Material
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel (57)
- Vortrag (57)
- Posterpräsentation (14)
- Sonstiges (10)
- Beitrag zu einem Sammelband (8)
- Handbuch (4)
- Forschungsbericht (4)
- Forschungsdatensatz (4)
- Beitrag zu einem Tagungsband (3)
- Newsletter (1)
Schlagworte
- Nanoparticles (72)
- Electron microscopy (45)
- VAMAS (32)
- Particle size distribution (26)
- Standardisation (16)
- SEM (13)
- Inter-laboratory comparison (12)
- Reference materials (12)
- AFM (11)
- SAXS (10)
- Thin films (10)
- TiO2 (10)
- Traceability (10)
- EDS (9)
- Sample preparation (9)
- Interlaboratory comparison (8)
- Nanomaterials (8)
- EBSD (7)
- Size (7)
- Imaging (6)
- Nanomaterial (6)
- Shape (6)
- Elemental composition (5)
- FIB (5)
- ISO/TC 202 (5)
- Nanoparticle concentration (5)
- Titanium dioxide (5)
- nPSize (5)
- Advanced materials (4)
- ISO (4)
- ISO/TC 229 (4)
- Image segmentation (4)
- Microbeam Analysis (4)
- Microbeam analysis (4)
- NanoDefine (4)
- Nanomaterial classification (4)
- SiO2 (4)
- Spectroscopic ellipsometry (4)
- TEM (4)
- X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (4)
- XPS (4)
- Correlative analysis (3)
- Correlative imaging (3)
- EPMA (3)
- HAXPES (3)
- ISO/TC 229 Nanotechnologies (3)
- Image analysis (3)
- Iron oxide (3)
- Nano@BAM (3)
- Nanotechnology (3)
- Photocatalysis (3)
- Porosity (3)
- Quantum dots (3)
- Scanning electron microscopy (3)
- Titania nanoparticles (3)
- Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (TKD) (3)
- 3D (2)
- ACEnano (2)
- Atomic force microscopy (2)
- Auger electron spectroscopy (2)
- Automated image analysis (2)
- Automatisation (2)
- BAM reference data (2)
- Boehmite (2)
- CEN/TC 352 Nanotechnologies (2)
- Characterisation (2)
- Concentration (2)
- Convolutional neural networks (2)
- Core–shell particles (2)
- Decision support (2)
- EC4SafeNano (2)
- EMPIR (2)
- Elektronenmikroskopie (2)
- Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (2)
- Epoxy (2)
- European Centre (2)
- FeNi (2)
- Film thickness (2)
- Functionalized graphene (2)
- Gold (2)
- Graphene oxide (2)
- Graphene oxide flakes (2)
- Hard-energy X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (2)
- Homogeneity (2)
- Iridium oxide (2)
- Laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) (2)
- Layer-by-layer deposition (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Mesoporous (2)
- Mesoporous thin films (2)
- Microanalysis (2)
- Microplastic (2)
- Nano (2)
- Nano-safety (2)
- Nanosafety (2)
- Neural networks (2)
- Non-spherical shape (2)
- Particle size and shape distribution (2)
- Photooxidation (2)
- Raman (2)
- Reference data (2)
- Reference material (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Reproducibility (2)
- Roughness (2)
- SEM/EDS (2)
- SIMS (2)
- SOP (2)
- STEM-in-SEM (2)
- SiGe (2)
- Size distribution (2)
- Standardization (2)
- Standards (2)
- Surface chemical analysis (2)
- Surface functionalization (2)
- TKD (2)
- Titanium oxide (2)
- ToF-SIMS (2)
- Ultrashort laser pulses (2)
- 2D materials (1)
- ACCORDs (1)
- AI tool (1)
- Absorption spectrometry (1)
- Abwasser (1)
- Advanced material (1)
- AgInS (1)
- Al2O3 thin films (1)
- Amorphous phases (1)
- Amperometry (1)
- Analytical services (1)
- Anatase (1)
- Aqueous synthesis (1)
- Article concentration (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Atomic fraction (1)
- Au-nanocubes (1)
- Auger Electron Spectroscopy (1)
- Automated Image Analysis (1)
- Automation (1)
- BADGER film (1)
- BNP (1)
- BadgerFilm (1)
- Batch analysis (1)
- Benchmarking (1)
- Bimodal size distribution (1)
- Bipyramid (1)
- Bisphenol A (1)
- Boehmite nanoparticles (1)
- Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (1)
- CEN (1)
- CUSP (1)
- Calcium monofluoride (1)
- Case studies (1)
