contaminants of emerging concern. Thus, procedures for identifying potential sources of the entrance of these compounds into the environment, identification of new organofluorine species, and closing mass balances need urgent development. The intrinsic fluorine tag appears in a sizable fraction of these and other xenobiotics, making elemental speciation desirable for quantitative NTA in these areas. Current non-target approaches based on ESI-HRMS suffer from a lack of data mining algorithms for identification of PFASs with low fluorine mass percentages. Furthermore, low ionization efficiencies of the compounds hamper detection limits.
Hence, the proposed combination of simultaneous HPLC-ESI-MS and HPLC-PARCI-MS via split-stream coupling is a promising approach for environmental PFAS monitoring. Furthermore, it could serve as an important analytical procedure to set up limiting values in compliance with the desired PFAS ban of the European Union.
HR-CS-GFMAS a new screening tool for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment
(2023)
Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) are a large group of anthropogenic contaminates. Concerning are especially their persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic properties. Mostly, target-based approaches (e.g., LC-MS/MS) are utilized for the analysis of PFASs in the environment. But these approaches are limited to the availability of analytical grade standards and therefore drastically underestimate the total PFAS burden. Analytical approaches based on total fluorine for PFAS sum parameter analysis become increasingly important to indicate realistic PFAS pollution levels.
PFAS sum parameters display the proportion of organically bound fluorine that can either be extracted (EOF) or adsorbed to activated carbon (AOF). For the instrumental analysis of such sum parameters, a fluorine selective detector is needed. Besides combustion ion chromatography (CIC), high resolution-continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) is a sensitive and highly selective tool for fluorine determination. The method is based on the in situ formation of diatomic gallium-mono fluoride (GaF) in a graphite furnace at a temperature of 1550°C. The molecular absorption of GaF can be detected at its most sensitive wavelength at 211.248 nm providing limits of quantification in the low µg F L-1 range.
Here, we present a comparison of total fluorine analysis methods – AOF vs. EOF and HR-CS-GFMAS vs. CIC. Therefore, surface water samples from the Spree River in Berlin, Germany were analyzed at 10 locations for total fluorine (TF), AOF and EOF. The AOF made up 0.14–0.81% of TF and the EOF 0.04–0.28% of TF while AOF concentrations were systematically higher. For the instrumental comparison, HR-CS-GFMAS was the more sensitive and precise method for fluorine analysis compared to CIC.
HR-CS-GFMAS turned out to be a sensitive, fast and highly selective tool for fluorine determination. The method is based on the in situ formation of diatomic gallium-mono fluoride (GaF) at a temperature of 1550°C. GaF can be detected at 211.248 nm providing limits of quantificationin the low μg/L range. However, several species specific effects where observed when analyzing PFASs.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of anthropogenic contaminates associated with persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic properties. Mostly, target-based approaches (e.g., LC-MS/MS) are utilized for the analysis of PFASs in the environment. Target approaches are limited to a few selected PFASs and therefore underestimate the total PFAS burden. Analytical approaches based on total fluorine for PFAS sum parameter analysis become increasingly important to indicate realistic PFAS pollution levels.
Recently high resolution-continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) turned out to be a sensitive and highly selective tool for fluorine determination. The method is based on the in situ formation of diatomic gallium-mono fluoride (GaF) in a graphite furnace at a temperature of 1550°C. The molecular absorption of GaF can be detected at its most sensitive wavelength at 211.248 nm providing limits of quantification in the low µg F/L range. HR-CS-GFMAS analysis can be combined with the extractable organically bound fluorine (EOF) approach whereas PFASs are extracted from liquid or solid samples using organic solvents and/or solid phase extraction (SPE).
In this presentation the applicability of HR-CS-GFMAS for organic fluorine analysis in various environmental sample including (1) water samples, (2) soil samples and (3) plant samples is demonstrated.
(1) We investigated EOF concentrations in water bodies in Berlin, Germany and used additional PFAS target analysis for a PFAS mass balance approach. EOF concentrations were in the expected range for an urban river system. However, downstream of an effluent discharge, the EOF increased by one order of magnitude from 40 to 574 ng F/L. Target analysis determined mostly short-chained perfluorinated carboxylic acids and sulfonic acids, which however only made up less than 10% of the EOF. This study highlights that EOF screening using HR-CS-GFMAS is useful and advantageous compared to target analysis to identify pollution sites in urban water systems.