- Catalogue of services (1)
- Catalysis (1)
- Cationic photocuring (1)
- Cerium oxide (1)
- Certification (1)
- Certified reference materials (1)
- Certified reference nanomaterials (1)
- Charge (1)
- Chemistry (1)
- Classification (1)
- Coating (1)
- Complementary methodology and metrology (1)
- Complex-shape (1)
- Composites (1)
- Controlled morphology (1)
- Controlled periodic illumination (1)
- Correlative Imaging (1)
- Correlative microscopy (1)
- Cross-sectioning (1)
- Crosslinking density (1)
- Cubical shape (1)
- Cyclic voltammetry (1)
- Cycloaliphatic epoxy oligosiloxane (1)
- Cyclometalated iridium (III) complexes (1)
- Data correlation (1)
- Data readiness level (1)
- Definition (1)
- Definition of nanomaterial (1)
- Dodecanethiol (1)
- EC nanomaterial definition (1)
- EDS-TM002 (1)
- EDX (1)
- EMPIR nPSize (1)
- EPMA (Electron Probe Microanalysis) (1)
- ESR (1)
- EU (1)
- Electrocatalysis (1)
- Electrochemical catalysts (1)
- Electrochemistry (1)
- Electrolysis (1)
- Electron Microscopy (1)
- Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) (1)
- Electron probe microanallysis (EPMA) (1)
- Electron probe microanalysis (1)
- Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) (1)
- Electrospun nanocomposite fiber (1)
- Epoxy conversion degree (1)
- Epoxy nanocomposites (1)
- Expert system (1)
- FAIRification (1)
- FTIR (1)
- Fe-Ni (1)
- FeNi thin film (1)
- Framework (1)
- Governance (1)
- Graphene (1)
- Graphene powder (1)
- Graphene related 2D materials (1)
- Graphene-related 2D materials (1)
- Graphite furnace (1)
- HR-CS-MAS (1)
- Hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) (1)
- Hierarchical micro-nanostructures (1)
- Hybrid metrology (1)
- Hybrid metrology measurement (1)
- Hydrogen evolution reaction (1)
- Hydrothermal synthesis (1)
- Hyperspectral imaging (1)
- ILC (1)
- IR oxide (1)
- ISO 21363 (1)
- ISO/TC 201 (1)
- ISO/TC 202 Microbeam Analysis (1)
- ISO/TC229 (1)
- ISOGScope (1)
- Identification (1)
- Image Segmentation (1)
- Imaging surface chemical analysis (1)
- Immunoassay (1)
- In-situ SAXS/WAXS (1)
- Infrared nano AFM (1)
- Inter-lab comparison (1)
- Inter-laboratory comparisons (1)
- Interlaboratory comparisons (1)
- Intermediate phases (1)
- Intermodulation (1)
- Intermodulation AFM (1)
- Interphase (1)
- Intrinsic OER activity (1)
- Iridium-titanium mixed oxides (1)
- K-rich Birnessite (K0.45MnO2) (1)
- Katalysator (1)
- Laser processing (1)
- Lateral dimensions (1)
- Lifetime analysis (1)
- Ligand exchange (1)
- Luminescent lifetime (1)
- Magic-sized cluster (1)
- Magnetpartikel (1)
- Me-TiO2 (1)
- Mechanical properties (1)
- Mesoporosity (1)
- Mesoporous iridium oxide films (1)
- Metal-semiconductor (1)
- Method development (1)
- Metrology (1)
- Microarray printing (1)
- Microplastics (1)
- Microscopy (1)
- Microstructure (1)
- Microwave-assisted synthesis (1)
- Mixed metal oxide (1)
- Modelling (1)
- Morpho-chemical characterization (1)
- Morphology (1)
- Multi-sample analysis (1)
- Nano CRM (1)
- Nano Characterisation (1)
- Nano-characterisation (1)
- NanoSIMS (1)
- Nanoanalysis (1)
- Nanocomposite (1)
- Nanocomposites (1)
- Nanocubes (1)
- Nanomaterial analysis (1)
- Nanomaterial categorisation (1)
- Nanomaterial definition (1)
- Nanomaterial legislation (1)
- Nanomaterial regulation (1)
- Nanomechanical charecteisation (1)
- Nanomechanical properties (1)
- Nanoparticle (1)
- Nanoparticle size distribution (1)
- Nanopartikel (1)
- Nanoplastics (1)
- Nanopowder (1)
- Nanosafety services (1)
- Nanoscale (1)
- Nanostructures (1)
- Nanotechnologies (1)
- Neural Networks (1)
- Non-classical crystallization theory (1)
- Non-destructive ambient analysis (1)
- OECD (1)
- OECD TG 125 (1)
- Oberflächenanalytik (1)
- Ochratoxin A (1)
- One-pot synthesis (1)
- Optically active surfaces (1)
- Orientation (1)
- Oxygen evolution reaction (1)
- Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) (1)
- P25 (1)
- PC characterisation (1)
- Particle (1)
- Particle number concentration (1)
- Particle size (1)
- Partikelgrößenverteilung (1)
- Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) (1)
- Performance check (1)
- Phosphates (1)
- Photoelectrochemistry (1)
- Photoreforming (1)
- Physicochemical characterization (1)
- Polycarbonate (1)
- Polyethylene glycol (1)
- Porous materials (1)
- Powder X-ray diffraction (1)
- Pphosphates (1)
- Pre-standardisation (1)
- Py-GC/MS (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Quantum yield (1)
- Real-time infrared spectroscopy (1)
- Reference nanoparticles (1)
- Reference procedures (1)
- Reference products (1)
- Referenzdaten (1)
- Regional workshop (1)
- Risk asessment (1)
- SSbD (1)
- STEM-in-SEM (TSEM) (1)
- Sabatier (1)
- Scanning probe microscopy (1)
- Secondary ion mass spectrometry (1)
- Semiconductor nanocrystals (1)
- Shape-controlled (1)
- Si-Ge (1)
- Silica (1)
- Singulettsauerstoff (1)
- Size and shape distribution (1)
- Size measurement (1)
- Size measurements (1)
- Small-angle X-ray scattering (1)
- Solar concentrator (1)
- Solar energy (1)
- Sonochemical synthesis (1)
- Stability (1)
- Standard Operation Procedures (1)
- Standard operation procedures (1)
- Standardarbeitsanweisung (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardized check (1)
- Strontium titanate (1)
- Struvite (1)
- Surface Analysis (1)
- Surface characterization (1)
- Surface chemistry (1)
- Surface morphology (1)
- Surface morphology and chemistry (1)
- Synthesis (1)
- TED-GC/MS (1)
- TRL (1)
- TSEM (1)
- Test material (1)
- Thermoplastics (1)
- Thermosets (1)
- Thickness (1)
- Thin film analysis (1)
- Thin mesoporous films (1)
- Thiols (1)
- Threshold (1)
- Ti oxide (1)
- Ti-6Al-4V alloy (1)
- Tilting (1)
- Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) (1)
- Tools (1)
- Traceable nanoparticle size measurements; (1)
- Transition metal (1)
- Transition metals (1)
- Transmission electron microscopy (1)
- Trends (1)
- Volcano plot (1)
- Volume specific surface area (1)
- Wastewater (1)
- X-Ray Spectroscopy (1)
- X-ray Fluorescence (1)
- X-ray spectrometer (1)
- X-ray spectroscopy (1)
- X-rays (1)
- Xerogel (1)
- Zinc oxide (1)
- Zirconium (1)
- ZnSe (1)
- analytical service (1)
- electron microscopy (1)
- shape control (1)
- transmission mode (1)
- µ-XRF (1)
Organisationseinheit der BAM
- 6 Materialchemie (161)
- 6.1 Oberflächen- und Dünnschichtanalyse (161)
- 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien (24)
- 1.2 Biophotonik (13)
- 6.6 Physik und chemische Analytik der Polymere (9)
- 1.0 Abteilungsleitung und andere (5)
- 4 Material und Umwelt (5)
- 4.2 Material-Mikrobiom Wechselwirkungen (5)
- 5 Werkstofftechnik (5)
- 6.3 Strukturanalytik (5)
Paper des Monats
- ja (6)
Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) provides a non-destructive approach in the dedicated thin film analysis mode with the commercial StrataGem software. Recently, the open-source programme BadgerFilm by Moy and Fournelle became available. Similarly to StrataGem, it is based on the algorithm of Pouchou and Pichoir and needs intensity ratios of the unknown sample and standards (k-values). We have evaluated the k-values measured for the FeNi and SiGe film systems using the BadgerFilm software package and compared the thickness and composition with the results obtained with the established StrataGem software and other reference methods. The thicknesses of the SiGe films obtained by the BadgerFilm software agree within 20% with the StrataGem and TEM results; the elemental compositions BadgerFilm-StrataGEM agree within 2% with one exception (9%).