(2) For soil samples, we optimized a fast and simple PFAS extraction method for EOF determination. The developed extraction method consists of a liquid-solid extraction without any additional SPE for fluoride removal. We investigated different soil samples using the optimized method with and without an additional SPE clean-up step and revealed a drastic underestimation of EOF mass fractions using SPE. The optimized method is a valuable screening tool for fast PFAS monitoring.
(3) For plant samples, we conducted a study on the uptake and fate of PFASs in bean plants. For PFAS mass balancing HR-CS-GFMAS analysis was combined with LC-MS/MS analysis. PFASs were spiked as mixtures of known and unknown composition. Short-chained PFASs were determined with high mass fractions mainly in the fruits of the investigated plants while long-chained PFASs were mainly determined in roots. Overall, both methods indicate comparable results with target analysis being more reliable for known PFAS contamination and EOF/HR-CS-GFMAS analysis being more valuable to identify PFAS exposure of unknown composition.
Per- und polyfluorierte Alkylverbindungen (PFAS) sind eine Substanzklasse bestehend aus mehreren tausenden Einzelverbindungen. Unter PFAS zählen alle Verbindungen, die mindestens eine perfluorierte Methyl- (-CF3) oder Methylen-Gruppe (-CF2-) besitzen. Somit zählt auch ein großer Teil der fluorierten Medikamente, Pflanzenschutzmittel oder Biozide in die PFAS-Substanzklasse. Aufgrund der Persistenz, Bioakkumulation in Nahrungsketten, Toxizität und der ubiquitären Verbreitung von PFAS zählen sie zu den „emerging pollutants“. Die PFAS-Analytik ist wegen ihrer vielfältigen physikalisch-chemischen Eigenschaften und der sehr hohen Anzahl an PFAS eine große Herausforderung. Da es für viele Anwendungen noch ungewiss ist, welche PFAS verwendet werden, wie sie in die Umwelt gelangen und welche Transformations- bzw. Abbauprodukte entstehen, stoßen analytische Ansätze, die nur auf Einzelsubstanzen abzielen, hier an ihre Grenzen. PFAS-Summenparameter-Methoden, die darauf abzielen ein möglichst vollständiges Abbild der PFAS-Belastungssituation widerzuspiegeln, werden daher immer wichtiger.
Per- und polyfluorierte Alkylverbindungen (PFAS) sind eine Substanzklasse bestehend aus mehreren tausenden Einzelverbindungen. Unter PFAS zählen alle Verbindungen, die mindestens eine perfluorierte Methyl- (-CF3) oder Methylen-Gruppe (-CF2-) besitzen.[1] Somit zählt auch ein großer Teil der fluorierten Medikamente, Pflanzenschutzmittel oder Biozide in die PFAS-Substanzklasse. Aufgrund der Persistenz, Bioakkumulation in Nahrungsketten, Toxizität und der ubiquitären Verbreitung von PFAS zählen sie zu den „emerging pollutants“.[2] Die PFAS-Analytik ist wegen ihrer vielfältigen physikalisch-chemischen Eigenschaften und der sehr hohen Anzahl an PFAS eine große Herausforderung. Da es für viele Anwendungen noch ungewiss ist, welche PFAS verwendet werden, wie sie in die Umwelt gelangen und welche Transformations- bzw. Abbauprodukte entstehen, stoßen analytische Ansätze, die nur auf Einzelsubstanzen abzielen, hier an ihre Grenzen. PFAS-Summenparameter-Methoden, die darauf abzielen ein möglichst vollständiges Abbild der PFAS-Belastungssituation widerzuspiegeln, werden daher immer wichtiger.
Introduction
Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of over 4730 individual compounds. Several PFASs are extremely persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic. The analysis of PFASs is challenging because of their various chemical and physical properties as well as the high number of compounds. Target-based approaches (e.g., LC-MS/MS) are limited to the availability of analytical grade standards and are not suitable for the analysis of new/unknown PFASs and transformation products. Therefore, PFAS sum parameter methods become increasingly important to indicate realistic PFAS pollution levels.
Methods
For the instrumental analysis of such sum parameters, a fluorine selective detector is needed. In our study we used high resolution-continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) which is a sensitive and highly selective tool for fluorine determination. The method is based on the in situ formation of diatomic gallium-mono fluoride (GaF) in a graphite furnace at a temperature of 1550°C. The molecular absorption of GaF can be detected at its most sensitive wavelength at 211.248 nm providing limits of quantification of c(F) 2.7 µg/L.