In order to bridge the gap between lab-scale and industrial-scale production of graphene it is necessary to develop processes, equipment and measurement procedures to control the material features. One of the crucial reasons of graphene’s limited commercialization is the lack of standard procedures to properly characterize and define the material chemical and structural properties down to the nanometer level. This leads to many issues regarding material synthesis repeatability, inappropriateness choice of measurands and measurement reproducibility which heavily affect the consistency of the material performance.
In our study, a comparative analysis is performed on two different series (G5 and G6) of industrial graphene powders, each series produced with four types of functionalization: raw graphene, oxygen-functionalized, nitrogen-functionalized and fluorine-functionalized. All the 8 sample variants were analyzed from a chemical and morphological point of view in the form of powders prepared as slightly pressed in metallic sample holders.
The results of the comparative chemical analyses XPS and EDS show a good agreement in the concentration values for all the elements present in the samples, despite the different analysis volumes addressed by the two techniques. For this reason, the samples can be considered homogeneous in both lateral and vertical direction.
A clear influence of the morphology on the composition is evident. Therefore, such correlative measurements of morphology and composition are necessary for a comprehensive characterization of industrial graphene flakes.
For test laboratories operating under accreditation schemes like ISO/IEC 17025 (ISO/IEC 17025), as the international reference for testing and calibration laboratories wanting to demonstrate their capacity to deliver reliable results, a periodical control of the critical instrumental parameters of an Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS) is required.
This periodical check of an EDS is specified with exact procedures and materials in the ISO 15632:2021 ”Microbeam Analysis – Selected instrumental performance parameters for the specification and checking of energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometers for use in electron probe microanalysis” (ISO 15632). The EDS check can be simplified to the acquisition of only one 10 kV spectrum from a dedicated test material, EDS-TM002, which is made available by BAM since 2009 (https://webshop.bam.de/webshop_en/). The optional BAM software “EDX spectrometer check” is destined to automatically evaluate this spectrum and determine the performance of the EDS in terms of energy resolution and calibration, as well as possible alteration of low-energy efficiency due to detector contamination. Nearly 200 laboratories have the EDS-TM and associated software package in use.
Practical examples based on various types of artifacts occurred in the EDS spectra and a long-term (>10 years) meticulous observation of the own spectrometers will be discussed. Different types of EDS spectrometers are considered, e.g. Si(Li) and SDD, of various window types (AP, the recent one Si3N4 or even windowless), and with different front contact layers (Au and Ni) (Hodoroaba and Procop, 2014). Evaluation of other parameters or effects such as the deadtime at different count rates or pileup effects is also explained with examples.
The thickness of thin films can be measured by various methods, e.g., profilometry, ellipsometry, atomic force microscopy (AFM), or X-ray reflectometry. For the additional determination of thin film composition, techniques like X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or mass spectrometry-based techniques can be used. An alternative non-destructive technique is electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). This method assumes a sample of homogenous (bulk) chemical composition, so that it cannot be usually applied to thin film samples. However, in combination with the thin film software StrataGEM, the thickness as well as the composition of such films on a substrate can be determined.
This has been demonstrated for FeNi on Si and SiGe on Al2O3 film systems. For both systems five samples with different elemental composition and a reference were produced and characterised by Korean research institute KRISS using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), Rutherford backscattering (RBS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). These samples were used for an international round robin test.
In 2021, a new and open-source thin film evaluation programme called BadgerFilm has been released. It can also be used to determine thin film composition and thickness from intensity ratios of the unknown sample and standards (k-ratios).
In this contribution, we re-evaluated the data acquired for the FeNi and SiGe systems using the BadgerFilm software package and compared the resulting composition and thickness with the results of the established StrataGEM software and other reference methods. With the current evaluation, the BadgerFilm software shows good agreement with the composition and thickness calculated by StrataGEM and as the reference values provided by the KRISS.
The conversion of solar energy into electricity and solar fuels is of crucial importance for a green and sustainable future. Water splitting using semiconductor photo-catalysts is considered a sustainable method to produce clean hydrogen (H2) fuel. Nevertheless, H2 photo-production efficiency remains still low, although extensive research works to understand better the mechanisms of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) and the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) are being carried out. In this respect, TiO2 is a key photoactive material, usually employed with a co-catalyst deposited onto the surface to enhance charge carriers’ separation and catalyze surface charge transfer reactions. The deposition of a co-catalyst on the TiO2 nanoparticle surface represents one successful way to enhance the activity of the photocatalyst through a modification of its surface and redox properties. In this context, high-resolution scanning electron microscopy coupled with elemental analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) is fundamental for studying and understanding the effect of the nanoparticle morphology on the functional properties of shape-controlled TiO2 crystals (bipyramides, platelets, and elongated particles). Different types of metal-semiconductor combinations, TiO2 shapes and dopant metals (Ag, Pt, etc) and metal concentrations will be discussed.
Nanosafety is becoming increasingly important as nanomaterials are widely used in industrial processes and consumer products. For nanotoxicity measurements prior sterilization of the samples is necessary, but as structure activity relationships are made with properties of pristine particles, the question arises, if the sterilization process has an impact on the physico-chemical properties of nanoparticles and thus on the biological behavior.
This question will be addressed in this talk. For this purpose, results from SEM and EDS measurements are combined with those of a novel lab-based HAXPES spectrometer in order to obtain a more complete picture. At the end, an influence of sterilization will be evident, which indicates a restructuring of the nanoparticles owing to sterilization.
Electron microscopy (EM) is the gold standard for the characterisation of the morphology (size and shape) of nanoparticles. Visual observation of objects under examination is always a necessary first step in the characterisation process. Several questions arise when undertaking to identify and count particles to measure their size and shape distribution. In addition to challenges with the dispersion and identification of the particles, more than one protocol for counting particles is in use. This paper focuses on precise rules for the counting of particles in EM micrographs, as this influences the measurement accuracy of the number of particles, thus implicitly affecting the size values of the counted particles. We review and compare four different, commonly used methods for counting, which we then apply in case studies. The impact of the selected counting rule on the obtained final particle size distribution is highlighted. One main aim of this analysis is to support the application of a specific, well-defined counting approach in accordance with regulatory
requirements to contribute to achieving more reliable and reproducible results. It is also useful for the new harmonised measurement procedures for determining the particle size and particle size distribution of nanomaterials.
Catalysts are important components in chemical processes because they lower the activation energy and thus determine the rate, efficiency and selectivity of a chemical reaction. This property plays an important role in many of today’s processes, including the electrochemical splitting of water. Due to the continuous development of catalyst materials, they are becoming more complex, which makes a reliable evaluation of physicochemical properties challenging even for modern analytical measurement techniques and industrial manufacturing.
We present a fast, vacuum-free and non-destructive analytical approach using multi-sample spectroscopic ellipsometry to determine relevant material parameters such as film thickness, porosity and composition of mesoporous IrOx–TiOy films. Mesoporous IrOx–TiOy films were deposited on Si wafers by sol–gel synthesis, varying the composition of the mixed oxide films between 0 and 100 wt%Ir. The ellipsometric modeling is based on an anisotropic Bruggeman effective medium approximation (a-BEMA) to determine the film thickness and volume fraction of the material and pores. The volume fraction of the material was again modeled using a Bruggeman EMA to determine the chemical composition of the materials. The ellipsometric fitting results were compared with complementary methods, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) as well as environmental ellipsometric porosimetry (EEP).