Results
Here, we present an improved method for the determination of PFASs using HR-CS-GFMAS via GaF detection. The optimized method includes a modifier pretreatment step using a mixture of Mg, Pd and Zr and a correction measurement using perfluorooctanoic acid. The combination of both resulted in increased accuracy and precision as well as overall lower detection limits. Furthermore, during optimization the influence of species-specific responses during HR-CS-GFMAS analysis was reduced resulting in a more accurate determination of PFAS sum parameters. To test the applicability of the improved method, we analysed soil samples from a former fire-fighting training area combining the improved method for detection with our previously optimized extraction method for extractable organically bound fluorine (EOF) determination in soils.
Innovative aspects
• Highly sensitive and selective method for fluorine/PFASs analysis based on HR-CS-GFMAS
• Increased accuracy for the determination of EOF
• Reduction of PFAS species-specific responses by optimized modifier conditions
Sediments and soils can act as sinks of species of inorganic mercury (Hg2+), while they are simultaneously sources of organic species, such as monomethylmercury (MMHg). Although the fraction of MMHg in total Hg of sediments is suggested to be only 0.1–1%, MMHg poses a threat for humans and wildlife due to its toxic properties, high bioaccumulation potential and the ability to pass the blood-brain barrier. One example of a highly Hg contaminated waterbody is the Finow Canal, the oldest artificial waterway still in operation in Germany. Here, Hg mass fractions of up to 100 µg/g were found in the sediment in previous studies. These are suggested to be associated with a chemical plant producing mercury-based seed dressings. Despite this high mass fraction of Hg, no Hg speciation studies have been conducted there up to now.
In this study, Hg speciation in sediments of Finow Canal at locations before and after the known polluted site was conducted using species-specific isotope dilution (SSID) GC-ICP-ToF-MS. Mass fractions of up to 0.41 µg/g MMHg were determined. In addition, waterbodies around the initially polluted site were investigated and elevated concentrations were also determined around 14 km downstream. For MMHg analysis, the performance of ICP-ToF-MS for SSID GC/ICP-MS was compared with ICP-Q-MS and ICP-SF-MS. Here, isotope ratio precision was similar between the tested instruments. However, the (quasi-) simultaneous detection of the whole mass spectrum will probably offer a much higher precision of ICP-ToF-MS, when more than one isotope system is used.
These results are the first evidence of the occurrence of MMHg in this region and show the need for further investigations of the whole regional ecosystem, as well as the consideration of possible measures of remediation. SSID GC-ICP-(ToF)-MS is a suitable tool for investigating species-specific (multi) isotope systems for environmental monitoring.
Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of several thousand individual compounds. Many PFASs are extremely persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic. The analysis of PFASs is challenging because of their various chemical and physical properties as well as the high number of compounds. Target-based approaches (e.g., LC-MS/MS) are limited to the availability of analytical grade standards and are not suitable for the analysis of new/unknown PFASs and transformation products. Therefore, PFAS sum parameter methods become increasingly important to indicate realistic PFAS pollution levels.
PFAS sum parameters display the proportion of organically bound fluorine that can either be extracted (EOF) or adsorbed to activated carbon (AOF). For the instrumental analysis of such sum parameters, a fluorine selective detector is needed. High resolution-continuum source-graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) is a sensitive and highly selective tool for fluorine determination. The method is based on the in situ formation of diatomic gallium-mono fluoride (GaF) in a graphite furnace at a temperature of 1550°C. The molecular absorption of GaF can be detected at its most sensitive wavelength at 211.248 nm providing limits of quantification of c(F) 2.7 µg/L.
In the present work a HR-CS-GFMAS method for EOF analysis was utilized for suspended particulate matter (SPM) analysis in German rivers in time lines from 2005–2020. Therefore, time and spatial resolved trends were investigated. In addition, SPM samples were analyzed for the Σ41PFAS using target analysis based on UHPLC-HRMS. Overall, target analysis drastically underestimated the total PFAS burden in SPM of German rivers compared to the EOF HR-CS-GFMAS analysis. Using a fluorine mass balance approach, only 0.2% to 38.6% of the EOF was explainable using the Σ41PFAS determined with target analysis. Our study highlights the need to integrate PFAS sum parameters (e.g., EOF with HR-CS-GFMAS) in PFAS risk assessment strategies.