Morpho-Chemical Characterisation of Me-TiO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Photocatalytical Activity
(2022)
The conversion of solar energy into electricity and solar fuels is of crucial importance for a green and sustainable future. Water splitting using semiconductor photo-catalysts is considered a sustainable method to produce clean hydrogen (H2) fuel. Nevertheless, H2 photo-production efficiency remains still low, although extensive research works to understand better the mechanisms of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) and the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) are being carried out. In this respect, TiO2 is a key photoactive material, usually employed with a co-catalyst deposited onto the surface to enhance charge carriers’ separation and catalyze surface charge transfer reactions. The deposition of a co-catalyst on the TiO2 nanoparticle surface represents one successful way to enhance the activity of the photocatalyst through a modification of its surface and redox properties. In this context, high-resolution scanning electron microscopy coupled with elemental analysis by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) is fundamental for studying and understanding the effect of the nanoparticle morphology on the functional properties of shape-controlled TiO2 crystals (bipyramides, platelets, and elongated particles). Different types of metal-semiconductor combinations, TiO2 shapes and dopant metals (Ag, Pt, etc) and metal concentrations will be discussed.
Both essential aspects of the surface of solid matter, its morphology and chemistry, are studied traditionally at BAM starting in the 60’s with different cyclical research focus areas, mostly related either to applicative research or method development. In the recent years, the focus has shifted almost exclusively to the nano-analytics of advanced materials such as complex nanoparticles, (ultra)thin films/coatings, nanocomposites, 2D materials, energy materials, etc. This is also the reason why BAM has established recently the new Competence Center nano@BAM (www.bam.de/Navigation/DE/Themen/Material/Nanotechnologie/sichere-nanomaterialien.html) with the five sub-fields nanoCharacterisation, nanoMaterial, nanoSafety, nanoData and nanoTechnology. The link to the BAM central guidelines to the safety in technology and chemistry is given by the development of reference products such as reference measurement procedures, reference (nano)materials, and newly reference data sets. Thus, an internationally well-networked group in surface analysis has been established @BAM, with regular contributions to integral analytical characterization with metrological and standardization background.
Examples of newly developed methodical approaches will be given with an emphasis on correlative nano-analysis of morphology and chemistry of nanomaterials. Correlative imaging by STEM-in-SEM with high-resolution SEM and EDX, and further with AFM or the new technique TKD (Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction) will be explained on various examples of nanostructures, both as starting materials and embedded/functionalized nanoparticles in products. The unique analytical benefits of the Auger electron probe as a veritable nano-tool for surface chemistry will be highlighted. The panoply of advanced surface characterization methods @BAM is completed by discussing examples of hybrid analysis of the bulk of nanomaterials by X-ray Spectroscopy with the highest surface-sensitive methods X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). Particularly for the analysis of the surface chemistry of nanostructures, such as the completeness of the shells of core-shell nanoparticles or in-depth and lateral gradients of chemistry within mesoporous thin layers, the latter methods are inherent.
Other special developments like approaches for the quantitative determination of the roughness of particle surface by electron microscopy or for the quantitative determination of the porosity of thin mesoporous layers by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) with SEM will be presented.
The main outcomes of the EMPIR project nPSize are presented and the suitability of the new capabilities, e.g. reference materials, sample preparation protocols, measurement procedures, and data analysis, to be standardized and implemented in accredited analytical laboratories is discussed. Complementation and/or filling gaps of published and ongoing standardisation projects on size, shape and number concentration measurements under ISO/TC 229/JWG 2 are offered.
The two VAMAS inter-laboratory comparisons resulted from the nSPize project and just started under TWA 34 Nanoparticle Populations (Projects #15 and #16) of bipyramidal TiO2 anatase and bimodal SiO2 nanoparticles are presented in detail.
he main objective of the nPSize project is to improve the measurement capabilities for nanoparticle size based on both measurement methods traceable to SI units and new reference materials. Two basic approaches have been used in order to develop measurement procedures resulting in traceable results of the nanoparticle size distribution: physical modelling for the methods used in the project (TSEM, SEM, AFM and SAXS) and machine learning.
Physical modelling: In this part, the physical models associated with different shape measurements for the techniques TSEM, SEM, AFM and SAXS have been collected and further developed with the aim to simulate the resulting signal as measured by the individual methods. Uncertainties and traceability associated with each model were investigated and evaluated. In the following, the progress on these physical models is reported for each individual method.
Machine Learning modelling: The aim of this part is to use machine learning to enable automatic measurement of nanoparticle shape from expert a-priori information only. No physical model will be used as a-priori information in this task.
The accuracy and traceability of the size results obtained by each technique will be analyzed and compared with the physical modelling. A machine learning database will then be used to create automatic detection algorithms.
International standardisation network VAMAS is calling for participants in two studies on the measurement of (relative) number concentration of bimodal silica nanoparticles including deposition from liquid suspension and the measurement of particle size and shape distribution of bipyramidal titania including deposition from liquid suspension.
Whereas the characterization of nanomaterials using different analytical techniques is often highly automated and standardized, the sample preparation that precedes it causes a bottleneck in nanomaterial analysis as it is performed manually. Usually, this pretreatment depends on the skills and experience of the analysts. Furthermore, adequate reporting of the sample preparation is often missing. In this overview, some solutions for techniques widely used in nano-analytics to overcome this problem are discussed. Two examples of sample preparation optimization by au-tomation are presented, which demonstrate that this approach is leading to increased analytical confidence. Our first example is motivated by the need to exclude human bias and focuses on the development of automation in sample introduction. To this end, a robotic system has been de-veloped, which can prepare stable and homogeneous nanomaterial suspensions amenable to a variety of well-established analytical methods, such as dynamic light scattering (DLS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), field-flow fractionation (FFF) or single-particle inductively coupled mass spectrometry (sp-ICP-MS). Our second example addresses biological samples, such as cells exposed to nanomaterials, which are still challenging for reliable analysis. An air–liquid interface has been developed for the exposure of biological samples to nanomaterial-containing aerosols. The system exposes transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids under reproducible conditions, whilst also allowing characterization of aerosol composition with mass spectrometry. Such an approach enables correlative measurements combining biological with physicochemical analysis. These case studies demonstrate that standardization and automation of sample preparation setups, combined with appropriate measurement processes and data reduction are crucial steps towards more reliable and reproducible data.
The Competence Centre nano@BAM is presenting a new X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer – the HAXPES (XPS at hard energy) – for researching advanced materials at the nanoscale. With HAXPES detailed chemical information can now be gained not only from the first outermost nanometres of the sample surface, but also from deeper regions.
Top international experts will share their knowledge and key findings on how to utilise HAXPES for exploring the surface of various advanced materials. Following the lectures, we will show you a short demo of the new instrument and answer your questions.
The roughness as a property of core–shell (CS) microparticles plays a key role in their functionality. Quantitative evaluation of the roughness of CS microparticles is, however, a challenging task with approaches using electron microscopy images being scarce and showing pronounced differences in terms of methodology and results. This work presents a generalized method for the reliable roughness determination of nonplanar specimens such as CS particles from electron microscopic images, the method being robust and reproducible with a high accuracy. It involves a self-written software package (Python) that analyzes the recorded images, extracts corresponding data, and calculates the roughness based on the deviation of the identified contour. Images of single particles are taken by a dual mode scanning electron microscopy (SEM) setup which permits imaging of the same field-of-view of the sample with high resolution and surface sensitive in SE InLens mode as well as in transmission mode (TSEM). Herein, a new type of polystyrene core–iron oxide shell–silica shell particles is developed to serve as a set of lower micrometer-sized study objects with different surface roughness; the analysis of their images by the semiautomatic workflow is demonstrating that the particles’ profile roughness can be quantitatively obtained.
Both essential aspects of the surface of solid matter, its morphology and chemistry, are studied traditionally at BAM starting in the 60’s with different cyclical research focus areas, mostly related either to applicative research or method development. In the recent years, the focus has shifted almost exclusively to the nano-analytics of advanced materials such as complex nanoparticles, (ultra)thin films/coatings, nanocomposites, 2D materials, energy materials, etc. This is also the reason why BAM has established recently the new Competence Center nano@BAM (www.bam.de/Navigation/DE/Themen/Material/Nanotechnologie/sichere-nanomaterialien.html) with the five sub-fields nanoCharacterisation, nanoMaterial, nanoSafety, nanoData and nanoTechnology. The link to the BAM central guidelines to the safety in technology and chemistry is given by the development of reference products such as reference measurement procedures, reference (nano)materials, and newly reference data sets. Thus, an internationally well-networked group in surface analysis has been established @BAM, with regular contributions to integral analytical characterization with metrological and standardization background.
Examples of newly developed methodical approaches will be given with an emphasis on correlative nano-analysis of morphology and chemistry of nanomaterials. Correlative imaging by STEM-in-SEM with high-resolution SEM and EDX, and further with AFM or the new technique TKD (Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction) will be explained on various examples of nanostructures, both as starting materials and embedded/functionalized nanoparticles in products. The unique analytical benefits of the Auger electron probe as a veritable nano-tool for surface chemistry will be highlighted. The panoply of advanced surface characterization methods @BAM is completed by discussing examples of hybrid analysis of the bulk of nanomaterials by X-ray Spectroscopy with the highest surface-sensitive methods X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). Particularly for the analysis of the surface chemistry of nanostructures, such as the completeness of the shells of core-shell nanoparticles or in-depth and lateral gradients of chemistry within mesoporous thin layers, the latter methods are inherent.
Other special developments like approaches for the quantitative determination of the roughness of particle surface by electron microscopy or for the quantitative determination of the porosity of thin mesoporous layers by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) with SEM will be presented in conjunction with the corresponding advanced materials studied.
Current research projects, promising ideas, including ongoing (pre-)standardization activities in the field of the challenging nano/surface analysis will be touched systematically, with the open goal of identifying future bilateral cooperation possibilities between EMPA and BAM.
Results from different methods applied to micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) analysis show that there are large gaps in harmonisation with respect to terminology, size classes, sample preparation protocols and, finally, to the comparability of the measurands and descriptors.
Within the European research cluster to understand the health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics (CUSP) working group WG3-Inter-Laboratory Comparisons an overview of the existing detection methods revealing advantages and disadvantages regarding the analytical tasks is being compiled. There is a clear need to develop high class characterized reference materials for MNPs in the size ranges of 100-10 µm and smaller than 10 µm, so that these can be used to validate methods and to make results comparable. Inter-laboratory comparisons (ILCs) on model samples with complex matrices regarding mass, or water samples for number-based methods, will help us to advance the process of harmonization as well as to train users early in process of developing new methods.
We plan to keep all five CUSP projects well-connected also with the 'outside' MNP projects and ILCs and to extract the optimum of needs, capabilities, and efforts in order to launch new VAMAS ILCs which should expand already available ones.
In this paper, the accurate determination of the size and size distribution of bipyramidal anatase nanoparticles (NPs) after deposition as single particles on a silicon substrate by correlative Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) analysis is described as a new measurement procedure for metrological purposes. The knowledge of the exact orientation of the NPs is a crucial step in extracting the real 3D dimensions of the particles. Two approaches are proposed to determine the geometrical orientation of individual nano‐bipyramides: (i) AFM profiling along the long bipyramid axis and (ii) stage tilting followed by SEM imaging. Furthermore, a recently developed method, Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (TKD), which needs preparation of the crystalline NPs on electron‐transparent substrates such as TEM grids, has been tested with respect to its capability of identifying the geometrical orientation of the individual NPs. With the NPs prepared homogeneously on a TEM grid, the transmission mode in a SEM, i.e., STEM‐in‐SEM (or T‐SEM), can be also applied to extract accurate projection dimensions of the nanoparticles from the same sample area as that analysed by SEM, TKD and possibly AFM. Finally, Small Angle X‐ray Scattering (SAXS) can be used as an ensemble technique able to measure the NPs in liquid suspension and, with ab‐initio knowledge of the NP shape from the descriptive imaging techniques, to provide traceable NP size distribution and particle concentration.